of Educational Technology, 46(5), 1015-1019.Drape, T. A., Lopez, M., & Radford, D. (2016). Teacher Efficacy and Professional Development Needs of Mid-Career Agriculture Educators Integrating the Next Generation Science Standards and Other Content Areas. Career and Technical Education Research, 41(1), 33-48.Douglas, K.A., & Strobel, J. (2015). Hopes and goals survey for use in STEM elementary education. International Journal of Technology Design and Education, 25, 245-259.Duschl, R. A. (2012). The Second Dimension-Crosscutting Concepts. Science and Children, 49(6), 10.Finson, K.D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: what we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics
these professions7.Thom and Thompson15 conducted a study on recruiting models and concluded that the traditionalrecruiting model ignores the internal needs of young women who are conscious of self-imageand self-worth and who worry that women in technical careers are perceived as less feminine. Asearly as elementary school, boys typically possess more interest in studying science than girls.By middle school, girls’ attitudes toward science tend to decline, and this decline may persistthrough high school9. Young women may also fear failure and assume that males have superiortechnical knowledge. Further, a perceived lack of support, communication, and camaraderie maydeter young women from pursuing technical careers. Thom and Thompson suggest that
the five subscale measures or overall.Differences in scores between the genders were also not statistically or practically significant (p <0.5). The Middle School Students’ Attitude to Mathematics, Science, and Engineering Survey(MSE) probed participants’ attitudes and beliefs about engineering and engineering careers alongsix components. Table 3 shows each MSE component’s scale scores and t-test results.Table 3MSE Responses and t-tests Results (n=63) Interest: Interest: Non- Positive Negative Problem Technic Stereotypic Stereotypic Opinions Opinions Solving al Skills Aspects Aspects # of 7 4
, Systems, and Com- puters, and Mobile Computing. She has also served as track chair for IEEE International SoC Conference 2014. She has also served in technical program committees for a number of IEEE and other international conferences. Dr. Gong received 2014 NDSU Development Board of Trustee Endowment award and 2014 NDSU Centennial Endowment award.Dr. Jinhui Wang, North Dakota State University Dr. Jinhui Wang has been an Assistant Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing at North Dakota State University (NDSU), since Aug. 2014. His research interests include low-power, high-performance, and variation-tolerant integrated circuit design, 3D IC and EDA methodologies, and thermal issue
Science and Engineering Program at BSU and served as the first chair. In February 2011, she became Dean of the College of Engineering. Her research interests include microelectronic packaging, particularly 3-D integration and ceramic MEMS devices.Mrs. Catherine Rose Bates, Institute for STEM & Diversity Initiatives c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The Impact of Volunteering at a Girls Outreach Activity on Community FormationAbstractThis paper is focused on exploring the motivation for volunteering at an engineering outreachactivity. The outreach activity itself involved a two day, overnight experience for 9th and 10thgrade girls that started in
than national average3. Positiveimpacts included better student outcomes and engagement in STEM subjects as well as higherattendance rates for seniors4.Longitudinal research on Iowa PLTW graduates report overall graduation rates were 3% higherthan in control groups. Males and females both showed slight increases in their probability ofgraduating from high school after participating in PLTW programs5. This study also found thatapproximately 70% of PLTW students transitioned to higher education, while non-PLTWstudents were more likely to transition to 2-year institutions5. Further examination revealed thatalthough the majority of Iowa’s PLTW participants are white males, 20% of PLTW femaleparticipants suggested their numbers mirrored national
the status and improving the prospects. (L. Katehi, G. Pearson, & M. Feder, Eds.), Engineering Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2. Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., & Seifert, C. M. (2014). Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(3), 417–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20048 3. National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, D.C. 4. International Technology Education Association (ITEA/ITEEA). (2002). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA. 5. N. Asper, personal communication, January 27, 2017. 6. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S
described further below.Beyond curriculum, the initial focus of the project was feasibility and usability of the curriculum.Our adapted process involved two dimensions: adapting from step-by-step procedures previouslyused in an outreach setting16 to a two-week design experience, and adapting from laboratorycontrol and equipment to the unpredictability and budget of classroom settings. We internallydeveloped and tested various 3D printed mold designs to support design flexibility (see Figure 2and Zhang, Jackson, Hacker, Mentzer, and Kramer17). For example, the mold parts affordvariation in the length of the gripper, configuration of internal pneumatic chambers, and differentfill heights to affect the elasticity of the robot (see Figure 3). Mold
