Paper ID #45772Barriers and Innovations: Promoting Inclusion in South Dakota’s EngineeringEducationDr. Cristian Eduardo Vargas-Ordonez, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Cristian Vargas-Ordonez is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines. He has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University, a Master in Education from the University of Los Andes in Colombia and a Master in Science, Technology, and Society from the National University of Quilmes in Argentina.Cedric Collinge, South Dakota Mines ©American Society for Engineering Education
Paper ID #12246Understanding a New Paradigm for Engineering Science Education UsingKnowledge about Student LearningDr. Donald E. Richards, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Richards is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and teaches in the area of thermal-fluid sciences. He earned his mechanical engineering degrees at Kansas State Uni- versity (BS), Iowa State University (MS), and The Ohio State University (PhD). Prior to joining Rose- Hulman in 1988, he was on the faculty at The Ohio State University. In 1998, he joined Kenneth Wark as co-author of Thermodynamics (6th Ed
Paper ID #16447Teamwork in Engineering Undergraduate Classes: What Problems Do Stu-dents experience?Dr. Joanna Wolfe, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Wolfe is Teaching Professor of Rhetoric and Director of the Global Communication Center at Carnegie Mellon University.Dr. Beth A Powell, Tennessee Technological University Dr. Beth Powell has a doctorate in Rhetoric and Composition from the University of Louisville. Her research is in engineering communication, and she works as a Coordinator for the College of Engineering Student Success Center at Tennessee Tech University.Mr. Seth SchlissermanMs. Alexandra Kirshon Alexandra
Paper ID #14349Design as an integrating factor in an International Cross-Disciplinary Inno-vation CourseProf. Anders V Warell, Lund University, Industrial Design Bio Anders Warell Professor Anders Warell is Director of Research at the Division of Industrial Design, Lund University, Sweden. He received his PhD on Product Identity and Design Aesthetics from Chalmers University of Technology in 2002. After being part of the development of the Industrial Design Engineer- ing masters programme at Chalmers, he joined the School of Design at Massey University in Wellington, New Zealand in 2005, where he led the Industrial Design
AC 2011-983: USE OF BUZZWORDS IN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERINGEDUCATIONAbhijit Gosavi, Missouri University of Science & Technology Abhijit Gosavi obtained a Ph.D. in industrial engineering from the University of South Florida in 1999. He has an MTech and BE, both in Mechanical Engineering, from IIT Madras and Jadavpur University, respectively. He joined as an assistant professor in the engineering management and systems engineering department at Missouri University of Science and Technology (S & T) in 2008. His research interests are in simulation-based optimization, production management, and industrial engineering education.Jane M. Fraser, Colorado State University - Pueblo Jane M. Fraser is chair of the
. Kadel, & J. Keehner, National Center for Teaching, Learning and Assessment, ___, State College, PA[12] Lipscomb, L., Swanson, J., and West, A., 2004, Scaffolding," Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Technology, edited by M. Orey.[13] Vygotsky, L. S., 1978, Mind in Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.[14] Borthick, A., 1999, “Designing learning experiences within learner's zones of proximal development (ZPDs): Enabling collaborative learning on-site and online”[15] Kao, M., Lehman, J., and Cennamo, K., 1996, “Scaffolding in hypermedia assisted instruction: An example of integration,” Association for Educational Communications and Technology.[16] Parmelee, D. X, and Michaelsen, L. K, 2012, “Twelve tips
evaluation, poorperforming students will step up their game with the end-of-project peer evaluation showing amore even distribution of the contributions.Term Project ResourcesThere are a large number of technologies that teams will use during the project. Most studentshave experience with Java and source control from prerequisite coursework. To help studentswith the others, we provide a Resources page [11] which lists web resources for tutorials andother information to help the students learn the technologies. Through the project the studentswill be required to work with these technologies: Java 8 – implementation language MetricsReloaded – code metrics Sparkjava web micro-framework Trello
2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.Donald Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Carpenter is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering. Dr. Carpenter also serves as Chair of the Educational Innovation Collaborative at LTU and Coordinator of the Civil Engineering Assessment Program. He is actively involved in ASEE and serves as Faculty Advisor for the ASCE Student Chapter at LTU. His research interests involve academic integrity, assessment tools, urban stream restoration, and watershed processes. Page 11.322.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Cheating in
