informal and out-of-school time settings, pre-college engineering education, design thinking, mathematical thinking, and assessment research. Page 22.647.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Evaluating Student Responses in Open-Ended Problems Involving Iterative Solution Development in Model Eliciting ActivitiesAbstractOpen-ended problems are an important part of the engineering curriculum because, when welldesigned, they closely resemble problem-solving situations students will encounter asprofessional engineers. However, valid
University’s Board of Trustees. At Virginia Tech, he also serves as Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Engineering Education. His research interests are: Higher Education Finance and Administration; STEM Education; Migration and Immigration issues in education; and Quality Assurance.Mr. Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Virginia Tech Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury is a PhD student at Virginia Tech in the department of Engineering Edu- cation. Tahsin holds a BSc. degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from IUT, Dhaka and has worked as a manufacturing professional at a Fortune 500 company. He is actively engaged in differ- ent projects at the department involving teamwork, communication and capstone design with a
and MSC Software Corp., as well as various consulting and expert witness positions. He also held a faculty position at University of the Pacific and is an adjunct faculty member at University of Texas, Austin. He has received numerous professional awards including a NASA Post-Doctorial Fellowship, ASEE Best Paper Awards, the ASME Most Innovative Curriculum Award, the Ernest L. Boyer - International Award for Excellence in Teach- ing, the US Air Force Academy Seiler Award for Excellence in Engineering Research and the Outstanding Academy Educator Award. He has published over 100 technical articles and generated approximately $3.5 million of research; all at institutions with no graduate program. His research
Team, a select group of teaching faculty expressly devoted to the first-year Engineering Program at NU. In addition, she serves as a Faculty Advisor for Senior Capstone Design and graduate-level Challenge Projects in Northeastern’s Gordon Engineering Leadership Program. Dr. Jaeger-Helton has been the recipient of over 15 awards in engineering education for both teaching and mentoring and has been involved in several engineering educational research initiatives through ASEE and beyond.Dr. Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University Dr. Smyser is an Associate Teaching Professor and the Lab Director of the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. Her research interests include Capstone Design and Lab Pedagogy.Prof. Hugh L
$18 million annual cost savings to the refrigeration business. Later as a design team leader he led product development efforts and the initial 1995 market introduction of the Built-In Style line of GE Profile refrigerators. His last assignment at GE Appliances was in the Office of Chief Engineer in support of GE’s Design for Six Sigma initiative. Dr. Steiner has taught advanced design methods to hundreds of new and experienced engineers. His research interests include; design education, product architecture, mechanical reliability, design for manufacture and quality.Junichi Kanai, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Junichi Kanai (kanaij@rpi.edu) He received his BS in Electrical Engineering, M.Eng. and Ph.D. in Com
is an ASEE and IEEE Fellow and PAESMEM awardee.Mrs. Susan Beth D’Amico, College of Engineering, NC State University Susan B. D’Amico Coordinator of Engineering K-12 Outreach Extension The Engineering Place College of Engineering NC State University Susan earned a B.S in Industrial Engineering from NC State and has worked in the Telecom and Contract Manufacturing Industries for over 25 years as an Industrial Engineer, Process Engi- neer, Manufacturing Engineer, Project Manager, Business Cost Manager and Program Manager. Inspired by coursework she developed and presented as an engineer, her professional path made a turn towards education by completing coursework for lateral entry teaching. Susan now works for
Engineering at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, in the August of 2004. Dr. Tongele’s areas of research include Theory of Elasticity, Structural Mechanics, Design, and Engineering Education. Page 13.1397.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008Abstract How effectively are future engineers exposed to codes, standards, and technicalregulations that influence design and manufacturing or construction? How well are futureengineers aware of the importance of codes and standards for the effectiveness, the reliability,and the safety of products designed and manufactured in the United States (US) as well
