upright, whichwas similar to what she experienced herself. In addition, children were able to calm down or findalternative solutions to continue their work with the appropriate support from their caregivers.This demonstrates how adequate guidance and scaffolding during maker activities can helpchildren develop their own strategies when encountering similar situations by themselves [24].As for engagement and interest, all four families managed to complete their structures despite thefrustrations they encountered. Caregivers emphasized that the outcome did not need to be perfectand that their children’s creations were valuable regardless of frustrations encountered during theprocess. Since there was no formal assessment or survey examining
.12284[34] Watkins, J. (2023). “That is Still STEM”: Appropriating the Engineering Design Process toChallenge Dominant Narratives of Engineering and STEM. Cognition and Instruction, 1-31.[35] Welsh, R. O. (2021). Assessing the quality of education research through its relevance topractice: An integrative review of research-practice partnerships. Review of Research inEducation, 45(1), 170-194. https://doi-org.libproxy.uncg.edu/10.3102/0091732X20985082[36] Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2015). FAM JAM: Supporting Powerful Learning inMiddle School STEM. Engineering for Sustainable Communities Curriculum. RetrievedFebruary 21, 2025, from www.engineeriam.org
; Osterman, 2017). When surveying 2700 U.S.manufacturing establishments to focus on hiring mechanisms and skills of an employee,positions that were more common to have vacancies were related to a lack of advanced math andreading skills. Participants were from a wide background of skill levels from differenteducational backgrounds. The ideal respondent was someone who worked in human resources tohave a wide knowledge of daily operations or someone in a plant managing position. Based onsurvey data, the researchers found that 76% of positions place an emphasis on reading skills and74% place an emphasis on math skills for job success. The next area for assessing an employee istheir technical abilities. Over 42% of the respondents stated that an
research.Dr. Atota Halkiyo, Florida International University Dr. Halkiyo is a Postdoctoral Associate at the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education at Florida International University. Dr. Halkiyo graduated in Education Policy and Evaluation from Arizona State University and uses mixed methods but largely qualitative inquiry to study his primary research interest: enhancing higher education equity for all students, particularly those from international and/or underrepresented backgrounds (e.g., women and/or Black students in engineering). He envisions researching and removing possible systemic learning barriers from the curriculum, pedagogy, assessment, and learning environment to make
mission statements tell us about what they believe and do? Research in Comparativeand International Education, 9(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2014.9.1.83[21] Aib, I., & Shehzad, W. (2023). Defining mission statements in higher education: Towards agenre perspective. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(1), 138–157.https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12378[22] Manning, K. (2013). Organizational theory in higher education. Routledge.[23] Vohra, A., Achut, H. A., Loh, A. P., & Tan, W. W. (2014). Study of motivational constructs,learning orientations and goals affecting engineering students’ learning process. 2014 IEEEInternational Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 462–467. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE
Education V. 1, 2024, pp. 680–686.[10] G. Press, Internet traffic from mobile devices stats (2024), https://whatsthebigdata.com/mobile-internet-traffic/, 2024.[11] L. Su, “Web accessibility in mobile applications of education sector: The accessibility evaluation of mobile apps of higher education sector in portugal,” M.S. thesis, Universidade de Tr´as-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 2021.[12] G. Agrawal, D. Kumar, and M. Singh, “Assessing the usability, accessibility, and mobile readiness of e-government websites: A case study in india,” Universal Access in the Information Society, pp. 1–12, 2022.[13] L. C. Serra, L. P. Carvalho, L. P. Ferreira, J. B. S. Vaz, and A. P. Freire, “Accessibility evaluation of e-government mobile
) capabilities,ANSYS is extensively utilized in the design and evaluation of wind turbine blades, offering asuite of tools that enable engineers to address aerodynamic, structural, and thermal challenges. Inwind turbine blade design, ANSYS provides advanced tools for analyzing aerodynamicperformance using CFD modules such as ANSYS Fluent and ANSYS CFX. These tools simulateairflow around the blade, assess lift and drag forces, and calculate power coefficients undervarious wind conditions. Engineers can use these insights to optimize blade geometry, twist, andchord distribution for maximum energy capture. Blades are subjected to complex and varyingloads, including aerodynamic forces, gravitational effects, and centrifugal forces. Using tools likeANSYS
presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2—30888 (2018)[2] Raghu Echempati, New Course Development and Assessment Tools in Automotive Lightweighting Technologies, Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2—30837 (2018)[3] Nuno Manuel Mendes Maia and Júlio Martins Montalvão e Silva, eds., Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis, Research Studies Press Ltd., Baldock (1997)[4] Jacob P. Den Hartog, Strength of Materials, Dover Publications, New York (1961)[5] Daniel J. Inman, Engineering Vibration, Pearson, 4th edition (2013)[6] Gloria G. Ma, Siben Dasgupta, and Anthony W. Duva, Cantilever Beam
Paper ID #38940Lessons Learned While Managing ”Raise Your Hand,” a MultidisciplinaryCollaboration between Engineering and the ArtsMary Ann WeitnauerDr. Jacqueline Rohde, Georgia Institute of Technology Jacqueline (Jacki) Rohde is the Assessment Coordinator in the School of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her interests are in sociocultural norms in engineering and the professional development of engineering students.Thomas Martin, Georgia Institute of Technology ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Lessons learned while managing Raise
learning processes that lead to these outcomes [4], [5].CURE, as a course-based experience with pre-defined learning outcomes, is very amenable tooutcomes-focused research using surveys, test-based assessments, and grade-point averages [6].However, URE does not have the same kind of set learning goals; the primary goals of the UREcontext are the knowledge-production goals of the working laboratory. Learning here will, ofcourse, be a more organic by-product of the enculturation of students into scientific (andengineering) practice. Graduate research experiences are akin to URE in terms of difficulty toassess learning outcomes. Rather than focusing on outcomes defined from the start, we usecognitive-ethnographic methods to understand the social
met. The assessment of the identified ABET performance indicators at the end of the semester were above the acceptable threshold and comparable with the in-person course. This experience demonstrates that through innovation, some of the engineering laboratory courses can be taught remotely without sacrificing any experiments.1. Introduction One of the most meaningful measures of an engineering program is for its graduates to be able to perform from the first day on the job. It is only through a fine interplay of the theory and practice that such an outcome can be achieved. Hence, it is imperative that when developing courses and curricula, we keep a theory to practice outcome in mind. What distinguishes the new graduates in
socialjustice. Using a particular perspective on sociotechnical thinking (STSE), the goal of thisresearch was to explore sociotechnical thinking within engineering instructor teaching goals andpractices. The study also sought to identify the challenges and enabling factors that engineeringinstructors experience in utilizing teaching practices related to sociotechnical thinking. STSEwas selected given both its inherent flexibility, and its specific features that allow for somenatural connections with engineering. Using STSE also allowed for the introduction of aframework from a different context to assess its utility and relevance to the engineeringlandscape.This study employed an online survey, featuring both qualitative and quantitative methods
generally had a strong interest in aesthetics and design.This meant that it was difficult to detect significant positive shifts across student responses.ResultsTransformative ExperienceThe AesDes survey assessed the transformative experience by measuring the three indicators:expansion of perception, motivated use, and affective value. The findings are presented below.Expansion of PerceptionExpansion of perception was measured by Questions 9, 10, and 11, as shown in Table 1.It was found that the responses to Question 9 were positively saturated, as 51% (n=15) of thestudents who came into the class gave responses like the following on the entry survey: “In the engineering field, even though aesthetics is rarely mentioned in any textbooks or
students in the creation and submission of a smart contract, and verification oftransaction blocks through a proof-of-work consensus algorithm. A preliminary assessment of thelab exercises by undergraduate students allowed us to present in this paper (see Appendix A) awell-tested set of lab exercises.The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we provide a brief overview of the opportunitydefinition and the solution goal and objectives of the work described in this paper. In Section 3,we provide a brief description of the core and special components of the Ethereum blockchainplatform. Also included is a walk-through of the data flow of blockchain transactions and blocks.Section 4 focuses on the solution implementation stages and section 5
“Q” noted on their transcript [17]. ● QDFW% rates: the percentage of students in the course who Q-dropped the class, made a D, F, or withdrew (and received a W on their transcript), in comparison to the whole student population for that course. ● “SI” students: students who attended 6 or more sessions ● “non-SI” students: students who attended 5 or fewer sessions.IV. Research Questions To assess the impact of SI on freshmen engineering participants, this report addresses the following questions: 1. How did SI attendance affect overall course GPAs for SI students versus non-SI students in this course? 2. How did SI attendance affect QDFW% rates for SI students versus non-SI students in this