African American, 3 Hispanic and 1 Caucasian. DTSCparticipants consisted of three primary clusters, urban (7 students), suburban (7 students),and international (2 students). Seventy-five percent of the DTSC participants were frompublic schools, and twenty-five percent from private institutions.Parents were encouraged to engage through session visits and exchange with faculty andstaff. Throughout the two-week DTSC, parents interacted with faculty on a regular basisand many attended the final DTSC student presentations.DTSC participants achieved the following outcomes associated with the introduction andfundamental development of basic design thinking skills and competencies:1. Leading and collaborating in cross-functional team environments.2
. Hirsch has extensive experience conducting longitudinal research studies and is proficient in database management, experimental design, instrument development, psychometrics and statistical programming.Dr. Howard S. Kimmel, New Jersey Institute of Technology HOWARD KIMMEL is Professor-Emeritus of Chemical Engineering and Retired Executive Director of the Center for Pre-College Programs at New Jersey Institute of Technology. Dr. Kimmel has continued to provide his services, as needed, for Teacher Training, Curriculum Development and technical services with a focus on alignment of teaching practices with the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards. He has spent over forty years designing
State University Sriram Sundararajan is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs at Iowa State University. His research areas encompass multiscale tribology (friction, lubrication and wear), surface engineering and engineering education. He has authored over 70 articles in peer- reviewed journals and conference proceedings and two invited book chapters. He is a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and serves as an ABET evaluator on their behalf. He is on the steering committee of the International Conference on Wear of Materials and an executive committee member of the Mechanical Engineering Division of the American Society of Engineering Education
advanced manufacturing; silicon micro-fabrication; micro- electromechanical Systems (MEMS); and electronic and MEMS Packaging. He has authored over 85 technical publications, book chapter, and is a member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, American Society of Engineering Education, and Phi Kappa Phi. Dr. Mian is a recipient of MSU Presi- dent’s Pure Gold Award (2012), ASEE Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Best Paper Award (ASEE Conference 2011), IMAPS Conference Best Paper Award (1999), and Graduate Research Forum Award (1998). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
Education and Outreach (CEEO) “works in the areas of outreach, research, and tool development to make engineering and design accessible and feasible in P12 classrooms” [3] . In this study, funded by an internal grant from the CEEO’s innovation fund, we have developed a game that integrates and scaffolds content knowledge of engineering design while allowing students to playfully engage in problem solving and teamwork skills. Engineering education researchers have worked with P12 teachers to understand their mental models of engineering and how professional development can help them identify
art lesson on creating composite materials to build better slum houses in developingnations using the natural materials; 3) HS algebra and physical science lesson on optimizingmaterial compositions to build a case for cell phone packaging that can resist breaking whendropped; 4) HS lesson on using various foods that can generate electricity using the operations ofa battery during a power outage and 5) Middle school lesson on how heat changes the atomicstructure of materials by building a lighter lift for a wheelchair.SummaryThe EDP process was used to develop curriculum as part of an NSF-RET program. In an effortto address the challenges associated with the idea generation step of the EDP process, astructured ideation session through UD’s I
current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects exploring engineering design thinking. His areas of research include engineering design thinking, adult learning cognition, engineering education professional development and technical training. He has extensive international experience working on technical training and engineering educaton projects funded by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, and U.S. Department of Labor, USAID. Countries where he has worked include
