frame a workshop?", and "How do you set up and clarify the goals of a meetingwhere you want to engage diverse stakeholders?". Based on real case studies students get theopportunity to practice these skills.Module 2: Sustainable Structures / Sustainable Structures, Construction Materials, andTechnologiesStudents are introduced to various sustainable construction materials and technologies that areresource efficient and minimize impacts on the environment. This course is subdivided into twomain themes: Sustainable Structures and Construction Technologies and SustainableConstruction Materials. Within the first theme, the course will cover topics such as sustainableconcepts in structural design, functional and structural lifespans, design for
can be “taught,” either deliberately or organically[5]. Sternberg and Williams recommend several approaches to promoting creativity throughpedagogy [6], among these being: 1. Building self-efficacy (self-perceived ability to successfully engage in a task) 2. Encouraging idea generation 3. Instructing and assessing creativity 4. Rewarding creative ideas and productsWe enacted in a design class the above four approaches to promoting the development ofcreative thinking. Students were enrolled in either a fall or a spring section of a BME designcourse based on development of software and fabrication skills. One of the sections includeddaily, brief creativity exercises with non-academic rewards. On the first day of class and
Teach Design: Implementing Research ResultsAbstractWhile design has been increasingly taught in engineering courses over the last decade, there arestill many opportunities to improve the effectiveness of design learning. One opportunity is toleverage research on design processes in classrooms as design is taught. This paper presentsstudent work from two instances of a small seminar course in which empirically-based designprocess timelines were used as the basis of teaching undergraduate engineering students aboutdesign processes. Design process timelines are graphical representations that display how anindividual allocates time across a set of design activities as they engage in a design process.These
. Student engagement was one of the greatest successes in this FLCfor rapid EML micromoment implementation. As noted by one participant: “The greatest success was that the activities broke the monotone nature of the lectures; the students seemed more active and engaged during and after the activity. Both activities that I tried, I believe, also helped the students learn the concepts better.”All respondents agreed to recommend this EML micromoments FLC to other faculty andincorporate micromoment activities in their future courses. One of the respondents concurred thatthese activities are low effort and can make a significant impact. If multiple classes implementthese activities, the students will learn the entrepreneurial mindset
include the Engineering Success Program, established to provide academic support to first- generation underrepresented college students, and the Engineering Learning Community Introduction to Research Program, a high impact learning and research opportunity that offers freshmen underrepresented engineering students a chance to partake in a one-credit class and research project while gaining global experience with a research trip to Merida, Yucatan, Mexico. Garcia also leads efforts directing and coor- dinating the Engineering Summer Bridge Program, which gives first-generation students a head start on engineering and math courses before their first semester begins. Before joining the College of Engineering, Garcia
this paper, we present ourstudy of the performance of students in two partially flipped electrical and computer engineering (ECE)classes, where we compare students’ performance in the flipped modules to those in the non-flippedmodules. This comparison enabled us to evaluate the potential impact of flipped instruction on studentlearning within a single course offering. Also, we studied the students’ perspectives on flipped learning andthe activities conducted during class time.The elements of flipped classroom generally include (a) an exposure to the content prior to the classmeeting, (e.g., video lectures), (b) a motivator for students to prepare for class, (e.g., pre-class oraccountability quizzes), (c) a method to assess student
learning,reflection, and peer-to-peer instruction. PLTL was originally developed to focus on teachingtechnical skills [2], but, in our initiative, it was modified to teach soft skills, such as teamwork,leadership, effective communication, among others. Peer leaders were selected among volunteerstudents.A program for LIATS was recently established in the College of Engineering to address thedifferences between the performance of low-income students when compared with the generalengineering population. A cohort of ninety-two (92) students, ranging from 1st. to 3rd. year ofstudy participate in the program. The purpose of this program is to increase retention andimprove graduation rates of students from economically disadvantaged communities as well
grade and their problemsolving, communication and logical thinking skills after engaging in PBL activities duringengineering modeling and design course.Our study employed a within-subjects design to assess the impact of PBL on students inengineering modeling and design courses with respect to their course grades, self-efficacy, andother essential skills. The participants were 95 undergraduate third year engineering studentsenrolled in Engineering Modeling and Design Course during 2017- 2019 academic years. This isthe first course focused on engineering modeling and design within the engineering curriculumand is offered in the first semester of the third year. This course is followed by a two-creditcourse on engineering design during the second
; and the ASME C. D. Mote Jr., Early Career Award. In 2014 Dr. Rhoads was included in ASEE Prism Magazine’s 20 Under 40.Dr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for over 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country. His current research focuses on student problem-solving pro
class standing or major. A core objective of thecourse is to provide vital connections between engineering content, oral communication skillsand creative problem-solving through an engaging multidisciplinary team design experiencewithout increasing time to degree.Course structure involves a weekly large format interactive lecture session followed by a studiosession where smaller groups of students participate in hands-on collaborative activities.Homework and presentation assignments are structured around a team-based engineering designproject that emphasizes key stages of the engineering design process along with several forms ofcommunication that engineers typically utilize in design.In Fall 2017, an exploratory student team design project for
working in the intersection of undergraduate engineering education, sustainable infrastructure, and community engagement. She teaches the introductory engineering course for all first-year undergraduate students in the College of Engineering at UD. Her undergraduate teaching experience includes foundational engineering mechanics courses like statics and strength of materials as well as courses related to sustainability and infrastructure. Her research interests are in foundational engineering education, sustainability in engineering curriculum, and green technologies in infrastructure. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by
interests are in the development of information systems applications and the complementary nature of back-end developer and front-end developer skill sets. Her research interests are program and student assessment, the impact of instructional technology on student learning, and the improvement of e-learning environments and experiences.Dr. Barbara Louise Stewart Page 24.372.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Design of On-line Courses: Implications for Student Time ManagementThe Chronicle of Higher Education reported that - from a
identities with other gender, racial, andethnic groups that are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) education.Based upon national recognition that nontraditional students possess untapped potential tostrengthen and diversify the engineering workforce, the purpose of this qualitative research studywas to examine the lived experience of nontraditional students engaged along alternativepathways to engineering degrees. Providing new understandings of how nontraditional studentsmade sense of their engineering education experiences, this work reports on the waysnontraditional engineering students narratively described their success in the context of the two-year transfer program. Findings revealed that participants
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationThe chief concern expressed by the Fellows about teaching was that they would not be effective.There were two ways of articulating this concern. First, the majority of Fellows expressed worrythat they might be a burden to the high school teacher. Second, a few of the Fellows articulatedconcerns that their assignment was likely to lead them to work with students that might not needtheir help. Instead they would have preferred an appointment in a high school with fewerscience resources.Time emerged as a major theme for the Fellows on both the survey and in the interviews.Most of these students are actively engaged in research projects either for their majoradvisor or in preparation of a
student population in each section. The resultsshowed that each instructor had failure rates that did not necessarily relate to teachingexperience. Significantly, one of the seasoned instructors had no identified failures versusanother seasoned instructor had a 12% failure rate. The new instructors had statisticallycomparable results for failure rates. The significant conclusion from Table 1 is that teachingexperience may not necessarily impact the rate of student failure. This is counterintuitive, but isimportant to consider that a well trained teacher is as effective as a seasoned professional. Table 1 - Results of the statistical analysis which identified student failures. Instructor Experience Course Cadet Grade
Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013.Dr. Cindy Waters, North Carolina A&T State University Her research team is skilled matching these newer manufacturing techniques
, 2020WIP: Identifying Structural and Cultural Characteristics of Hispanic-Serving Institutions in Engineering Education – A Morphogenetic ApproachAbstractThis work-in-progress (WIP) paper presents the methodological approach of Phase 1 of a largerstudy exploring how Hispanic-serving institutions (HSIs) can better “serve” Latinx engineeringstudents, as illustrated through a particular case study institution. The main goal of Phase 1 is toexamine the impacts of the HSI designation on institutional systems and identify the resultingstructural and cultural characteristics that may influence the experiences of undergraduate Latinxengineering students. Ultimately, this study seeks to identify how colleges of engineering at HSIscan leverage their
the costs of developing and maintainingprograms that increase retention and reduce attrition rates. In addition to these benefits, it hasbeen demonstrated that for university staff, mentoring “increased employee productivity andencouraged people to engage in more activities that enhanced the institution’s reputation.”3 It iseasy to imagine the return on investment for increased mentoring programs at the graduate level,and thus our focus here will be on mentoring in graduate school.Several factors have been correlated to student success in graduate school such as having a senseof connectedness to peers, faculty, and the department. Other factors include having aknowledgeable advisor, good communication with professors, and professors that
electrical engineering1. Among other possibilities, studentowned portable equipment facilitates hands-on experiential learning and provides the opportunityto flip the laboratory to increase student engagement2.Up until now, this trend has had reduced impact in analog and digital communications becausethe most capable equipment, such as the Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP) was tooexpensive or inexpensive equipment, such as the ubiquitous RTL Software Defined Radio (RTLSDR) dongle, lacked the necessary features for full transceiver implementation1. Currentlyretailing for $99 (academic price), the Analog Devices Active Learning Module-Pluto SoftwareDefined Radio (or PlutoSDR) appears to have the potential to bridge the gap between these
organizational cultures,time zones, and practice. This framework fosters experience-based learning and examines thevalue-added communication skills achieved through the addition of a global, virtual studentproject environment to supply chain-logistics management courses.Literature ReviewThe globalization of the world economy and the impact of technology on workforce preparationand curriculum design are reflected in the literature and showcase a strong awareness of thevalue of globalizing the curriculum. This shift is readily apparent when comparing the concernsof authors in past decades over lack of global awareness with the strong advocacy and promotionof globalization in current literature2, 10, 18.Traditional supply chain courses provide students
