specific comments on issues that survey respondents and others provide, outside the structure of the alumni/industry surveys. This includes perceived shortcomings in the program from their perspective.” • “The faculty listens carefully to the employers of their graduates. Alumni who are employers as well have a very significant impact.” • “Many employers are pleased with the process we go through in program improvement. They often wish that students were more familiar with the ABET program assessment process since is it so similar to many industrial QC/QM processes.” • “Deficiencies in student learning.” • “Engaged faculty provides the best feedback for continuous improvement. Cluster or
Session 3268 Interactive Dynamics: A Collaborative Approach to Learning Undergraduate Dynamics Gary L. Gray and Francesco Costanzo Engineering Science and Mechanics Department The Pennsylvania State University Abstract Collaborative learning, computer simulations and practical experimentation are the essential elements of a new project for the enhancement of undergraduate engineering courses cur- rently being developed at Penn State University. This project introduces teamwork, hands-on
assistant), professors may opt for assessments that are easier to grade, such as multiple-choice exams or assignments with clear-cut answers, instead of more time-consuming butpotentially more meaningful forms of evaluation, like essays or project-based assessments.My findings overall highlight a misalignment of priorities among faculty. This excessive focuson preventing dishonesty can overshadow efforts to address more impactful aspects of education,such as refining course content, developing innovative teaching strategies, and creating a moreenriching learning experience for students [33], [34].. Instead, faculty should also balance inemphasizing improving test design and preparation strategies, which can be more effective andbeneficial to
approach allowing for the development of emergent codes. Throughout thecoding process, inter-rater reliability (IRR) quantitatively assessed the coding agreement acrossresearchers until the IRR was higher than 80% for each coding category and the overall IRRacross all categories was higher than 90%. The data from the interviews showed studentsperceived poorer team communication in the virtual environment, limiting team’s effectivenessin completing tasks. Students mentioned that the environment had negative effects on thecollaboration and relationship formation of the group members. Some students describedstrategies they adapted for improving communication, including approaches for establishingclear expectations, streamlining meetings, and building
thecomplexity of the cognitive processes necessary to perform this task, which is precisely thebenefit of early introduction of DOE methodology to engineering students. Assessment methodsare integrated into the instructor interface. A more comprehensive assessment strategy, plannedfor future offerings, is also described.AcknowledgementsThe authors are grateful for support provided by the Intel Faculty Fellowship Program and theNational Science Foundation’s Course, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement Program,Educational Materials Development under grant DUE-0442832. We would like to recognizediscussions with David Abercrombie and Manu Rehani from LSI Logic leading to therecognition of the need for this type of learning tool. Edith Gummer of the
Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). https://engineering.tufts.edu/me/people/faculty/kristen- bethke-wendellNicole Alexandra Batrouny, Tufts University PhD candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Tufts University. Interests: upper elementary engineering education, integrated science and engineering, collaboration in engineering, decision making in engineer- ing.Dr. Tejaswini S. Dalvi, Univeristy of Massachusetts, Boston c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Elementary Students Navigating the Demands of Giving Engineering Design Peer Feedback (Fundamental) Throughout the design process, practicing engineers seek out feedback on their
. Particularly, faculty perceptions of institutional rewards for productive researchover teaching provide little incentive for course improvement.3Teaching assistants (TAs) can be valuable resources in facilitating the transition of a traditionalengineering course to include active learning techniques; however, prior studies indicate thatpeople tend to teach how they were taught,4 contributing further to this lack of course reform.TA training can help prepare graduate students to teach in this new course structure. Various TAtraining workshops,5 courses,6,7 boot-camps,8 and certificates9 have been successful at preparinggraduate students to teach; however, few papers have outlined ways in which TAs can worktogether with instructors to transition a