study their preferences and therefore acquire knowledge to build age appropriate userinterfaces to control the Online Laboratory in order to make these more attractive andtherefore improve the learning experiences.Together with national and international partners we are carrying out a project that placesstudents of technical secondary schools in Austria in the role of remote laboratory developersunder the supervision and tutoring of the project staff. Students are actively involved in thescientific process and actively participate in the acquisition of knowledge.The project pursues three main objectives: 1. Studies on age-appropriate requirements for the use of Online Laboratories at secondary schools. 2. Peer feedback to improve the
for their knowledge. With the responses seen above in Figure 3, peers were askedto elaborate on how their level of prior exposure impacted their undergraduate experience. Thegeneral response appears to be that approximately 38% felt adequately prepared by the rigor ofthe secondary school curriculum but 44% felt unprepared compared to peers due to a lack ofexposure to technical classes and hands-on engineering projects and activities. At the same time,100% of peers surveyed believe that there is benefit to offering a hands-on engineering programto secondary school students in Trinidad and Tobago, based on their own experiences.DiscussionSurvey results indicated that those students in Trinidad and Tobago had limited exposure topractical
University of Texas at Austin (1989). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Work in Progress – Pre-college Engineering Activities with Electronic CircuitsAbstract Projects involving engineering experimentation, design, and measurement can be effectivecontent for pre-college STEM outreach. Such applications-oriented activities can promoteliteracy and interest in technical topics and careers and have the added benefit of showing therelevance of science and mathematics. Exposure to electrical engineering concepts is discussedusing the 555 timer integrated circuit. This low-cost device can be used for modular activitiesinvolving the production of light, sound, and
instruction difficult, as students either felt bored or overwhelmed. Student travelschedules further exacerbated this issue, as one student with the least technical experiencemissed some group work sessions due to travel, causing the student to fall behind. Eventuallygroup instruction was modified to better fit a group of disparate experience, but this could notfully bridge the skill gap between students. In addition, the use of opt-in recruitment instead of direct contact of potentially wellfitted students may have limited the number of potential participants, as students with lesscomputing confidence may have felt discouraged from applying despite their interest or skill.Our third student, despite being well qualified for the project, did
. Sahin, A. (2013). STEM Clubs and Science Fair Competitions: Effects on Post-Secondary Matriculation. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research,14(1). 3. Bencze, J. L., & Bowen, G. M. (2009). A national science fair: Exhibiting support for the knowledge economy. International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2459-2483. 4. Bunderson, E. D., & Anderson, T. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers' attitudes toward their past experience with science fairs. School Science and Mathematics, 96(7), 371-377. 5. Craven, J., & Hogan, T. (2008). Rethinking the Science Fair. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(9), 679-680. 6. Aubusson , P., Griffin, J., & Kearney, M. (2012). Learning Beyond the Classroom
. 2 Table 1 – The Design Teaching Standards Standard 1. STEM Concepts Standard 2. Informed Design Standard 3. Classroom When teaching engineering Practices Instruction design, teachers facilitate When teaching engineering When teaching engineering students’ learning and use of design, teachers facilitate design, teachers use relevant science, technology, students’ development of appropriate instructional engineering and mathematics
STEM. After our experience in 2015Girls academy where we worked mostly with the latter group (girls who are already interested inSTEM) we changed our target group and worked with the former group. Our success storyresulted through this change in directions is described in our result section.ImplementationsThe Summer STEM Camp includes the following nine technical sessions. The technical sessionsare divided in two major categories, Science and Engineering. In the Engineering sessions wehave covered five different fields of Engineering as provided below.(1) Computer Engineering: Playing with Robots(2) Civil Engineering: Traffic Signals(3) Mechanical Engineering: Gears(4) Chemical Engineering: Battery and Fuel Cell Technologies(5) Electrical
. Posttest survey results show over 90% at a 3, 4, or5. After the summer session, NetLogo was useful to 95% of K12 teachers. After an academic yearNetLogo follow-up session over 75% of the K12 teachers were satisfied with instruction andsupport. Over 85% of teachers believed that the workshop "stretched teacher thinking into theirclassrooms.” Teachers’ qualitative comments are included for triangulation. Conclusionsinclude that intense K12 teacher exposure to engineering CS topics (e.g. 24 hours total of alarger PD) is not enough to truly enact meaningful classroom changes (although the teachers didcreate new activities). Additional support for meaningful classroom change and K12 teacherconfidence is necessary. In general, K12 teachers need (and
