distant universities introduces logistical and programmatic challenges that need tobe addressed to ensure a high-quality program.Several examples of multi-campus REU programs appear in the literature (e.g., TheoreticallyInteresting Molecules (TIM) Consortium [4], National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network(NNIN) [5], Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) [6], Rosetta Commons [7],and Engineering Research Center for Wireless Integrated MicroSystems (WIMS ERC)) [8]. Aprior study of the Rosetta Commons, a multi-campus computational biology REU, found itmatched outcomes for community, scientific identity, scientific self-efficacy, and intention topursue a science research-related career when compared to two single-campus life
, with a particular focus on imaging and pediatric hip disorders.Dr. Kerry Greer, University of British Columbia Kerry Greer is a Senior Instructor in the Department of Sociology, at the University of British Columbia. She is part of a research group that studies the experience of women student in engineering, focusing on how students perceptions of engineering affect their recruitment and persistence in the field.Dr. Katherine A. Lyon, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Katherine Lyon is an Instructor in Sociology at the University of British Columbia with an interest in the scholarship of teaching and learning, sociology of education, and gender. Katherine’s recent work has been published in Teaching Sociology
Paper ID #21526Exploring Gender Differences in Students’ Sustainability Beliefs in Upper-level Engineering CoursesMs. Marisa Swift, Purdue University, West Lafayette Marisa Swift is an undergraduate student studying Computer Science at Purdue University. She is doing both qualitative and quantitative research about diversity in the field of engineering.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering
of Nevada, Las Vegas Kaya is a PhD candidate in science education at University of Nevada, Las Vegas. He is working as a research assistant and teaching science methods courses. Prior to beginning the PhD program, he received his MS degree in computer science and engineering and holds a BS degree in chemical engineering. He taught K-12 STEM+CS for seven years. Additionally, he coached robotics teams and was awarded sev- eral grants that promote Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and Computer Sci- ence(CS) education. He is also interested in improving STEM+CS education for minorities. He has been volunteering in many education outreach programs including Science Fair and Robotics programs such
hydraulic vibration machine at IIT Madras, for Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO), Tumba. In US he worked for the R&D departments of Computer, ATM and Railway Industry. He then resumed teaching at several US academic institutions. He spent two summers at NASA Kennedy Space Center as a research fellow. He received awards for academic, teaching and research excellence. His teaching experience ranges from KG to PG. After his return to India, Dr. Malladi taught his favorite subject ”Engineering Mechanics” at a few en- gineering institutions and found a need to 1. simplify the subject 2. create a new genre of class books to facilitate active reading and learning and 3. reform academic assessment for the sure
Paper ID #24875Influences of Female/Women Engineering Professionals at the Workplace,Home, and CommunityDr. John M. Mativo, University of Georgia Dr. John Mativo is Associate Professor at the University of Georgia. His research interest lies in two fields. The first is research focusing on best and effective ways to teaching and learning in STEM K- 16. He is currently researching on best practices in learning Dynamics, a sophomore engineering core course. The second research focus of Dr. Mativo is energy harvesting in particular the design and use of flexible thermoelectric generators. His investigation is both for the
. • Utah Engineers Council, UEC: Engineering Educator of the Year 2005 award, in recognition of outstanding achievements in the field of engineering and for service to society. • SLC Foundation; Salt lake City, Utah: Teaching Excellence Award 2004. • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE): Chapter faculty Advisor recognition award 2002. • Computational Sciences and Ed- ucation; recognition for outstanding contributions and for exemplary work in helping the division achieve its goals1998. • Engineering Division; recognition for outstanding contributions and for exemplary work in helping the division achieves its goals 1995. • Science and Humanities; recognition for outstanding contributions and for exemplary work in
. Director, Survey Research and Curricular Assessment The Survey Research and Curricular Assessment unit coordinates campus wide survey research to assess student satisfaction, document student learning, and provide data for UCLA’s academic program reviews coordinated by the Academic Senate. This work includes primary responsibility for developing and ad- ministering the Senior Survey to over 8,000 graduating seniors annually in the College of Letters and Science, the School of Arts and Architecture, and the School of Theater, Film, and Television. The unit also provides ongoing assessment support for academic programs within the Division of Undergraduate Education including those in areas related to general education