Diploma in Industrial Administration (Aston University). He was the recipient of the Henry Morton Distinguished Teaching Professor Award in 2009. As Associate Dean, Prof. Shep- pard has had a leading role in the development of the undergraduate engineering curriculum at Stevens, including innovations in design education and initiatives to include entrepreneurship, sustainability and global competency for undergraduate students.Prof. Christos Christodoulatos, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES) Dr. Christos Christodoulatos is Vice Provost for Innovation and Entrepreneurship at Stevens Institute of Technology. The Office of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (OIE) has the mandate to modernize the technology transfer
teaching approaches of engineering faculty. Dr. McKenna received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Drexel University and Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley.Betty J Harper, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Betty Harper is the director of Student Affairs Research and Assessment at Penn State. Prior to assuming this role, Betty worked in Penn State’s Center for the Study of Higher Education as the Senior Project Associate under Project Directors Lisa R. Lattuca and Patrick T. Terenzini on two NSF-funded stud- ies of engineering education: Prototype to Production and Prototyping the Engineer of 2020. She also worked with colleagues Lisa Lattuca, Patrick Terenzini, and J
Department Head of the Department of Engi- neering Education at Virginia Tech. He is the Director of the Multi-University NSF I/UCRC Center for e-Design, the Director of the Frith Freshman Design Laboratory and the Co-Director of the Engineering First-year Program. His research areas are design and design education. Dr. Goff has won numerous University teaching awards for his innovative and interactive teaching. He is passionately committed to bringing research and industry projects into the class room as well as spreading fun and creating engage- ment in all levels of Engineering Education. Page 22.904.1
a broad necessary to understand the impact of education and the global aspect of engineering solutions in a global, engineering practice. economic, environmental and societal context. 7. Students will have recognition of the I Recognize the importance of life-long need for and the ability to engage in life- learning in the engineering profession. long learning.Figure 1. The blades contact the eyelids, restraining the lids and lashes during surgicalophthalmologic procedures. The arms connect the blades to the pivot mechanism, allowing thesurgeon to manipulate the blades a safe distance from the eye. The pivot mechanism allows theblades to hold the eyelashes
practices’ for student professional development and training. In addition, she is developing methodologies around hidden curriculum, academic emotions and physiology, and en- gineering makerspaces.Dr. Jana Bouwma-Gearhart, Oregon State University Jana L. Bouwma-Gearhart is an associate professor of STEM education at Oregon State University. Her research widely concerns improving education at research universities. Her earlier research explored en- hancements to faculty motivation to improve undergraduate education. Her more recent research concerns organizational change towards postsecondary STEM education improvement at research universities, in- cluding the interactions of levers (people, organizations, policy
and W. J. Hynes, “If you build it, will they come? Student preferences for Makerspace environments in higher education,” Int J Technol Des Educ, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 867–883, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10798-017-9412-5.[5] S. Weiner, M. Lande, and S. Jordan, “The Engineer of 2020, in the Making: Understanding how Young Adults Develop Maker Identities and the Implications for Education Reform,” p. 10, 2020.[6] C. Lenhart, J. Bouwma-Gearhart, I. Villanueva, K. Youmans, and L. S. Nadelson, “Engineering Faculty Members’ Perceptions of University Makerspaces: Potential Affordances for Curriculum, Instructional Practices, and Student Learning.”[7] E. Wenger, “Communities of practice,” Communities of practice, p. 7.[8
Paper ID #11437Measuring the Complexity of Simulated Engineering Design ProblemsMs. Golnaz Arastoopour, University of Wisconsin, Madison Before becoming interested in education, Golnaz studied Mechanical Engineering at the University of Illi- nois at Urbana-Champaign with a minor in Spanish. While earning her Bachelor’s degree in engineering, she worked as a computer science instructor at Campus Middle School for Girls in Urbana, IL. Along with a team of undergraduates, she headlined a project to develop a unique computer science curriculum for middle school students. She then earned her M.A. in mathematics education at
Development, 2001.[11] M. C. Jackson, G. Galvez, I. Landa, P. Buonora, and D. B. Thoman, "Science that matters:The importance of a cultural connection in underrepresented students’ science pursuit," CBE-LifeSciences Education, vol. 15, no. 3, p. ar42, 2016.[12] S. Virani, I. B. Burnham, V. Gonzalez, M. Barua, E. Fredericksen and S. J. Andrade, "Workin Progress: Designing an Innovative Curriculum for Engineering in High School(ICE-HS)," inAmerican Society for Engineering Education, 2011: American Society for EngineeringEducation.[13] S. Virani and I. B. Burnham, "Innovative Curriculum for Engineering in High School(ICE-HS)-Status Update," in American Society for Engineering Education, 2012: American Society forEngineering Education.[14] C. L. Dym, P
