Bar Apparatus for use with Fiber Reinforced Composite Materials, Master thesis, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, 2012.5. Alan, D. J., Magleby, S. P., Sorensen, C. D., and Todd, R. H., A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 17-28, 1997.6. Lackey, L.W., Jenkins, H.E., Mines, R.O., and Schultz, S.R., Utilizing Senior Capstone Design as an Instrument for Student and Faculty Assessment of Program Outcomes, 2009 ASEE Conference, Marietta, GA, paper, 2009006MIN, pp. 1-11, April 2009.7. Todd, R.H., Sorensen, C. D., and Magleby, C. D., Designing a Capstone Course to satisfy industrial customers, Journal of Engineering
Page 23.1073.9related to their academic and career goals. Means and standard deviations were calculated to quantify perceptions of social support and barriers. The responses for social support and barriers were assessed on a 5-point scale, with four potential choices: 1- Not likely at all, 2- A little likely, 3- Moderately likely, 4- Quite likely; and 5- Extremely likely. The higher the score indicated the greater the extent to which students‘ experienced or expected to experience varying types of social support or support barriers. Descriptive analysis revealed that on average, students reported that receiving support from family and friends was most likely to occur during their engineering education (see Table 3). The analysis also
States. 4 Undergraduate engineering students have been reported to be some of themost likely to engage in academic dishonesty. 5-7 Whether this is due to academic pressures, peerpressure or perceptions, faculty involvement, or other factors, engineering students have self-reported dishonest behavior in over 80% of students. 4 Thus, academic dishonesty in engineeringis particularly worrisome as significant consequences to society may result from this dishonesty.Unfortunately, academically dishonest behavior by the students often leads to higher grades forthe student. Not only is this an unfair representation of the students’ knowledge and worth whichmisrepresents the student’s institution, but also is an unfair assessment when used as a predictor
; systems&methodology,&modeling&and&analysis,&data& • Curriculum&based&on&existing&systems&engineering&graduate& analysis,&risk&assessment,&plus&key&business& programs&with&emphasis&on&professional&practice&across& concepts.& multiple&domains.& Page 23.1128.73) Tailored& • Coordination&with&the&Registrar's&office&to&ensure&that&the& • All&veterans&who&choose&
graduates in technology and engineering to be morecompetent in the use of SI units and standards. Training our students for competence in the jobmarket is important to all of us. In fact, job placement rate is one of the assessment criteria ofvarious Accreditation bodies of programs. SI literacy and competence are factors that will berelevant in getting employed in a global economy which can influence placement rates.This paper discusses strategies for accelerating the training of engineering and technologystudents in the use of the SI units system in post-secondary technical education system. This willeventually help in metricating the whole economy due the predominance of graduates literateand competent in SI usage. A M20-50 strategy is proposed
Analysis of Visual Spatial Ability in Academically Talented Page 23.1253.15 Students. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 137-151.10. Linn, M., & Petersen, A. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta- analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498.11. Lohman, D. F. (1996) Spatial Ability and G. In I. Dennis, & P. Tapsfield (Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and assessment, (pp. 97-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.12. Pellegrino, J., Alderton, D. & Shute, V. (1984). Understanding spatial ability. Educational Psychologist, 19(3), 239–253.13. Olkun, S. (2003-Apr
degree in engineering. To help students complete college,Tinto tells us that there are four conditions for student success: high expectations; academic,social, and often financial support; assessment and feedback; and involvement or engagement.3For the past 10 years, the author and colleagues have been collaborating with CCs, working withtheir students, and helping them to transfer. We visit the CCs and speak with their students in themathematics and science classes, make high school visits with CC representatives to encouragemore students to consider engineering and attend their local CC, help provide scholarships bothat the CC and the university for transfer students, smooth the transfer process, and work to meetTinto’s four conditions for
impression of the course, (2) the instructors,(3) the presentations, (4) the students’ self-assessment of topic competency, (5) the overallunderstanding of marine renewable energy, and (6) the research tools used by students. Possibleresponses were: Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly Disagree, and NotApplicable. In Table 4, those questions that highlight the course strengths and weaknesses ofboth 2009 and 2012 are presented. A positive response represents the sum of Strongly Agreeand Agree, while a Negative response represents the sum of Disagree and Strongly Disagree.Similar trends were seen in the course feedback between the two offerings. The students seemedto overwhelmingly enjoy the course and find it beneficial to have taken it
, regardless of their choice ofsub discipline for subsequent specialization, occasionally show up late for classes or neglect toparticipate, which further complicates the ability to administer surveys of freshmen. The numberof responses we received (221), however, offer the opportunity to assess a significant number ofstudents and their perceptions. Continued efforts are needed to identify the perceptions andneeds of non-respondents and is a subject of current attention.In conclusion, this paper revealed information that can be used to improve the implementationand design future resources for supplemental instruction for freshmen engineers. There is aconfirmed gap in the trigger point for male and female participation in extra help resource
assess our results. Inaddition we are most concerned that our students still have meaningful experiences in thelaboratory and lecture components of the course. In this paper we also present our future plans.Introduction Page 23.1288.2This paper outlines our experiences from the Fall 2012 semester in adopting the complexprogrammable logic device (CPLD) into our introductory logic circuits course. These effortsinvolve integrating the technology deeper into the course and developing entirely new contentfor that purpose. Our research started in the Fall 2011 semester, when we successfully adopteda CPLD in our course, see Hill, Yu1 for details. At that
, technological literacy is absolutely essential in order to allowpeople to function and be productive in our competitive society today.Martin14 (2002) stated that “In a democratic society, technological literacy has individual,societal, and environmental implications…. As individuals, people need (a) to developtechnological abilities so they will better know how to use products; (b) to assess the impacts oftechnological actions; and (c) to develop better decision-making abilities in order to determinewhich technological system or process to use or not use (p.52).” According to the InternationalTechnology Education Association, ITEA3, (1996) “The technologically literate personrecognizes the possibilities advances in technology create and the choices
. Since the syllabus did not clearly specify a grading scheme for writing quality in particular, the quality of the lab reports was below standard. As a trade-off, the decision was made to remove a great deal of points from unacceptable work, with an offer to restore them if corrections were made by the student. In this manner, the student is not penalized for initially expecting low standards, but they must still improve the quality of their work to acceptable levels if they want to obtain full credit. The authors also realized the importance of the assessment scheme on the quality of student learning, and it was noticed that the students’ training on technical writing was not emphasized enough in the practice
research done in situ, we struggled with balancing the tradeoffsbetween the best data collection process for student learning and the best process for rigorousresearch. Having students work in pairs to develop their rankings should require the students toarticulate their reasoning and think more deeply about the task. The result is then a negotiated setof rankings that belongs to the pair of students, rather than the individual students, which makesit difficult to analyze the correlation between individuals’ performances on assessments with therankings. We considered giving the ranking task as a homework assignment, but that option hasseveral disadvantages. First, we could not observe them as they performed the task and thereforewe would lose a
researchedwhy students leave or complete college. In his recent book, Tinto outlines the four conditionsshown by research that students need to be successful in college: high expectations; academic,social, and if needed, financial support; assessment and feedback; and involvement orengagement.4 Tinto states that “the more students are academically and socially engaged withfaculty, staff, and peers, the more likely they are to succeed in college.”4The authors of this research believe that if a student is passionate about an area or subject, thenthey will do well in that area. When we talk to students at community colleges, we are primarily Page
stage would be Unity’s specificimport file compatibility as well as the compatible files still not being able to be imported properlybecause of windows video file decoder. This led to a couple hours of the project being dedicatedsolely to getting the video file into unity and functioning properly. Another design aspect that hadto be considered was the orientation of the plane as well as the main camera that is filming the“scene” of VR. This was mostly due to the unfamiliarity with Unity software.STUDENT SURVEY RESULTS:The final assessment of how this idea fared is done by providing the students with surveys inTables 1 and 2 based on seven criteria listed below:1 Rate your understanding of meaning and nature of the robotics lab course.2
