University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Design, Fabrication, and Testing of LEGO-neered Vertical Flight Dynamic Systems: Using Custom LEGO Models to Inspire the Next Generation of Innovators (Work in Progress)Abstract:Engaging the next generation of technical thinkers is crucial for ensuring our society continues toinnovate into the future. There are many possible methods for engagement that can be used tospark an interest in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) for students inprimary school and middle school. Most of these students are already familiar with LEGObricks. By using custom built LEGO models to demonstrate engineering principles, interest
Paper ID #38603Board 161: Elementary Students’ Mechanistic Reasoning about TheirCommunity-connected Engineering Design Solutions (Work in Progress)Dr. Mustafa Sami Topcu, Yildiz Technical UniversityDr. Kristen B. Wendell, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Education at Tufts University. Her research efforts with the Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach and the Tufts Institute for Research on Learning and Instruction focus on supporting knowledge construction in engineering classrooms at the pre-college and undergraduate levels
mathematics) education has beenperforming well below numerous fellow OECD nations [1]. The committee identified severaldeleterious results if this trend continued, including the reduction of the United States’ competitiveeconomic edge. Stated benefits of improved science and technological literacy included theprovision of essential preparation for all careers in the modern workforce. Moreover, without aflourishing scientific and engineering community, young people may not be motivated to dreamof “what can be,” and might have inadequate motivation to become the next generation of scientistsand engineers that can address persistent national problems including national and homelandsecurity, health care, the provision of energy, the preservation of the
Advanced Research withan 85 or above have the option to progress to Thesis Research in their respective discipline. Figure 1. BR Course ProgressionThree lab spaces have been designated on the first floor of the science building. Table 1 lists theprimary equipment available for the research students.Table 1. Lab Equipment ListThe BR program is financially supported by an endowment gifted by the family of a schoolalumnus. The endowment provided the construction of the science building, perpetualmaintenance on the science building, as well as a generous budget for the science department andother STEM-related endeavors.Research Scholars DesignationWith the support of the administration, Research Scholar designation can be given to studentsthat
and working towards community and classroom goals. 4. Evaluates communication, logistics, and any processes which may help the partnership function more effectively. 5. Fosters brainstorming and discussions for new developments to improve the STEAM x S- L framework.Throughout the semester, feedback occurs primarily via emails between the S-L TA andcommunity partner. After each activity, the S-L TA requests feedback regarding 1. General STEAM Club reception, enjoyment, and comprehension 2. University student behavior and preparation 3. Timing and material concerns 4. Any other questions, difficulties, successes, or recommendations for future lessonsThe S-L TA also solicits feedback from the university students in the form
engagement in STEM education and careers.Amy Hurst, New York University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023The Impact of Participating in an Afterschool Professional Training Program on Youth Employees (RTP)1. IntroductionAfterschool STEM training programs for youth provide valuable opportunities to learn hands-on,real-world technical and social skills and develop STEM career interests [2,21]. However, manyyouths, especially in urban contexts, face financial pressures and may instead take afterschooljobs in non-technical fields such as food service or retail [5,30]. Paid out-of-schooltime (OST)professional training programs that can offer youth learning experiences while earning an
Sustainable Energy Research Group at ISU. Dr. Jo is an honors graduate of PuAllison Antink-Meyer, Illinois State University Allison Antink-Meyer is a pre-college science and engineering educator at Illinois State University.Dr. Matthew Aldeman, Illinois State University Matt Aldeman is an Associate Professor of Technology at Illinois State University, where he teaches in the Renewable Energy and Engineering Technology programs. Matt joined the Technology department faculty after working at the Illinois State University Center for Renewable Energy for over five years. Previously, he worked at General Electric as a wind site manager at the Grand Ridge and Rail Splitter wind projects. Matt’s experience also includes service
ways that make their success more likely [4].In engineering, there are different ways in which self-efficacy is measured. Three categories ofself-efficacy measures used are: 1) general academic self-efficacy, 2) domain-general self-efficacy, and 3) self-efficacy measures for specific engineering tasks or skills [5]. Generalacademic self-efficacy scales broadly assess engineering students’ beliefs in their capabilities toperform academically or perception of their competence to do the work [5]. The second, adaptedfrom general academic self-efficacy, domain-general self-efficacy asks students to rate theirgeneral confidence within a particular subject area of engineering [5]. Third, task- or skill-specific self-efficacy asks students to evaluate
use the power they generate to benefit their community. They also collect, analyze, andshare data with researchers and students at other schools, making recommendations for changesin agriPV design and/or protocols based on results. Along the way, students are supported bytheir teacher and an interdisciplinary team of university researchers and industry partners. In this session, we share teaching-learning resources that engage students in agri-PVcitizen science, co-created by our team members and distributed through the SPV Lab website.Our aim is to help teachers (a) introduce students to agrivoltaics engineering research and thesymbiotic relationship between plants and solar panels from a citizen science perspective; (b)develop
issues of risk mitigation into account, and they should be quantified to the extent possible and stated in such a way that one can tell if a given design meets them. (HS-ETS1-1) Evaluate a solution to a complex real-world problem, based on scientific knowledge, student-generated sources of evidence, prioritized criteria, and tradeoff considerations. (HS-ETS1-3) New technologies can have deep impacts on society and the environment, including some that were not anticipated. Analysis of costs and benefits is a critical aspect of decisions about technology. (HS-ETS1-3) The uses of technologies and any limitations on their use are driven by individual or societal needs, desires, and values; by the findings of scientific research; and
engineering. YES has developed three curricula:All YES units engage youth in real-world engineering problems.An equity-oriented approach to learning grounds YES. As youthengage in socially engaged engineering design challenges, theydraw upon their communities and cultures, consider who isimpacted by problems, and reflect upon the implications of theirsolutions. Youth develop facility with engineering practices asthey use an engineering design process to generate and iterateoriginal solutions. Scientific concepts, computational thinking, andasset-based approaches strengthen design ideas and solutions. Byengaging in meaningful engineering activity, youth develop engineering identities
tools to solve engineering problems more efficiently and accurately. 2. Engineers must interact with computational tools in a knowledgeable way— understanding the algorithm, or the steps, the computer is executing to carry out the task and knowing how to generate new algorithms. 3. Engineers must recognize the human and socially embedded nature of computational tools and the biases that may exist in the tool itself and/or in the application and interpretation of the tool and its output.Figure 1: Youth Engineering Solutions Principles for Computational ThinkingWe turn now to describe each of these principles briefly and illustrate how they play out in ourunits and lessons.Use CT to Solve Engineering or Science
study was to introduce a conceptual framework forpedagogical content knowledge focusing on engineering integration. The components of EIPCKwere determined through a comprehensive review of prior literature on pedagogical contentknowledge. The resulting EIPCK framework has four domains (engineering content knowledge,general pedagogical knowledge, engineering integration pedagogical knowledge, and contextualknowledge) and five components (1- Knowledge of Orientation to Teaching Engineering, 2-Knowledge of Engineering Integration Curriculum, 3- Knowledge of Students' Understanding ofEngineering, 4- Knowledge of Engineering Teaching Strategy, and 5- Knowledge of Assessmentin Engineering). We hope that the EIPCK framework will contribute to future
curriculum. But these robots are not made from traditionalnuts and bolts. Students will dive into the squishy world of polymers to build robots that are soft, and safe enough for us to use as wearable devices! Ages 6-10 3 One-Hour Sessions Learn About and +Instructor Prep Time Build Soft Robotics Are you a Girl Scout troop leader Are you a teacher looking to align your helping your Daisy Girl Scouts to earn curriculum with the Next Generation robotics badges? Science Standards? These activities align with the
-hour time period.Data collection was done through observation, not intended for generalizable results, but toevaluate the soft robotic activity. One research team member was tasked with exclusivelyobserving visitors, features of the toolkit, and roadblocks visitors face with the activity. College-age volunteers assisted students by guiding them. Guidance included directions on whatmaterials to pick up, a demonstration of the gripper, and general assistance if students struggled.Data CollectionAt Event 1, the research team member in the observer role took notes on a tablet as communitymembers visited the booth. The grade ranges for data collection were K-3, 4-6, and middleschool (7-8). During observations, it was noted if visitors were in a