AC 2011-445: DEVELOPMENT OF A SUSTAINABLE DESIGN CHAL-LENGES WORKSHOP FOR SENIOR INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING STU-DENTS(Ruth) Jill Urbanic, University of Windsor (Ruth) Jill Urbanic received her B.A.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Waterloo in Canada. After receiving her degree, she pursued opportunities to work in various advanced manufacturing environments. She has worked with several types of manufacturing, material handling, testing, gauging and assembly equipment for a variety of engine components and vehicle styles. She wished to expand her horizons by enhancing her practical background with more theoretical knowledge. To that end, she received her M.A. Sc. in Industrial Engineering and her Ph.D
Paper ID #26944Innovation, Design, and Self-Efficacy: The Impact of MakerspacesRoxana Maria Carbonell, University of Texas, Austin Roxana Carbonell is a current graduate student in mechanical engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. Her primary research interests are prosthetics, additive manufacturing, makerspaces, and engi- neering education.Madison E. Andrews, University of Texas, Austin Madison Andrews is a STEM Education doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant in the Depart- ment of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. She received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
biomedical materials. Dr. Harding earned B.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering (1995), a M.S. degree in Materials Science and Engineering (1997), and a Ph.D. degree in Materials Science and Engineering (2000) from the University of Michigan. Previously, he was Associate Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Kettering University. He currently serves as Associate Editor of the online journal Advances in Engineering Education, is Materials Division Program Chair for the 2009 ASEE Annual Meeting, and ERM Program Chair for the 2010 ASEE Annual Meeting. Dr. Harding has delivered several invited presentations on ethics in engineering curricula
Padnos College of Engineering and Computing at Grand Valley State University. She earned her Bachelors from GMI Engineering & Management Institute, Masters from Purdue University and Doctorate from Michigan State University. Her industrial experience includes designing quality systems for Allison Engine Company in Indianapolis. Since joining GVSU, she has focused on introducing design and build projects in traditionally analytical courses in the Engineering Mechanics sequence.Dr. Christopher P. Pung P.E., Grand Valley State University Dr. Pung has interests in experiential learning, design processes and student teams. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020
they need to focus on to do well in the course. Thegoal is to eventually encourage students to shift away from focusing on the grade and movetoward a goal of learning and improving in each course objective.Bibliography 1. Sadler, D.R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30 (2), 175-194. 2. Scriffiny, P.L. (2008). Seven reasons for standards-based grading. Expecting Excellence, 66 (2), 70-74. 3. Tomlinson, C., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by Design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), Alexandria, VA. 4. Reeves, D.B. (2003). Making
Paper ID #29384Guiding Student Engineers in the Co-op Obtainment Process: ExploringMethods of MotivationMs. Brandy Maki, Minnesota State University, Mankato Brandy is an electrical engineer who serves students of Minnesota State University’s Bell Program. She has prior experience in the electronics manufacturing industry, automotive industry, and process control. She aims to push the limits–of engineering education, of what humanity can accomplish, of what one educator (alone and together with a network) can do to promote, encourage, and improve the education of our future engineers. Her vision of the future is a
organize what they were saying and really learn it. So I think, even just those two quizzes [have] completely changed how I learned from this course and thought about this course and handled it.Quizzes served to validate PBL for students. Engagement in PBL required epistemologicalactivity that was at odds with students’ notion of how to construct knowledge in a traditionalacademic setting. Assessments, a key feature of traditional education, gave students a referencefor how their engagement in PBL aligned with course goals and specified learning outcomes. Assuch, quiz-taking afforded students a metric by which to measure their own learning in PBL, andhenceforth find value in their epistemological activity in
