further studyinggraduate student mental health. Therefore, the aim of this ScLR is to determine the current state ofscholarly discourse surrounding engineering graduate students’ mental health, forming thefollowing three research questions: (1) What are the major trends and findings present in literature about engineering graduate students’ mental health? (2) What areas of mental health for engineering graduate students are being studied? (3) What are the current gaps in the literature about engineering graduate students’ mental health?There are three central inclusion criteria that come from the scope of the proposed researchquestion: (1) the literature must discuss graduate students, (2) these graduate students must be
. candidate in the School of Computing and Information Sciences at Florida International University (FIU). Her research interests span the fields of computing education, human computer interaction, data science, and machine learning. Previously, Stephanie received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Neuroscience from the University of Miami, in addition to a B.S. degree in Computer Science from FIU. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Multi-Institution Study of Student Demographics and Stickiness of Computing Majors in the USAAbstractRetention and graduation rates in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)careers are
research.3.5 Long-term follow-up Former REU students were contacted in 2011 in order to track their status and the impactof the REU program on their career path. Of students who had completed their bachelor’sdegrees, 47% were pursuing a Ph.D. or master’s degree (two of which had received NationalScience Foundation graduate fellowships), 33% professional school (primarily medicine), and20% were working in industry (Figure 3). These numbers are within the range found in previouspublications. In these studies surveys identified a broad range (10-75%) of former REU studentsattending graduate school following completion of their bachelor’s degrees.5-8 It is not clear whythis distribution is so broad. It may be the type (background, academic year
Study examines changes associated with the implementation of thenew EC2000 accreditation standards in a representative sample of accredited engineeringprograms in seven engineering disciplines – aerospace, chemical, civil, computer, electrical,industrial, and mechanical engineering. To answer the research questions with confidence, thestudy must examine institutional functioning and student outcomes before and after EC2000.The impact analysis plan therefore includes measurement of student learning outcomes at twopoints in time—pre-EC2000 and post-EC2000. Table 1 arrays four different groups ofinstitutions that provide opportunities to evaluate the impact of EC2000 over time. Bycomparing the performance of graduates from selected engineering
Paper ID #8260English for Russian FacultyDr. Phillip Albert Sanger, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Julia Ziyatdinova, Kazan National Research Technological UniversityDr. Vasiliy Grigoryevich Ivanov, KAZAN NATIONAL RESEARCH TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITYProf. Svetlana Vasilievna Barabanova, Kazan National Research Technological University Professor Barabanova Svetlana, Doctor of Juridical Science, is vice-director of the Institute of Additional Professional Education of the Kazan National Research Technological University (KNRTU). She was born on January 4, 1962 in Kazan, Russian Federation. In 1983 she graduated the Faculty of Law
Page 20.35.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 The Role of the Presidential Program of Training Engineers in Improvement of the Research University Educational ActivitiesIn 2011 the number of engineers in Russia constituted 6 million which is 40% of all specialists withhigher education. The statistics show that 8% of engineering graduates work as laborers and thisnumber has increased by 6 times over the past 15 years, and their share of work - almost by 3 times.According to the survey, 75% of engineers work in their profession immediately after graduation.However, for only 43% the content of work matches the area of their specialization. Throughout thecourse of the engineers
; threegraduate students and eight undergraduate students. The mentorship model termed Relationship,Commitment, Desire, and Disseminate (RCDD) is being simultaneously adopted to promoteengineering student success through a genuine mentorship role and prepare students for graduateschool and post-graduation employment.I. BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATIONResearch VenuesAccording to numerous studies, it is well-established that student participation in research venuesand proper faculty-student mentorship are two commonly implemented methods that promote andenhance student success in higher education. A significant number of undergraduate studentspursuing Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) related fields engage inresearch opportunities
