literature points to aspects of the student’s social environment, such as feelings ofconnectedness, a sense of belonging, social self-efficacy, and social support, influencingstudents’ reported mental health measures in addition to lasting academic impacts. It is stillunclear, however, to the extent which of these concepts are present in current surveys used toassess graduate student mental health. The research question guiding this study is, Whatunderlying factors are important when looking at the mental health of science, engineering, andmathematics graduate students?This study will look specifically at the Healthy Minds Study (HMS), conducted by the HealthyMinds Network (HMN): Research on Adolescent and Young Adult Mental Health group, to tryand
list the rolesthey assume as instructors for this course. The research questions for this study are:Research Question 1: To what extent are a set of pedagogical techniques based on multiple dimensions of the “How People Learn” framework present in the instruction of a group of engineering graduate teaching assistants?Research Question 2: What roles do these engineering graduate teaching assistants assume?Methods The participants in this study were the graduate teaching assistants for a first-yearengineering course required of all engineering majors at Purdue University. This course involvestwo weekly lectures taught by a faculty member and a two-hour weekly laboratory session leadby a graduate
challenges faced byinternational students during the journey from the beginning of graduate study to graduation aremaking student life more stressful than is necessary. Due to newly introduced policy issues, rulesand regulations, students are finding their time usurped by government bureaucracy and are thusless focused on research goals and academic study. It is important for faculty mentors to be wellinformed of potential challenges in advance; this will enable them to help new internationalstudents navigate the system and achieve their goals. In this paper, a team of an internationalgraduate student and faculty seek to develop resources for potential faculty mentors and graduatestudents at institutions within North America. The goal will be to a
program, degree requirements follow that of a traditional doctor ofphilosophy degree. Students are required to pass the following milestones: establish advisorycommittee, degree plan submission, qualifying exam, internship proposal (in place of a preliminaryexam), internship objectives (in place of a research proposal), a record of study report on theirinternship experience as the dissertation and an oral defense as the final exam. A comparison chartis shown in Table 1. Table 1: Doctor of Philosophy and Doctor of Engineering Comparison PhD DEng Coursework 55hrs min. 80hrs Coursework Research
Academic Careers AbstractFor students graduating with a Ph.D. in engineering today and opting for an academiccareer, the path to eventual promotion and tenure is likely to be long and difficult. Whilenew Ph.D.s may understand the importance of continuing to do cutting-edge research,establishing a solid funding record, and obtaining strong teaching recommendations,there are many other factors important to career success of which they may be unaware.For example, they may have little knowledge of how formal promotion and tenure rulesmay be interpreted by their colleagues, what an annual performance evaluation reallymeans, how to establish a good network of mentors with whom to discuss importantcareer decisions
as fast as average (+9%- 17%) Industrial Production Managers grow more slowly than Page 13.400.5 average (+0%-8%) Artists and Related Workers (CGT) grow as fast as average (+9%-17%) Based on this information, there is a need for graduates in most areas, which are growing at least as fast as or faster than average. Based on this data, one can research
and collection of surveys in person is eliminated. Since eachstudent can access the Internet at their own convenience, there are no restrictions with respect tothe time or location to reach students, in contrast to past studies in our program1 that used fixeddistribution and collection points. Additionally, online surveys allow geographically distantrespondents to be reached, increasing the population available to be surveyed. This is importantin graduate programs where it is not uncommon for students to leave for days or weeks to go toconferences or perform research in the field or distant laboratories and hence, making it difficultto reach out to these students if survey distribution were done in the traditional way. An onlinesurvey
graduate level, many faculty still face the profound—andtime consuming—challenge of not only correcting the writing of their international students, butalso elevating their written language to a level acceptable in graduate studies. As is argued in thispaper, the origin of the previously mentioned pedagogical challenge faced by graduate faculty isthree-fold: the majority of second language writing curricula at higher education institutions donot emphasize the advanced, technical, and discipline-specific composition skills nor theelevated vocabulary indispensable to international graduate students to successfully navigate theacademic and scholarly research environment; many supervisors, committee members, andgraduate faculty often lack the time to