students used the term cross-section whendescribing the shape in the middle of a part. Presumably, the students did not know the terms andhence didn’t use them. It seems that adding a brief list of technical terms into a curriculum andthen using them may remedy this shortcoming.Another technical way to describe parts is leveraging how the part is manufactured or modeled.The students used the occasional modeling or machining term; however, they frequently andeffectively used the manufacturing term bend while describing the electrical boxes. Thisparticular term allowed them to describe the flat surfaces as they progressed from one point toanother. It should be noted that all participants were currently enrolled in a design class whereevery prototype
. Since joining James Madison University, Nagel has helped to develop and teach the six course engineering design sequence which represents the spine of the curriculum for the Department of Engineering. The research and teaching interests of Dr. Nagel tend to revolve around engineering design and engineering design education, and in particular, the design conceptualization phase of the design process. He has performed research with the US Army Chemical Corps, General Motors Research and Development Center, and the US Air Force Academy, and he has received grants from the NSF, the EPA, and General Motors Corporation.Dr. Wendy C Newstetter, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr Wendy C. Newstetter is the Director of
of Texas at Austin, masters degree from Penn State, and PhD from Georgia Tech, all in Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include manufacturing processes and quality techniques. He also serves as the program director for Engineering Technology at WCU. Page 26.1074.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 LEARNING OUTCOMES OF A JUNIOR-LEVEL PROJECT-BASED LEARNING (PBL) COURSE: PREPARATION FOR CAPSTONEAbstractThis paper evaluates the learning outcomes of a junior-level course designed to serve as apreparation for the Capstone project in the senior year
. 17-28.7. Marin, J.A., J.E. Armstrong, and J.L. Kays, Elements of an Optimal Capstone Design Experience. J. Eng. Educ., 1999. 88(19-22).8. Beudoin, D.L. and D.F. Ollis, A project and process engineering laboratory for freshmen. J. Eng. Educ., 1995. 84: p. 279-284.9. Clough, G.W.e.a., The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. 2004, Washington, DC: National Academcy Press. Page 24.148.1410. Kotys-Schwartz, D., D. Knight, and G. Pawlas, First-Year and Capstone Design Projects: Is the Bookend Curriculum Approach Effective for Skill Gain, in American Society for Engineering
semester of 2008, the program is the fourth largest discipline at theinstitution in terms of freshman enrollment. At the core of the curriculum are four signaturecourses called Unified Robotics I-IV. The educational objective of these courses is to introducestudents to the multidisciplinary theory and practice of robotics engineering, integrating thefields of computer science, electrical engineering and mechanical engineering. In addition totaking these and other courses, it is a requirement that all WPI undergraduates, regardless ofdiscipline, complete a senior-level project in their major field of study called Major QualifyingProject (MQP). This paper discusses the capstone design experience within the context of ournew RBE degree program
Industrial Technology with a focus on curriculum and instruction for industry from Purdue University in 1998, and a B.S. in Aeronautical Technology in 1997. He is an FAA certificated Airframe and Powerplant mechanic and Private Pilot.Stephen M Belt, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng. Stephen M. Belt is an assistant professor in the Aviation Science Department at Saint Louis University. He is a certified flight instructor and commercial pilot. He received a PhD in higher educational adminis- tration in 2012 from Saint Louis University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Individual resilience as a competency for aviation professionals
professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering Technology at University of Cincinnati. She holds a BS degree in Mechanical Engineering and a MS degree in Manufacturing Engineering. She received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Columbia University in 2003. Her academic interests include CAD/CAM, manufacturing engineering technology, process planning, control and automation, robotics, engineering education and research, and manufacturing applications in the dental field. Page 14.368.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Conversion of an Existing Car to a
rigor of this program4) Quality of professors, staff, and teaching assistantsBackground Conventional wisdom states that students choose to study engineering because they are“good at math and science.” However, there are mixed results when looking at the reverseimpact of engineering coursework on math and science performance. A publication of theNational Academies of Engineers indicates that K-12 engineering education improves students’ability to apply mathematics and science skills [1]. However, in a study of Project Lead theWay, a widely-used high school engineering curriculum that measures achievement throughstandardized testing between 8th and 10th grade, researchers found that enrolled students sawlower improvement in