into therealm of engineering leadership work. We do not purport that this conditional sub-sample representsall individuals in our sample engaging in engineering leadership-related work (especially given non-positional and distributed modes of leadership [18]), yet we required a consistent method of boundingthe scope of occupational experiences on which to focus, given the quantity and variety of occupationaloutcomes we observed. There are undoubtedly many others among our sample pursuing or engagingin engineering leadership across different types of careers or earlier in their engineering leadershipjourneys; for these reasons, we frame the findings that follow as pertinent to the engineeringleadership education community without claiming they
use traditional natural language processing techniques, such asLatent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) [23], to automatically detect topics from students’ questionsand match suitable answers. However, LDA, by itself, lacks language generation capabilities,limiting its role to that of an automated text pre-processing module within chatbots.Despite the active interest of the existing CSCL community in deploying conversation agents, therole of a large language model with language generation capabilities as a conversation agentremains largely unexplored. While significant technical advancements have been made in naturallanguage processing, their impact on student engagement during CSCL activities requiresthorough investigation to demystify their
Psychology in Education and has held both elected and appointed offices in the American Psychological Association (APA) and the Motivation Special Interest Group of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction.Dr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University Dr. Michael Prince is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University and co-director of the National Effective Teaching Institute. His research examines a range of engineering education topics, including how to assess and repair student misconceptions and how to increase the adoption of research- based instructional strategies by college instructors and corporate trainers. He is actively engaged in presenting workshops on instructional
; any of these tools can effectively drive theviewer's attention to key information quickly, improving viewer engagement and setting the toneof a presentation.To understand Typography, one can approach the text as “a continuous field whose grain, color,density and silhouette can be endlessly adjusted” [6]. Effective visual communication can beachieved solely on the basis of Typography, if necessary, as Hierarchy, Alignment, andWhitespace are all ingrained components of effective Typography.Key tips for improving Typography include the following: • Urge research of effective font pairings to improve consistency and avoid using too many font styles. The site Fontpair is a helpful resource. • Encourage students to avoid widows, orphans
the constructs of interest. Specifically, this data setenabled testing hypotheses related to the impact an engineering identity has on students’ leadershipself-efficacy, while controlling for the impacts of a large number of other variables. Through thisinvestigation, this work adds to the engineering leadership education communities understandingof the relationship between an engineering identity and the kinds of leadership outcomes many inthe community are interested in developing.Data Source and SampleThe data for this study were taken from the 2013 College Senior Survey (CSS), an annual, nationalsurvey of college students administered at the end of their fourth year of college by the CooperativeInstitutional Research Program (CIRP) at the
-efficacy31, persuasive communication and vicarious learningexperiences can also have an important impact on self-efficacy32,33.The concept of self-efficacy has been applied to a variety of different professions and academicdisciplines, including the study of teachers and teaching. As noted by Skaalvick and Skaalick32, acommon conceptualization of teacher self-efficacy is the perceived ability to bring out desirededucational outcomes through the development, organization, and implementation of educationalactivities. Teacher self-efficacy has been found to increase if teachers believe that it is withintheir power to influence students in an educational environment34. Importantly, low self-efficacyhas been found to correlate negatively with
. This is not surprising, as these courses includeResnick’s 4Ps – projects, peers, passion, play – for developing as creative thinkers [13]2.2. Vision and GoalsOur vision is that MRE will become one of the most impactful disciplines of engineering;attracting diverse and innovative students, graduating professional engineers who will design,develop, and implement transformative autonomous technologies, and improving health andwelfare sectors while extending human reach to previously inaccessible realms large and small,near and far.To reach our vision, our long-term goals are to: • Develop a diverse, inclusive community of MRE educators, students, and practitioners • Define the MRE knowledgebase as a community • Achieve recognition of MRE as