partnership and relationship among educationresearchers, subject matter experts, teachers, and students for learning concepts, design, theories,etc. Moreover, DBR can be combined with the concepts of project-based learning (PBL)10 and itcan evolve constructionism theories, in which learners may create their own knowledge throughthe process of designing and developing objects and artifacts.7,10,11 The DBR approach seekslinkages with existing learning theories,1 produces new theories,1 and is usually contextuallysituated.1,7 Such a strategy may ultimately improve learning outcomes and help yield novellearning theories and artifacts.6-8As evidenced from the literature, DBR has been frequently employed in teacher professionaldevelopment (PD) programs and
curricula has yet to be properly analyzed forits impact on students’ science knowledge and understanding 23, 24, 25.The study context: Developing design-based science curriculaFor the past six years, engineering and education students and faculty at the University ofVirginia have been working with middle school teachers to bring engineering curricula into theirclassrooms. Topics from science, math, and technology that have interesting engineeringapplications have been identified and engineering teaching kits are developed to help middleschool students learn science and math in the context of engineering design. The curricula,packaged as kits, focus on a well-defined set of concepts in science or math. All lesson plansinclude a final design
Paper ID #5682A Novel Partnership for Advancing K-12 STEM Education & Entrepreneur-shipMr. Chet Boncek Jr, Raytheon Company Biography: Mr. Boncek is Senior Principal Engineer at Raytheon. He holds a BSEE from Northeastern University and an MSEE from Georgia Tech. Mr. Boncek is actively involved in community activities related to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) and enjoys working with students in middle and high school. He has partnered with several schools in Massachusetts as a guest speaker developing and facilitating units on topics such as remote sensing, feedback control systems and rocketry
engineering studies. Such assessment results can provide the basis for thedevelopment and revamping of effective activities designed to meet program objectives andmissions.This paper reports the development and early results of a survey undertaken as part of theNational Science Foundation-funded Assessing Women in Engineering (AWE) project. Theinstrument is designed to measure undergraduate women students’ self-efficacy in studyingengineering. Self-efficacy is “belief in one’s capabilities to organize and execute the sources ofaction necessary to manage prospective situations" 2. Prior work from Blaisdell3 has shown thatfeelings of efficaciousness can be an important predictor in the success of women studyingengineering. In our project, we developed
Paper ID #42783Application of Data Analysis and Visualization Tools for U.S. Renewable SolarEnergy Generation, Its Sustainability Benefits, and Teaching In EngineeringCurriculumMr. Ben D Radhakrishnan, National University Ben D Radhakrishnan is a Professor of Practice, currently a full time Faculty in the Department of Engineering, School of Technology and Engineering, National University, San Diego, California, USA. He is the Academic Program Director for MS Engineering Management program. He develops and teaches Engineering courses in different programs including engineering and business management schools. His research
reinforcement learning. His research interests include medical informatics, robotics, animal monitoring, and prediction of biomaterial properties. Before joining the King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia, Emmanuel worked as a faculty member at the Department of Computer Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria. Furthermore, Emmanuel was a research and teaching fellow at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), USA, and earned a distinction in the course: ”An Introduction to Evidence-Based Undergraduate STEM Teaching” coordinated by the Center for the Integration of Research Teaching and Learning (CIRTL), 2022. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
awarded the Fiona and Michael Goodchild best graduate student mentor award during her PhD. She has also been named an NSF iRedefine ECE Fellow for leadership potential among underrepresented graduate students across US/Canada. Shailja’s research vision is to develop AI methods for healthcare that ”close-the-loop” between surgeons, research scientists, educators, and engineers.Mr. Satish Kumar, University of California, Santa Barbara Machine Learning Researcher-PhD student at UC Santa Barbara with 10+ years of research experience building advanced algorithms for large-scale solutions. It includes 6+ years in computer vision and machine learning algorithms and infrastructure at Vision Research Lab at UCSB. The current
Paper ID #48389The Staying Power of Socializing Engineers: A Systematized ReviewMr. Craig M. Spears, Texas A&M University Craig M. Spears is an Associate Professor of the Practice for the First Year Engineering Program in the Engineering Academic and Student Affairs (EASA) department at Texas A&M University. He holds both an M.Eng. and a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Texas A&M, as well as a Graduate Business Certification from the Mays Business School. With extensive experience in both academia and industry, Craig has taught a variety of engineering courses, while also helping develop programs to enhance
