Structural Health Monitoring Using Computer Vision, he joined UCF in 2010 as a Lecturer at the Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering (CECE) Department. He has published computer vision related research work in prominent journals and still mentors graduate students in this particular area. Dr. Zaurin has been very active in the STEM area as he is one of the selected faculty members for the NSF funded EXCEL and NSF funded COMPASS programs at UCF. Dr. Zaurin received College Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching Award in 2015, TIP Award in 2016, and also received 4 Golden Apple Awards for Undergraduate Teaching for a record four years in a row. During Fall 2013 he created IDEAS (Interdisciplinary Display for
not fit into any of the categories previously describedand still need further research to develop a description for these microaggressions and werementioned in 33% of the papers. The results suggest that exoticism is the most frequentlyexperienced microaggression by Asian women while emasculation is the most frequentlyexperienced microaggressions by Asian men. Nevertheless, exoticism is much more prevalent forAsian women. Table 6: Microaggressions types experiences by Asians, Asian Men and Asian Women Microaggressions Type Asian Asian Men Asian Women Alien in own land 60% Ascription of intelligence 33% Denial of racial identity
teams to solve aproblem. Our study uses an identity lens to understand Latinx persistence in engineering.Theoretical Framework and Literature Review We draw from a sociocultural theory of identity [5] - [7] to understand how Latinxengineering students see their trajectory through engineering studies and how they decide onnext steps, whether it be entering the engineering workforce or pursuing graduate school. Briefly,this perspective argues that identities are situated in social and cultural worlds that are populatedby social types that members of those worlds recognize as meaningful, i.e., their actions and theiruse of cultural artifacts such as words, images or texts [8]. Literature over the past decade indicates that developing
using the results of online homework. Davis &McDonald5 reported that students performed significantly better when a combination of onlineand handwritten homework was used compared to just handwritten homework. However, theyobserved that some students became frustrated when they could not identify minor inaccuraciesin their work within the online system.The availability of online homework systems varies. Stowell6 observed that commercialproviders of online homework are generally limited in upper-level engineering coursework andtypically are only available for the large enrollment classes of statics and dynamics. Anexperiment in creating online homework for a chemical engineering class found it was wellreceived by both students and faculty
Laboratory (San Jose, California), and Com- piler Developer at Kuck & Associates (Champaign, Illinois). He has held a visiting research position at the US Air Force Research Laboratory (Rome, New York). He has been a Nokia Distinguished Lecturer (Finland) and Fulbright Specialist (Austria and Germany). He has received the NSF Career Award (USA). He is a Fellow of the IEEE.Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta is Assistant Research Professor in Physics and Keystone Instructor in the A. J. Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. Broadly speaking he is interested in modeling learning and reasoning processes. In particular, he is attracted to fine-grained analysis of video
valve dis- ease. Currently, she is investigating cyber-based student engagement strategies in flipped and traditional biomedical engineering courses. She aspires to understand and improve student attitude, achievement, and persistence in student-centered courses.Dr. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory
College, Columbia University. Her BA is also from Columbia.Dr. Mia K. Markey, The University of Texas at Austin Dr. Mia K. Markey is a Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Engineering Foundation Endowed Faculty Fellow in Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin as well as Adjunct Professor of Imaging Physics at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. A 1994 graduate of the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy, Dr. Markey earned her B.S. in computational biology (1998) from Carnegie Mellon University and her Ph.D. in biomedical engineering (2002), along with a certificate in bioinformatics, from Duke University. The mission of Dr. Markey’s Biomedical Informatics Lab is to develop decision
education.Dr. Sivachandran Chandrasekaran P.E., Deakin University Dr. Sivachandran Chandrasekaran is a Research Fellow in Engineering Education at Deakin University. He has graduated his BE (CSE) in India and ME, MES (Electronics) from Victoria University and PhD (Engineering Education) from Deakin University respectively. He is active member of Deakin engineer- ing education research Centre (DEERC), School of engineering in the Faculty of science, Engineering and Built Environment at Deakin University. Siva is an active researcher and his research interests in- clude creativity and innovation in learning and teaching, Design based learning, Cloud learning & located learning and engineering education innovation. His
students as they move through these institutionalized trajectories. He is co-editor of a 2010 National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Learning Research as a Human Science. Other work has appeared in Linguistics and Education; Mind, Culture, and Activity; Anthropology & Education Quarterly, the Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science; the Journal of Engineering Education; and the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. His teaching interests include develop- mental psychology; sociocultural theories of communication, learning, and identity; qualitative methods; and discourse analysis.Dr. Frederick A. Peck, University of Montana Frederick Peck is Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education in
Paper ID #16044Lessons Learned in Teaching Heat Transfer with a Flipped ClassroomDr. Francis Wessling, University of Alabama, Huntsville Professor, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, 1985 - present Former Chair of the Department (1999 - 2003, 2007) Fellow, ASME Associate Director, Consor- tium for Materials Development in Space 1985 - 1999 Professor, Mechanical Engineering, University of New Mexico, 1967 - 1979Dr. Sarah A Roller, University of Alabama in Huntsville Sarah A. Roller is an Assistant Professor in Mathematics Education at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. She
couples arrive willing to make significant sacrifices of financial resources, toendure a roller coaster of emotions, and possibly to struggle over moral quandaries theymay face in the process of achieving their aspiration to have a family. The convictionbeing, that the design and development of technological artifacts happens only within alarger social context. The students needed to understand that before they could appreciatethe ethics involved. As explained by D. Johnson [4]: “Once developed, artifacts do not function in isolation; they are always embedded in social activities, a social context. This is true whether we think about a simple artifact such as a baby bottle or a complex artifact such as a nuclear power plant
consistently reminded and encouraged throughout the course.To help support these three big ideas, the book also shares several tips for teachers:Explain to students how learning worksStudents are naturally concerned with grades; thus many of their learning practices develop as aneffort to maximize their grades, not learning. They also dislike frustration and unnecessarydifficulty, which can lead to resentment if something seems difficult without reason. Because ofthis, the teacher can help students understand how learning works and point to specific ways theclass structure and their study habits can help the learning process. For example, the practice of“flipping the classroom,” where students go learn on their own and then meet together with
Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Under- graduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Biele- feldt serves as the chair of ASEE’s Community Engagement Division and on the AAAS Committee for Scientific Freedom and Responsibility. She is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Jacquelyn F
Paper ID #251684th Grade Engineering – Building Upon the Curriculum of Science, Math,and Creativity to Inspire the Next Generation of Engineers (Evaluation)Dr. John C. Oliva, Corteva Agriscience Dr. John C. Oliva has had a diverse career spanning the fields of academia and industry. John spent the first part of his career teaching mechanical engineering as a full-time faculty member, first at Kettering University and later at Grand Valley State University. He then transitioned to the corporate world where he has spent the more recent portion of his career as a professional engineer. John currently works as the Tools &
Page 12.251.3structural design of buildings in their curricula. In cases where the AE and CE programs arecollocated in the same department, it is common for faculty with a structures background to teach bothAE and CE students, often in the same class. In universities where they are in separate departmentsand in some cases separate colleges; there is either some duplication of effort or at least some cross-listing of courses.It is difficult to compare the 17 AE programs since four of the programs (Penn State, University ofKansas, Kansas State, and Oklahoma State) are five year programs, while the others are four yearprograms. Most of the schools are on a semester system with the exception of Cal Poly, Drexel, andMilwaukee which are on a quarter
2006-1336: THE ROLE OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN ENGINEERINGATTRITIONGuili Zhang, University of Florida Guili Zhang is research assistant professor in College of Engineering, University of Florida. She received a Ph.D. in Research and Evaluation Methodology at the University of Florida. She also received a B.A. in British and American Language and Literature at Shandong University, China, and a Master of Education degree at Georgia Southern University. Previously, she served as a staff development specialist and researcher at Jinan District Education Commission, China, and took part in the writing and revision of the National Unified Text Books and Teacher’s Reference Books. She
