engineering faculty’s lack offamiliarity with non-ABET professional skills, like entrepreneurial mindset and cultural agility,the difficulty of making changes in technical classes, and the limitations in assessing professionalskills. The researcher aims for the recommendations derived from this pilot study to raiseawareness of professional skill development within engineering curricula, fostering collaborationwith industry, and stimulating further research into enhancing the engineering curriculum with afocus on these essential skills.IntroductionTo succeed in the 21st-century workplace, engineering graduates need more than technical skillsor risk losing their jobs to automation [1, 2]. Professional skills complement a technicaleducation and are part
individuals with theknowledge and skills necessary to develop and sustain online learning community. A newgeneration of industry needs to be equipped to function in the interdisciplinary environment typicalof sustainable technologies and virtual reality (VR). Two universities are working together todevelop a green STEM that prepares participants for careers in the emerging manufacturingindustries by enhancing their knowledge in renewable resource development. In order to optimizeresources and to utilize expertise at multiple institutions, the program are delivered through onlinelearning community, making it accessible anywhere in the world. The multidisciplinary projectinvolves several different areas of study that directly support VR-based
. (2010). “Project-Oriented Capstone Design in Civil Engineering: Linkages with Industry to Enhance the Practice.” 117th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 20- 23, Louisville, KY. https://peer.asee.org/16855[10] University of California-Berkeley. (2017). Civil and Environmental Engineering Undergraduate Curriculum. [Online]. http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/undergrad/curriculum[11] Cornell University. (2017). Civil Engineering Undergraduate Handbook. [Online]. http://www.cee.cornell.edu/academics/undergraduate/civil_engineering.cfm[12] North Carolina State University. (2017). Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering Undergraduate Programs. [Online]. https://www.ccee.ncsu.edu
impact entrepreneurialmindset.2.1. Manufacturing Education for Engineers Manufacturing education is a type of education that focuses on teaching individuals the skillsand knowledge they need to work in the manufacturing industry. This may include technicalskills such as operating machinery, as well as a broader understanding of the manufacturingprocess and how different parts of a manufacturing facility work together [17]. Manufacturingeducation can be obtained through a variety of programs, including vocational schools,community colleges, and four-year universities. The goal of manufacturing education is toprepare individuals for careers in this important industry, which plays a vital role in theeconomy. Manufacturing coursework is
-computer-programming and reached across thecomputer spectrum with engaging activities that stimulate creative design. The research questionwas if this creative challenge would incite participants interest in computing, and if it was aneffective method for teaching cloud computing. During the program, participants were trained inJava programming and the art of multimedia production. Students were instructed in the use ofphysical LEGO robotic platforms and virtual Alice platforms as potential tools for their movie-making project. By implementing a wide range of apps, students learned cloud communicationtechniques in a software environment. The study under consideration examined the curriculum'sapproach and measured its effectiveness to teach the
AC 2010-1627: FACILITATING COLLABORATION OF ENGINEERING ANDARCHITECTURE STUDENTS VIA AN INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL-STUDYWORKSHOPMichael Symans, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Michael Symans is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute where his primary focus is on the development and application of advanced technologies for seismic resistance of structures. His involvement in the Bedford Program began in earnest when he served as the School of Engineering representative on the search committee for the second Bedford Visiting Professor. Subsequently, he participated in his first Bedford Travel-Study Workshop in Spain; that
Paper ID #38823Integrating Entrepreneurially Minded and Project-Based Learning into aManufacturing Supply Chain CourseDr. Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University Yalcin Ertekin, Ph.D., CMfgE, CQE Yalcin Ertekin is a clinical professor in the College of Engineering, Department of Engineering Leadership and Society at Drexel University, Philadelphia, and serves as the Associate Department Head for Undergraduate Studies for the Engineering Technology program. He re- ceived his BS degree from Istanbul Technical University in Turkey, an MSc in Production Management from the University of Istanbul, an MS in Engineering Management, and
participants was formed towork on follow-up activities (including the development of another workshop/conference) withthe objective of formulating specific learning outcomes that identify core transportation conceptsand competencies expected of graduates from undergraduate Civil Engineering programs. Acompanion goal was to define appropriate taxonomies to measure student success in reachingthese outcomes.More specifically, building on existing literature, the group has been working to identify andvalidate a set of key transportation concepts. Following best practices in course design, thegroup will also formulate a set of outcomes related to these concepts around which a coursecould be developed. Further, the group expects to identify and develop a
the top floor, descending onefloor in each operation of formulation, blending, packaging, and shipping. An MS degreewas followed by an industry year operating small scale refinery processes, and learningcomputer programming. Page 11.1227.5 Along the undergraduate way I certainly took and survived many classes, thoughin retrospect I probably regarded most more as obstacles rather than enlightenments onmy path to engineering. My deepest learning and sense of confidence for “how stuffworks” arose largely from the easily remembered summer activities vs. the now veryhazy course topics of academia. “Hands-on” was clearly the best path for
, encouraging them to incorporate environment, gaining insights into the complexities andrenewable energy solutions into their designs. Engaging with challenges of renewable energy systems. The projectheliostat technology stimulates innovation and creativity, requiring involved the construction of a miniature heliostat using 3D-students to think critically about efficiency and effectiveness in theirproblem-solving approaches. Moreover, the interdisciplinary nature printed components, laser-cut materials, motors, sensors,of heliostat energy—encompassing fields such as optics, and Arduino programming to replicate the operationalthermodynamics, design process, use of sensor, rapid prototyping
importanceof having personal and work identities that challenge one another, keeping both stimulated andvibrant. A career commitment to service led to work on international standards, where herealized that participants tended to assume deployment in the developed or near-developedworld, without much thought of the possibility that not all technology is appropriate for thedeveloping world. Asserting that the goal of the engineering profession is to actually help people,Dan asserts that an expansive life insures expansive work by forcing a focus on broader impact.3. Expanding the practitioner to fit the person-Margaret Pinnell More importantly, when I was asked to manage programs developing war-related materials I also found my job to be in
fundingsources, and as relevant to a traditional academic infrastructure are presented. A case study of asuccessful implementation of a Community of Scholars for a large applied research contract isprovided, with lessons learned, along with a framework for others desiring to develop andimplement a similar opportunity.BackgroundUnited States universities have some of the most talented and innovative researchers in theworld. This is a significant labor pool, and can be enabling for problems with no knownsolutions. Unfortunately, bringing this talent to bear on large, applied research programs can bechallenging. That is because the primary human resources (faculty and students) at a universityare pulled in many directions compared to a focused industry
large contextual projects as part of their coursework) contributed to the developmentof a professional identity amongst recent graduates. Similarly, for undergraduate students, designexperiences [24], participating in technological innovation competitions [25], enjoyment ofelements of professional engineering practice [26], and engagement in engineering-relatedactivities [27] predicted undergraduates’ engineering identity.A sense of belonging is more associated with positive social and relational experiences. Bothformal and informal mentoring, especially for underrepresented students, were important forfostering belonging [11, 28, 29]. Peer mentors with the same identities as mentees could beespecially effective [30, 31]. Actions of faculty
, to better serve as gender equity allies. Dr. Green is the author of a series of advocacy tips, published by the Women in Engineering Division (WIED) of ASEE and available at wied.asee.org.Dr. Beth M Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette Beth Holloway is the Assistant Dean for Undergraduate Education and Director of the Women in Engi- neering Program (WIEP) in the College of Engineering at Purdue University. She is the current chair of the Women in Engineering Division of ASEE. Holloway received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue University.Prof. Archie L Holmes Jr., University of Virginia Archie Holmes, Jr. is a Professor in the Charles L
problems that they had realized, but they hadn’t really started focusing on yet. After learning more about this provider, and the different products that they had, they realized that they might have solutions for these other ones. It was kind of innovation, both in the project we were working on, because it allowed them more options, but then also it was starting to potentially resolve other problems that you have. That just happened by opening up the world, connecting them to something different. (Ella, Senior, Industrial Engineering)Immersion in Novel Innovation EcosystemsThis type of incident involved participants experiencing new contextual elements, reflecting onthose elements, and coming to deeper
lack of skilled professionals in areas deemed necessary for growthand development of oil-related industries of the Region, has been pivotal in the start-up of highereducation in general and engineering education in particular.There are today eight public colleges of engineering in the Region (Table 1) in addition toseveral, recently established, private and semi private colleges and/or universities that offerengineering programs. These eight public colleges have, since their inception, been guided byadvisory boards made up largely from faculty members and administrators drawn from UScolleges. Previously, the Grinter’s Report (15) and the Goals Report (16) have been used to guidethe educational process. Recently, ABET Engineering Criteria 2000
” learning-related activities, believed to spark and stimulate their learning, whilein the classroom.(17) These activities would include: reading, writing, solving problems,answering questions, participating in a discussion, etc.; and most important, students must beengaged in thinking tasks while actively involved. It is generally understood that duringactive learning, less emphasis is placed on transmission of information and more ondeveloping students’ skills. Additionally, during an active learning cycle, emphasis is placedon students’ exploration of their own abilities, including: their thinking process, their valuesystem, their intellect, and their courage to express themselves orally and in writing. Activelearning is contrasted to the
accepted that active learning requires students to take part in“pre-planned” learning-related activities, believed to spark and stimulate their learning, whilein the classroom.(17) These activities would include: reading, writing, solving problems,answering questions, participating in a discussion, etc.; and most important, students must beengaged in thinking tasks while actively involved. It is generally understood that duringactive learning, less emphasis is placed on transmission of information and more ondeveloping students’ skills. Additionally, during an active learning cycle, emphasis is placedon students’ exploration of their own abilities, including: their thinking process, their valuesystem, their intellect, and their courage to express
question whether students are ready and willing tobecome active participants in the process? Sixth, most faculty members were mindful of thetime and effort required to become a more effective instructor; and, at the same time,apprehensive and concerned that teaching is often undervalued in comparison to research.The interviewed faculty members have been teaching undergraduate classes at their presentinstitutions for a minimum of five years. Most of the classes taught by the aforementionedfaculty are small size, seldom exceeding 35 students per class. The lecture format dominatesthe seen. Students listen, take notes, and are allowed to ask questions at the end of the lectureor during office hours. There seem to be less interest (by most of the
Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Marshall University Huntington, WV 25705 ferdjallah@marshall.edu, asad.salem@marshall.edu AbstractThe objective of this study is to design a framework that allows undergraduate students, regardlessof their technical expertise, to actively participate in researching complex interdisciplinaryengineering projects. To illustrate this objective, we designed a framework focusing on modelingand simulating the settling of coal fly ash, a byproduct of coal-fired power plants. This studyfocuses on coal burning, aiming to raise awareness among future students about the
interactive and web-based software AGORA-net: Participate - Deliberate! AGORA-net is on online world in which everyone can construct arguments or participate in debates. Its development is funded by the U.S. Department of Education. Most recently he works on collaborative and problem-based learning environments for ethics and for science education in which AGORA-net is used as a tool to focus and guide autonomous collaboration among small groups of students.Dr. Jason Borenstein, Georgia Institute of Technology Jason Borenstein, Ph.D., is the Director of Graduate Research Ethics programs at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He is also an Assistant Editor of Science and Engineering Ethics and Co-editor of the Stanford
enormously in setting up,manning, and providing needed guidance to these fledgling institutions during theirearly years. The dramatic increase in oil revenues during the 70s, and 80s, coupledwith lack of skilled professionals in areas deemed necessary for growth anddevelopment of oil-related industries of the Region, has been pivotal in the start-up ofhigher education in general and engineering education in particular.There are today eight public colleges of engineering in the Region (Table 1) inaddition to several, recently established, private and semi private colleges and/oruniversities that offer engineering programs. These eight public colleges have, sincetheir inception, been guided by advisory boards made up largely from facultymembers and
, unfortunately, the education process in nearly allgovernment-run programs within these countries, continue to suffer from: antiquatedprograms, improper teaching methods, poor management, and lack of resources. Onthe other hand, engineering institutions in the Arab Gulf Region have, by and large,been spared. Region’s colleges (a map of the Region is shown in Figure1) have, fromthe start, “got on the right foot” and founded - what appeared to be at the time -modern engineering colleges with a decisive advantage over most of the engineeringinstitutions of the broader Arab Middle East.Engineering education in the Arab Gulf Region started, in earnest, during the early tomid sixties. Initially, colleges of engineering were founded in Riyadh, Jeddah, andlater
