provide a broader range of learning opportunities.Introduction: Case Studies and ReengineeringCases studies are designed scenarios that develop analytical and decision-making process skills inengineering students [8]. Engineering management (EM) instructors often use the case study method todeliver integrated concepts and knowledge within an illustrative, simple format, or story line, that mayhave very complex content. This combination of simple story line and complex content can be helpful inguiding the development of real problem solving skills within future engineers. Niewoehner [2] suggestthat the case study offers an opportunity to broaden student perspective and increase critical thinkingthrough the use of real, complex examples from
for Undergraduate Studies and Wayne and Juanita Spinks Professor of Mathematics in the College of Engineering and Science at Louisiana Tech University. She is PI on Tech’s NSF ADVANCE grant, 2014-2015 President of WEPAN, a member of the mathematical and statistical societies Joint Committee on Women, and advises a variety of women and girl-serving STEM projects and organizations. She is a past Vice President of ASEE and current Chair of the ASEE Long Range Planning Committee.Stacy Doore, University of MaineDr. Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University Roger Green received the B.S. degree in electrical and computer engineering and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of
Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in evaluation and research in engineering education, computer science education, teacher education, and
for collegesand universities to learn what impact, if any, the availability of tenure-track positions may haveon their ability to attract and retain women faculty to meet this need.Using qualitative and quantitative data, this study examines the work life balance and jobsatisfaction of women engineering and technology faculty both on and off the tenure track.Recommendations for academic policies and practices based on their responses are offered.IntroductionThe number of full time, tenured faculty positions on college and university campuses has beendeclining nationwide. In fact, the majority of faculty hires since 1990 have been off the tenuretrack; a disproportionate number of those new hires are women.1 In the 1980s, only about 12% ofthe
the evidence only supports a two-factor model, corresponding to thecare and fairness versus loyalty, authority, and sanctity foundations.[47] Although the sample forthe validation study included more than 34,000 participants from all over the world, all respondedin English, had access to a computer, and chose to visit the site.Since then, versions of the MFQ have been used in different languages in over thirty countries.Subsequent studies have found the five-factor model a better fit than alternatives in Italy [55],Germany [56], New Zealand [57], Sweden [58], the Netherlands[59], France [60], Turkey [61]and South Korea [62]. However, other studies have been unable to replicate this structure, or havehad to change behaviors described in the
exploited by industry members who are seeking to acquire more active, hands-onmethodology to train the students for their future employment [4]. This sort of collaborationwould allow for the industry representatives to get a project off the ground with minimal Page 26.525.2resources, while maintaining a relationship with the student body that might be used in the futurefor similar endeavors.A joint project like this can reap multiple benefits for the university component as well. Having aconnection established can set up a multitude of projects that can allow the students to learn avariety of skills that can be implemented in the classroom or for
, making and creating technologies to improve quality of life. (Emma)Consistent between the genders, a comparable population of male and female engineeringgraduates expressed identified motivations for their engineering work, at rates lower than theyexpressed intrinsic motivations, and never in the absence of intrinsic motivations. Identifiedmotivations were mostly within the theme of service to society although a few (both men andwomen) also discussed that they valued finding work that would make use of the time and effortthey had invested in their engineering degrees: After finishing my degree, I wanted to focus on engineering … pick a career path by starting to use what you learned in school…. Engineering was the key
dissemination of an online resilience and interpersonal communication training program.Prof. Bianca L. Bernstein, Arizona State University Bianca L. Bernstein, Ph.D. is Professor of Counseling and Counseling Psychology in the College of In- tegrative Sciences and Arts at Arizona State University. Dr. Bernstein guides the CareerWISE research program, supported by the National Science Foundation since 2006. Her over 250 publications and pre- sentations and over $4 M in external support have focused on the application of psychological science to the career advancement of women and underrepresented minorities and the development of effective learning environments for graduate education. She is a fellow of the American
AC 2011-1956: INSTITUTIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY AS A METHOD TOUNDERSTAND THE CAREER AND PARENTAL LEAVE EXPERIENCESOF STEM FACULTY MEMBERSMarisol Mercado Santiago, Purdue University Marisol Mercado Santiago is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education, Purdue Univer- sity, and a research assistant in the Research in Feminist Engineering (RIFE) group. She has a M. E. in Computer Engineering and a B. S. in Computer Science (with honors). Among her research interests are (1) culturally responsive education, (2) engineering studies, and (3) art and engineering education. Address: School of Engineering Education, Armstrong Hall, 701 W. Stadium Ave., West Lafayette, IN 47907. mercado@purdue.edu.Alice L. Pawley
three sections: 1) Identity, which explored students‟ conceptions of themselves andtheir fields of study; 2) Path, which asked students to describe their academic choices andinfluences; and, 3) Process, which focused on students‟ experiences of learning. For the presentproject, we used data from the Identity and Path sections only.Student researchers conducted interviews with student participants from the Fall 2005 throughthe Spring 2009 semesters. Interviews were then transcribed in electronic form, and linked to anAtlas.ti database (known as a Hermeneutic Unit or HU) for qualitative analysis. In addition, toprovide context for the study, demographic information collected from participants was enteredinto an SPSS database to generate
straightforward,coherent, efficient and effective as they used them within their own departments and providedguidance for faculty in the other engineering and computer science departments at MissouriUniversity of Science and Technology. Case studies are presented as well as lessons learnedfrom recent objectives and outcomes assessment exercises and accreditation visits.I. IntroductionThe radical change in the process employed by ABET to accredit engineering programs with theadvent of EC2000 has produced much anguish and confusion for faculty and administratorswithin departments and institutions attempting to meet new and changing expectations. Theterminology and methods used in outcomes-based assessment are often unfamiliar to engineeringfaculty even
Paper ID #33685Rethinking the Curricular Complexity Framework for Transfer StudentsDr. David Reeping, University of Michigan Dr. David Reeping is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Engineering Education Research Program at the Univer- sity of Michigan. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech and was a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow. He received his B.S. in Engineering Education with a Mathematics minor from Ohio Northern University. His main research interests include transfer student information asymmetries, threshold concepts in electrical and computer engineering, agent-based
-teaching-opinion [Last accessed 3 October 2024].17. Teaching and Learning in Engineering Graduate Certificate, School of Engineering Education, Purdue University, [Online]. Available: https://engineering.purdue.edu/ENE/Academics/Graduate/certificate [Last accessed 3 October 2024].18. Engineering Education, University of Colorado Boulder, [Online]. Available: https://www.colorado.edu/academics/grad-engineering-education [Last accessed 4 October 2024].19. Contributors, “Best Undergraduate Engineering Programs,” US News, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/engineering [Last accessed 4 October 2024].20. Olin College of Engineering, Faculty/ Information about Olin/ Catalog 2024-25, Olin
, inevitably raising retention rates in engineering programs!Dr. Benjamin Ahn, The Ohio State University Dr. Benjamin Ahn is an Associate Professor at The Ohio State University in the Department of Engineer- ing Education.Mr. Matthew Nelson, Iowa State University My background and interests are in RF, embedded systems, and engineering education. I have a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Computer Engineering both from Iowa State University. I am now working towards my PhD in Engineering Education in th ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Understanding the Male Student Perspective of Gender Inequity in Engineering EducationAbstractIt is well
Definition Active coping Taking actions to address or confront the situation or problem Thinking about what steps to take or making action strategies to address Planning the situation or experience Seeking or receiving emotional comfort, advice, or help towards a situation Support from others Reframing Intentionally shifting perspective or interpretation of situation/experience Acceptance Tolerating the current situation and learning to live with it Denial Rejecting or refusing to accept the situation Physically reducing efforts or giving up
