evaluation of formal strategies to create stable and reusable parametric feature-based 3D models,” in ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, vol. 46606, pp. V011T14A003, 2014. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.[5] A. Aranburu, J. Cotillas, D. Justel, M. Contero, and J. D. Camba, “How does the modeling strategy influence design optimization and the automatic generation of parametric geometry variations?” Computer-Aided Design, vol. 151, 103364, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2022.103364.[6] I. Chester, “Teaching for CAD expertise,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 17, pp. 23-35, 2007.[7] S. Coşkun, Y. Kayıkcı, and E. Gençay, “Adapting
engineering and management graduates of the future. Expected changes in construction work put an onerous responsibility on construction educators, administrators, advisory boards, and other entities involved with curriculum design, development, and integration to think about the future of construction work and new construction technologies and chart an active path. No longer can we passively react to what is transpiring. Construction education must be modified appropriately to respond to impending changes in a timely manner. It is my hope that this paper will stimulate even further and better thinking than I have been able to bring forward about the topics raised and create an inertia for movement in the right direction.Bibliography
and scientist.Then-NSF Director Erich Bloch in 1986 stated “I believe that when we look at the Centers in several years wewill find new and very significant examples of the flow of ideas and people back and forth across thedisciplinary lines of science and engineering,” and “continuing disciplinary strength is needed as well ascontinuing cross-disciplinary strength.” At the same time, former NSF Director H.G. Stever stated “’A newgeneration of engineering students has to be educated to think and function in the cross-disciplinaryenvironment.” Thus, the policies of the Engineering Education and Centers Division of the EngineeringDirectorate at NSF require that each center develop, early in its evolution, very clear scientific objectives
, vol. 127, pp. 252–266, 2018.[2] C. Ekstrand, A. Jamal, R. Nguyen, A. Kudryk, J. Mann, and I. Mendez, “Immersive andinteractive virtual reality to improve learning and retention of neuroanatomy in medical students:a randomized controlled study,” CMAJ Open, vol. 6, no. 1, 2018.[3] Z. Merchant, E. T. Goetz, L. Cifuentes, W. Keeney-Kennicutt, and T. J. Davis, “Effectivenessof virtual reality-based instruction on students learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: Ameta-analysis,” Computers & Education, vol. 70, pp. 29–40, 2014.[4] F. Górski, “Effective Design of Educational Virtual Reality Applications for Medicine usingKnowledge-Engineering Techniques,” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science andTechnology Education, vol. 13, no. 1
also provide useful informationto evaluate and improve the program, and “close the loop” per the requirements of the ABET.AAS.MET Curriculum and StructureStudents pursuing the AAS degree in Mechanical Engineering Technology must meet thefollowing RCBC General Education requirements shown in Table I. Table I. AAS General Education Requirements Written and Oral Communication – 9 credits Arts and Humanities – 3 creditsENG 101 College Composition I ART 101 Introduction to ArtENG 105 Technical Writing MUS 101 Introduction to MusicSPE 102 Public Speaking PHI 101 Introduction to Philosophy THR
overlooked area that IEs have a greatimpact to the mantra put forth EC 2000 is to provide usable empirical models to measure monitorand continuously improve educational systems.Bibliographic Information1 Criteria for Accrediting Programs in Engineering: Effective for Evaluations During the 2001-2002 Accreditation Cycle. Published by The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), Page 7.868.12 Baltimore, Maryland. http://www.abet.org/images/eac_criteria_b.pdf, November 1, 2000. “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002
. Previously developed instruments could be utilizedto look at impact on design self-efficacy with students who have access to an academicmakerspace at different stages in their undergraduate career [15].References[1] E. Halverson and K. Sheridan, “The Maker Movement in Education,” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 84, pp. 495–504, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063.[2] S. Carlson, “The maker movement goes to college”, Chronicle of Higher Education, vol. 61, A26– A28, 2015.[3] V. Wilczynski and R. Adrezin, “Higher Education Makerspaces and Engineering Education,” presented at the ASME 2016 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1115/IMECE2016-68048.[4] M. M. Hynes