Research and Innovation Success and Excellence (Faculty-RISE) programat Prairie View A&M University for funding the project. Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX Copyright ã 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 8 References1. M. Rocco. “The long view of nanotechnology development: the national nanotechnology initiative at 10 years”. J. Nanoparticle Res., 13 (2011), pp. 427-445.2. Functional Nanofibers and Their Applications. WOODHEAD, 2016.3. C. Wei, Y. Feng, D. Che, J
Session xxxx Summer Workshops for High School Juniors: A Medium to Recruit Underrepresented Students Rafic Bachnak, Korinne Caruso, Cody Ross Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi AbstractTexas A&M-Corpus Christi recently implemented a new program to improve therecruitment of underrepresented students by attracting juniors in high schools toparticipate in two-week summer workshops and a follow-up science and technologyexhibit. Faculty, students, professional organizations, and a
Assistant Professor of Physics at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Her teaching and research activities focus on the practical and social aspects of the classroom that con- tribute to the development of student expertise in Introductory Physics Laboratories.Prof. Holly M. Golecki, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Dr. Holly Golecki (she/her) is a Teaching Assistant Professor in Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and an Associate in the John A Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences at Harvard University. She holds an appointment at the Carle-Illinois College of Medicine in the Department of Biomedical and Translational Sciences. She is also a core faculty member at
challenging for faculty members who are more accustomed to documentingteaching and content delivery. INCOSE does not require that universities teach the contentwithin the recognized course(s). This allows for thesis or final project courses, often taught to awide range of undergraduate students, to qualify for AcEq.Academic Equivalency was designed to offer an alternate path for assessment in languages otherthan English, in countries outside the United States and Western Europe. Despite that intent,fourteen of the fifteen academic equivalencies are in the United States. The champions of theseprograms typically pursue AcEq as a way to provide structure to their courses. It should benoted that only a small portion of AcEq-qualifying students pursue and
Paper ID #39301In/authenticity in STEM Social Networks: How ”Out” are LGBTQ Studentswith their Peers in STEM?Dr. Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University - Bozeman Bryce E. Hughes is an Associate Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University. His research interests encompass diversity and equity in engineering education, with a focus on LGBTQ students. He was recently awarded an NSF CAREER grant to study the experiences of LGBTQ under- graduates in STEM fields. He holds a Ph.D. in education from the University of California, Los Angeles, an M.A. in student development administration from Seattle
to teach them how to compute their grade.Lastly, you must be prepared to change things if things don’t go as expected.References 1. Howitz, William J., Kate J. McKnelly, and Renée D. Link. "Developing and implementing a specifications grading system in an organic chemistry laboratory course." Journal of Chemical Education 98.2 (2020): 385-394. 2. J. Mendez, “Standards-Based Specifications Grading in a Hybrid Course,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah, Jun. 2018, p. 30982. doi: 10.18260/1-2--30982. 3. L. B. Nilson. Specifications Grading: Restoring Rigor, Motivating Students, and Saving Faculty Time. Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2015. 4. L. Craugh, “Adapted Mastery Grading for
of Arkansas. She received her PhD in Chemical Engineering from Chemical and Biomolecular Department at North Carolina State University. She is responsible from teaching Intro- duction to Engineering course sequence, developing course material, and advising freshman engineering students. She also serves as the coordinator for the Honors Research Experience.Mrs. Leslie Bartsch Massey, University of Arkansas Leslie Massey is an instructor in the First-Year Engineering Program at the University of Arkansas. She received her BS in Biological Engineering and MS in Environmental Engineering from the University of Arkansas. She previously served as a project manager at a water resources center, but returned to the
state boards consists of three major steps:education, experience, and exams.1 Colleges and universities play a critical role in the educationrequirement through curricular development and program accreditation. They can also play a role inassisting graduates in experience acquisition through career support services. The extent to whichinstitutions should include passage of the exams- the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) and Practice ofEngineering (PE)- as a graduation requirement or even emphasize test content in the curriculum is open todebate.2,3 Regardless of curricular emphasis on FE exam preparation, Civil Engineering programs aim toprepare students for eventual licensure and some have created FE review courses to assist towardcompletion