NEXT GENERATION Game Designed for 2nd & 3rd Supplies: paper, SCIENCE STANDARDS Learn the basics of graders. (With tips for ashlight, plastic, Play- ML through a card 1-PS4-2, 1-PS4-3, 3-5-ETS1-3, using with older Doh, and a color printer and 2-PS1-1 [1]. game. students) [1] NGSS Lead States, “Next
their instructions diagnosed during small group discussionsto explicitly connect ideas to CS concepts. This low stakes, low resource activity isstructured using the Learning Cycle aligns with the Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS). Additionally, students will understand the importance of understanding basiclogic concepts for all STEM fields beyond CS through explicit connections to real-worldapplciations. EST. TIME GRADE LEVEL MATERIALS ~60 Minutes Middle School Butcher Paper/Large Stickies High School Markers College Freshman Whiteboard &
whenincorporating engineering design into core science content areas. Our primary researchquestions were: 1) To what extent did the High-Quality Engineering Guidebook feature in eachTaLENt fellow's Project? and 2) How did the TaLENt fellows describe their value in collaboratingwith novice peers? Qualitative analysis of the participants' data sets revealed that the TaLENt fellowsutilized the High-Quality Engineering Guidebook in several ways to address the needs of theirteams. In addition, personal narrative and focus group transcripts generated four themes(Teacher By, Motivation, Autonomy, and Reduced Stress) that explain how the participantsviewed themselves as valuable for mitigating novice teacher stress. The findings are presented in
reapplied to the same population [34].CEDA measures creativity in three aspects: - Fluency: number of responses - Flexibility: number of response categories defined as a variety of responses or number of category types - Originality: uniqueness of the solutionShah et al. [38] recommend that the assessment of the creative engineering design not only relieson novelty but also satisfies the intended function. Accordingly, Shah et al. proposed fourseparate effectiveness measures: - Novelty: how unusual or unexpected an idea is compared to others. - Variety: measure the explored solution space during the idea generation process. - Technical Feasibility: feasibility of an idea and how close it meets the design
of engineering. Thus,building a socially engaged engineering educational orientation both authentically frames thediscipline and provides insights into the epistemic practices of the field. Youth learn howengineering benefits or harms particular populations, local communities, and/or the environmentas well as how to analyze possible impacts of design solutions.This paper focuses on a conceptual framework for K-8 educators, researchers, and curriculumdesigners that offers guideposts for supporting students’ considerations of technical, social,environmental, and ethical dimensions of engineering. Situating engineering in this way raisesquestions for educators: How can educators help to nurture such understandings in youth? Howshould K-8
, (e.g., A Framework for K-12 ScienceEducation [1] and Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States[7]), the availableresources to support the integration of engineering into mathematics have not been the same [8].At present, there are no integrated K-12 mathematics and engineering educational standarddocuments. Explorations of existing resources, such as engineering problems and activities thatsupport and promote mathematics objectives, could help to address the lack of integrated K-12mathematics and engineering documents. Engineering problems and other engineering activities allow students to use mathematicscontent while learning engineering content, yet the connections between the content are limited[6]. Advocates of the
engineering, the use of role models has been touted as one way to increase the number ofgirls pursuing engineering majors and careers, e.g., [1]. However, based on findings from fourth-and fifth-grade girls participating in an engineering outreach program, we question whetheryouth in this age group are looking for engineering role models, and we challenge theassumption that youth take up an individual as a role model simply because a program attemptsto position them in this way. This has led us to question what role these “models” play in theminds and lives of youth, and we argue that it may differ from what we have believed. In thisstudy, we seek to answer the following: 1) Are elementary-aged girls looking for role models?;2) How do girls perceive
