Paper ID #38948Board 345: NSF ATE: Internet of Things Education ProjectProf. Gary J. Mullett, Springfield Technical Community College Gary J. Mullett, a Professor of Electronics Technology and the present Department Chair of the Ad- vanced Engineering Technologies (AET) Group, presently teaches advanced technology topics at Spring- field Technical Community College (STCC) located in Springfield, MA. A long-time faculty member and consultant to local business and industry, Mullett has provided leadership and initiated numerous program and/or curriculum reforms as either the Chair or Co-Department Chair of the four
AC 2011-1233: FOSTERING INNOVATION THROUGH THE INTEGRA-TION OF ENGINEERING AND LIBERAL EDUCATIONCherrice Traver, Union College Cherrice Traver received her BS in Physics from the State University of New York at Albany in 1982 and her PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia in 1988. She has been a faculty member at Union College in the Electrical and Computer Engineering department since 1986, and has been the Dean of Engineering since 2005. Recently Dr. Traver has been involved in initiatives at the interface of engineering and the liberal arts. She has led two national symposia on Engineering and Liberal Education at Union College and she was General Chair for the 2008 Frontiers in Education
. Page 14.896.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Multi-disciplinary team of students partners with Water For People in GuatemalaAbstractSix students and one faculty member teamed with Water For People in the western highlands ofGuatemala during the Summer of 2008 to assess water supply, water quality, sanitation andhygiene issues in 35 remote villages. The multi-disciplinary team consisted of threeenvironmental engineers, one environmental scientist, one human geographer, one internationalhistory major, and a Latin America studies major. Over the course of eight days, the teamevaluated 35 water projects, 3 sanitation projects and administered 270 surveys to collect criticaldata related to
engineering student as shown in Table 2.Engineering programs seeking accreditation are required by ABET to document their continuousprogram improvement efforts and their outcomes. Inputs from co-op focused site-visit sessions Page 25.347.12and end-of-semester reports should be analyzed and compared with inputs from other assessmentsources to guide faculty in their efforts to improve their program. Any concerns or negativefeedback are referred to the appropriate committee to act upon and provide recommendation. Insome cases, addition of new courses is necessary as shown in the figure below. It is worthmentioning that the site visit discussions were the
music would stop. Since PCs often havesystem issues, this would regularly embarrass him during a job. Another desirable was tocombine functionality of several programs into one system. The student wanted to add a varietyof effects to the music, as well as control playback (stop, start, volume).In consultation with faculty, the student determined a real-time DSP system with supportingstorage, I/O and user interface would be a good platform for the new system. Although thestudent’s final goal was a replacement D.J. system for his laptop, his faculty mentor broke theproject into smaller goals. The first of these was to determine optimal hardware and operatingsystem for the new system.In order not to limit possibilities to those solutions already
to keep the cost low for students. In addition, there are a plethoraof engineering economic textbooks on the market. Many of these texts are quite comprehensive.Several of the best texts are revised every few years to reflect new developments and futuretrends in the body of knowledge. Faculty do, however, supplement the single textbook withother material 44% of the time. Figure 5 reflects that class notes are most regularly used as asupplement. From a pedagogical perspective, it would seem beneficial to build a “bank” of classnotes used by faculty to be shared and improved upon by all. Supplement 6% 6
architectural project,students apply knowledge of math, science and engineering, they analyze data and design asystem to meet unique requirements, and they use the techniques, skills and modern engineeringtools to identify and solve specific engineering problems. Because the studio is team taught byfour faculty: two architects, one architectural engineer specializing in structures, and onearchitectural engineer with experience in environmental controls, students become familiar withthe interdisciplinary teamwork that makes architecture happen and with the multitude ofcontemporary issues facing engineering and design professionals today, and they gain anunderstanding of not only their professional ethics and responsibilities, but also those of
issues concerned with the transfers of theseconcepts to an engineering context. This includes the discussion of lessons learned from thetransdisciplinary dialogue. More specifically, these insights provide a new perspective onengineering communication on a conceptual as well as instructional level.1 Introduction: The need to foster empathic communication as part of engineering students’ professional developmentAs the nature of engineering work changes from well-defined, technological questions to broad,multi-facetted, and ill-defined issues 1, a focus of engineering education on preparing studentsfor socio-technical complexity emerges 2-6. The socio-technical systems, that constitute the coreof the engineering work our current students will
requirement to an early cornerstone or later capstone design experience as a result,making these courses an ineffective “catch all” for many ABET requirements. In this paper, weaddress this issue in a novel way by synthesizing concepts from archaeology with advances incyber-enhanced product dissection to implement new educational innovations that integrateglobal, economic, environmental, and societal concerns into engineering design-related coursesusing product archaeology.1 Introduction and MotivationOutcome h in the requirements of ABET [1] has become a significant challenge to manyengineering departments. Providing effective, useful, and engaging educational experiences tounderstand the global, economic, environmental, and societal impact of
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2002, American Society for Engineering Educationand Fisher 8 findings that female students feelings of not belonging in the CS field was a majorreason for leaving it.6. Faculty and TeachingMost minority and non-minority students reported positive experiences with the generalatmosphere, faculty, teaching assistants, and support staff. They did feel supported by the facultyand did not voice any complaints against them. Yet, there were some issues with faculty andteaching assistants, which are worth mentioning. Many students felt that the older teachersprimarily liked to teach, whereas some younger teachers, instead of teaching, were
. Page 26.65.6VI. Design and Rollout of the Program The individual department chairs and the Dean were briefed on the outcome of theredesign process. While the committee members tended to favor the skills modules-based Model2 used at an increasing number of schools, concern was raised by the chairs about managing thelogistics and about balancing the load of these modules. Based on concerns expressed by thedepartment chairs and the desire to have the new program ready to roll out the following fall, theDean selected the lower-risk first-year design elective course Model 1 because he felt that itwould involve fewer logistics issues, would scale better, and would be easier to rollout quickly.The Dean determined that he wanted the course to
practicalproblems and issues that practitioners usually face, into the classroom.(6) Pedagogical studieshave demonstrated that the case study/ case history approach to engineering education provides agreater understanding of the multifaceted nature of civil engineering.(7,8) They can be used to Page 22.312.2simulate a variety of learning protocols such as: design and analysis experiences,interdisciplinary issues and concerns, costs, hazards, owner preferences, and compliance withstandards and guidelines. Cases, by and large, describe situations, projects, problems, decisions,etc., and are primarily derived from actual experience, and do reflect thoughts
chairs are not. This could also be because thedepartment chair is not seen by students as a disinterested observer, which can cause students to Page 2.236.3be more reticent in expressing concerns. The expense of hiring a professional to conduct theinterviews each year is prohibitive, so we are considering an alternative of using focus groups ledby College of Engineering personnel.Regardless of how the exit interviews are done, we believe there is merit in doing them. The dataobtained is useful feedback to the department. Some professors will argue that nothing new islearned if you are in touch with your students. While this may be true, there is
ethics, contemporary issues, life-longlearning, and communications primarily in the two-semester senior design course sequence.About five years ago, the department observed that this approach was not as effective as neededand decided to introduce a new standalone course covering these and other topics. This papercovers details of the course and discusses lessons learned.2. IntroductionThe course is titled Professional Practices and is currently offered as a senior-level course.Students typically take the course prior to or simultaneously with the first course in a two-semester senior design course sequence. The course is structured as five modules – professionalethics, contemporary issues, entrepreneurship, communications, and career
enough with each other to ask a teammate to explain a term. Forinstance, an electrical engineering student asked their chemical engineeringteammate about the importance of flocculants. Unfortunately as will be describedbelow, the trust in explaining a concept did not always extend to trust incompleting a task.Over the two years that the students had to complete their projects, there wereseveral other issues that they faced. For instance, initial task assignments hadduplication of efforts (i.e., more than one team member researching the sametopic). Unfortunately two people did not yield "twice as much new or usefulinformation". It was not until students received repeated low grades onassignments that the duplication of effort stopped for the
