process to the next level of detail. Alternatives mustultimately be judged subjectively by the customer. Accordingly, Arrow L depicts the passing ofevaluated candidate designs to the customer as well as stakeholders for review and decision.Alternatives that are found to be unacceptable in performance terms can be either discarded orreworked with new alternatives sought. Alternatives that meet all, or the most important, functionalcriteria can then be evaluated based on estimations and predictions. This should be accompaniedby risk assessment, another capability of Engineering Economy.Engineering practice requires systems thinking more than ever before. Instead of offering systemsor system elements per se, Engineering Economy properly linked
series of presentations ofprojects by industry professionals in the final semester of the curriculum not only exposedstudents to a variety of different types of problems that taught them how to model real-worldsystems, but also helped them to integrate the knowledge that they have acquired over the courseof their studies prior to graduation, thereby helping them transition into the professional world.Finally, increased networking opportunities for both students and employers constituted a fringebenefit to the recommended modifications.References1. Drew, Christopher. “Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (Its Just So Darn Hard).” New York Times. 4 Nov. 2011.2. Nassersharif, B., and Rousseau, Carl-Ernst. "Best practices in assessing capstone
then administered a pilotsurvey created from this data to assess construct validity and reliability. In both phases, Renataused Yosso’s Community Cultural Wealth (CCW) framework [13] to guide the study.Renata collected twenty semi-structured interviews, which comprised the main data collection inthe qualitative phase of the study exploring the influences of SHPE on Latina/o students. Sheused purposeful sampling to achieve intensity and variation in the data [18], identifyinginformation-rich participants from those who attended SHPE’s 2013 national conference. Sheconducted interviews, which were an average of fifty minutes in length, using videoconferencingcapabilities such as Skype. While these interviews were the primary means of data
campus. Figure 4: The Invention Studio is Open to Anyone on Campus for Personal, Class and Research Projects163.3.1 Makerspaces as Industrial Environments for Study of 3D Printing Waste and EnergyThis fifth example demonstrates how equipment used for extracurricular activities can also beused for collecting research data (equipment in the model from Figure 2). One faculty at GeorgiaTech is working with the student makerspace to collect data for assessing environmental impactsof 3D printing, resulting in shared equipment, shared student resources, and ample real worlddata on manufacturing.Motivation & BackgroundFused deposition modeling (FDM) is a prominent technology for additive manufacturing offunctional parts. FDM is the
skills were reported in critical thinking, engineering design andapplications, and mathematics. Women reported somewhat higher improvements in writtencommunication, oral communication, and leadership than men. There are some differences in theskills reported by underrepresented minorities and other minority groups (e.g., other minorities b Note that the survey did not ask about how strong students felt their skills were at the beginning or end of theirstudies, instead asking them to assess their level of improvement. reported slightly higher gains in written and oral communication skills), but these differences arenot significant due to the small sample sizes of survey respondents in these groups.The survey also asked students for their
available only in the “gray”literature of think tanks, where validity is often assessed through critical readings by peers afterpublication, with responses issued from other think tanks. Compounding this difficulty is the factthat Louisiana carefully controlled the data from charter schools, releasing it only to a smallnumber of favored researchers, in violation of public records laws. The courts only sorted thisout in fall 2014.33Those who had privileged access to data touted success of charter schools: increasedstandardized test scores, increased graduation rates, and increased diversity (interpreted as ahigher number of white students enrolled).34,35 However, critics have pointed out methodologicalflaws in these studies, to the point where one
discovered through research,students can experience the enlightening and transformative potential of strategically focusingnew design efforts, on the pathway to potentially new, useful and non-obvious solutions.Reflections, Lessons, Student Assessment, Improvements - Future Work and Next StepsAssessment of Learning Objectives: Survey Reflections from Workshop Participants 1. “It was informative and interesting. I liked the idea of building a narrative before presenting the story behind a patent.” 2. “Upon reflection, I think a portion of the workshop could be an exercise of creating a provisional patent. Perhaps a sample provisional could be derived from the design exercise of the workshop.” 3. “Provide explanation of