education in Pennsylvaniaincluded condensing some of the standards, aligning with the Pennsylvania Career Readinessstandards, providing connections to content and practices from other standards (e.g., PA CoreStandards: Reading and Writing in Science and Technical Areas, PA Core Standards andPractices: Math), providing clarification statements for each standard similar to the format usedin the Next Generation Science Standards [2], and providing exemplars of Pennsylvania specificcontexts in which the standards could be applied. This paper will provide an overview of theapproved T&E standards that school districts in Pennsylvania must align instruction with by the2025-2026 academic year. These standards have resulted in T&E questions being
development stages of long-termprograms organized by the STEM outreach team at Texas A&M University at Qatar.Step 1: Forming the Team by Assessing Students’ Skills and InterestsThe first step to assembling the team members was to assess their skills and interests. The studentsare selected through a competitive process where they are asked to submit a registration formonline. That involved the collection of basic information of the students through short essay-formanswers that would help evaluate selected criteria such as the students’ technical abilities, problem-solving skills, communication skills, and their general interests in participating in the STEMprograms. Some examples of the questions asked include: “what discipline are you most
VA. Visual arts – Creating. VA:Cr1.2.7a and VA:Cr2.3.7a VA. Visual arts – Production. VA:Pr5.1.7a and VA:Re.7.2.7 Engineering design Activity development process Define – Session 1 The students will act as engineers who have to
term equity caused distrust among teachers that was difficult toovercome.The PI and Co-PI delivered the NEIR-ED workshop over 3.5 days during August 15-18, 2022 forthe 14 teachers representing both traditional STEM courses (math, chemistry, robotics) and careerand technical education programs. Following the PD, the team scheduled five faculty learningcommunity (FLC) meetings, setting expectations for attendance and assignments. The project teamalso selected university engineering students from rural communities who are participating in theinitial NEIR training. They are providing additional support to the STEM classroom teachers. Inaddition, they will:1. Participate in FLCs to provide student perspective on the challenges in the classroom2. Be
construct and modifying sessions to fit the needs of different audiences. An additionalchallenge was that we were given widely varying amounts of time to present the sessions. Thismeant that it was very important to have clear learning objectives.As an example, the learning objectives for a session for K-8 teachers and a session for highschool counselors are compared in Table 1. To make the table readable, we do not write out thefull learning objective. We placed verbs from different levels of Bloom’s taxonomy [1] toindicate how the learning objectives differ for each audience, because different audiences requiredifferent depths of understanding. In addition, each topic is given a level of importance for theparticular audience, indicated by low
Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the Pennsylvania State University. Her research interest focuses on engineering education for young students including classroom discourse, small-group interactions, and engineering identity. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Introduction For the past ten years, STEM education reform documents have prioritized two aspectsthat are new to all K-12 teachers, but particularly elementary generalists. The Framework for K-12 Science Education [1] and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) [1] were the first timenational reform documents referred specifically to engineering. Despite the number of positiveoutcomes to using an
Environmental Health and Safety for Glastonbury Public Schools. He also serves as NSTA’s and NSELA’s Chief Safety Compliance Adviser. He is general manager and safety consul- tant for National Safety Consultants, LLC. Dr. Roy is a nationally/internationally recognized safety specialist, author of more than 13 laboratory safety books and over 800 safety articles in professional publications. He has presented safety programs for professional associations worldwide and is an autho- rized/certified OSHA General Industry outreach trainer. Dr. Roy co-authored the national technology education and career and technical education (CTE) safety research study published in 2022. He also serves as an expert witness for school STEM lab
Panel 20 minutes Break 25 minutes Roundtable Discussions 35 minutes Interactivity Activity 4 (Moving to actionable steps) 10 minutes Evaluation form 20 minutes Share out and closing remarks Total time: 7 hoursWe noticed at this stage that the K-12 respondents encompassed more than just traditionalclassroom teachers. There were media specialists, curriculum designers, technology coordinators,and professional development partners who were interested in our workshop and we invited themto participate.2.3 StructureIn this section, we will discuss in detail the different activities we had the participants engage induring the workshop. Table 1 provides a general overview of the day