Collection

2009 Northeast Section Meeting

Authors

Alfred A. Scalza

must be some way to assess the value of whatever they learned.• Rewards other than grades, student recognition Rewards, other than grades, are great motivators. Student recognition will always go further to motivate a student than grades. Unfortunately, most student recognition is based on better grades. We bestow scholarships, awards, prizes and even privileged status on the students almost always based on the best grades. That’s the official student recognition. A professor can bestow recognition on a student in class too. Speak to students as if they are equal partners in the industry. Let them choose their own topics to research, have them set up their own groups and run their own clubs. Even have them decide

Collection

2009 Northeast Section Meeting

Authors

Luanna S. Gomez

Research on student understanding of engineering statics: The development of instructional materials to improve student understanding of center of mass AbstractUniversity students who have studied physics at the introductory level and beyond are oftenunable to apply basic concepts from mechanics to account for the motion of an extended object.Findings from an in-depth, systematic investigation were used to guide the design of curriculumto address the underlying conceptual and reasoning difficulties. Ongoing assessment was anintegral part of the development cycle. The instructional sequence that evolved from thisiterative process has proved effective in helping students learn to

Collection

2011 Northeast Section Meeting

Authors

Saeid Moslehpour; Hesham Elsaghir

, Number 11[8] Bilek, Jan. 2003. Evolutionary Trends of Embedded Systems. IEEE.[9] Pereira, Dias. 2006. A Low-Cost Tide Measurement System for Water Quality Assessment. IEEE.[10] Gracanin, Denis., Tsourveloudis, Nikos., Matijasevic, Maja and Valavanis, Kimon. 1999. Virtual Reality Test bed for mobile Robots. IEEE.[11] Wu, Helei., Ming, Jing., Yang, Yirong., Zhu, Shanan. 2004. Integrating Embedded-web technology and Real-Time Ethernet for Modern Distributed Control. IEEE.[12] Li, Dan., Zhong, Chongquan., Yuan, Ziaofeng., and Zhang, Li. 2006. Study on Embedded Equipment Web Monitoring and Control Based on Industrial Ethernet. IEEE.BiographyHesham Elsaghir was born in Alexandria, Egypt, the son of Kadria Nour-Eldin andMohamed Elsaghir

Collection

2012 Northeast Section Meeting

Authors

Valeria Matinuzzi; Danielle Peterson; Sean Iacobone; Salah Badjou

a regular basis. The present research was conducted in a semester-long sophomore-levelbiomedical engineering course of physiology for engineers.Keywords: Energy drinks, validation, taurine, caffeine, health INTRODUCTIONThe substances assessed in this paper are Red Bull and coffee, the two most commonly ingested energy drinks. Inorder to determine whether these energy drinks are safe for consumption and can deliver the promised effect, wewill evaluate existing research and conduct an experiment. The present research was conducted in a semester-longsophomore-level biomedical engineering course of physiology for engineers.Red Bull is the most popular new-age energy drink, and is increasing in

Collection

2012 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Yacob Astatke; Craig Scott; Kemi Ladeji-Osias; Petronella James

curriculum for the students in Harford County will be the same as our current students.The catalog description shown in Table II will not undergo any changes. Based on the existingarticulation agreement between HCC and MSU, we anticipate that the transfer students will havecompleted most of the courses in the first two years at HCC. The admissions process and criteriawill be the same for all transfer students, including those who opt to take courses in HarfordCounty. There is an existing articulation agreement with Harford Community College, whichlists these requirements. The learning outcomes for students in the program are based on therequirements for accreditation. These program learning outcomes are assessed in alldepartmental courses and

Collection

2014 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Thomas Dodson; Nicholas Mattei; Joshua T. Guerin; Judy Goldsmith; Joan M. Mazur

thought about the advicebecomes more robust we hope to use it in controlled, real- generated by our system, subjective user and expertworld settings with both students and advisors in order to assessments of our system on various features, and whatstudy its effectiveness. Surveys were handed out with factors users and experts would want to add to our system. Wenarratives based on two fictional, but plausible students. Both included questions regarding their perceptions of the advisingstudents are about half-way through completing a minor in process and specific factors affecting their decisions. We dotheir respective course of study: one student is