: www.linkedin.com/in/hossain123/Nirjhar Das Sharma, Purdue University Calumet My name is Nirjhar Das Sharma. I was born on November 20, 1990 in Chittagong, Bangladesh. I pursued my passion for engineering from my early childhood while I was going through High school education. I completed a four year B.Sc. course in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (2008-2013) from Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Bangladesh. The last two years of the Bachelor study introduced me to some real-life learning along with a lot of important experiences. I personally believe that the In- dustrial training at TICI (Training Institute for Chemical Industries), Narshingdi was the most valuable tour where I experienced about the
University of Minnesota, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Atmospheric Science from Purdue University.Ing. Mayari Illarij Serrano Anazco, Purdue University at West Lafayette MAYARI SERRANO is currently a graduate research assistant in the College of Engineering at Purdue University. She earned her B.S. degree in Biotechnology Engineering from the Army Polytechnic School, Quito, Ecuador. She completed her M.S. in Computer and Information Technology at Purdue University. Mayari is currently a PhD student at Purdue University and is working in for the Women in Engineering Program. Her interests include foster STEM enthusiasm, and technology innovation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020
that graduates of the program will have experiencedkey areas of the engineering profession and demonstrated their abilities to perform in aprofessional manner. This Professional Component has been divided into Engineering Design,Professional Communications, Professional (Computer) Tools, and Ethics, with studentsreceiving instruction and practice in each area at least once per academic year.The intended transition from students as observers to graduates as competent practitioners isaccomplished by project activities demonstrating the practice of engineering over the entirecurriculum. Freshmen individually build artifacts, sophomores function in design teams, andjuniors extend the design experience to an external audience. Seniors are thus
projects are becoming multidisciplinary and international in naturemaking it imperative that our students are exposed to projects of this nature. In recent years weincreased our multidisciplinary projects significantly, closer to 50% of our total number ofprojects have been multidisciplinary involving industrial, electrical and computer engineering.This year we have introduced three international projects, two with Brazil with two differentuniversities and one with Armenia. 10% of our senior design students are involved with theseinternational projects. The introduction of multidisciplinary and international aspects has provento be an exceptional conduit to educate our students in team-based strategies, and globalization.The experience gained by
employed in many steady state and transient heat transfer problems—infact, students have employed the modeling and programming techniques learned in this projectto other courses, including their Senior Capstone projects. Results of a student opinion survey,anecdotal data, and performance on the heat transfer portion of the Fundamentals of Engineeringexamination data are presented.I. Considerations in Designing a FDM ProjectWhen designing a problem appropriate for completion in a certain number of class meetings,certain educational and institutional constraints had to be considered. As opposed to the inite-element method (FEM), the inite-difference method (FDM) does not have a steep learningcurve, and was therefore ideal to provide students
research professor of electrical and computer engineering at Drexel University and he joined the staff of Drexel’s Goodwin College of Professional Studies in 2007. He is the author or coauthor of over 50 publications and conference proceedings and the holder of five U.S. patents in computer networking and signal processing.Shawn Racz, Lockheed Martin, Inc. Page 15.258.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Capstone Course Sequence for Engineering Technology StudentsAbstractThis paper discusses the capstone experience for the students of the Applied EngineeringTechnology (AET) program at Drexel
University of Texas at Brownsville (UTB). Prior to join- ing the faculty at UTB he was a visiting professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY. Also, an Associate Professor of Production Engineering Technology at PSG College of Technology Bharathiar University, India, where he served as the Director of Computer Vision Laboratory and National Cadet Corps – Engineering Division Director. With over 26 years of teaching and research experience in manufacturing/mechanical engineering and engineering technology, he currently teaches in the areas of CAD/CAM/CIM, Robotics & Automation, Product and Process Design, Materials and Manufacturing processes, Machine Design, Renewable Energy and Micro