increased confidence level both with and without the use ofperipherals. Students evaluated the simulation via the Simulation Effectiveness Tool-Modified(SET-M), and scored their perception of the simulation on a 1 to 5 point Likert Scale. Thehighest scoring areas were perceived support of learning by the faculty (M=4.6), feelingchallenged in decision-making skills (M=4.4), and a better understanding of didactic material(M=4.3). The lowest scoring area was feeling more confident in decision making (M=3.9). Wealso recorded students’ facial expressions during the task to determine a probability score (0-100) for expressed basic emotions, and results revealed that students had the highest scores forjoy (M = 8.47) and surprise (M = 4.34), followed by
Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of South Florida (USF) teaching Electronics I, II, and CMOS VLSI courses.Chris S Ferekides (Professor) Chris S. Ferekides received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of South Florida. He has been a faculty member in the Electrical Engineering Department since 1992. He is currently service as the department chair, and is the principal investigator of a NSF Funded RED Project that addresses the professional formation of electrical engineering students. His research is in the areas of electronic materials with a focus on photovoltaics. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
Paper ID #37238Benefits of Video Tutorials for a Computer Aided DesignClassGerald Prendergast (Assistant Professor of Engineering) Dr. Gerald Prendergast is currently an Assistant Professor of Engineering at University of South Carolina Aiken (UofSC Aiken). Prior to joining the faculty at UofSC Aiken, Dr. Prendergast served in the US Navy as a surface warfare and engineering duty officer in the operations, maintenance, and program management of nuclear aircraft carriers. Dr. Prendergast obtained his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the Naval Postgraduate School with research on underwater explosions and the
competency by interventions, counseling, pedagogy, and tool selection (such as how to use CATME Team-Maker to form inclusive and diversified teams) to promote DEI. In addition, he also works on many research-to-practice projects to enhance educational technology usage in engineering classrooms and educational research by various methods, such as natural language processing. In addition, he is also interested in the learning experiences of international students. Siqing also works as the technical development and support manager at the CATME research group.Andrew Katz (Assistant Professor)Christopher Greg BrintonMatthew W. Ohland (Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professor of EngineeringEducation) Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Head
Communications (CAD) course at amedium-sized private institution in the southeastern United States. Enrollment in the course was90 students spread across 4 sections. All sections received the same treatment.Course StructureThe course was designed using the ILEARN flipped-classroom framework, a modularscaffolding framework co-developed by the author. The ILEARN framework divides coursecontent into six weekly components described in Table 1. Two additional summative “-ed”categories (making it the ILEARNed framework) were added to incorporate the final projectmore fully into the course. Table 1. ILEARN Components Component Description Percent of course grade Introduction Learning
Paper ID #39584Board 357: Pilot Study of the Impacts of a Robotics Curriculum onStudent’s Subject-Related Identities and Understanding of EngineeringProf. Holly M Golecki, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign Dr. Holly Golecki (she/her) is a Teaching Assistant Professor in Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and an Associate in the John A Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences at Harvard University. She holds an appointment at the Carle-Illinois College of Medicine in the Department of Biomedical and Translational Sciences. She is also a core faculty member at the Institute for
consequences. On the other hand,some devices use instability for their functioning.While this concept is essential, it is usually given limited attention in traditional statics books andlectures. It is generally discussed as just a short section on the equilibrium of a rigid body. Thecurrent treatment of this topic in statics books needs to be revised. Thus, this paper recommendsa more in-depth examination of this topic and provides insights into the pedagogy, potentialactivities, and practical examples to help faculty better integrate the concept of tipping. Theexperimental results highlight the benefits of integrating the footprint concept in the tippingmodule.1. IntroductionThe Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) report [1] estimates an