and ASME. She is also a National Research Council-US AFRL Summer Faculty Fellow of the Human Effectiveness Directorate for 2002, 2003 and 2004.Madara Ogot, Pennsylvania State University Madara Ogot is an Associate Professor in Engineering Design and Mechanical Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University. He is the co-author, along with Gül Okudan of an introductory engineering design text, Engineering Design: A Practical Guide. His current research interests include design under uncertainty, stochastic optimization and innovative design. He received his BSE from Princeton in 1987, and his MS and Ph.D. from the Pennsylvania State University in 1989 and 1991, respectively.Girish Rao
Barbara, studying the transport and fate of PCBs and sediments in the Saginaw River. She has been a member of the Engineering department at Harvey Mudd College since 1995, and has served as Associate Dean of Faculty for Academic Affairs. She is the co-author of the Journal of Engineering Education paper, ”Use of ”Studio” Methods in the Introductory Engineering Design Curriculum” and co-developer of the sophomore-level rocket-based experimental engineering lab course at HMC. Dr. Cardenas is currently exploring novel pedagogy for Introductory Environmental Engineering courses.Dr. David Wayne Kelley, Department of Geography, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, MN Dr. David Kelley, Associate Professor and Chair, Department
University on the subject of Business Ethics for Engineering Students since 2003, and has been an instructor in Business Law at Albertus Magnus College. Mr. Ware earned his B.A. in Political Science from Amherst College, and his J.D. from the University of Connecticut School of Law.Prof. David J. Ahlgren, Trinity College David J. Ahlgren is Karl W. Hallden professor of Engineering at Trinity College and is director and host of the Trinity College Fire-Fighting Home Robot Contest. Professor Ahlgren has been a faculty member at Trinity College since 1973. His current professional interests include educational robotics with real-world applications. Prof. Ahlgren received the B.S. in Engineering from Trinity College, the
.Manufacturers have embraced lean manufacturing during the slow down in the economyas one method of remaining profitable5. Having students experience lean manufacturing concepts in the laboratory canhave a positive effect on the experiences offered to the students prior to them entering theindustrial setting. It is important that faculty provide students with the experiences thatdevelop a strong conceptual framework of how this management practice will benefit theindustry in which they work. Many of our students learn best when they are actively engaged in activities thatemphasize the concepts that we are trying to teach. This paper will focus on a NationalInstitute of Standards (NIST) developed Lean Manufacturing Workshop and a project
their peers and compete in local and regionalscience fairs.This project was a joint effort between high school teachers who participated in the 2011Research Experience for Teachers in Nanotechnology (RET-Nano), students in the 2011Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU), their graduate mentors and faculty. The Page 25.617.2RET-Nano teachers and REU students/mentors worked together to develop lesson plansand activities to scaffold the high school student’s learning experience. The REU studentsdesigned, built the tested the experimental hardware for the electrospinning traveling kit.And the graduate mentor travelled to all of the schools to
2005, American Society for Engineering Educationwe state that today’s business world is experiencing a new industrial revolution. Only throughthorough education, it is possible to achieve the most ambitious goals in manufacturing. The authors have developed courses and modified some others to focus on expandingstudents understanding and skills in “Lean Manufacturing.” Major educational emphasis areplaced on: 1. - Understanding the theory, concepts, policies, procedures and steps of LeanManufacturing. 2. - Determining the major causes that create “waste” in factories and how to implementthese modern techniques. 3. - Determining how Lean Manufacturing can be the answer to several problems inmodern factories as a way
AC 2010-1776: DOES CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING MATTER: PATTERNSOF ERROR IN SENIOR ENGINEERING STUDENTS PROBLEM-SOLVING INSTATICS?Tameka Clarke Douglas, Purdue University Tameka Clarke Douglas is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Engineering and Computing at the University of Technology, Jamaica (UTech). Before coming to UTech, Tameka was a PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She was a George Washington Fellow and Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Engineering Education, Purdue University. Her primary research interests are studying communities of practice and difficult concepts in science and engineering.Aidsa Santiago Roman, University of
Paper ID #9573Does Engineering Attract or Repel Female Students Who Passionately Wantto Help People?Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt, Ph.D., P.E., is a Professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, & Architec- tural Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. She has been on the faculty since 1996. She serves as the ABET Assessment Coordinator for the Department. Professor Bielefeldt teaches introduc- tory courses for first year engineering students, senior capstone design, and environmental engineering specialty courses. She conducts engineering education
one of these computational tools (all of whom are former students of mine), many of themcontinue to use these tools after graduation. Developing extensions or toolkits for software thatthe students will use after graduation seems more appropriate than developing complete softwarepackages that will only be used by students in an educational environment. Because of the needfor thermochemical functions for the widely used computational tools, functions were generatedto evaluate the thermodynamic properties of air and the thermochemical properties of twelvespecies of the CHON system in MathCAD.Each computational analysis package has strengths and weaknesses when compared to theothers. EES also has the thermodynamic functions discussed here (and
faculty as system components. The defining feature of this strategy is that it does not require specialequipment or software to clarify fundamental engineering concepts. Empty-handed demonstrations aredynamic, illustrative and interactive, and increase course effectiveness. Forms of active learning thatengage the students beyond lecture have been shown to have lasting value in the students' memory(Bransford et al., 2000; Felder & Brent, 2003). Our ambition is to generate a conference session todemonstrate, share, compile, and catalog some of these no-tech teaching tools. Our secondary objective isto stimulate engineering educators to think “inside the box” of the classroom and realize that, with someingenuity, the world around us is replete
School of Engineering, another element has been added to the FEAclass in the Mechanical Engineering Technology Program: a mechanics of materials laboratoryin which physical experiments are conducted to support the analysis exercises.In this paper, the course content will be discussed, with emphasis on the specific lab exercisesthat allow measured results to be compared to FEA results.IntroductionFinite element analysis is a subject area that is now commonly taught in Mechanical EngineeringTechnology (MET) programs. Several authors1,2,3 have reported on the development ofundergraduate courses in mechanical engineering and mechanical engineering technologyprograms. Others 4,5 have reported on efforts to add finite element analysis to
reason cited for this disproportionate attrition is that females who do remain in theSTEM workforce are more likely to experience discrimination and generally be paid less thantheir male counterparts. Structural reasons are often blamed for this, especially among thosefemales who are balancing a family with a career19,20. For example, a mother who cannot worklate because she must pick up her children from school may appear less dedicated to her job andthereby be passed over for promotion. With the cycle building upon itself, the family memberwho earns less is the logical choice to care for the family, and this further hinders that person’sprofessional development. It must be noted that the negative impacts of these issues extend tomales as well
AC 2012-3805: SERVICE-BASED FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING PROJECTS:DO THEY MAKE A DIFFERENCE?Dr. Malinda S. Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder Malinda S. Zarske is the Director of K-12 Engineering Education at the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. A former high school and middle school science and math teacher, she has advanced degrees in teaching secondary science from the Johns Hopkins University and in civil engineering from CU, Boulder. She is also a First-year Engineering Projects Instructor and on the development team for the TeachEngineering.org digital library. Her primary research interests are on the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity
student learning of the concepts introduced in the course lecture. Tofacilitate this goal, the laboratory section was divided up into hands on experimentation anddemonstration sessions. Furthermore, the documented success of cooperative learning inspired usto include principles of cooperative learning into the laboratory structure as well. As a result,CEAL was created. CEAL stands for Cooperative and Experimental Learning Initiative.Additionally, a course web page with video, pictures, and software applications was developed tosupplement student learning. This paper introduces the fundamental concepts behind CEAL andoutlines practical examples on how it was implemented into the laboratory structure of theaforementioned course. Finally, results of