orlittle confidence using computer assessed design (CAD) (n = 22, 81.5%), probes/sensors (n = 18,66.7%), and programming software (n = 16, 59.3%).RQ 2: Appropriateness for Engineering InstructionRegarding whether teachers felt it was appropriate to use each of the digital technologies withintheir classroom to support engineering instruction, all teachers (n = 27, 100%) indicated digitalimages, simulations, and interactive visualizations were somewhat to extremely appropriate(Figure 2). One or more teachers indicated spreadsheets (n = 12, 44.4%), computer-assisteddesign (n = 6, 22.2%), probeware/sensors (n = 3, 11.1%), and programming software (n = 2,7.4%) were not appropriate to use. Digital image use was most frequently ranked by teachers
, space, or resources to support course offerings in emerging fields [2].Students who left engineering programs have cited a lack of interest in their major and theinability to work closely with faculty on research projects throughout their undergraduateeducation [3]. Students’ own experiences and performance on assessments indicate that thetraditional “lecture-homework-exam” method of engineering education is insufficient to fulfillthe goal of long-term information retention and academic and professional success [4].Furthermore, students who struggle significantly to succeed in classes employing this method ofeducation are more likely to discontinue their pursuit of engineering, as evidenced by the >50%attrition rate observed in many
lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and assistive technology. Page 26.1711.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Vulnerable heroes: Problematizing metaphors of male socialization in engineeringAbstractWhile extensive research and intervention has occurred over the past two decades to amelioratethe underrepresentation of white females and
shape their actions. In particular, we suggestthat students construct a cultural model of the admissions process in order tobetter understand and navigate the process. To understand this cultural model weneed to examine the beliefs that are born from it. In other words, to understand thestudents’ cultural model of the process we must examine what they report theirbeliefs about the process to be. It is important to understand this cultural model,because it is an evaluative tool, one that allows them to assess themselves andothers. This in turn shapes the students’ view of themselves and others, and howothers see them as well. Page 12.428.2Gaining entry to a
of accelerated globalization, “grey matter” is a country’smain durable resource. Its exploitation for economic and social well-being is increasingly at thecenter of development strategies. The analysis and information on which this book is based arelargely drawn from work by the World Bank Institute’s Knowledge for Development program,launched in 1999, which has carried out a number of knowledge based economy diagnostics andcase studies, using the Knowledge Assessment Methodology (KAM) 5 .What are the basic foundations of knowledge based economies? The World Bank suggests fourmajor areas [2]: • Education & Training– An educated and skilled population is needed to create, share, and use knowledge. • Information
: Definition PhaseTask #1: Define Progressive Growth Levels of Engineering Beyond Entry [I – IX] Assess the progressive stages of growth and levels of increasing responsibility in the practice of engineering for leadership of responsible technology development and innovation in industry14.Task #2: Identify Core Progressive Skill-Sets in Engineering for all Levels Identify the professional skill-sets, experience factor, and knowledge required at all growth levels for engineering-leadership of technology development and innovation a) Early-career Level I – III Engineer b) Mid-career Level IV–VI Engineer c) Senior-career Level VII–IX
was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, and accessibility and assistive-technology.Debra S. Fuentes, Brigham Young University Debra S. Fuentes is a doctoral student at Brigham Young University in Educational Inquiry, Measurement, and Evaluation specializing in Mathematics Education. She received a Master’s degree in Curriculum and Instruction emphasizing English as a Second Language, and a Bachelor’s degree in elementary education, minoring in
participation in groupactivities. Other studies have found that mixed-gender groups are associated with more positiveoutcomes than single-gender groups. For example, researchers [82] found that middle-schoolstudents participating in a design-based physics curriculum performed better on assessments ofcontent and practices if they had worked in mixed-gender as opposed to single-gender groups.Schnittka and Schnittka [27] found mixed-gender groups to be beneficial in engineeringeducation, with girls learning more in such mixed-gender groups.Although research findings related to the influence of group gender composition are mixed, anumber of studies [78], [83] – [85] have found group gender composition to be significantlyrelated to students’ participation