Page 26.756.1 areas of Systems and Product Design Methods, Medical Devices, Regulations, Complexity Assessment, Decision Support Systems, Manufacturing, Automation, Real-Time Process Control and Engineering Ed- ucation. Dr. Medina is the IDEAS (Improving Design Decisions in Engineering and Applied Systems) Research Group Leader. This group is dedicated to innovating the development process of products and c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Paper ID #12765 processes. Dr. Medina has been the recipient of several fellowships such as the GEM Ph.D. Engineer- ing Fellowship, NASA
of teaching and assessment—creative, synthetic design problem solving is out, differentialequations, free-body diagraming, and equation balancing are in.The logic of exclusion operating within higher engineering education has two majormanifestations. The first is most obvious: the exclusion of those students who, over time, aredeemed not to have what it takes to be an engineer. These students either prove themselveswithout the necessary aptitude or discipline (e.g., poor performance in calculus, physics,chemistry, etc.) or they opt out of engineering willfully when it turns out not to be what theyexpected. The second manifestation of the logic of exclusion is less obvious, involving the waysin which various facets of a student’s identity are
Institute integrated the 50 students into their regular summer session while creating atailored TOEFL preparation class for the group and designating conversation partners that wouldaddress each student’s English weakness. Students took an assessment test at the beginning andwere placed in classes appropriate to their levels addressing their needs. The goal was not only toimprove their English language skills, but also prepare them to take the TOEFL and meet theminimum required by the university, which is a score of 80 on the iBT TOEFL.The program was also designed to provide students with GRE training and research immersion.The GRE training took place during the first five weeks of the program. It was two hours twice aweek (Mondays and Wednesdays
Paper ID #13327Informal Pathways to Engineering: Middle-School-Aged Homeschool Stu-dents’ Experiences with Engineering (Fundamental)Tamecia R Jones, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamecia Jones is currently a doctoral student in the Engineering Education department at Purdue Uni- versity with a research focus on K-12 engineering education, assessment, and informal and formal learn- ing environments. She is a graduate of Johns Hopkins and Stanford University. Originally trained as a biomedical engineer, she spent years in the middle school classroom, teaching math and science, and consulting with nonprofits, museums
Page 26.1006.8perceived by others. I have been incorrectly called out before by others who feel that I amsimply being politically-correct and not really a believer in equity issues. Because I have lookeddeep within myself and assessed my words and actions, I have been able to readily counter thoseclaims.Dr. Kokini: Some of the barriers to individual-level advocacy are bias, culture, and a lack ofunderstanding on the part of the majority on how it feels to be part of an underrepresented group.Dr. Lopresti: Engineers and scientists often behave as though we exist in a perfect meritocracy,and hence we should not have to worry about discrimination or gender equity. An unwillingnessto acknowledge reality is part of the problem. Also, what passes as
emotionally satisfying career choice [25]; while a much smaller set of voices [26; 27; 28] contend that the burdens and opportunities for change also fall to engineering educators.In considering the process and findings from an NPA study, it is important to clarify that the“policy” in NPA does not imply the analysis of policy documents. Rather, Roe[13] argues that thestories that underpin, inform, and drive our efforts to solve complex, uncertain, and polarizedproblems are “a force in themselves and must be considered explicitly in assessing policyoptions” (p. 2). In this paper we build on our prior work and conceptualize this “force” as theautopoietic function of stories
to then go shape into pots. She also spent hours in the backyardgarden with her father, who came up with creative ways to maintain the health of the garden andits produce without using expensive fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides. For example, sheremembered building a mesh contraption out of things they found in his shop in order to filterout the Bermuda grass in the garden.After assessing the availability of materials, Julie then considers the physical constraints ofwhere the actual system or artifact is going to be built, and how those impact the people doingthe work, installation, and maintenance. In her senior design team, she was the most attentive inher group to thinking about the risks their home design posed to the people doing
to beactive and involved in their learning. And there is much evidence that these techniques producegains in students’ learning1, engagement2, and sense of meaning3. In addition, these activities arealso immensely fulfilling for the educators involved. This paper is an example of both asignificant learning experience and an assessment method that can provide additional insight intogains for students beyond quantifiable institutional measures. Page 26.1448.2The paper begins by explaining the learning initiative in some detail to provide a clear contextfor the later discussion of students’ learning outcomes. Then a discussion of the theory