pedagogy and, through the guidance of faculty, facilitate student learningby encouraging active engagement in and out of the classroom. LAs are not Teaching Assistants(TAs) who are involved in grading; the focus of the LA is on assisting students throughout thelearning process, as a peer mentor who has recently taken the course, which enables them toprovide guidance and insight from the student perspective.The major assessments were homework, exams, and a group project. A single data set that waslocal, freely available and discipline-specific was used for all six homework assignments in datascience. Table 1 presents these formative assessments with topics introduced using same data set.Using the same data throughout the course helps students
engineer. The number of women inthe STEM disciplines and the community are key factors that influence the career goals of afemale student.3.6.1 Women professionals in science, technology or mathematics disciplinesThe authors believe that women professionals have a great impact on the educational goals oftheir daughters. The causal relationship of women professionals in science, technology ormathematics disciplines is shown in Figure 3.6. Female students, who have parents in science,technology or mathematics disciplines, are highly exposed to career options in the STEM field.The exposure raises greater chances of female students to choose a career in a STEM field. Adouble line that is perpendicular to the arrow at the arrows handle marks a link as
-concept.Entrepreneurial self-concept should motivate individuals to engage in goal-directed behaviorsthat put them on a path to being entrepreneurs; hence, entrepreneurial self-concept should lead toentrepreneurial proclivity, including entrepreneurial intentions, entrepreneurial knowledgeacquisition, and entrepreneurial action. Importantly, these psychological states are malleable[38], e.g. [41], [44] and therefore likely to be impacted by carefully designed interventions.Relatable role models We propose that exposure to appropriate role models can help instill entrepreneurialself-concept in female students. Most students likely have had limited direct experience withentrepreneurial activity and, hence, might not understand what it entails or view it as
beingexposed to non-AEC communities will support the development of a well-rounded student. ACivil Engineering RP noted, “Honestly, I feel that my program did a really nice job exposingfirst-year students to industry. I appreciate this considering time is of the essence and knowingwhat you like and what you know you do not want from a job is crucial. The only thing I wishmy program did was advertise organizations not related to engineering as well, in order todevelop more well-roundly. Consequently, RPs wished that AEC programs will increase studentaccess to non-AEC resources and opportunities. Considering the rigor of AEC programs,students could also benefit from improvement in mental health if they engaged in non-AECventures. An Architecture RP
survey that was used, the group of individuals that were contacted to answerthe survey, and the set of those that responded to the survey.Survey descriptionA survey was created to gain insight into how different universities incorporate traffic operationsconcepts as part of their transportation engineering curricula and instructional methods used toengage students with this material. Respondents were told in the survey that the “…survey isspecifically focused on the teaching of traffic operations/engineering, including topics such astraffic stream characteristics, data collection studies, intersection control/warrants, signal controland design, Highway Capacity Methodologies, transportation impact studies, signalcoordination, among others
community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service- learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Ms. Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder Madeline Polmear is a PhD candidate in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural En- gineering at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Her research interests include ethics education and the societal impacts of engineering and technology.Dr. Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc. Dr. Canney conducts research focused on engineering education, specifically the development
STEM FieldsAbstractAs demand for qualified workers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)fields continues to rise, there is a need to not only consider how to improve engagement andretention, but also an opportunity to strive towards broadening participation. To create a moreequitable workforce, and in particular, one that encourages the enrollment and persistence ofunderrepresented minorities, pedagogy centered around cultivating inclusivity is key. Along theselines, empathy as a construct can play a crucial role in aiding students to consider the impact oftheir own decisions and behaviors on others and society. Given the necessity of embedding theconcept of empathy within post-secondary education, we sought to understand
longitudinal data can becollected. However, there are some results from the earlier 2004 and 2005 cohorts thatsuggest the RREE community is being sustained.Table 5 summarizes the responses to quantitative questions on the follow-up e-surveycompleted one year after the workshop by the 2004 and 2005 cohorts. In both cases,participants continued to engage in a variety of engineering education activities. Mostrelevant to the current discussion of networks and communities of practice are responsesto questions about intellectual neighbors and collaboration. More than two-thirds (69%)of 2005 participants stayed in touch with their intellectual neighbors in the year followingtheir workshop, and 31% collaborated with someone they had met or contacted as a
development of different technologies, products and infrastructures? Who may beharmed? Most fundamentally, the Grand Challenges proceed from the premise that engineeringresearch, construction, invention, and production are to take precedence over their absence, asbefits a body dedicated not to the contraction of such enterprises but to their extension. Yet theinterests of sustainability, global health, and other areas of human well-being might be bestserved in certain cases by just such a turning away from engineering. By making explicit thesocial and historical assumptions of the NAE’s Grand Challenges, and probing the implicationsof those assumptions for a diverse range of actors and communities, we may pave the way formore thoughtful engagement
’ understanding of grammar for both STEM andhumanities/social sciences students alike, but also engaged students’ interest in applying theirlearning toward the study of language beyond grammar. On the other hand, my trial class alsorevealed that, for some students (those who dropped the class during weeks one and two), theprospect and very nature of studying grammar through the lens of math was immediately off-putting—to the extent that these students opted not to try it and to study grammar moreconventionally or not at all.Feedback from Students, Start to FinishWhen I launched the class on the first day, along with addressing the students’ confusion aboutclass focus and matters of enrollment, I distributed 3x5 notecards and asked the students to dotwo
with the supervisor, but in case of failure of thiselement, it could be replaced with relatedness with the academic community. The CLD offigure 3 presents the resulting sequence. Figure 3. Causal Loop Diagram for hypothesis 3VI. DiscussionThis study aims to advance the understanding of the dynamics between factors that affect thepersistence of URM students in their doctoral programs. By exploring the results of differentstudies, we extracted causal relations between factors and built two CLDs as the initial base for aSystem Dynamic Model. The first CLD provides information on how a positive relationship withthe supervisor can enhance a feedback loop that involves raising the student’s sense ofcontribution, engagement
methodology for making thisconversion was available, which became a key motivation for writing this paper. A number ofworks chronicled the relative advantages and disadvantages of the quarter and semester systems.Bostwick et.al. [4] contended that conversion to the semester system negatively impacts on-timegraduation rates and specifically lowers first-year grades, decreases the probability of enrollingin a full course load, and delays the timing of major choice. Johnson and Kestler [5] conducted amixed methods study, involving a sample of Midwestern university students’ favoritism towardquarters and semesters, the students’ predicted and perceived changes to their motivatedbehaviors, and their self-reported motivation/learning strategies during the
“Develop ways to give back to your community,” ZJUI improved their abilitymore than the Grainger sections in 2021, but no significant difference was identified by semesterwithin each section. Finally, there were no significant differences between the two universitysections regardless of semester when it came to the learning outcomes “Ask compellingquestions” or “work in diverse teams.”4. Summary and Conclusions COIL courses were first implemented in Fall of 2020. Through continued implementationand improvement of this survey tool, a stronger sample set can be constructed to betterunderstand the impact that COIL projects in engineering courses have on student learningoutcomes. The Cultural Competency Scores were likely higher in the pre
quickly advance from novice to expert problem solvers. He has co-authored over 120 referred technical articles and has won numerous awards for his teaching. In his role as Vice Provost, Archie’s major responsibilities include areas related to the undergraduate educational experience including advising, expanding and enhancing university-wide high impact experi- ences, and connections between academic and student affairs. He also works on building the interdisci- plinary capacity of U.Va. and further efforts to establish institutes and centers to foster interdisciplinary research and education.Dr. Brian P Kirkmeyer, Miami University Brian Kirkmeyer is the Karen Buchwald Wright Assistant Dean for Student Success and
Paper ID #20033Characterizing the Alignment in Faculty and Student BeliefsDr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for nearly 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country. His current research