some concerning safety issues that need addressed and further investigated to make P-12engineering teaching and learning safer [3-4]. One study that compared results from previous P-12 science and engineering education studies found very little improvement in national and statesafety findings reported from 2002 to 2022 [4]. Moreover, a national P-12 engineering educationsafety study published in 2022 by the International Technology and Engineering EducatorsAssociation (ITEEA), in collaboration with the American Society for Engineering Education(ASEE) and the National Science Education Leadership Association (NSELA), offered anextensive overview of the status of safety in P-12 engineering education programs across theU.S. [3]. This study
Paper ID #33012Work in Progress: Assessment of Automation Labs to Facilitate ContinuousImprovementMr. Bradley Lane Kicklighter, University of Southern Indiana Brad holds a BS in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (1989) and an MS in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University (2001). His past work experience includes eleven years at Delphi (formerly Delco Electronics) as an Advanced Project Engineer, eleven years at Whirlpool Corporation as a Lead Engineer/Solution Architect, and three years at Ivy Tech Community College as an Instructor/Program Chair of Pre-Engineering. Since
virtual workshop team focused on building a community of educators passionate about expanding their knowledge concerning diversity, equity, and inclusion in engineering education. Her most recent accomplishment was being recognized as one of seven AAC&U 2019 K. Patricia Cross Scholars based on her commitment to teaching and learning and civic engagement. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 “Blessing in Disguise”: Understanding the Racialized and Gendered Experience of a Black Woman’s Pathway in an Interdisciplinary Engineering ProgramThis research paper examines the experiences of a Black woman, Simone
July 2002, Dr. Nelson joined the faculty at Western Michigan University as Chair of Civil and Construction Engineering. At Western Michigan he started the civil engineering undergraduate and graduate degree programs and also chaired the Departments of Materials Science and Engineering and Industrial Design. In summer 2005 he joined the faculty at The University of Texas at Tyler. At UT Tyler he was the founding chair of the Department of Civil Engineering and instituted the bachelor’s and master’s degree programs. In 2006 he became the Dean of Engineering and Computer Science. Dr. Nelson returned to Texas A&M University in 2016 as Assistant Vice Chancellor and Director of Special Academic Initiatives for the
often rivals reality. We tend to express our expectations of in-dividuals in entrepreneurial action with contentment, anger, frustration, confusion, and grati-tude in different ways. In seeing how men and women respond to a CEO/founder's behavior,we discover how interpersonal perceptions matter. Recent engineering graduates tell us thatthey learn about themselves by observing and listening to all sides of the story, and then theyfill in the blanks. One student, after interning as an innovation development lead explains, “Isee conflicts that I would never had expected to arise among co-workers, and some internalconflicts in my attempt to reconcile the rulebook and my own conscience. I struggle withpeople I work with in ways that may harm our
CivilEngineering Areas), 15 (Technical Specialization), 16 (Communication), 17 (Public Policy), 21(Teamwork), and 23 (Lifelong Learning). The wording of the two standards is almost identicaland those BOK2 outcomes should be fully met. There is a partial gap with respect to outcomes 5(Materials Science), 6 (Mechanics), 10 (Sustainability), 11 (Contemporary Issues and HistoricalPerspectives), 12 (Risk and Uncertainty), 13 (Project Management), 18 (Business and PublicAdministration), 19 (Globalization), 20 (Leadership), 22 (Attitudes), and 24 (Professional andEthical Responsibility). A partial gap typically indicates that the accreditation criteria include aportion of the outcome but not all of it or it requires a lower cognitive level than specified in BOK2
(SSI) have received increased attention from many science andengineering educators, as it provides a meaningful learning opportunity to improve students'argumentation skills [4] - [7]. In the SSI environment, students can formulate positions, negotiatediverse ideas, and make decisions about important issues directly related to their everyday life [8].The problems in SSI contexts are “more open-ended, debatable, complex, or ill-structured” [9,p.140] than the general scientific hypothesis in the laboratory. In this kind of environment, studentsare required to apply their epistemic understanding of argument (i.e., what counts as good evidence,what counts as a good claim) to debate, reach a consensus, or make decisions [10] - [12].Sadler [6