years on the faculty at the US Military Academy at West Point teaching civil engineering. He is a Fellow of ASCE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Imperative Issues and Elusive Solutions in Academic Integrity: A Case StudyAbstractThis research investigates the issue of academic integrity, specifically plagiarism, as it relates toand affects graduate engineering students. The scope of this project included a comprehensivereview of relevant literature and case study analysis in a large enrollment, multi-instructor, 1-credit course entitled Career Management for Engineers. This is a required course for graduateengineering students who desire to participate
Paper ID #6877Active Learning in Engineering: Perspectives from Graduate Student In-structorsDr. Tershia A. Pinder-Grover, University of Michigan Tershia Pinder-Grover is an Assistant Director at the Center for Research on Learning in Teaching (CRLT) and the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering (CRLT-Engin) at the University of Michigan (U-M). In these roles, she is responsible for teacher training for new engineering graduate student instructors (GSIs), consultations with faculty and GSIs on pedagogy, workshops on teaching and learning, and preparing future faculty programs. Prior to joining CRLT
-value and moreinnovative designs than his or her peers.This has meant designing a sustainable program with these stakeholders in mind: leadingand innovative local employers, engineering graduates, and academia. Each of thesestakeholders requires a specially attenuated message aimed at their particular perspectiveas to the role of leading design engineers. In particular, to involve academia in this processmeans that they too must be able to evaluate not only the technical competence of designfrom within a positivist1 paradigm but also the creative aspects of the work.Herein lies the difficulty. Engineering faculties, such as ours in a research-intensiveinstitution, has no experience or understanding of creative aspects of engineering designand
federalbuildings are supplied with 100% renewable energy, by the year 2030. The study is relevant tothe ASEE graduate division’s mission and it can be incorporated in any relevant engineeringgraduate level course. The study can also be linked to a renewable graduate level courses.Furthermore, it can be incorporated to interdisciplinary research leading to a degree of Master ofScience in engineering.1. Ailworth, Erin. "In Maine, a US First in Tidal Energy; Commercial Project Dedicated." The Boston Globe(Boston, MA). 25 July 2012.2. Bernitsas M.M., Raghavan K., Ben-Simon Y., Garcia E. M. H., “VIVACE (Vortex Induced Vibration AquaticClean Energy): A New Concept in Generation of Clean and Renewable Energy from Fluid Flow”, OMAE 2006; andJournal of Offshore
Page 15.1070.9make for a well-rounded and professionally skilled graduate who will thrive in theworkplace. A deeper understanding of the necessity for professional skills may helpaddress the tensions in this area. And of course, there is also a tension between makingsure the plan of study has adequate development of technical skills: the limited numberof courses in a master’s plan of study may leave little room for allowing or requiringadditional courses in professional skills.ConclusionRecent research suggests that professional skills are very important for the success ofcollege graduates, both at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Degree programs andfaculty should be encouraged to examine their graduate programs in engineering
inseveral components of its long-range strategic plans. This strategic plan identifies its ForestBiomaterials and Biotechnology Initiative (FBBI) as a key growth area in terms of both research andinstruction. NCSU has a number of Biomaterials courses that it regularly offers.1NCAT has over the past few years begun to focus upon the development of interdisciplinarygraduate programs and initiated this past fall within its interdisciplinary Energy andEnvironmental Systems graduate program a concentration in Sustainable Bio-products.2 Thisconcentration capitalizes on NCAT’s agriculture and engineering research strengths. TheBioSUCCEED initiative will help NCAT enhance its graduate course offerings in materials frombiomass and better educate a growing
students enrolled in engineering graduate programs.While the work of returners may have significant impact, very little research has been conductedabout returning students at the PhD level, particularly within the field of engineering. There havebeen several studies on returning graduate or undergraduate students in other disciplines thatprovide some insight into the experiences of these students. Existing studies within and outsideof engineering also point to some differences in the motivations and needs of returners comparedto direct-pathway students. Returning students are often more goal-oriented14,15, more motivatedand mature, have stronger teamwork skills16, and generally display a high work ethic15.However, returners have reported struggles