engineering Work In ProgressIntroductionThe purpose of this Work In Progress (WIP) qualitative study was to explore howunderrepresented women graduate students and faculty in Science and Engineering understandand perceive what constitutes ethical behavior in a mentoring research relationship centeredaround the six ethical principles of Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, Fidelity, Fairness,and Privacy. This WIP paper focuses on the responses of eight graduate students and four facultyto six case studies that targeted a specific ethical mentoring principle, and it represents anexpansion of a larger study currently under review. The goals of this WIP paper are to: (a)explore participant understanding of each
Paper ID #15152Development of a Networking Model for Internationalization of EngineeringUniversities and its Implementation for the Russia-Vietnam PartnershipDr. Julia Ziyatdinova, Kazan National Research Technological University Julia Ziyatdinova graduated from Kazan State Pedagogical University in 1999. Her major areas of study were foreign languages and she finished her University course with honors and qualification of teacher of English and Turkish. She continued her training and obtained PhD in Education degree in 2002. The topic of her PhD study was titled ”System of Character Education in the US Schools: Current State
2006-2197: DOCTORAL STUDENT CO-FOUNDERS: A CASE STUDY OFADVANCED LASER MATERIALS, L.L.C.Robert Evans, University of Texas-Austin R. S. Evans, Ph.D. is a post-doctoral fellow and lecturer in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. His current research focus is on technology commercialization and engineering education. Dr. Evans completed his doctorate in mechanical engineering at UT Austin in 2005. His dissertation covered materials and product development for rapid manufacturing. He also co-founded a company based on his doctoral research concurrently with his doctoral studies. Prior to enrolling at UT he worked as a manufacturing engineer and
Page 23.954.2students with Japanese language ability.To encourage exchange students to study in Japan, financial support is needed particularly inTokyo, which has a high cost of living. Most existing exchange programs typically fund one wayexchanges, where the sending side pays or the receiving side pays the students’ travel, housingand living expenses. For example, the US National Science Foundation supports researchexperiences for US graduate students 6 by issuing awards directly to participants andundergraduates (REU) by granting awards to a US institution, such as the NanoJapan 7 project atRice University, that supports US students or residents (sending side pays) to undertake asummer research project at a Japanese institution. An example
Paper ID #45223Insights and Updates on Identity Constructs Among Hispanic EngineeringStudents and Professionals: A Longitudinal StudyDr. Dayna Lee Mart´ınez, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Dayna is a Senior Director of Research & Impact at the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE), where she leads a team of professionals who specialize in data-driven design and implementation of programs and services to empower pre-college students, parents, graduate students, and faculty members in STEM fields, with a particular focus on advancing Hispanic representation and success. With over 15 years
utility engines has been conducted. The project studied (1) the extent of the deteriorationof the emissions as the engines age, (2) the causes of the deterioration, and (3) strategies forimproving the emissions. Thirteen undergraduate students have worked on this project over theyears. In comparison, only two M.S.-level graduate students (one of whom originally worked asan undergraduate student on the project) worked on the project over the same time. As a result,much of the research work was completed by these undergraduate students and their effortsplayed a large role in sustaining the project over its duration.Students who worked on this project benefited by performing engineering work in a modernresearch laboratory facility, thereby gaining
organized in collaboration with the SROP program, ourguidelines for mentors and students are based on the Rackham SROP mentor and studentguidelines [Capsouras].The relationship between the REU student and the project leader/mentor (faculty,member, research scientist or graduate student) is the foundation of the REU program.Mentors aid in one of the primary goals of the program: introducing students to thegraduate school experience through a full range of applied research opportunities.Research and related projects may include reading primary literature, developinghypotheses, designing and carrying out experiments, studying and analyzing results andwriting about research. Mentors are afforded a great deal of autonomy in developing aworking and
in the hands-on research can greatly improvestudents’ critical thinking. Participation in research enhances student’s presentation skills byallowing them opportunities for presenting their research at regional and national conferences, aswell as provides them information on the recent developments in areas of their field of study. Itwas also observed that students who were engaged in research with faculty often were moresuccessful than their peers in getting job offers or admission to graduate schools of their choice.This study will discuss the university strategies and specific strategies taken by both authors toinvolve and enhance undergraduate students’ participation in hands-on research in the areas ofarchitecture and manufacturing. The