Collection

2014 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Andrew Martin; Christian Bach

] Leitzel, K., Teramoto, Y., Konrad, K., Chinchilli, V. M., Volas, G.,[15] Dowsett, M., Cooke, T., Ellis, I., Gullick, W. J., Gusterson, B., Grossberg, H., . . . Lipton, A. (1995). Elevated serum c-erbB-2 Mallon, E., & Walker, R. (2000). Assessment of HER2 status in antigen levels and decreased response to hormone therapy of breast breast cancer: why, when and how? Eur J Cancer, 36(2), 170-176. cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 13(5), 1129-1135. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00264-6 [35] Li, Y., John, M. A. S., Zhou, X., Kim, Y., Sinha, U., Jordan, R. C., . . .[16] Elgamal, A.-A. A., Ectors, N. L., Sunardhi-Widyaputra, S., Van

Conference Session

CANCELLED: Track 5: Technical Session 6: Think-Aloud Insights: Exploring QuantCrit Challenges and Diverse Survey Responses Among Undergraduate Engineering Students

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Sheila Kathryn Castro, University of Florida; Bruce Frederick Carroll, University of Florida; Janice Mejía, Northwestern University; Kent J. Crippen, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

appointment in Engineering Education. His research interests include engineering identity, self-efficacy, and matriculation of Latine/x/a/o students to graduate school. He works with survey methods and overlaps with machine learning using quantitative methods and sequential mixed methods approaches.Dr. Janice Mej´ıa, Northwestern University Dr. Mejia is an Associate Professor of Instruction in the Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences. She also teaches in the Design Thinking and Communication (DTC), Masters in Engineering Management (MEM), and College Prep programs. Her research interests focus on mixed methods research in engineering education, curriculum assessment and development, and engineering

Conference Session

Track 6: Technical Session 4: WIP: investigate recruitment strategies used by engineering bridge and success programs to recruit underserved students

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Xinyu Zhang, Purdue University; Lynette Michaluk, West Virginia University; N’Diya Harris, Wright State University; Ansley Lynn Shamblin, West Virginia University

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

respondentsfrom private, MSI or non-doctorial institutions, including one private, one HSI, one HSI andAANAPISI, two undergraduate institutions, and two institutions primarily offering undergraduateand master’s degrees.Survey InstrumentTen subject-matter experts in the field of survey developments, engineering bridge and successprogram recruitment, qualitative research, and mixed-method research provided inputs andevaluation of the survey instrument. The survey instrument was developed based on items fromthe literature on recruitment, communication, and cocurricular programs [23, 33, 38, 42]. Forexample, it include items that assessed effectiveness of student recruitment practices used byAgriculture colleges in the U.S. and validated through content and

Collection

2014 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Amer H. Daggag

be easily assessed. The other issue hasare seen to use high voltages. These voltages could exceed the been the security of the information that is transferred over thepower provided or lead to a power surge. The plugging f the Internet. The sensitive and personal information that has beenmany cables will ease the rate at which the fire will spread. placed in social media websites have been easily accessed yThe other aspect is where heavy objects of the computer could the different individuals in the world [3]. ICT in the home hasfall on users and cause damages. The example is the laser led to millions of children cutting and pasting of informationprinters, CRT monitors or any heavy computer equipment [3

Collection

2010 ASEE Zone 4 Conference

Authors

Amelito Enriquez

Collection

2010 ASEE Zone 4 Conference

Authors

Kenneth W. Santarelli

Conference Session

Track 6: Technical Session 3: Breaking Barriers: Unveiling the Journeys and Triumphs of Faculty Women of Color in STEM Academia

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Kemesha Gabbidon, University of South Florida; Saundra Johnson Austin, University of South Florida

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

, B., Gunther, O., Bitar, J., & Ilano, L. (2023, July) link: https://edtrust.org/blog/why- stem-equity-must-address-the-experiences-of-women-of-color/• Vijayan, V., Fang, S., Barclay, S. A., Reissman, M. E., & Reissman, T. (2024). Impact of scaffolding and hands-on assignments within mechatronics on student learning outcomes of KEEN’s entrepreneurial mindset. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190241240463• Zappe, S. E. (2018). Avoiding construct confusion: An attribute-focused approach to assessing entrepreneurial mindset. Advances in Engineering Education, 7(1). 44

Conference Session

Track 7: Technical Session 3: Latine STEM Doctoral Students' Perceptions Regarding Doctoral Mentoring Relationships - A Qualitative Study

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Dilara Yaya-Bryson Ph.D., University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Lisa R Merriweather, University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

by gender and race/ethnicity.,”Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 17–35, Jan. 2018, doi:10.1037/cou0000243.[22] R.W. Lent and S.T. Brown, “Social Cognitive Career Theory and Subjective Well-Being inthe Context of Work,” Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 16, no 1, 2008. Accessed: Aug. 22,2024. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.1177/1069072707305769[23] C. D. Howell, L. R. Merriweather, A. Sanczyk, and N. Douglas, “Challenges in STEM PhDPrograms: Biased Mentoring,” in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala,Sweden: IEEE, Oct. 2020, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274209.[24] T. Chavous, S. Leath, and R. Gamez, "Climate, Mentoring, and Persistence AmongUnderrepresented STEM

Collection

2014 ASEE Zone 4 Conference

Authors

Debra Larson

accessed: 9/9/2013).7. Academic Senate of California Polytechnic State University. 2011. Resolution on defining and adopting the teacher-scholar model. AS-725-11. March 8.8. Boyer, E.L. 1990. Scholarship reconsidered, priorities of the professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Jossey-Bass Publishers.9. Academic Senate of California Polytechnic State University. 2012. Resolution on retention, tenure and Promotion. AS-752-12. May 29.10. Enz Finken, K. 2012. Retention, promotion, tenure charge to departments and colleges. Internal memo of the California Polytechnic State University. October 15.11. Glassick, G.E., Huber, M.T. and G.I. Maeroff. 1997. Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. The

Conference Session

DSA Technical Session 6

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristina A Manasil, The University of Arizona; Gregory L. Heileman, The University of Arizona; Bhavya Sharma, The University of Arizona; Ahmad Slim, The University of Arizona; Aryan Ajay Pathare, The University of Arizona; Husain Al Yusuf, The University of Arizona; Roxana Sharifi, The University of Arizona; Rohit Hemaraja, The University of Arizona; Melika Akbarsharifi, The University of Arizona

Tagged Topics

Data Science & Analytics Constituent Committee (DSA)

grades.Graduation Rates. The analytical inquiry starts with an examination of the anticipated gradua-tion rates within the student cohort. The framework embedded within the cohort analytics trackingplatform evaluates the progression of students toward the milestones of a four-year, five-year, orsix-year graduation trajectory. This analysis involves an assessment of earned credits applicable tothe degree requirements in each respective program. Unlike the conventional assumption that allcredits undertaken by a student will contribute toward degree satisfaction, this approach delineatesprogress based on the quantification that credits align with requirements. To clarify, if a studenthas 32 credits that are applicable toward requirements in a program that

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 6: Programs in Graduate Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tess Bisbee Meier, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Ceren Yilmaz Akkaya, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Yunus Doğan Telliel, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

co-advising the undergraduate projects, at the conclusion of the Preparation Term and again atthe conclusion of the Project Term. The graduate students will be asked to write a reflection ontheir experience in the program and the skills they learned, practiced, and taught. The graduatestudent will receive course evaluations from the undergraduates. Six months after the experience,when the graduate students take the survey for a final time, there will be additional questions onretention of skills and reporting of accomplishments or initiatives born from participation in theprogram.Additional surveys will be provided to the project sponsors and faculty advisors to assess theimpact and efficacy of the graduate student’s participation on both