outside theirmajors.One way to promote engineering and liberal arts is to use projects with an innovative andentrepreneurial emphasis.32 Students are challenged by big questions that are open ended andthat allows them to pursue creative solutions, typically in capstone projects. This helps studentsto see their engineering education in the global context.Another way to integrate engineering and liberal arts is to develop minors such as “TechnologyManagement and Policy” that is available at the University of Virginia.33 As an interdisciplinaryminor, it is open to all undergraduates. This program helped engineering students find relevantliberal arts courses that are a vital component of a professional study. If these courses areimportant for a minor
less an imparter of knowledge and more a designer and a facilitator oflearning experiences and opportunities. In other words, the real challenge in college teaching isnot trying to cover the material for the students, as many of us believe and practice today; but,rather uncovering the material with the students. This is a call for all faculty involved withteaching engineering courses and as members of faculty teams who develop, maintain andimplement engineering programs , to consider not only the content and topics that make up anengineering degree but also how students engage with these materials. It is primarily a call toconsider how students engage in their college experience, and to search for proper tools that canbe deployed to stimulate
within the traditional lectureapproach. Fifth, some members have stressed the point that the success of any active learningstrategy requires students’ active participation, raising the question whether students are readyand willing to become active participants in the process? Sixth, most faculty members weremindful of the time and energy required to become a more effective instructor; and, at the sametime, apprehensive and concerned that teaching is often undervalued in comparison to research.The interviewed faculty members have been teaching undergraduate classes at their present Page 13.941.6institutions for a minimum of five years. Most of
within thetraditional lecture approach. Fifth, some members have stressed the point that the success of anyactive learning strategy requires students’ active participation, raising the question whetherstudents are ready and willing to become active participants in the process? Sixth, most facultymembers were mindful of the time and effort required to become a more effective instructor;and, at the same time, apprehensive and concerned that teaching is often undervalued incomparison to research.The interviewed faculty members have been teaching undergraduate classes at their presentinstitutions for a minimum of five years. Most of the classes taught by the aforementionedfaculty are small size, seldom exceeding 35 students per class. The lecture
, the challenge of a longitudinal study isto quantify how good a decision-maker a subject actually is. The recommended approach is toassemble a panel of experts from the local construction industry to serve as judges. The panelinterviews each one of the participating subjects before and after the exercise is executed todetermine if their decision-making skills have changed. Members of the panel do not know thegroup to which each subject belongs (experimental or control). Panel members should receiveproper training in order to make sure that they respond in a consistent and reliable manner. Thedecision-making skills of each subject can be evaluated through the introduction of ahypothetical situation in the same topical area as the exercise. They
Engineering department and the Associate Director for the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation at the University of Pittsburgh. He serves as the Program Director for the Master’s in Sustainable Engineering, the Undergraduate Certificate in Sustainability, the John C. Mascaro Faculty Fellows, and the Sustainability Global Engagement grant. He is the faculty lead for the University Honors College Food Ecosystem Scholar Community. His research lab, Sustainable Design Labs, focuses on fusing analytical chemistry, sustainability design principles and data analytics to address Water and Sustainability grand challenges. Current thrusts focus on Smarter Riversheds, Microbial Fuel cells and advanced oxidation and separation
. Conventional aspectsof course delivery, including lecture and slide presentations, were used mostly in the early daysto cover the fundamentals of fluid mechanics and to lay a foundation for the in-class and out-of-class projects, experiments, and computer simulations. However, even during the “lecture days”,care was taken to present the material in a manner that invited participation from the students.Both of the instructors have had significant experience in creating positive, welcoming learningenvironments at the undergraduate level, even when the course material is rigorous. Lectureswere not one-way. Instead, material presented via notes or overheads was heavily supplementedwith active learning activities and open discussion. Other means of content