experiences.These classes will involve a diverse set of topics such as scaling issues, micromachining,interfacial phenomena, and thin-film energy transport. The students will participate in formalclassroom and laboratory training, industrial and government laboratory internships, a monthlyinterdisciplinary seminar, and international educational experiences.Throughout the duration of the fellowship students participated in small group (3-4 members)projects that were intended to complement the coursework. Projects were microsystems focusedand designed to encourage the involvement of an interdisciplinary design team. Projectprogression was intended to track with the coursework with the goal of applying class learning toa complex project with no clear solution
institutions. MIPS accelerates the commercializationof new technology by jointly funding commercially directed collaborative research anddevelopment projects between USM faculty and company researchers. Faculty,postdoctoral fellows and graduate students have the opportunity to perform research thatdirectly leads to commercialization of new products. Companies are able to access expertuniversity faculty and state of the art facilities to conduct cost effective research anddevelopment. They also benefit from access to a vibrant student labor pool. MIPSprojects have covered a wide range of technologies in engineering, computer, physicaland life sciences. Since 1987, MIPS has provided matching funds for more than 445projects worth a total value of $120
articulation. By divergent thinking Haws means “considering options and impacts beyondthe narrow realm of engineering, engaging in unfettered discourse with non-engineers, andconsidering the ethical perspectives of virtue, right, justice and care, as well as utility.” He alsocategorizes engineering ethics education approaches to meeting these goals as one of sixpossibilities: professional codes, humanist readings, theoretical grounding, ethical heuristics, casestudies, and service learning. We suggest that the use of design norms has the potential, withinthe context of design evaluation, to motivate students to carefully consider the implications oftheir choices for all involved in, or affected by, the design and to justify their choices in more
testing.11 Theequations then may be used not only for repetitive analysis of a structure, but also for design of asimilar structure, where the dimensions and materials must be selected for a given loading.Incorporating a computer equation solver with the ‘raw’ fundamental symbolic equations, asproposed in our approach, not only leads to easy design applications, but also has the addedbenefits of reduced opportunity for algebraic errors and increased engineering productivity.This paper will first present the structured problem solving process that is used in the author’smechanics of materials course for the lecture examples, homework problems, quizzes, anddesign project (focus of this paper) in our mechanics of materials course. We then discuss
, providingmethods and tools to be used in the Systems Architecture course, and the Systems and ProjectManagement course, which are taught in subsequent quarters.Topics covered include System Engineering Basics, Requirements Analysis, Trade Studies, CaseStudies, Software Engineering, Design-to-Cost, Modeling and Simulation, and Robust Design.A term-long design project is employed to improve the depth of understanding of all aspects ofthe SE course, and this will be covered in detail in a later section of this paper.In Systems Engineering Basics the learning objectives include having students understand thebenefits of System Thinking, how SE deals with complexity, SE concepts and language, theneed for SE standards, and various SE process models. Emergent
from medicine and engineering, through psychology andcommunication sciences. Plus 6 research institutes, ranging from the internationally accreditedOptical Communications Institute and the Physics Institute, to the Research Institute onHumanities.The institution has a student population of more than 26,000 at the bachelor’s level and over 500at a postgraduate level. It has a payroll of more than 2,500 professors and researchers and 2,000clerical employees.The School of Engineering offers 12 different careers, spanning from Mechanical and Civilengineering, through Computer Sciences and Surveying. The enrollment is of over 2,500 and the Page
products and processes. The course modules aresuitable for use in upper level undergraduate and graduate level engineering programs. Anumber of the modules are also suitable for use in business curricula or in technologyoriented courses in public policy and history. The modules were developed from theresults of industry-oriented research in green design and pollution prevention conductedat Carnegie Mellon University over the past 5 years.Modules include:• introduction to green design,• full cost accounting (and teacher’s guide),• radioactive waste management,• disposition of personal computers (and teacher’s guide),• reverse engineering for green design, and• rechargeable battery management and recycling
past ten years. Much work has been performed on assessingusefulness of the technique (students generally like it, and learn well from it) and its validity(students do in general rate better work more highly, though some effort needs to be invested inthe assessment procedure to assure this). However, very few published reports discussappropriate strategies for matching reviewers with reviewees, how students can be induced togive good feedback, or how student-assigned grades can be prevented from clustering closelyaround the mean. These topics are the focus of this review paper.2. Strategies for assigning reviewersIn his 1998 survey paper [Topp 98], Topping says, “How peer assessors and assessees should