). “Cultivating diversity and competency inSTEM: Challenges and remedies for removing virtual barriers to constructing diverse highereducation communities of success,” Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, vol. 11no. 1, p. A44. [Online] Oct. 15, 2012.[10] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the numbers,” Amer. Assoc. Engr. Ed., 2016.[11] A. Kezar and C. Sam, “Special issue: Understanding the new majority of non-tenure-trackfaculty in higher eudcation--demographics, experiences, and plan of action,” ASHE Higher Ed.Report, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1-133, 2010.[12] National Education Association, “Update: Full-time non-tenure-track faculty,” (September1996). Available: National Education Association, http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/HE/v2no5.pdf[13] P. M
outcomes.The benefits of AI’s role in optimizing engineering team assignments extend beyond automatingteam assignments. As experienced engineers move on to different roles and new managers andsupervisors are hired, it requires effort and time to learn and know the strengths and capabilitiesof teams, and sometimes the complexities of the engineering tasks and team size make traditionalassignments suboptimal. Leveraging AI, machine learning algorithms, and advanced dataanalytics can match personality traits, experience, and individual skills to optimize teamassignments and maximize synergistic performance.Utilizing AI in engineering decision-making concerning team assignments enables organizationsto mitigate the challenges inherent in traditional
institutions on mobile hands-on learning. • developing standardized assessment tools for the MHOS partner institutions. • creating and implementing new assessment tools that measure student learning, including the development of new concept inventories, as well as measure ease of adoption by instructors. • identifying implementation barriers for wide-spread adoption and how these might be overcome by engaging potential new adopters in workshops, working with faculty who have recently received funding to implement the mobile pedagogy, and holding focus groups among different constituencies. • holding a practitioners’ best practices workshop to build a community of users to pool expertise. • conducting a series of mini workshops to
low bandwidth. We support Kuzma’s argument that technology should not be viewed as an end initself but is used as a means toward reaching active learning education goals. Acomparative study of the exam scores of the traditionally taught students and the Webbased students will benefit in the evaluation process. Since this project began many new tools have been developed to handle more ofthe backend networking concerns. It is advised to anyone who takes on Web-basedteaching to start small and be certain that the goals are presented clearly in an effort tohelp students understand what is expected. Highlight and date changes in an effort tokeep students informed of current events and changes, and prevent Web pages
considered the potential to result in marketable new technology. When relevant, intellectual property (IP) issues should be addressed in the thesis, and the potential identified. This criterion arises from Stevens long tradition of enterprise and innovation that started with the Stevens founding family, which has been incorporated into its mission. Stevens has pioneered the concept of Technogenesis as the educational frontier, where faculty, students and industry jointly nurture research concepts to commercialization and back to the classroom. It is more than technology transfer, it is part of the Stevens educational experience and creates a climate of innovation and enterprise across the campus. • The Ph.D
thatall the team members had better opportunity to participate in the execution of the project, wehave concluded that future offering of the course will be strictly restricted to first and secondyear students. The objective of the course is to instill an increased awareness of the issues ofinnovation and entrepreneurship early in their education process and admitting upperclassmen isobviously not consistent with this goal. Allowing senior students into the course for the first Page 15.434.9offerings were motivated by two concerns: The first was that early their education cycle thestudents might not have a firm experiential basis for appreciating
awareness of microaggressions among engineeringstudents, faculty members, and administrators. Anthropology focuses on human behavior,beliefs, and values. Here, we focus on the views and beliefs of minoritized engineering students.In addition, anthropology is concerned with social difference, inequality, and the everydayexperiences of marginalized groups [10]–[12]. By employing interviews as an ethnographicmethod from the field of anthropology, we aim to contribute to the understanding of minoritizedstudents’ experience with microaggression and the effort to combat these microaggressions fromthe perspective of these minoritized students. The significance of this project lies in its study ofminoritized engineering students’ understanding of