technical translations and training facilitation. Contact information: mnino@vt.edu.Dr. Kimberly Monique Holmes, George Mason University Kimberly Holmes is the Director of Retention and Student Success at George Mason University. She also served as a Research Analyst with the PROMISE Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) at the University of Maryland Baltimore County. She completed the Higher Education Ph.D. program at the University of Maryland College Park. She also earned her M.Ed. in Higher Education from the College of William & Mary and her B.A. in Latin American and Iberian Studies from the University of Richmond. Her research interests include the experiences of women of color in STEM
in Industrial Engineering at the Chihuahua Institute of Technology, a Master in Science in Industrial Engineering at the Cd. Juarez Institute of Technology, a Master in Science in Educative Mathematics at the Research Center for Advanced Studies (CINVESTAV del IPN) and Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo.Dr. Maged Mikhail, Purdue University - Calumet Dr. Maged B. Mikhail, Assistant Professor, Mechatronics Engineering Technology Ph.D., Electrical Engi- neering, Tennessee State University, Nashville, Tennessee, August 2013. Dissertation title: ”Development of Integrated Decision Fusion Software System For Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring” M.S., Electri- cal
graduate programs may notconsider potential returners. Those same potential returners are often the ones universities inviteto lead guest lectures and seminars, but their credentials may not map well to admissionsrequirements designed with direct-pathway students in mind.Some schools, including the University of Michigan, have networking groups for variouspopulations of graduate students. One of these groups may be a returner students’ group;however, aside from such networking groups, there are no large-scale organized efforts to assistreturning students in dealing with these challenges, and due to the lack of research into suchstudents, it is currently unknown what types of programs might be most effective.Research MethodsParticipants. The study
communications area are also reported.In Western Carolina University’s Wireless Communications Lab, DSSS technology has not beencovered. Although this technology can be demonstrated through the simulation using MATLAB,SystemView, or other software, however, it will be better to provide students first-hand learningexperiences through hardware experiments. In view of this, the development of a DSSS systemfor undergraduate laboratory was initiated and carried out as a graduate student project by astudent whose research interest is wireless communications. This system includes the hardwareimplementation based on Altera FPGA/CPLD development board and Mini-Circuit RF modules.Software simulation model will also be built based on MATLAB to verify
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) Report, Reshaping the Graduate Education of Scientists and Engineers, pointed out: the U.S. system of engineering graduate education has evolved during the last four decades primarily as a research-oriented endeavor, largely as an outgrowth of the 1945 U.S. science policy.11 As a result of the 1945 Vannevar Bush Report Science the Endless Frontier12, the nation invested substantially during the 1960’s, 70’s, 80’s, 90’s [and must continue into the 21st century] in establishing preeminence of the U.S. system of research- Page 14.1076.5 oriented graduate
. His teaching interests are in the areas of environment, building systems, and computer aided design.Keerthi V. Takkalapelli, Temple University Keerthi is a graduate student in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department. Page 14.700.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Improvement of Graduate Students’ Performance in Design, Discovery, and LearningAbstractIn this paper we describe how graduate students’ performance was improved in design,discovery, and learning. The primary objective of this study is to provide adequate learningexperience for the students
Paper ID #13382Learning Style DynamicsQuintana Clark, Purdue University, West Lafayette Quincy Clark, a graduate from the College of Technology at Purdue University. Her research interests include emerging technologies for teaching and learning in STEM, e-learning instructional theory and design, and social media as applied to learning styles.Prof. James L. Mohler, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alejandra Magana is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer and Information Technology and an affiliated faculty at the School of Engineering Education at
. John Wiley & Sons, 2010.[28] SL Sellers, K Friedrich, N Gunasekera, T Saleem, and J Burstyn. Case studies in inclusive teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning, 2006.[29] Shari Saunders and Diana Kardia. Creating inclusive college classrooms. A guidebook for University of Michigan graduate student instructors, pages 46–56, 2004.[30] University of Michigan Center for Research on Learning and Teaching. Reflecting on your practice: Applying inclusive teaching principles.[31] Philip Stark and Richard Freishtat. An evaluation of course evaluations. ScienceOpen, 2014.[32] Stephen Benton. Student