Engineering Studies (INES); past chair of the ASEE Liberal Education / Engineering and Society Division; and a former member of the Society for the History of Technology’s (SHOT) Executive Council. Publications include /Calculating a Natural World: Scientists, Engineers and Computers during the Rise of U.S. Cold War Research/ (MIT Press, 2006).Dr. Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Soheil FatehiBoroujeni is a postdoctoral researcher at Purdue University School of Engineering Educa- tion as well as a lead instructor at Purdue First-Year Engineering Program. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Merced in 2018.Sarah
Paper ID #9023Comparing Engineering and Business Undergraduate Students’ EntrepreneurialInterests and CharacteristicsDr. Qu Jin, Stanford University Qu Jin is a postdoctoral scholar in the Designing Education Lab at Stanford University. She earned her Ph.D. degree in Engineering Education from Purdue University in 2013, M.S. degree in Biomedical En- gineering from Purdue University in 2009, and B.S. degree in Material Science and Engineering from Tsinghua University in China in 2007. Her research interests focus on educational studies that can help improve teaching, learning, and educational policy decision makings using
research and development: development is an attempt to construct, assemble, or prepare for the first time, a device, material, technique, or Page 9.826.6 procedure, meeting a prescribe set of specifications or desired characteristics and intended to solve “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education” a specific problem. This definition includes not only mechanical devices and hardware, but such things as computer programs, chemicals, and other materials.” “The essence of this
Inadequate note-taking skills 1.31 Inability to find help when needed 1.08 Addiction to video gaming, online social 0.77 networking, etc. Inadequate preparation in written English 0.62 before coming to LETU Too involved in extracurricular activities (sports, 0.54 clubs, etc.) Inadequate computer skills 0.54 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
unrecognizable, even after decades of organizing insociety at large and in the profession specifically. What can this examination tell us about theconstruction of privilege in engineering along other axes of difference such as race, nationality,or gender, or less recognized categories like age or class? What can Queer Theory and DisabilityTheory offer the engineering education community as it seeks to understand these questions anddevelop a praxis of resistance to able-bodied heternormativity?I come to this work as a queer able-bodied white woman from a middle-class background. I amneither a queer theorist not disability theorist but am interested in discovering what engineeringeducators can learn from these areas of scholarship for diversity efforts
highlysophisticated computer programs are available (e.g., Adams), able to solve special problemsfrom the area of Multibody Systems or even nearly every general type of engineeringdynamics problem. The use of such software has some drawbacks for students however.There is a high risk to waste valuable time by learning how to use software that was notdesigned for educational use but was instead designed for large scale problems in industry.And, what is even worse, students do not really see how the software works, because thetransition from the theoretical to numerical concepts is usually not visible in the software.To deal with this challenge, this paper presents a strategy based on the software Matlab,usually known by engineering students. The proposed
definitebias in the peer ratings for the single group he interviewed. In this case, one peer lowered theratings for one peer. Falchikov 25 reported that the students felt that the calculation of a finalmark was fair and accurately reflected the group work. Mathews 6 in his qualitative studyreported some targeting of individuals in the peer rating process. Finally, Sullivan 20 in hiscooperative learning groups found a lack of a correlation (ranged from -0.14 to 0.13) between“liking” ratings of individual group members and task related functions. Sullivan used this resultto infer that “liking” did not interfere with how individuals assessed skill or attributedresponsibility.In summary, in the literature there was a clear pattern of concern for bias in
success within engineering.2.4 The Role of Institution Type. Institution type significantly impacts the transfer studentexperience, influencing their academic and social integration, as well as their overall success.Transfer shock, marked by a decline in grade point average (GPA) at the receiving institution, isfrequently observed among transfer students due to insufficient academic preparation andinstitutional support [18], [35]. The size and culture of the receiving institution can negativelyaffect transfer students, especially when transitioning from smaller institutions with a closestudent-instructor learning environment to larger research institutions that may not emphasizeinstruction in the same ways (i.e., R1 and R2) [36], [37]. For