element in the process. These visions of the future may becomereality, but superior results will not result if the design team is not well trained or experienced inthe process. In the hands of the poorly trained or inexperienced, the computer and data basesforeseen in the technical literature will produce poor designs as quickly as good ones.Senior, well-respected members of my professional community, naval architecture, are worriedabout education and training (3,4). It is noteworthy that the Lisnyk Prize, the SNAME studentdesign competition is being won by a wide margin by teams from overseas. The judges in thesecompetitions have been troubled by the poor quality of many of the American design projectssubmitted. Gale, attributes this in part to
be called a "naturaldesigner", one who might produce a good product regardless of the process used. Outliernumber two, on the other hand, measured high on the quality score and both process variablessuggesting that the process variables may have contributed to his high quality score. He mayhave learned to spend time in problem scoping and to iterate through the steps in the designprocess as an engineering student, providing some evidence for the importance of teaching thedesign process. Although Outlier number three scored very high in terms of transitions per minute, he didnot spend a significant portion of time on problem scoping. This could explain the quality scoreof 5 out of 7 and provides some support for suggesting that both of
Paper ID #43572Board 438: Year Two of Developing a New Dataset for Analyzing EngineeringCurriculaDr. David Reeping, University of Cincinnati Dr. David Reeping is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering and Computing Education at the University of Cincinnati. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech and was a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow. He received his B.S. in Engineering Education with a Mathematics minor from Ohio Northern University. His main research interests include transfer student information asymmetries, threshold concepts, curricular complexity, and
courses that emphasize student outcomes pertinent to the appropriateaccreditation commission, assessment of courses administered and controlled by themultidisciplinary program, the use of consistent direct and indirect approaches to assess studentlearning in the selected courses, and the filtering of results to only include students in theprogram.IntroductionThere are four commissions by which multidisciplinary programs between engineering and non-engineering may be accredited: Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC), Applied ScienceAccreditation Commission (ASAC), Computing Accreditation Commission (CAC), andTechnology Accreditation Commission (TAC). These commissions have similar criteria that theprograms must meet to become accredited, but
engineering lies at theinterfaces of biological sciences, engineering sciences, mathematics and computational sciences. Itapplies biological systems to enhance of the quality and diversity of life. Health and safety ofworkers in industrial environments, animals in confinement, plant culture in controlledenvironments, and analysis of the mechanics of various physiological activities in higher levelorganisms are examples of topics studied. The boundaries between limited specializations (or emphasis areas) at the undergraduatelevel at both Virginia Tech and Nebraska are not rigid, nor should they be. These structures areput into place to provide a guide for students to choose their electives. Typically about 18 hours ofelectives are allowed, so
learning disabilities. Mrs. Starling has also taught middle school math and science at Durham Academy, Providence Day School, and Community House Middle School. She is also a consultant for the TeachEngineering website through Duke University.Timothy Allen, University of Virginia Dr. Timothy E. Allen is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. He received a B.S.E. in Biomedical Engineering at Duke University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Bioengineering at the University of California, San Diego. Dr. Allen's teaching activities include coordinating the undergraduate teaching labs and the Capstone Design sequence in the BME department at the
: 3Project Deadline: 6/4/2004 Description: Measure the electrical properties of a set of 3.579 MHz quartz crystal. Specific crystal parameters should include: series resonance, equivalent series resistance, motional inductance and capacitance, crystal -3dB bandwidth, and holder capacitance. Exercise an appropriate simulation to verify the design of a crystal ladder filter. Objectives: Measure the electrical properties of a set of 3.579 MHz quartz crystal. Design three-pole Butterworth and Cohn crystal ladder filters. Simulate the Cohn filter frequency response using appropriate software and the electrical equivalent circuit of the crystal. Learn how to effectively use an engineering research notebook. Evaluation