learning habits1, this approach ofstatic learning reduces students’ autonomy and communications, lack of efficientorganization and planning, and it provides less motivation for learning and creativity2. It isobserved that in recent years, instructors of circuits course more often utilize active learningapproaches to help students better understand complex circuit and physical-level phenomena.It is optimistic to see more instructors are no longer relying only on lecturing high levelabstractions, but are prompt to involve students’ minds and hands in projects, team work,circuits design, and student-centered activities. This active learning approach has proven to beeffective for teaching circuits in several schools and to improve the quality of
Page 24.1329.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Using Faculty Communities to Drive Sustainable Reform: Learning from the Strategic Instructional Initiatives ProgramAbstractIn February 2012, the College of Engineering allocated an unprecedented level of funding tosolicit proposals for the Strategic Instructional Initiatives Program (SIIP) – a new programtargeting the improvement of undergraduate engineering education. Faculty proposed large-scalerenovations of a specific undergraduate course or closely-related group of courses, with the goalof improving student engagement, learning outcomes, and faculty teaching experiences. Whileour faculty possess requisite expertise in
their students suffer from the loss of potential. When faculty membersare not forced to expend energy on hiding aspects of their identities, it releases that energy sothat they can live up to their full potential. Welcoming all faculty members to personalize theiroffices to the extent they feel comfortable and engaging students in critical discussions of howtheir multifaceted identities affect their motivations to engineer/design innovative solutions tothe world’s most pressing problems could go a long way to dissolve the technical/social dualismthat has long been the culture within engineering [10-12]. Obviously, there are limitations towhat information should be shared in a work environment. However, this author would proposethat the limits
choiceof learning tasks; (2) explicit communication and explanation of expectations; (3) modeling,practice, and constructive feedback on high-level tasks; (4) a student-centered instructionalenvironment; and (5) an attitude of respect and caring for students at all levels of development”.Lizzio, Wilson and Simon suggest, however, that the quality of the experience has an impact onthe outcomes16. This idea had been recognized 70 years ago (1939) by John Dewey17: The belief that all genuine education comes about through experience does not mean that all experiences are genuinely or equally educative. Experience and education cannot be directly equated to each other. For some experiences are mis-educative. Any experience is
eligible to receive a TOGA 2 fellowshipin that semester.Evaluation of TOGAFrom the beginning of the pilot phase, TOGA 2 graduate students completed feedback forms foreach workshop as well as a final questionnaire designed to ascertain feedback about theirparticipation in TOGA. Questions were included regarding a variety of aspects of TOGA such asthe time allotment, obtaining feedback from undergraduate students, the professionaldevelopment sessions, the ‘lead’ facilitator, and impact on undergraduate student learning.Beginning in the Spring semester of 2006, students were asked to rate a statement related to theoverall benefit of TOGA. In Table 1 below, the total TOGA 2 TA ratings for the statement“TOGA is a beneficial program” are given for the
cohort 1 to graduation. Lessonslearned at the end of four years include: (1) Proactive advising should be implemented for all fouryears as it remained useful in helping scholars stay on track to graduation and reaching their careergoals. Scholars always valued the advising sessions with the Director of Academic Success whois part of the CREATE management team, in terms of understanding their options for classes,major changes, minor degree programs, and other ways to pursue their academic and careerinterests. She often helped them feel agentic in their choices, despite being stuck on a narrow,major degree path due to the credit expectations of their programs. Her impact was particularlyimpactful later in the program as students started wanting to
the insignificant ones. We wanted to determine Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationwhether they were engaging in the kinds of reasoning strategies used by engineers when startingin on a new problem. Ideally we would have given students a hard problem and then follow themfor three weeks as they worked on it, but this is hardly realistic. With these goals in mind, wedecided to give them a complex problem statement and have them do the first steps towardsproblem structuring. This would allow us to begin to assess how they were developing initialreasoning and inquiry skills. A sample problem is
individual questions. Key feedback included practicing theimplementation from a faculty perspective instead of from a student perspective, and desire foradditional time spent on the educational psychology background. In addition, the workshopspurred some participants to request additional modules after seeing ease of use, and otherparticipants inquired about letting other faculty at their home institution use the LC-DLMs in theclassroom. This feedback will be used to improve future spoke workshops in the coming years,including two serving the South Central Region, one in the Northeast, and one in the West.Keywords: active learning, hands-on activities, disseminationIntroduction:Studies have shown that students participating in engaged, active
solution at the Gunjur site. Ateam of US based students, mostly engineering students but also including two political sciencestudents who spent one semester (Fall 2011) at UTG, are working to build on the experience atPirang to develop small scale power systems for villages or cooperative sets of compounds.Many community groups do not have the upfront resources for such a system. To attempt toaddress this difficulty, we have set up a fund within the Norwegian NGO Aktive PeaceFoundation to provide for upfront costs with interest free micro-financing. We hope engaging thecommunities own resources in this way will help counter the issues we've seen in too manyexternally funded projects that fall from the sky into a community.Other simple uses of
Haojing Chang is a Ph.D. graduated from College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China. She received B.S. from School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. After graduating from a Ph. D., she engaged in education management related research at Public Administration Mobile Station, Beihang University, Beijing, China. Her academic and research interests include student ideological and political education, educational research and methods. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Effectiveness of Research and Practice on the Improvement of Scientific Literacy Based on Extra-curricular