Experience for Girls (SEE)” at Carnegie MellonUniversity3, and “Robocamp” at University of North Texas4.Implementation of the summer STEM camp The photo in Figure 1 was taken at the camp with all the camp participants. The mainobjective of this project is to inspire female high school students' interests in STEM disciplinesand to encourage them to choose STEM as their college majors. The technical topics covered atthe camp span computer science, electrical engineering, computer engineering, mechanicalengineering, civil engineering, chemical engineering, chemistry, pharmacy and biology.Faculties of WVU Tech were the instructors at the Summer STEM Girls Camp. In addition totechnical sessions, the Summer STEM Girls Camp also included a few special
the Arduino station and Khan Academy asespecially useful. The time spent collaborating on lesson planning was always useful, and all ofthe teachers reported the lesson planning time was extremely meaningful and productive.Interestingly, each participant’s suggestion for improving the March 2015 session was unique.Those comments that pertained to what happened during the session included: 1) adding anopportunity for participants to share their projects and hear what each had “learned/playedwith/could see themselves incorporating into the classroom;” 2) offering fewer activities and“having another computer science 'expert' on hand to help with coding questions when we aretrying to make our own model/lesson;” 3) providing time to review the
tribology as a career exploration conference workshop for sixth grade girls. In: 2015 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference.13. Leicht, R., Zappe, S. E., Messner, J., Litzinger, T. (2012). Employing the classroom flip to move “lecture” out of the classroom. Journal of Applications and Practices in Engineering Education, 3(1), 18-31.14. Liston, C., Peterson, K., Ragan, V. (2008). Evaluating practices in informal science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education for girls. Girl Scouts of the USA.15. McCallum, S., Schultz, J., Sellke, K., Spartz, J. (2015). An examination of the flipped classroom approach on college student academic involvement. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27(1
activity for the particular topic suggestedby the engineering faculty member. During the initial session, educators and engineers cametogether to begin their mutual learning. Faculty members used a variety of materials todemonstrate their particular engineering concept and allowed the educators to internalize theconcepts to build and mold them into lessons that were applicable to elementary, middle andhigh school level students. With the mentorship of the lead engineering faculty member, teacherswere encouraged to draft their lesson and look for guidance when necessary to ensure effectivelearning. The support from both the faculty and educator allowed for each member to understandwhat each professional brings to their particular field. Upon
completed prior to and again at the end of theprogram. Students were emailed a link to the survey after they had accepted their lab placement,but prior to the program’s start. At the end of the program, after completing their oralpresentations, students were given the link to the anonymous, online survey followed by an emailreminder.Knowledge of the types of skills needed in performing STEM research and several illustrativeexamples of self-efficacy surveys12 for diverse domains initially led to the consideration of thefollowing 12 items for the STEM research self-efficacy survey. 1. Identify a research problem 2. Ability to conduct literature search and obtain scientific/technical papers 3. Comprehend scientific/technical papers 4
are described in more detail below:Engineering Design Thinking, Professional Skills, and Technical Skills.Engineering Design ThinkingEncouraging active engagement in and excitement about engineering at a variety of grade levelsfrom middle to high school is a key step in building the pipeline of students into STEMprograms. Incorporating the EDP into secondary curriculum allows students to use project-basedlearning to develop a model or a prototype, giving them the critical opportunity to apply mathand science content in real world engineering experiences 3, 4.Over the past four years of developing this program with local teachers, we have found that oneof the primary barriers to teachers implementing EDP and project-based, technology
: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. (The National Academies Press, 2004).7. Grover, S. & Pea, R. Computational Thinking in K–12 A Review of the State of the Field. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER 42, 38–43 (2013).8. Partovih, H. Transforming US education with computer science. in 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2014, March 5, 2014 - March 8, 2014 5 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2014). doi:10.1145/2538862.25547939. Nikou, S. A. & Economides, A. A. Measuring student motivation during ‘The Hour of Code’ activities. in 14th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2014, July 7, 2014 - July 9, 2014 744–745 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers