discussionforum was established for each case study, whereby every student contributed an originaldiscussion thread and engaged in at least two responses to a peer's contribution. In addition,students were actively encouraged to engage in questioning and responding within the discussionand not just limited to their particular case study.The outcomes of this new pedagogical approach have been remarkably positive. The onlineformat promoted increased interaction, richer and more profound discussions, higherparticipation rates, and well-thought-out responses. Students benefited from extended reflectionand research time compared to traditional in-class presentations, resulting in a morecomprehensive understanding of engineering ethics. This innovative method
teaching goDr. Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Lawrence Angrave is an award-winning computer science Teaching Professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. He creates and researches new opportunities for accessible and inclusive equitable education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Inclusive Glossary: An Embedded, Interactive Approach to Accessible and Inclusive Learning Abstract To assist students in engineering and related STEM disciplines, we report on themotivation, design, implementation, and evaluation of the Inclusive Glossary, a novelembedded interactive educational tool. The Glossary
-campusinstruction.Key findings include the growth in civil engineering knowledge for each cohort regardless ofdelivery method. Learners consistently identified innovative activities like debates and livedemonstrations as the most impactful for student learning. They identified hands-on activitiesand field visits as the most engaging and memorable. At the end of each course, instructors self-identified as gaining knowledge of research-based educational methods, greater ease in teachingand managing a classroom, and confidence in assessing student learning. The innovativeteaching approach to pre-college education has encouraged new cohorts of high school studentsto pursue engineering as a career and current graduate students to pursue engineering educationas a
Measurements Lab Class’, in 2006Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago,Illinois: ASEE Conferences, p. 11.1093.1-11.1093.12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28.Caridade, C.M. and Rasteiro, D. (2018) ‘INVOLVE ME AND I LEARN–video-lessons to teachmath to Engineers’, 19th SEFI-MWG, pp. 107–114.Cutri, R. et al. (2016) ‘Ten Ways to Improve Learning Physics as Part of an EngineeringCourse’, in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. 2016 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, p. 26075. Available at:https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26075.Davis, C. and Wilcock, E. (2003) ‘Teaching materials using case studies’, C. Baillie (Series Ed
Paper ID #41381Development of a Procedure to Avoid Plagiarism in Scholarly WorkDr. Quamrul H. Mazumder, University of Michigan, Flint Dr. Quamrul Mazumder is currently a professor of mechanical engineering at University of Michigan-Flint. His areas of research include computational and experimental fluid mechanics, quality in higher education, metacognition, motivation, and engagement of faculty and students, assessment and accreditation. He is actively involved in experimental techniques in multiphase flow using particle image velocimetry (PIV). Dr. Mazumder also served as a Fulbright scholar in developing curriculum and
[3,4,5,6].There is a high level of stress among engineering students due to the difficulty of their degreeprogram. Grades and rigor have been identified as some of the most significant stressors forengineering students. High levels of stress can become part of the engineering culture and canbe passed on to new students. This cycle of expecting stress can lead to further elevating stresslevels for students and can even result in other mental health challenges. One study showed thatstudents enrolled in engineering programs are two times more likely to experience anxiety thantheir non-engineering classmates. In addition, another study found that engineering students whowere experiencing mental health issues sought treatment less often than other
Engineering Education, 2023 Pairing Self-Evaluation Activities with Self-Reflection to Engage Students Deeply in Multiple Metacognition StrategiesAbstractSelf-directed learning requires students engage deeply in all three metacognitive dimensions:Planning, Monitoring, and Evaluating. While instructors may currently integrate differentactivities in courses that provide the opportunity for students’ metacognitive engagement,they might not draw students into thinking deeply. For new engineering educators, it might bechallenging to select activities that could provide opportunity for sufficient studentengagement in metacognition. The purpose of the study was to investigate pairing self-evaluation and self-reflection activities by
. A case study-baseddiscussion will be provided on how Mechatronics and Renewable Energy curricula could be usedas potential options to address the multi-/interdisciplinary skills gap. These curricula could beapplied at multiple levels of engineering education, including high school, 2-year programs, andhigher education. Thus, they present a broad modular approach that could address several areas ofneed in the Sustainable Engineering field.Keywords: Sustainable engineering, curriculum design, innovative teachingIntroduction:In the next 30 years, the existing 8 billion people on the planet are predicted to grow byapproximately 2 billion. Therefore, using natural resources to enable people to live harmoniouslyand sustainably will rise along
Paper ID #39835Work-in-Progress: A Multidisciplinary Hands-on Course to GuideEngineering Students Toward Becoming Blended Digital ProfessionalsDr. Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi is interested in first-year engineering curriculum design and recruitment, retention and success of engineering students. He is the coordinator of ENGR101, an application-oriented course for engineering students placed in pre-calculus courses. He has also developed and co-teaches the Fundamen- tals of Engineering Design course that includes a wide spectra of activities to teach general engineering students
and expertise but also pedagogical content knowledge that enables them to employ discipline-specific instructional strategies effectively [6].As part of a larger project aimed at enhancing undergraduate pedagogy, a discipline-specificprofessional development (PD) program for engineering professors was developed by anacademic center with a focus on mathematics, science and technology education in aneducation faculty at the same university. The PD program is intended is to move beyond PD asa passive, instrumental approach to gaining teaching skills toward professional learning (PL) asactively and deliberately enhancing one's teaching and understanding of teaching in a way thatis "continuing, active, social, and related to practice" [7
Paper ID #44356Effective Strategies for New Faculty from the Perspective of an AssistantProfessor in the Early-Career StageDr. Yuzhang Zang, Western Washington University Yuzhang Zang is currently an assistant professor in the department of Engineering and Design at Western Washington University since Fall 2022. She was a visiting assistant professor at Valparaiso University from Aug 2021 to May 2022. Yuzhang received her Bachelor of Engineering (B. Eng.) in Electromagnetic Field & Wireless Technology Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT) in 2014, Master of Science (M.Sc.) in Electrical and Computer Engineering at
Innovation Fellow, Andre Schleife, for guidance and support.References[1] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005, doi: j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x.[2] P. H. Borgstrom et al., “Science and engineering active learning (SEAL) system: A novel approach to controls laboratories,” presented at the 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, Jun. 2012. doi: 10.18260/1-2--21900.[3] W. E. Dixon, D. M. Dawson, B. T. Costic, and M. S. de Queiroz, “A MATLAB-based control systems laboratory experience for undergraduate students: toward standardization and shared resources,” IEEE Transactions on
teaching.References[1] Lynch, P. C., Wilck , Bober, C. A., Mines, J. L., “A New Look at Involving Undergraduate Students, Real Life Applications, and Active Learning Activities in the Industrial Engineering Undergraduate Course Delivery Process,” 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 15-18, 2014[2] Lynch, P. C., Bober, C. A, Mines, J. L., “Designing Industrial Engineering Course Content and Delivery with an Understanding of the Learning Preferences and Factors Driving Satisfaction of Undergraduate Industrial Engineering Students,” 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 15-18, 2014.[3] Felder, R. M., Brent R., “Understanding Student Differences,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol
appreciating key disciplinaryfeatures of geotechnical engineering.Fruitful areas of additional research include (a) developing and investigating other means ofincorporating IE into a range of undergraduate engineering courses, and (b) more deeplyunderstanding the extent to which, and ways in which, transmedia elements may support theeffectiveness of an IE-based engineering curriculum. In addition, there is also room within an IEapproach to engage in curricular co-design with students; in EGR340, for example, some of thenods to movies, shows, and other pieces of popular culture will lose relevance over time, andstudents can be a part of drawing new connections between the course’s overarching narrativeand meaningful cultural touchpoints. Overall, IE is
. IntroductionEngineering education faces the continuous challenge of incorporating the latestresearch findings into its curriculum to ensure graduates are well-equipped totackle current and future technological challenges. Traditional methods ofcurriculum development often struggle to keep pace with the rapid advancementof technology and emerging research areas [1, 2]. Current approaches tointegrating research into engineering education primarily involve the introductionof elective courses, predetermined laboratory classes, or the occasional inclusionof term papers from existing courses. However, these methods have limitations,including insufficient coverage of new technologies and the lag in updating coursecontent to reflect the latest research developments
]. Despite this support, the path to formally engage in EER on a substantial level isnot trivial. In this paper, the authors present challenges and lessons learned based on their ownexperiences, as well as specific recommendations for prospective engineering educationresearchers. Three of the authors are civil engineering faculty new to EER, while one author isan established social science researcher and mentor to the engineering faculty.2. Research contextIn the sections that follows, the experiences associated with initiating and undertaking EER arediscussed in the context of the authors' recent grant funding in Table 1. Two of the projects arestill gaining traction in Year 1, while one project has entered Year 2.Table 1. Summary of the authors
conductappropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to drawconclusions” [1]. These analyses, interpretations, and conclusions are usually communicated in alaboratory report.Unfortunately, most faculty have little training or instruction in how to develop effective labreport assignments nor how to instruct students on how to write laboratory reports. This isespecially problematic for new faculty who additionally have little or no experience designing,assigning, and grading laboratory reports. Some engineering programs, such as the Writing-Enriched Curriculum program at the University of Minnesota and Engineering CommunicationProgram at Cornell, offer resources to support engineering faculty in writing pedagogies [4, 5
presented. In addition, a discussion of the results is presented coupled withthe post survey results from the students. Lastly, lessons learning from the projects along withrecommended future improvements are presented.IntroductionWith advances in technology and a heavier use of computers in industrial settings, it has beenobserved that programming is a necessary skill for all engineering majors to develop. Inaddition, to knowing the basic programming skills it is imperative that students graduate with theability to utilize programming tools to solve complex engineering problems.In the mechanical engineering curriculum, dynamics is a critical course that all students musttake and it focuses on the analysis of objects in motion when acted upon by
instructor’s assessment and feedbackmay help the student to transform the knowledge of their strengths and weaknesses into habitsthat can lead to better academic performance.Some other classroom approaches that could help new engineering educators foster SDL skills instudents are:Providing clear learning objectives. Clearly articulated learning objectives or course outcomescan help students understand course expectations. When students understand what is expected ofthem in a course, they are empowered to take ownership of their learning journey and recognizewhen and where they are falling behind in their learning. Through a curriculum that is alignedwith the course’s learning objectives, instructors can foster SDL skills such as autonomy, self
in real time.This paper provides the new STEM educator with relevant background about how undergraduatestudents approach source evaluation, both traditionally and today. This work summarizesexisting research to help new STEM educators understand and situate themselves among bestpractices in teaching source evaluation and information literacy to undergraduate students. Mostimportantly, it provides classroom-ready collaborative activities (some writing-based, alldiscussion-based) for a STEM educator to help students learn and implement source evaluationtechniques in a manner that is engaging and efficient.As students progress through the activities, they—and the new STEM educator—learn not onlyhow to recognize a credible source in general (e.g
shift is evident in the discussion andimplementation of various ‘non-traditional’ grading models such as standards-based grading[15], student self-assessment and grading [16], and the adoption of other “ungrading” [17]approaches or recommendations.Engineering education is an exciting field in which we are often encouraged and rewarded forclassroom and assessment innovations that break the mold of traditional engineering education.Early-career engineering faculty members are uniquely positioned such that they are newlyresponsible for design and delivery of engineering courses while also not being so far removedfrom our own educational experience that we can remember our personal educationalexperiences and the impact that various aspects of our