professional member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).Dr. Jinan Ziade, Westcliff University Jinan Ziade, PhD, holds a doctorate of management in Organizational Leadership and information sys- tems technologies from the University of Phoenix (UOPX), also a graduate Executive Transformation Certificate in Strategic Diversity and Inclusion Management from Georgetown University. Dr. Ziade is an Assistant Professor and a member of the Diversity and Inclusion committee at Westcliff University, teach- ing managing global diversity, corporate social responsibility and organizational behavior. Additionally, Dr. Ziade is a postdoc research fellow and a member of the Center of Entrepreneurship and Innovation
(PBL) environments. We beganby interviewing a broad and diverse set of female engineering students. The lead authortravelled to multiple locations across Europe—Ireland, Portugal, and Poland—to gatherdata from students in three geographically and culturally diverse corners of the Europeancontinent. It happened that one-third of the Irish cohort hailed from the Middle East. Duringthe Academic Year 2012-13, we conducted our first set of semi-structured interviews with46 of the participants. Interviews varied from 45 to 120 minutes in length and wereconducted on-campus at Dublin Institute of Technology (DIT), Instituto Politécnico deSetúbal, and Warsaw University of Technology.LiteratureWithin the emerging field of engineering education research
Farrell is Professor and Founding Chair of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University (USA) and was 2014-15 Fulbright Scholar in Engineering Education at Dublin Institute of Technology (Ireland). From 1998-2016, Stephanie was a faculty member in Chemical Engineering at Rowan. Dr. Farrell has contributed to engineering education through her work in experiential learning, focusing on areas of pharmaceutical, biomedical and food engineering. She has been honored by the American Society of Engineering Education with several teaching awards such as the 2004 National Outstanding Teaching Medal and the 2005 Quinn Award for experiential learning.Dr. Adrienne Robyn Minerick, Michigan Technological University
is invested in research, classes and assignments that provide overlap and continuity within the engineering curriculum and engineering pipeline. Nick is also a mentor for the REU program at Olin which studies the educational experiences of undergraduate engineers.Kevin A. Nguyen, Texas Tech University Kevin Nguyen is currently a graduate student in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Texas Tech University and is working towards a B.S. and M.Eng in Environmental Engineering. He has participated as an undergraduate researcher in the NSF REU Summer Experience in Engineering Education Research program at Franklin W. Olin College.Chris Aaron Gewirtz, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology I’m
Paper ID #12167What makes an undergraduate course impactful? An examination of stu-dents’ perceptions of instructional environmentsDr. Alexandra Emelina Coso, Georgia Institute of Technology Alexandra Coso is a Postdoctoral Fellow at Georgia Tech’s Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning. She completed her Ph.D. in 2014 in Aerospace Engineering at Georgia Tech. Prior to her time at Georgia Tech, she received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from MIT and her M.S. in Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her research interests include graduate student experiences in engineering programs, engineering
held fellowships in Ethics of AI and Technology & Society organizations.James N. Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Magarian, PhD, is a Sr. Lecturer and Associate Academic Director with the Gordon-MIT En- gineering Leadership (GEL) Program. He joined MIT and GEL after nearly a decade in industry as a mechanical engineer and engineering manager in aerospace/defense. His research focuses on engineering workforce formation and the education-careers transition.Dr. Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto Alison Olechowski is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineer- ing and the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice (ISTEP
AC 2008-771: BUILDING AN ENTREPRENEURIAL ENGINEERING ECOSYSTEMFOR FUTURE GENERATIONS: THE KERN ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATIONNETWORKJeffrey Blessing, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Blessing is an associate professor and director of the Management Information Systems program at the Milwaukee School of Engineering, where he has taught for 21 years (16 years in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science department and 5 years in the Rader School of Business). He earned a Ph.D. in Computer Science and Engineering from the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, a Master of Science in Computer Science and Engineering from the University of California, San Diego, and a Bachelor of Science
Paper ID #36813Interplay of Gender and Nationality in the Early Careers of FinnishEngineering Doctoral GraduatesDr. Johanna Naukkarinen, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Finland Johanna Naukkarinen received her M.Sc. degree in chemical engineering from Helsinki University of Technology in 2001, her D.Sc. (Tech) degree in knowledge management from Tampere University of Technology in 2015, and her professional teacher qualification from Tampere University of Applied sci- ences in 2013. She is currently working as a post-doctoral researcher and project manager with the School of Energy Systems at Lappeenranta
current research interests include improving the quality of human-intensive processes (HIPs), such as medical processes, with a focus on detecting human errors before harm is done and preventing such errors. He has used software engineering tech- niques to formally represent and analyze models of complex HIPs and industrial engineering techniques to elicit and validate models of such processes. He is also interested in educational approaches for peda- gogical collaboration between different courses in the curriculum. His work has resulted in publications in international journals and conferences.Dr. James Walker, Michigan Technological UniversityDr. Mark Hoffman, Quinnipiac University Mark Hoffman is a professor of
), and high school (n = 7) S, T, E, and M teacherswho were part of a university-school partnership geared towards developing and implementing amulti-day standards-based STEM task in their classrooms. Data included participants’ responsesto a previously validated Views of Nature of Engineering Knowledge (VNOEK) survey andresearcher-developed STEM pre-survey. The VNOEK comprises 13 open-ended prompts to examine and optimize a community-wide water filtration system. Data analysis consisted of independently coding and corroboratingdata using validated procedures with a focus on teachers’ VNOEK, and teachers’ responses werecategorized as “Informed,” “General,” “Emergent,” “Problematic,” or “Absent.” Preliminaryfindings revealed that: (i
Psychology and Measurement, and Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing. She is also the Fellow of the Academy for Teaching, Learning, and Leadership and the Faculty Fellow at The University of Central Florida.Dr. Richard Catrambone, Georgia Institute of Technology Richard Catrambone is a Professor in the School of Psychology at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He received his B.A. from Grinnell College and his Ph.D. in Experimental Psychology from the University of Michigan. The question Catrambone likes to ask–and the thread that runs through the projects he does alone and in collaboration with others–is: What does someone need to know in order to solve novel problems or carry out tasks within a
reference framework are displayed,further cloud manufacturing planning and simulation level are proposed and learningoutcomes are described. History of the Automotive systemsAutomation of different product life-cycle phases is being developed since 1970. Theattention was usually focused on programs facilitating automated design (Computer AidedDesign) and manufacturing (Manufacturing Execution Systems, MES) [2]. With significanthelp of information technologies, evolving since 1980, the new step was made, emerged aconcept of FMS(Flexible Manufacturing System). In the end of 80th - beginning of 90thfocus of attention shifted toward product design, manufacturing equipment configuration andnew products management issues. At that time concepts of PDM
, deliberate practice is usually focused on one component skill ata time, which results in less cognitive load and more specificity. Contemporary theories ofexpertise development have highlighted the influence of deliberate practice (DP) on achievingexceptional performance in sports, music, and various professional fields. Concurrently, there isan emerging method for improving learning efficiency of novices by combining deliberate practicewith cognitive load theory (CLT), a cognitive-architecture-based theory for instructional design.Mechanics is a foundation for most branches of engineering. It serves to develop problem-solvingskills and consolidate understanding of other subjects, such as applied mathematics and physics.Mechanics has been a
● What would a “just” pay system look like in each of the four Justice in Pay organizational justice areas (distributive, procedural, informational, Processes and interpersonal)? Building ● Developing a professional development program for pay decision- Knowledge About makers Faculty Pay ● Address decision-making AND communicating decisions Communicating ● Engage communication experts Salary-Related ● Consider the audience Topics ● Plan the content ● Anticipate responses in advanceAdditional representatives could be from offices of research, finance, strategic planning andinitiatives, information technology, communications, and/or the
-solving skills of senior high school students using PhysProSS-CAT,” REID: Research and Evaluation in Education, 4(2), 144–154, 2018. https://doi.org/10.21831/REID.V4I2.2221812[34] B. Ozdemir and S. Gelbal, “Measuring language ability of students with compensatory multidimensional CAT: A post-hoc simulation study,” Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6273–6294, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-021-10853- 0/FIGURES/4[35] S. Saarinen, E. Cater, and M. L. Littman, “Applying prerequisite structure inference to adaptive testing,” ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 422–427, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375541[36] B. Keskin and M. Gunay, "A survey on computerized adaptive testing," 2021
Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Education, International Journal of Engineering Education, Transactions of ASME, Chemical Engineering Journal, Bioresource Technology, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, and Combustion and Flame. She is a member of the ASEE, ASME, and the Algae Biomass Organization. Dr. Shuman served as Chair for the ASEE Energy Conversion and Conservation Division. She received a Dipl. Ing. degree in mechanical engineering from Belgrade University and an M.S.M.E. and a Ph.D. from the University of Washington. She has held the title of Paccar Professor and is an Affiliate Professor at the University of Washington.Dr. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville
University of Arizona.Dr. Fei-Yue Wang, Chinese Academy of SciencesDr. Wangping Sun, Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Wangping is a professor of Oregon Institute of Technology.Dr. Xisong Dong, Qingdao Academy of Intelligent Industries Xisong Dong received the B. Sc. degree in applied mathematics in 2001 and Ph. D. degree in control theory and control engineering in 2007 from the University of Science and Technology Beijing, China. He worked as a post-doctor at the Center of Information Security from 2007 to 2010 in Beijing University of Posts and Communications, China. He is currently an Assistant Professor at the State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of
, by itsnature, be comprehensive or holistic (Demarest & Sugimoto, 2015; Repko & Szostak, 2017).Challenges that are inherent in discipline-specific education also exist in science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Based on the literature, three challenges seemto emerge. First, globally, improving STEM education has become a concern. In recent years,there has been a decline in the motivation and interest of learners, particularly in Westerncountries and more affluent nations in Asia, to pursue STEM fields (Thomas & Watters, 2015).However, the demand for STEM skills is on the rise as we face increasingly complex globalchallenges (Kelley & Knowles, 2016). This poses a challenge as there is a disconnect
provide faculty with a better understanding of the practical industry application of engineering, manufacturing, information technology and business skills 2. To help faculty enhance the content of undergraduate education in ways that will better Page 15.388.2 prepare tomorrow's graduates for careers in a global environment 3. To have faculty observe the Boeing environments, processes, and procedures with "fresh perspectives." Faculty will use their expertise to help identify areas for possible improvements and document their observations at Boeing.The program is an obvious win/win situation for all involved. The
the varioussectors discussed diverse aspects of Peace Engineering and, in general, conference participantsagreed that the new global engineers, leaders and professionals need to be multi-disciplinary witha new mindset to solve global challenges. Among the aspects of Peace Engineering education theparticipants learned at the conference, they mentioned: a better idea of what Peace Engineeringis, including teaching students about compassion; the skill changes needed and the strain it willput on an already loaded curriculum as we add dimension like ethics, security and understandingof information technology; and an understanding of “good” and “bad” examples of PeaceEngineering.We also identified the overarching components of Peace Engineering
, especially those inengineering management roles, with the skills to successfully navigate work in systemsintegrating automation, artificial intelligence, data and people.To better prepare engineering management students to navigate contemporary work systems,new modules and projects that focus on emerging trends in the future of work were introducedinto the work analysis and design course offered to engineering management graduate students.The goal of this course was to apply engineering methods to improve work systems while alsoidentifying opportunities to modernize them through the adoption of emerging technologies suchas AI, computer vision, sensors, exoskeleton suits, and virtual and augmented reality. Towardsthis end, course materials were
Paper ID #36897Assessing Engineering Sketching Skills on Object AssemblyTasksHillary E. Merzdorf (Graduate Student) Hillary Merzdorf is a Ph.D. candidate at Purdue University in the School of Engineering Education. Her research interests are in flexible assessment practices incorporating both traditional psychometrics and technology-based approaches, digital engineering education tools, and cognitive engineering methods for learning research.Donna Jaison Graduate Student at Texas A&M University.Morgan Weaver (Graduate Research Assistant)Kerrie A Douglas (Assistant Professor of Engineering Education) Dr