Woods, Jr., J. C., & Chowdhury, T. M., & Murzi, H., & Soledad, M., & Knight, D. B., & Grohs, J. R., & Case, S. W., & Smith, N. (2019, June), Factors Influencing Course Withdrawal in Fundamental Engineering Courses in a Research 1 University  Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32834

\bibitem{asee_peer_32834}
  Woods, Jr., J. C., \& Chowdhury, T. M., \& Murzi, H., \& Soledad, M., \& Knight, D. B., \& Grohs, J. R., \& Case, S. W., \& Smith, N. (2019, June), \emph{Factors Influencing Course Withdrawal in Fundamental Engineering Courses in a Research 1 University}
  Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Tampa, Florida.
  10.18260/1-2--32834

Johnny C. Woods, Jr., Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Homero Murzi, Michelle Soledad, David B. Knight, Jacob R. Grohs, Scott W. Case, and Natasha Smith.  "Factors Influencing Course Withdrawal in Fundamental Engineering Courses in a Research 1 University".  2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida, 2019, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2019.  https://peer.asee.org/32834 Internet.  11 Feb, 2025

\bibitem{asee_peer_32834}
  Johnny C. Woods, Jr., Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Homero Murzi, Michelle Soledad, David B. Knight, Jacob R. Grohs, Scott W. Case, and Natasha Smith.
  "Factors Influencing Course Withdrawal in Fundamental Engineering Courses in a Research 1 University".
  \emph{2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Tampa, Florida, 2019, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2019.
  https://peer.asee.org/32834 Internet.  11 Feb, 2025

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_32834
author = "Johnny C. Woods, Jr., Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Homero Murzi, Michelle Soledad, David B. Knight, Jacob R. Grohs, Scott W. Case, and Natasha Smith"
title = "Factors Influencing Course Withdrawal in Fundamental Engineering Courses in a Research 1 University"
booktitle = "2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition "
year = "2019"
month = "June"
address = "Tampa, Florida"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/32834}
number = {10.18260/1-2--32834}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Engineering students develop competencies in fundamental engineering courses (FECs) that are critical for success later in advanced courses and engineering practice. Literature on the student learning experience, however, associate these courses with challenging educational environments (e.g., large class sizes) and low student success rates. Challenging educational environments are particularly prevalent in large, research-intensive institutions. To address concerns associated with FECs, it is important to understand prevailing educational environments in these courses and identify critical points where improvement and change is needed.

The Academic Plan Model provides a systematic way to critically examine the factors that shape the educational environment. It includes paths for evaluation and adjustment, allowing educational environments to continuously improve. The Model may be applied to various levels in an institution (e.g., course, program, college), implying that a student’s entire undergraduate learning experience is the result of several enacted academic plans that are interacting with each other. Thus, understanding context-specific factors in a specific educational environment will yield valuable information affecting the undergraduate experience, including concerns related to attrition and persistence. In order to better understand why students are not succeeding in large foundational engineering courses, we developed a form to collect data on why students withdraw from certain courses. The form was included as a requirement during the withdrawal process. 

In this paper, we analyzed course withdrawal data from several academic departments in charge of teaching large foundational engineering courses, and institutional transcript data for the Spring 2018 semester. The withdrawal dataset includes the final grades that students expected to receive in the course and the factors that influenced their decision to withdraw. Institutional transcript data includes demographic information (e.g., gender,
major), admissions data (e.g., SAT scores, high school GPA), and institutional academic
information (e.g., course grades, cumulative GPA). Results provide a better understanding of the main reasons students decide to withdraw from a course, including having unsatisfactory grades, not understanding the professor, and being overwhelmed with work. We also analyzed locus of control for the responses, finding that the majority of students withdrawing courses consider that the problem is outside of their control and comes from an external source. We provide analysis by different departments and different specific courses. Implications for administrators, practitioners, and researchers are provided. 

AU  - Johnny C. Woods, Jr.
AU  - Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury
AU  - Homero Murzi
AU  - Michelle Soledad
AU  - David B. Knight
AU  - Jacob R. Grohs
AU  - Scott W. Case
AU  - Natasha Smith
CY  - Tampa, Florida
DA  - 2019/06/15
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Factors Influencing Course Withdrawal in Fundamental Engineering Courses in a Research 1 University
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/32834
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--32834
ER  -