-college student’sperceptions of engineers or engineering as a career. Most of the research is based onsurveys completed by students or interviews with smaller sets of students. One wellknown tool used with first year engineers is the Pittsburgh Freshman EngineeringAttitude Survey.1 ASSESS Engineering Education states the PFEAS is an attitude surveythat gathers information about incoming students’ attitudes about “how engineerscontribute to society” and “the work engineers do.”2 However, the questions do not askfor specifics about tasks but more general questions about how respectable the field isand if the work of engineers has a positive impact on society. Specific tasks andengineering disciplines are not discussed.Most studies that ask students
conferencing22. Duringthe TUES project, the research team gathers mixed-method data to assess achievement andaffective outcomes among students who did and did not have access to the online intervention. As the TUES project recently moved into its third year, the members of the research teamnoted a process of teacher change occurring as a result of project activities. Periodic reflectiveinterviews with the MI, as well as informal discussions in research team meetings, suggested thatthe MI is doing more than simply implementing a prescribed instructional innovation. Rather,the research team witnessed as the MI moved from a state of reluctance to one of enthusiasticadoption of the online intervention. Sensing this deep attitudinal shift on the part
working on curriculum development and research on authentic STEM instruction and directing the state’s FIRST LEGO League competi- tion program. Mr. Rosen has authored or co-authored papers and book chapters that address issues of underrepresented populations participation in engineering programs and the integration of robotics and engineering into classroom instruction.Jayma Koval, Georgia Institute of Technology Jayma Koval is a Teacher in Residence at Georgia Tech’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Math- ematics and Computing (CEISMC). In this role she has developed middle school science curriculum and assessments for NSF funded projects. Previously, Jayma was a middle school science teacher for 10 years
stay on track or that the presence of an attendance policybenefits only some students in these courses but not the majority. The School of engineeringfaculty do not believe that an attendance policy is beneficial, even in lower level courses.As shown in Figure 4.5, an overall assessment of all schools and the perception of attendancepolicies on student learning indicates that, in lower level courses, faculty members reportinsignificant difference in whether an attendance policy has a benefit or not. The percentage offaculty who feel that the attendance policy is beneficial is almost equal to the number of facultymembers who believe an attendance policy is not beneficial. However, in 4000 level courses, it isvery clear, across disciplines, that
InternationalStudent Assessment (PISA) [1] states the need to train people with the future skills such asmathematical literacy. PISA [1] defines mathematical literacy as the capacity to identify, tounderstand, and to engage in mathematics and to make well-founded judgments about the rolethat mathematics plays, as needed for an individual’s current and future private life, occupationallife, social life with peers and relatives, and life as a constructive, concerned, and reflectivecitizen. Subsequently, more specific studies [2] [3] aimed at a very specific population, futureengineers, have made explicit the prevailing need for the basic individual education taking intoaccount the fact that they should develop generic skills that complement and reinforce the
systems of power that promote and perpetuate injustice. From this perspective, thesocial good of an international bridge expansion, or a new line of cars, or the delivery of drinkingwater to a large metropolitan area cannot be assessed, and certainly cannot be celebrated as amodern social feat, without taking into account the following: a) whose interests are served fromthe improved vehicle access to the customs plaza, or the determination of insufficient evidence toconduct an investigation into driver complaints, or the invalidation of high lead-in-watermeasurements, b) what the self-defined needs are of individuals who are excluded from thedecision-making table but are suffering from asthma, or experiencing their car engine shut downin the
, these studies indicate that external factors, such astraining and possibly gender discrimination, are influencing women faculty’s entrepreneurialself-efficacy and intentions.RISK AVERSIONIt is safe to say that research shows that women appear to be more risk averse, especially when itcomes to finances. Charness and Gneezy pulled together 15 separate investment gameexperiments, including experiments done with graduate business students.45 Overall, andspecifically in the case of the business students, it was shown that men engage in more risktaking than women. Another study assessing the differences in risk taking between men andwomen recruited at the Pittsburgh Experimental Economics Laboratory, matched the participantsby ability. These