International Conference on Engineering Design (with E.Y. Kim, V. S. Kocsik, C.E. Basnage). Page 24.849.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Learning about Learning and Engineering: Engineers, Students, and Educators Co-Design Challenges for a Science CenterAbstractWe present two case studies of cross-community collaborations of museum educators, engineersfrom industry, and undergraduate engineering students tasked with co-designing engineeringchallenges for a science center’s drop-in engineering tinkering program. Each collaborationworked over a semester to research, brainstorm, design
Vanessa Bracho Perez is an upcoming mechanical engineering Ph.D student at Florida International University. She also holds a Bachelor’s and Master's degree in Mechanical Engineering from FIU. Her research interest includes integrating LAs into engineering courses, and examining teaching practices in engineering courses.Meagan R. Kendall (Associate Professor) Dr. Meagan R. Kendall is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and Leadership at the University of Texas at El Paso. As an NSF Graduate Research Fellow, she received her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, with a concentration in Biomechanics, from The University of Texas at Austin. An engineering education researcher, her work
held international Postdoctoral Fellowships at Cambridge University and Technische Universit¨at Wien. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023BYOE: A Laboratory Experiment with a Stirling Engine for Troubleshooting Education in Mechanical EngineeringAbstractTroubleshooting is a systematic approach to problem solving that involves identifying the rootcause of a problem and finding a solution to address it. Strong troubleshooting skills requiresnot only a combination of technical knowledge and critical thinking skills, but also strongcommunication skills to collaborate with others to efficiently solve complex problems. Forinstance, team must find a faulty component in a
teachereducators and engineering educators with regards to what might be included in an engineeringlesson. With a guide such as this, thoughtful lesson creation can focus on the teaching andlearning objectives desired.References 1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok- Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88, 397–419. 2. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. 3. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39–43. 4. Berkowitz, T., Schaeffer, M. W
and RNA-based control systems for mammalian synthetic biology applications. He also serves as the faculty advisor for the Duke International Genetically Engineered Machine undergraduate research group.Charles WallaceMargaret Wacera Gatongi ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work-in-Progress: Transforming the Molecular and Cellular Engineering Educational Experience in Biomedical Engineering AbstractIn recent decades, biomedical engineers have capitalized upon the “molecularrevolution” that fundamentally changed the study of biology through discovery,design, and commercial production of molecular and cell-based therapeutics thatform the foundation and
was that we are not really doing very much at all, and hepredicted dire consequences for our society at local, national, and international levels if suchnegligence continues.In response to Kamen’s challenge to engineering educators to take proactive steps, four facultymembers from two large urban universities decided to investigate the situation at our ownuniversities and in our own communities: • Were we failing to reach out to students and potential students in our communities? • Were these students indeed expecting sports careers with the commensurate salaries? • If so, as engineering educators, what did we have to counteroffer?What started as a casual inquiry evolved into a formal survey designed to determine who
engineering from Princeton University in Princeton, N.J. After serving as USAF pilot in KC-135 and KC-10 aircraft, he completed his D.Phil. in engineering sci- ences at the University of Oxford, U.K., and returned to the USAF Academy to teach heat transfer and propulsion systems. At Baylor University since 1998, he teaches courses in laboratory techniques, fluid mechanics, energy systems, aeronautics, wind energy, and propulsion systems. Research interests include experimental gas turbine heat transfer and wind energy. Page 25.602.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012
ASEEconference papers for possible themes and leads for further exploration. To broaden theliterature review into published journal articles, the following journals associated with scienceand engineering should be explored: International Journal of Engineering Education,International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, Journal of CollegeScience Teaching, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Journal of STEM Education, andScience. Other journals not directly related to the STEM field but containing articles of interestto this topic include American Journal of Education, Cognition & Instruction, Cognition &Science, Educational Researcher, Journal of Education, and New Directions for Teaching andLearning. Lastly, journals
Paper ID #73332013 State of Manufacturing EducationDr. Hugh Jack, Grand Valley State University Hugh Jack is a Professor of Product Design and Manufacturing Engineering at Grand Valley State Uni- versity in Grand Rapids, Michigan. His interests include manufacturing education, design, project man- agement, automation, and control systems. Page 23.19.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 The 2013 State of Manufacturing EducationAbstractThis paper presents
systems curriculum. International Journal of Information Management 18, 427–441 (1998).23. Isomottonen, V. & Karkkainen, T. The value of a real customer in a capstone project. in IEEE 21st Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, 2008. CSEET ’08 85–92 (2008). doi:10.1109/CSEET.2008.2424. Blumer, H. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. (University of California Press, 1986).25. Burke, P. J. & Tully, J. C. The measurement of role identity. Social Forces 55, 881–897 (1977).26. Goffman, E. The presentation o f the self in everyday life. (Anchor Books, 1959).27. Coyne, I. T. Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear
Paper ID #9273Introduction to Cooperative Education-The CourseDr. Joy Watson, University of Cincinnati Joy Watson is an assistant professor in the University of Cincinnati’s Division of Professional Practice and Experiential Learning where she is the co-op adviser for chemical and environmental engineering students. She completed her Ph.D. in the College of Engineering at the University of South Carolina in August 2011. Her doctoral work focused on preparing engineering Ph.D. students for careers in industry. She obtained her B.S. and M.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville with her
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022WIP: Developing the Next Generation Expert - What we learned fromacademically underprepared students about academic self-efficacy inengineering and computingDr. Jennifer I Clark, Montana State University Jennifer I Clark, Ed.D. is the Student Success Coordinator for the Norm Asbjornson College of Engineering at Montana State University. Her research, study, and practice promote retention in engineering and computing disciplines with a focus on underrepresented and academically underprepared populations.Dr. Bryce Hughes, Montana State University Bryce Hughes, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the Department of Education. His
Technique," Maa-Cie Cooperative News, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-2, 1987.[2] A. Kaw, G. H. Besterfield, and J. Eison, "Assessment of a Web-Enhanced Course in Numerical Methods," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 712-722, 2005.[3] A. Kaw and M. Hess, "Comparing Effectiveness of Instructional Delivery Modalities in an Engineering Course," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 508-516, 2007.[4] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth, "Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23
2001, American Society for Engineering Educationterm milestone events leading to full program startup for the academic year 2001-2002.I. IntroductionThe Physics Department at the University of Arkansas took the broad themes identified as beingneeded in future graduate students and translated them into a set of four specific goals for theFIPSE program implementation. They were: a) Integrating traditional physics education with a business framework b) Integrating traditional physics education with creativity training c) Integrating global perspectives into local technology decisions d) Integrating soft skill set development with traditional physics educationThe University of Arkansas was awarded its Department of
interesting” or “something that I have never donebefore.”What did engineers feel their education lacked? When asked, “What would you like to have had as part of your education to betterprepare you for your current work?” engineers most frequently mentioned hands-on and real-world problem solving. They felt they needed less book learning and memorization and “morefundamental hands on problem solving skills.” The second most common theme that arose was adesire to have more focus on “business acumen.” Considering that about half of the 113 surveyrespondents were managers of some sort, this theme is perhaps not surprising. While somethemes came up repeatedly, there was definitely no consensus, with only 23% of engineersmentioning practical problem
more information). Oldconcepts have been revisited in light of new information such as the role of natural selection andmutations in genetic variations and the more recent emphasis on the concept of genetic drift.Projects are underway to create an International databank for DNA samples in an effort to obtain Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Regional Conference 459larger and more comprehensive data sources. Needless to say, an interdisciplinary andtransdisciplinary academic approach that includes cyberinfrastructure, science and the socialscience is a relevant and timely