AC 2007-330: ENABLING THE U.S. ENGINEERING WORKFORCE FORTECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION: THE VALUE OF ENGINEERING TO THENATION'S GROWTH AND SECURITYNorm Egbert, Rolls-Royce Corporation NORMAN F. EGBERT is vice president of engineering and technology, Rolls-Royce Corporation.Donald Keating, University of South Carolina DONALD A. KEATING is associate professor of mechanical engineering, University of South Carolina, and chair ASEE-Graduate Studies Division. Page 12.606.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Enabling the U.S. Engineering Workforce for Technological Innovation: The Value of Engineering to the
AC 2007-342: FACULTY REWARD SYSTEM REFORM FOR ADVANCEMENT OFPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION FOR INNOVATION:REVISITING THE URGENCY FOR REFORMDennis Depew, Purdue University DENNIS R. DEPEW is dean of the college of technology, Purdue University.Gary Bertoline, Purdue University GARY R. BERTOLINE is professor and assistant dean for graduate studies of the college of technology, Purdue University.Mark Schuver, Purdue University MARK T. SCHUVER is director of the Rolls-Royce-Purdue Master’s degree program, Purdue University.Donald Keating, University of South Carolina DONALD A. KEATING is associate professor of mechanical engineering, University of South Carolina, and chair ASEE-Graduate
AC 2007-375: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO TEACHING ASSISTANTTRAINING AND ORIENTATIONRonald Kane, New Jersey Institute of Technology Ronald S. Kane is Dean of Graduate Studies and Assistant Vice President for Academic Affairs at New Jersey Institute of Technology. Before that he had been Dean of Graduate Studies, Research, and Continuing Professional Education and Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology and before that served as Mechanical Engineering Department Chair at Manhattan College. He has industrial experience in the energy and aerospace industries and worked for a number of years on nuclear safety and alternative energy systems, with focus on modeling and
AC 2012-4344: FUTURE ENGINEERING PROFESSORS’ VIEWS OF THEROLE OF MOTIVATION IN TEACHING AND LEARNINGMrs. Ana T. Torres-Ayala, University of South Florida Ana T. Torres-Ayala is a doctoral candidate in higher education at the University of South Florida. She holds a B.S. degree in computer engineering from the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez, and a M.Eng. degree in computer and systems engineering from Rensselear Polytechnic Institute. She has experience in the telecommunications industry where she worked for Lucent Technologies. Torres-Ayala was previously an information technology instructor. Her research interests include faculty development, scholarship of teaching and learning, graduate education, and
A Professional Development Program for Graduate Students at North Carolina State UniversityI. Introduction The traditional engineering graduate school experience involves taking courses, selectinga dissertation or thesis advisor and project, performing the research under the advisor’ssupervision, and completing and defending the dissertation. Such an experience trains graduatestudents to carry out research on a problem someone else has defined and gotten funded. It doesnot, however, prepare them for anything else they might be called upon to do in graduate schooland in their professional careers, including: • Teaching assistant responsibilities. Grade assignments, projects, and tests; supervise laboratories
Paper ID #27328Development of Graduate Level Cybersecurity Programs at North DakotaState UniversityDr. Jeremy Straub, North Dakota State University Jeremy Straub is the Associate Director of the NDSU Institute for Cyber Security Education and Research and an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science at the North Dakota State University. He holds a Ph.D. in Scientific Computing, an M.S. and an M.B.A. and has published over 40 journal articles and over 120 full conference papers, in addition to making numerous other conference presenta- tions. Straub’s research spans the gauntlet between technology
AC 2008-1966: ASSESSMENT OF A PRESTIGIOUS ENGINEERING GRADUATETEACHING FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMMaura Borrego, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University MAURA BORREGO is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Dr. Borrego holds an M.S. and Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Stanford University. Her current research interests center around interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering and engineering education, including studies of the collaborative relationships between engineers and education researchers. Investigations of interdisciplinary graduate programs nationwide are funded through her NSF CAREER award