Collection

2025 ASEE North Central Section (NCS) Annual Conference

Authors

Aiman S Kuzmar, Islamic University of Madinah, Saudi Arabia

-research. [Accessed on 18 Jan 2025][3] S. Kaul, C. W. Ferguson, P. M. Yanik, and Y. Yan, “Importance of Undergraduate Research: Efficacy and Student Perceptions, Proceedings of the 123 ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, Paper ID #14488, June 2016[4] A. L. McDevitt, M. V. Patel, and A. M. Ellison, “Lessons and recommendations from three decades as an NSF REU site: A call for systems‐based assessment,” Ecol Evol. 10(6): pp. 2710–2738, Mar 2, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7083679/ Accessed 18 Jan 2025. [Accessed 15 Jan 2025][5] A. Kuzmar, “Undergraduate Research Collaboration Between Penn State Main Campus and One of Its Remote Campuses,” In: Radcliffe

Conference Session

Transfer Issues Between 2-Year Colleges and 4-Year Engineering and Engineering Technology Programs 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Yowell, University of Colorado Boulder; Heidi G. Loshbaugh; Nick A. Stites, University of Colorado Boulder; Chris Anderson, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College Division (TYCD)

interviews withimmediate feedback, resumé review, and application guidance, offered in conjunction with thecommunity colleges’ Career Services or Growth Sector (the backbone organization). During thecompetitive application process, project leadership interviewed students to assess their interestsand determine whether they preferred a university or industry internship. Based on the interviewsand a review of their qualifications (Table 2), students received initial placement—or,unfortunately, notice that they had not been selected.Table 2. Internship Criteria Curriculum Math Prior or Current 500-Word Essay/ GPA2 Pathway Preparation Coursework Application

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 3: Mentorship and Communication in Engineering Graduate Programs

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Himani Sharma, Arizona State University; Amanda Singer Nault, The Ohio State University; Mayra S. Artiles, Arizona State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

, “Assessment for Faculty Advising: Beyond the Service Component,” NACADA Journal, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 66–75, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.12930/NACADA-16-028.[11] E. Hart-Baldridge, “Faculty Advisor Perspectives of Academic Advising,” NACADA Journal, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 10–22, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.12930/NACADA-18-25.[12] S. E. Brownell and K. D. Tanner, “Barriers to Faculty Pedagogical Change: Lack of Training, Time, Incentives, and…Tensions with Professional Identity?,” LSE, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 339–346, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-09-0163.[13] M. Artiles and H. Matusovich, “Doctoral Advisor Selection in Chemical Engineering: Evaluating Two Programs through Principal-Agent Theory,” vol. 2, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Feb. 2022

Conference Session

Computational Tools and Simulation III

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

El-Sayed Aziz, Stevens Institute of Technology; Sven Esche, Stevens Institute of Technology; Constantin Chassapis, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

allotted time asin the traditional hands-on mode. The assessment data obtained from the pilot at SIT indicatedthat the students improved their knowledge of the concepts taught in the lecture component ofthe class and expressed general satisfaction with this laboratory approach.52 The results of theassessment study furthermore suggest that game-based learning environments have the potentialfor developing into an educationally viable complement to traditional pedagogical tools and Page 14.1032.10warrant further investigation (see Figure 8). 9Figure 8: Comparison of test results to evaluate learning

Collection

2021 Northeast Section Meeting

Authors

Dirk R. Albrecht

. Further data assessing impact of these labactivities on the broader curriculum is yet to be gathered.VII. Limitations and Future OpportunitiesWhile overall successful in student learning outcomes, interest, and engagement, we identifiedseveral limitations and future opportunities. • Students spend much of the course building prescribed circuits and relatively little time designing new circuits. This was required due to the short 7-week course duration, and students reported appreciation of the well-defined and well-organized labs given the fast pace. The open-ended sensor project does give a small experience in circuit design, construction, testing, and troubleshooting. However, a longer 14-week semester or 10