Pakistan. The perspectives of engineering graduates as well as industry leaders will beutilized in understanding the current situation in both countries in terms of engineering graduatepreparedness for industry jobs. As such, the research questions of this study is: RQ1: How do recent mechanical engineering graduates describe their preparedness forindustry needs around standards? What courses or projects do they identify as particularlyrelevant to developing that knowledge? RQ2: What are the perceptions of industry leaders about recent graduates’ preparednessto join industry regarding their knowledge and competency of engineering standards? The first research question illuminates the entry-level professional
Paper ID #22626Peer-led Research Methods Workshop for First-year Ph.D. Students (StudentPaper)Mr. Vincent Joseph Tocco Jr., University of Florida Graduate Student in Chemical Engineering at the University of Florida.Mr. Kevin BuettnerMs. Madeline G Sciullo, University of Florida Madeline Sciullo is a 4th year Ph.D. Candidate studying Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Uni- versity of Florida under the appointment of Dr. Mark Law. Her research interests include device physics and simulation on III-V and Silicon based sensors for various application ranging from pH sensors, me- chanical stress effects, to
].Engineering educators have called for contributory ways to groom leadership understanding andcompetencies among engineering students, without further squeezing the already denseengineering curriculum [5-6]. Mentoring opportunities provide an alternative approach. Studiesshowed that mentoring experience in engineering research settings has the potential to developleadership among mentors [5, 7-8]. However, the resulting impact and what part of theleadership is developed based on this impact are still unknown. An earlier exploratory qualitative study conducted by the authors revealed that serving asmentors provided opportunities and experiences for engineering graduate student to both broadentheir understanding of leadership and practice and
with more than 120 faculty in engineering• Public or private universities with less than 120 faculty in engineeringQuestions for all groups1. What is the impact of uncertainty in the Federal R&D budget outlook (due to continuing resolutions and ultimate negotiated budget between the Congress and the Administration) on universities in your category?2. How have the changes in the Federal R&D budget priorities between the previous and current administration impacted your university?3. What are three key areas the US Government priorities impact your universities (e.g. graduate studies support, research capacity building, etc.…)?
Engineering Education, 2015 Evaluation of a Nine Year Summer Undergraduate Research Program in Biomedical Engineering Page 26.695.2 Abstract Interest and opportunities for undergraduate research programs continues to increase atuniversities throughout the United States. Despite the significant level of interest and support forthese activities our understanding of the characteristics of a successful program and its long-termimpact on student outcomes remains is limited. The purpose of this study is to examine theimpact the relationships and interactions with faculty, graduate student mentors, and otherundergraduate researchers in a summer program at the Illinois Institute of
developed throughexposure to, practice of, and socialization in disciplinary expectations and norms, the research questions tobe answered through the course of the evaluation plan include: What are factors governing optimal time tointroduce research to undergraduate students to encourage them to pursue graduate school? Whatcharacteristics of REU experiences are most critical in encouraging students to pursue graduate study?How do these vary given other factors (e.g, gender, race, institutional type, impact of prior researchexperiences?) Educational data were collected through qualitative and quantitative methods. Three surveyswere distributed to participants over the course of the summer and into the fall semester comprising severalestablished and
served as a key leader and member of the UW OMA&D Outreach and Recruitment Unit that contributed to two consecutive years of increased underrepresented freshmen student enrollment at the UW. In her current capacity as the Director for the Pacific Northwest Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP) Pro- gram at the UW, she strives to increase the recruitment, retention and graduation rates for underrepre- sented students in STEM disciplines while providing experiential and research opportunities. Through the LSAMP Program she was able to co-write the OMA&D/UW College of Engineering STEM focused study abroad seminar to Brisbane, Australia. This was selected for a best practice model workshop at
lacked technological integration.Theoretical FrameworkAfter researching the topic of graduate readiness and looking at all available scales, Prikshat etal. [22] created a framework to look at graduate work-readiness. The framework is called theWork-Readiness Integrated Competence Model (WRICM). This model is not limited to aspecific area of study, but rather encompasses the complexity of work-readiness for allgraduates. The model includes four types of resources: intellectual resources, personalityresources, meta-skill resources, and job-specific resources. Intellectual resources referred to bothfoundation skills (reading, writing, and numbers) and cognitive skills (critical thinking, problem-solving, decision-making and strategic thinking
Undergraduate Research Collaboration Between Penn State Main Campus and One of Its Remote Campuses Aiman S. Kuzmar, Ph. D., P. E. Penn State Fayette, The Eberly Campus One University Drive, Uniontown, PA 15401AbstractUndergraduate research has been heavily promoted recently by universities and through local,state and federal agencies. The importance and benefits of this type of research have been welldocumented in the literature. The general focus of universities without graduate programs is onteaching, and less emphasis is given to research. Consequently, such universities face variouschallenges to carry out undergraduate research. Some
-sponsored projects 7. Faculty see these courses as vehiclesto help students synthesize prior coursework, engage in open-ended projects, and simulate real-world work experiences 6 – goals that are consistent with the needs identified by ASME andothers as well as with accreditation requirements 8.While capstone courses emphasize workplace preparation, few studies have systematicallyexamined the effectiveness of this preparation in the context of students’ transitions from schoolto work. At the same time, the gaps identified by industry and professional organizations point tothe need for such research. Toward that end, scholars such as Korte 9, Trevelyan 2, and othershave explored the career pathways and workplace practices of engineering graduates
(NHERI) – NetworkCoordination Office (NCO) is a National Science Foundation funded collaborative grant thataims to coordinate research and outreach activities for the multi-disciplinary natural hazardsengineering research. As part of the NHERI-NCO, the Education and Community Outreachinitiatives include opportunities for undergraduate students to conduct research to mitigate theeffects of natural hazards. The Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) has been well-researched as a best practice for preparing college students for graduate studies (Willis, Krueger,& Kendrick, 2013), especially underrepresented students in engineering (Labrador & Perez,2006). Curriculum was developed specifically for the NHERI REU program to
postsecondary institutions in the U.S. IfSTEM educators are to successfully broaden participation of Hispanics in STEM, it is imperativeto understand the role these institutions play and their potential to broaden participation ofHispanics (hereafter referred to as Latinx) in STEM. Equally important is understanding thechallenges, barriers, or hurdles Latinx students face in seeking STEM degrees at HSIs,particularly in engineering and computer science. To that end, an interdisciplinary research team is currently conducting a study on (1)persistence of Latinx engineering and computer science (hereafter referred to as engineering)undergraduates and (2) factors contributing to their successful trajectories beyond graduation. Inparticular, the
Session 2510 Learning through Teaching: A Longitudinal Study on the Effects of GK-12 Programs on Teaching Fellows Brian E. Gravel, Christine M. Cunningham, Meredith T. Knight, Russell Faux Tufts University Center for Engineering Educational Outreach/ Museum of Science, Boston/ Davis Square Research AssociatesAbstractIn 1999, the National Science Foundation Division of Graduate Education began a new projectcalled the GK-12 program. These grants are awarded to universities to have graduate studentsand faculty in STEM fields work with teachers, schools
, architected materials, smart structures, structural stability, structural art, biomimetics, fiber-reinforced composites, sustainable infrastructure and bridge engineering. He co-authored more than 40 publications, actively presented in national conferences, and received multiple student awards during his graduate studies. Beyond research activities, Dr. Hu has six years of teaching experience through a variety of roles and have mentored more than 10 undergraduate students on different research programs.Dr. Natassia Brenkus, Ohio State University Natassia Brenkus is an Assistant Professor at The Ohio State University. Her research interests include prestressed concrete behavior and structural durability
siteprovided students with ADHD an opportunity to engage in research outside the confines of thetraditional engineering curriculum and interact with other students facing similar challenges. Thispaper presents quantitative and qualitative findings from a semi-structured interview and post-program survey of the students’ experiences. Overall, the major findings suggest that participatingin the program enhanced students’ 1) interest in engineering research, 2) interest in pursuinggraduate studies in engineering, and 3) feelings of belonging in engineering. For instance, allparticipants (N=10) responded either “agree” or “strongly agree” to statements reflecting thatattending the REU site increased their interest in research and in pursuing graduate