Guild was held in the winter of 2022 at a large urban public university in theSoutheast. It gave students the chance to engage in experiential software projects,community-building activities, and mentorship from computing majors and industryprofessionals. In our research, we applied disciplinary identity theory, with a focus on computingidentity, to explore participants’ perceptions of the experiences and the impact of the Guild ontheir future computing aspirations. Towards this goal, we used a convergent parallelmixed-methods approach. We conducted pre- and post-workshop surveys of (n = 34) students’impressions and goals. In the analysis, we quantitatively assessed responses around students’computing identities and qualitatively evaluated open
interviews withimmediate feedback, resumé review, and application guidance, offered in conjunction with thecommunity colleges’ Career Services or Growth Sector (the backbone organization). During thecompetitive application process, project leadership interviewed students to assess their interestsand determine whether they preferred a university or industry internship. Based on the interviewsand a review of their qualifications (Table 2), students received initial placement—or,unfortunately, notice that they had not been selected.Table 2. Internship Criteria Curriculum Math Prior or Current 500-Word Essay/ GPA2 Pathway Preparation Coursework Application
, “Assessment for Faculty Advising: Beyond the Service Component,” NACADA Journal, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 66–75, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.12930/NACADA-16-028.[11] E. Hart-Baldridge, “Faculty Advisor Perspectives of Academic Advising,” NACADA Journal, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 10–22, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.12930/NACADA-18-25.[12] S. E. Brownell and K. D. Tanner, “Barriers to Faculty Pedagogical Change: Lack of Training, Time, Incentives, and…Tensions with Professional Identity?,” LSE, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 339–346, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-09-0163.[13] M. Artiles and H. Matusovich, “Doctoral Advisor Selection in Chemical Engineering: Evaluating Two Programs through Principal-Agent Theory,” vol. 2, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Feb. 2022
allotted time asin the traditional hands-on mode. The assessment data obtained from the pilot at SIT indicatedthat the students improved their knowledge of the concepts taught in the lecture component ofthe class and expressed general satisfaction with this laboratory approach.52 The results of theassessment study furthermore suggest that game-based learning environments have the potentialfor developing into an educationally viable complement to traditional pedagogical tools and Page 14.1032.10warrant further investigation (see Figure 8). 9Figure 8: Comparison of test results to evaluate learning
. Further data assessing impact of these labactivities on the broader curriculum is yet to be gathered.VII. Limitations and Future OpportunitiesWhile overall successful in student learning outcomes, interest, and engagement, we identifiedseveral limitations and future opportunities. • Students spend much of the course building prescribed circuits and relatively little time designing new circuits. This was required due to the short 7-week course duration, and students reported appreciation of the well-defined and well-organized labs given the fast pace. The open-ended sensor project does give a small experience in circuit design, construction, testing, and troubleshooting. However, a longer 14-week semester or 10
Education Department, Seattle Children’s Institute, Seattle, WA. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v2i1.02[14] P. Potvin, & A. Hasni, “Analysis of the decline in interest towards school science and technology from grades 5 Through 11.” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 23, pp. 784-802. 2014.[15] M. Al Salami, M., C. Makela, & M. Miranda, .“Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. International Journal of Technology & Design Education”, vol 27, no. 1, pp. 63–88, 2017.[16] N. K. DeJarnette, “Early childhood STEAM: Reflections from a year of STEAM initiatives implemented in a high-needs primary school.’ Education vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 104-118, 2018b.[17] D. E
best alignswith their course’s context and objectives. In this process, the researchers from the nationallaboratories develop webinar introductions to each problem and provide professors with a rubricby which to assess the final product of the project—a 5‒7 page proposal describing a solution toone of the three problems. For their participation, professors receive a certificate and the chanceto visit a national laboratory, whereas student teams get to attend a final competition with theirtravel expenses covered. By leading the competition, national laboratories benefit fromreviewing student submissions and providing mentorship and internship opportunities to studentswith the most compelling solutions. Ultimately, the project helps attract
. ● An ability to create eco-friendly designs by using recyclable materials and optimizing the prototyping process.These outcomes will be assessed through: 22 ● Preliminary design review addresses technical risks, hazards associated with safety, ethical and professional responsibilities. ● Student works maintain professional codes & standards in their modeling, drafting, and analysis. ● Students minimize initial rapid-prototyping costs by using low-cost materials and computer simulations. ● Students consider environment-friendly, reusable, and easily replaceable materials
careful assessment of these factors is an important first step when considering theimplementation of a control system in a student laboratory.We feel that the benefits of a centralized control system to student education in ChemicalEngineering are significant. In particular, we emphasize that such systems simplify instructionalaspects, allow both modeling and experimentation to be done with the same software andprotocols, and provide students with needed practical experience handling not only processcontrol but also control loops and instrumentation. Finally, we believe that, if properlyimplemented, using a commercial DCS is reasonably cost efficient.References[1] T. Blevins and G. McMillan, “Bridging the gap between universities and industry
professionaldevelopment hours towards the state's continuing education requirements and presenting DCCsreceive a small stipend for their time. The summer workshop provides the opportunity for DCCsto engage with the content they will teach and build community. Each DCC is paired with acampus faculty partner that provides a connection to the university and the main campus course.The DCCs can gain ideas and insights from their partners and share their successes.Tuition and recruitment: Dual enrollment courses in the state through community colleges areoften offered at no cost. However, the College of Engineering charges tuition of $496, whichincludes the $50 application fee and $26.50 mandatory fees assessed by the university. This is asignificant reduction in
featured with embodied andconventional learning methods for robotics technology instruction. By systematically analyzinguser engagement and sentiment toward the video content with the LLM methods, this study isable to provide a comprehensive understanding of how the videos featured with embodiedlearning method impact the learning effectiveness of the robotics technology. For this purpose,through the utilization of the LLM based data extraction, transcription, sentiment analysis, andstatistical techniques, our research is able to ensure accurate and reliable video analysis for thedesirable research outcomes. We seek to assess whether videos featured with embodied learningtechnique is able to better engage with learners in comparison to conventional
, and how to most effectively reach out to and engage with them, b) identify specific questions we should ask stakeholders, including to capture contextualized needs, concerns, and future outlooks that will assist in guiding ethics- related learning and training goals, content, pedagogy, assessment, etc., and c) identify specific opportunities for future “ethics R&D” efforts that may be worthy of further exploration.To help prepare for the event and seed initial lines of discussion, a survey was developed by theleadership team and deployed to all invitees. More detailed information about our approach tosurvey data collection and analysis is presented below, followed by a summary of the findings.The HEEE event itself
Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. His research includes undergraduate engineering education with focus on engineering design, problem-based learning, co-curricular involvement and its impact on professional formation, and the role of reflection practices in supporting engineering undergraduates as they transition from student to professional. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Supporting First-Year Students to Set Engineering RequirementsAbstractIn this Education Research and Assessment Paper, we present results from a design-basedresearch (DBR) study. While first-year design is now a common approach in engineering, less
participant mentioned learning to adapt theirfacilitation approach “on the fly” after realizing that a fixed planned approach may not resonatewith a particular group of students, requiring instructional flexibility, while others discussed howover time they gained more comprehensive and nuanced understandings of student needs andused those understandings to adapt their plans and facilitation strategies. One participant shared: “I learned to identify key learning objectives that were practically achievable within a set amount of time. I learned how to implement active learning strategies, and how to adapt to the flow of these activities during class time. I learned how to assess student learning within the context of