long-termcommitment to increase diversity in engineering is an organic way to promote an inclusive andequitable environment with a strong sense of belonging for all students, faculty and staff. Giventhe increasingly diverse and multicultural world, the question is “how do we prepare ourfirst-year engineering students with the knowledge, skills and abilities (KSA) necessary to ensurethey are provided an opportunity to reach their potential in this regard?” The proposed workshopwill engage participants in a series of novel activities, which are grounded in the literature thatare developmentally appropriate to help first-year students discover their communication styleand learn how said style impacts their interactions with others.The purpose of
populations, teaching practices, and community college students. Her dis- sertation will be a Phenemological case study on community college students in a Research Experience for Undergraduate (REU) Program.Mr. Alireza Dayerizadeh, North Carolina State University Alireza received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of South Florida in 2015. His previous industry experience includes engineering roles at DPR Construction, Jabil, GE Aviation, and Stryker Communications. In the Fall of 2016, Alireza began pursing a PhD in Power Electronics at North Carolina State University. He is a recipient of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department’s Merit Fellowship (2016) and the NSF Graduate Research
variations on the exact definition ofinquiry based instruction exist. The NRC4 identifies five critical features of inquiry that extendacross all K-12 levels:1. Learners are engaged by scientifically oriented questions.2. Learners give priority to evidence, which allows them to develop and evaluate explanations that address scientifically oriented questions.3. Learners formulate explanations from evidence to address scientifically oriented questions.4. Learners evaluate their explanations in light of alternative explanations, particularly those reflecting scientific understanding.5. Learners communicate and justify their proposed explanations.Minner et al5 performed a meta-analysis of 138 studies to examine the impact of inquiry basedinstruction
of the Center for Engineering Edu- cation at the Colorado School of Mines, where he has taught chemical engineering and interdisciplinary courses and conducted engineering education research for the past 26 years. Miller has received three university-wide teaching awards and has held a Jenni teaching fellowship at CSM. He has received grant awards for education research from the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Education FIPSE program, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the Colorado Commission on Higher Education and has published widely in engineering education literature. His research interests include measuring and repairing engineering student misconceptions in thermal and
Paper ID #27113Relying on Sight as the Primary Sense: Employing Deaf Students in STEMand Design FieldsMs. Wendy A. Dannels, Rochester Institute of Technology/National Technical Institute for the Deaf Wendy A. Dannels is a research associate professor in the Center on Access Technology at the Rochester Institute of Technology/National Technical Institute for the Deaf (NTID). Her primary goal is to generate more collaborative partnerships that will assist lifelong learners in deaf education and the greater deaf and hard-of-hearing communities, particularly putting them on an equal footing in term of accessibility issues
there is a statistically significant correlation betweenhigher term GPAs and more time spent in SI. [1] [11] [12]It has also been found that factors that are not easy to measure, such as long-term retention ofcourse information, communication skills, teamwork, and information processing skills, areimproved when students engage in SI. [8] Students who take advantage of SI have been found tohave a better attention span, could study for longer periods of time, were less dependent on “lastminute” studying, and were more accustomed to being helped or helping other classmatesunderstand difficult course work. [13] These findings support a similar study that determinedstudents who not only found extra resources (e.g. recitation, on-line availability of
dialogue about the ethics of the Grand Challenges – boththe specific challenges described and the process that produced them. May the conversationcontinue.References1. Ross, P. (2010). Space Exploration: Science, Engineering and Social Impact in a Freshman Technical Communication Course. ASEE Annual Conference.2. Johnson, G. and Siller, T. (2010) A 21st Century Undergraduate Engineering Education Program. ASEE Annual Page 22.1677.9 Conference.3. Savilonis, B., Spanagel, D., and Wobbe, K. (2010). Engaging Students with Great Problems. ASEE Annual Conference.4. Bottomley, L., Lavelle, J., and Martin-Vega, L. (2010
engagement in global programs in the College of Engineering. Some of her most significant accomplishments are establishing a shared vision among stakeholders by jointly developing and implementing the strategic plan, and leading her team to double student participation in global programs while elevating the value and impact of the global program on the students’ learning experience; establish new models of global experience (global research and internship, global virtual courses, and multidisciplinary project-based field trips); and create and implemente many long-lasting global programs in collaboration with faculty members and international partners. Dr. Alves commenced her employment at Texas A&M in 2005 as Assistant