administration and delivery. 2. Some faculty feel compelled to excessively manage, draw conclusions from poor data presented powerfully or have unrealistic expectations about 24-7 access. 3. New courses, in particular, require a large work investment up front before the class can go online. 4. CMS could provide the College with a “time sheet” or create other privacy issues for faculty and the institution. 5. Faculty constantly battle to keep up with technology, course material, and with the students without live meetings. 6. Any CMS requires an especially dedicated and self-motivated faculty to create and maintain courses that are of equal quality or better than traditional instruction
is a strong advocate for exploring strategies for success- ful academic achievement at all levels of education and customizes her educational approach to enhance the diversity of strengths of each individual student while also shoring up areas of relative weaknesses. She is a tireless advocate for her STEM adult learners.Dr. Andrew Greenberg, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering University of Wisconsin-MadisonDr. Christine S. Grant, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Dr. Christine S. Grant joined the NC State faculty in 1989 after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. (Geor- gia Institute of Technology) and Sc.B. (Brown University) all in Chemical Engineering (ChE). One of less than 10 African-American
other side of campus. ! Students and faculty would benefit from training and tactics (e.g., for identifying and managing implicit bias and power imbalances, building greater cultural awareness and support for group work, etc.). ! Potentially perceived lack of engagement by students around DEI issues is not due to apathy; they feel stressed and overworked, and need time and space to “care”.While participants were drawn from across demographic groups, they self-selected to participate,making it unclear from the dialog data if climate concerns are uniform across groups. A subsequentstudent-led pilot study, consisting of semi-structured in-person interviews, did find discrepancies instudent experience
, including those who remain in theprogram after transfer, are supported with annual scholarships of up to $6000, depending onfinancial need. In addition to scholarship money, students participate in a variety of programactivities throughout the school year in the form of academic seminars, extracurricular events,professional development, faculty mentoring, peer mentoring, academic advising, andundergraduate research opportunities. Noteworthy elements of the program in years three and fourinclude 1) the selection and award of the fourth and final cohort entering the program, 2) atransition of leadership to a new principal investigator for the program at the two-college, and 3)the increase in number of students who have continued with the program
sought by the different disciplines as well as the vision of amultidisciplinary capstone project. The multidisciplinary capstone model described in this papercan foster partnerships between various engineering departments and disciplines. Nevertheless,advising a multidisciplinary capstone requires a committed, motivated faculty who are creativeand willing to change. Cultivating multidisciplinary capstones such as the Bionic Foot is adevelopmental experience for the faculty as well as the students, but the rewards are worth theadditional time required to make it interesting and relevant to the students.Bibliography1. National Academy of Sciences, “Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century,” National
Student Mentor Award in 2018, and was inducted into the Virginia Tech Academy of Faculty Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including Dean’s Awards for Outstanding New Faculty, Outstanding Teacher Award, and a Faculty Fellow. Dr. Matusovich has served the Educational Research and Methods (ERM) division of ASEE in many capacities over the past 10+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief of
and ENGR 126. In addition to the in-class cohorting, the STEM students are urged to meet weekly to formproblem-solving cohorts and an on-line communication/messaging system was created to holddiscussions on issues of common concern, share information, participate in collaborativeassignments and projects, and seek advice from STEM faculty and staff advisors. To maximizecohort building, a weekly meeting is held in which the STEM students meet with the STEMfaculty and staff to discuss problems and issues related to the courses they are registered in, plangroup activities, and listen to invited speakers on topics of common interest, such as goal setting.In one weekly meeting in November and March, the academic advisor helps STEM
not only practical hands-onexperience, but also with the critical thinking and technical skills to solve the problems andchallenges that graduates will face in their professional careers. Engineering Technologyprograms need then to anticipate the future needs of industry in order to be abreast of the ever-changing market in technological fields.Our experience in the Biomedical Engineering and Telecommunication Engineering Technologyprograms show that Electromagnetic Compliance and Interference (EMC/EMI) will be a keyissue for the US industry in the very near future, if not today. We can expect in the futureregulatory agencies will issue new Standards in a manner similar to the European experience,which will result in a demand of graduates