. H. (2011). Drive: The Surprising Truth about What Motivates Us. Riverhead Trade, New York.18. Husman, J., Benson, L., & Brem, S. (2010). Mini worshop – Understanding motivation in research and practice. In Proceedings of the 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. (pp. F4A-1 to F4A-2). Washington D.C. October 27-30.19. Herman, G. L. & Loui, M.C. (2012). Identifying the core conceptual framework of digital logic. In Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, (pp. AC2012- 4637). San Antonio, TX. June 10-13.20. Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered
Paper ID #19305Systematically Integrating Liberal Education in a Transdisciplinary DesignStudio EnvironmentDr. Marisa Exter, Purdue University Marisa Exter is an Assistant Professor of Learning Design and Technology in the College of Education at Purdue University. Dr. Exter’s research aims to provide recommendations to improve or enhance university-level design and technology programs (such as Instructional Design, Computer Science, and Engineering). Some of her previous research has focused on software designers’ formal and non-formal educational experiences and use of precedent materials, and experienced instructional
no assessment.The low rankings on management topics are due to the disdain I have with ABET trashing the specific technical requirements for Manufacturing Engineering Technology, in favor of soft skills and basic credentials and the movement toward a NAIT model. If Manufacturing Engineering and Engineering Tech- nology are trying to emulate business schools they will lose. We need to move, but it should be in a more technical way and not toward the business side. We need to differentiate manufacturing education.[Industry Comment] A focus on the fundamentals is absolutely needed. Manufac- turing needs an interested society and education system capable of producing contributors not just Engineers. I would take a non
. "Limited learning on college campuses." Society 48 (2011): 203-207.12. B. C. Sanyal and M. Martin, "Quality assurance and the role of accreditation: An overview," Report: Higher Education in the World 2007: Accreditation for Quality Assurance: What is at Stake?, 2007.13. J. S. Eaton, "An Overview of US Accreditation. Revised November 2015," Council for Higher Education Accreditation, 2015.14. D. G. Rodionov, I. A. Rudskaia, and O. A. Kushneva, "The importance of the university world rankings in the context of globalization," Life Science Journal, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 442-446, 2014.15. S. N. S. Sahuri et al., "Engineering Education: Program Ranking and Student Interest," ASEAN Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 1, 2015.16
Student Representative to the Engineers Without Borders- USA Board of Directors.Dr. Christopher Lombardo, Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Dr. Christopher Lombardo is an Associate Director of Undergraduate Studies and Lecturer at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Dr. Lombardo received Bachelor of Science degrees in Electrical Engineering and Physics from the University of Maryland at College Park and a Master of Science and a Doctor of Philosophy degree in Electrical Engineering from the The University of Texas at Austin. Outside of the classroom, Dr. Lombardo facilitates international engineering programs at SEAS and is currently the faculty representative to the Board of
Applications in Engineering Education, 4(3): 191-205.21. Ang, S. and R.D. Braatz (2002). Experimental projects for the process control laboratory. Chemical Engineering Education, 36(3): 182-187.22. Pérez-Herranz, V., A.I. Muñoz, J.L. Guiñon, J. Garcia-Antón, S.C. Navarrete (2003). An Internet-based Process Control Laboratory Project. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education, 21-25.23. Selmer, A., M. Goodson, M. Kraft, S. Sen, V.F. McNeill, B.S. Johnston, C.K. Colton (2005). Performing Process Control Experiments Across the Atlantic. Chemical Engineering Education 39(3): 232-237.24. Gossage, J.L., C.L. Yaws, D.H. Chen, K. Li, T.C. Ho, J. Hopper, D.L. Cocke (2001). Integrating best practice
introductory software engineering course with integrated mobile application development. Annual ASEE Conference. 2014.4. Subbian V, Purdy C. Redesigning an advanced embedded systems course: A step towards interdisciplinary engineering education. IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference. 2013.5. Subbian V, Beyette F. Developing a new advanced microcontrollers course as a part of embedded systems curriculum. Frontiers in Education Conference. 2013:1462-1464.6. Inozemtseva L, Holmes R. Coverage is not strongly correlated with test suite effectiveness. Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering. 2014:435-445.7. Harder M, Morse B, Ernst MD. Specification coverage as a measure of test suite quality. ACM. 2001;25