Collection

2021 Northeast Section Meeting

Authors

Nancy K. DeJarnette; Ruba S. Deeb; Jani M. Pallis

Education Department, Seattle Children’s Institute, Seattle, WA. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v2i1.02[14] P. Potvin, & A. Hasni, “Analysis of the decline in interest towards school science and technology from grades 5 Through 11.” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 23, pp. 784-802. 2014.[15] M. Al Salami, M., C. Makela, & M. Miranda, .“Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. International Journal of Technology & Design Education”, vol 27, no. 1, pp. 63–88, 2017.[16] N. K. DeJarnette, “Early childhood STEAM: Reflections from a year of STEAM initiatives implemented in a high-needs primary school.’ Education vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 104-118, 2018b.[17] D. E

Collection

2025 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Benjamin Bruxvoort; Nehemiah Emaikwu; Kim Trenbath; Jason Schmidt

best alignswith their course’s context and objectives. In this process, the researchers from the nationallaboratories develop webinar introductions to each problem and provide professors with a rubricby which to assess the final product of the project—a 5‒7 page proposal describing a solution toone of the three problems. For their participation, professors receive a certificate and the chanceto visit a national laboratory, whereas student teams get to attend a final competition with theirtravel expenses covered. By leading the competition, national laboratories benefit fromreviewing student submissions and providing mentorship and internship opportunities to studentswith the most compelling solutions. Ultimately, the project helps attract

Collection

2025 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Abigail Neering; Mitchell Keck; Julia Reyna; Natcin Sorensen; Travis Price; Randy Hurd

. ● ​ An ability to create eco-friendly designs by using recyclable materials and optimizing the prototyping process.These outcomes will be assessed through: 22 ● ​ Preliminary design review addresses technical risks, hazards associated with safety, ethical and professional responsibilities. ● ​ Student works maintain professional codes & standards in their modeling, drafting, and analysis. ● ​ Students minimize initial rapid-prototyping costs by using low-cost materials and computer simulations. ● ​ Students consider environment-friendly, reusable, and easily replaceable materials

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 6

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Ann Weitnauer; Jacqueline Rohde, Georgia Institute of Technology; Thomas Martin, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

Paper ID #38940Lessons Learned While Managing ”Raise Your Hand,” a MultidisciplinaryCollaboration between Engineering and the ArtsMary Ann WeitnauerDr. Jacqueline Rohde, Georgia Institute of Technology Jacqueline (Jacki) Rohde is the Assessment Coordinator in the School of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her interests are in sociocultural norms in engineering and the professional development of engineering students.Thomas Martin, Georgia Institute of Technology ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Lessons learned while managing Raise

Conference Session

Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Vegas Lewis, SUNY Fredonia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 3: Mentorship and Communication in Engineering Graduate Programs

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Magdalena G. Grohman, University of North Texas; Matthew J. Brown Ph.D., Southern Illinois University; Nicholas Raphael Gans, The University of Texas at Arlington; Jeff Glenn Edwards, University of Texas at Dallas

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

learning processes that lead to these outcomes [4], [5].CURE, as a course-based experience with pre-defined learning outcomes, is very amenable tooutcomes-focused research using surveys, test-based assessments, and grade-point averages [6].However, URE does not have the same kind of set learning goals; the primary goals of the UREcontext are the knowledge-production goals of the working laboratory. Learning here will, ofcourse, be a more organic by-product of the enculturation of students into scientific (andengineering) practice. Graduate research experiences are akin to URE in terms of difficulty toassess learning outcomes. Rather than focusing on outcomes defined from the start, we usecognitive-ethnographic methods to understand the social

Conference Session

Online and Remote Teaching

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nazanin Mansouri, University of Portland

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

met. The assessment of the identified ABET performance indicators at the end of the semester were above the acceptable threshold and comparable with the in-person course. This experience demonstrates that through innovation, some of the engineering laboratory courses can be taught remotely without sacrificing any experiments.1. Introduction One of the most meaningful measures of an engineering program is for its graduates to be able to perform from the first day on the job. It is only through a fine interplay of the theory and practice that such an outcome can be achieved. Hence, it is imperative that when developing courses and curricula, we keep a theory to practice outcome in mind. What distinguishes the new graduates in

Conference Session

Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 11

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margaret E.B. Webb, Virginia Tech ; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity