Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceII. Overview The objective of this work was to design a robot kit that can be utilized to teach the basicsof computer vision with Python to robotics at the high school and college level, at the same timeproviding critical hands-on experience with this type of design project. The learning tool consistsof a three-degrees-of-freedom robotic arm equipped with a camera for computer vision. Belowthe camera is a workspace fixed to a panel, all mounted on a portable station. The Pythoncomputer vision program runs on a Raspberry Pi 4, sending commands to an Arduino Uno board.When assembled and programmed, the robot will be capable of sorting objects by color
, "Opportunites for sex education and personal and social education (pse) through science lessons: the comments of primary pupils when observing meal worms and brine shrimps," International Journal of Science Education, vol. 21, 1999.[8] International Technology Education Association and Technology for All Americans Project, Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association, 2000.[9] National Research Council (U.S.), National Science Education Standards: observe, interact, change, learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.[10] J. H. Tullock, Natural reef aquariums: Simplified approaches to creating living saltwater
AC 2008-501: INTERDISCIPLINARY TEACHING TECHNIQUES ANDLEARNING IN DYNAMIC MODELING AND CONTROLRobert Rabb,David Chang, United States Military Academy Page 13.788.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Interdisciplinary Teaching Techniques and Learning in Dynamic Modeling and ControlAbstractEngineering education experiences unique challenges as well as opportunities. As the future ofengineering education emphasizes more interdisciplinary work and more work performed inteams, one logical starting point for this evolution in interdisciplinary work is with the faculty.Engineering educators cannot ignore the real world’s shifting focus
AC 2007-2126: USE OF QFD IN THE ASSESSMENT OF COURSE ACTIVITIESFOR LEARNING OUTCOMESZbigniew Prusak, Central Connecticut State University Dr. Zbigniew Prusak is a Professor in the Engineering Department at Central Connecticut State University in New Britain, CT. He teaches courses in Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Technology and Mechanical Engineering programs. He has over 10 years of international industrial and research experience in the fields of precision manufacturing, design of mechanical systems and metrology. Dr. Prusak received M.S. Mechanical Engineering from Technical University of Krakow and his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Connecticut. E
Paper ID #7910E-Book on DSP Theory with Interactive iOS, Java, and Android SimulationsProf. Andreas S Spanias, Arizona State University Andreas Spanias is a professor in the School of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering at Arizona State University. He is also the founder and director of the SenSIP industry consortium. His research interests are in the areas of adaptive signal processing, speech processing, and audio sensing. He and his student team developed the computer simulation software Java-DSP (J-DSP - ISBN 0-9724984-0-0). He is author of two text books: Audio Processing and Coding by Wiley and DSP; An
Director of Engineering programs and Associate Professor of Manufacturing Engineering atWashington State University Vancouver. His research interests are robotics, automation, fuzzy logic, technologyassisted distance delivery of laboratory courses and haptic interfaces for virtual reality. Page 8.59.8 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education
experience of faculty as a whole. There is a chance that oursample may use CMSs more extensively than the rest of the population.Bibliography[1] E. F. Gehringer, “To see or not to see: Access restrictions on course Web sites,” Proc. American Society for Engineering Education 2002 Annual Conference, Session 1520.[2] Nancy Shute, “Open University,” ASEE Prism 11:3 (November 2001), pp. 18–25.EDWARD F. GEHRINGEREdward Gehringer is an associate professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and theDepartment of Computer Science at North Carolina State University. He has been a frequent presenter at education-based workshops in the areas of computer architecture and object-oriented systems. His research interests
refereed international journals and conference proceedings. He is a Senior Member of the Society for Manufacturing Engineering and a member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. He is also a member of the American Society for Engineering Education and a member of the American Educational Research Association. Page 25.574.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Enhancing Students’ Understanding of Dynamics Concepts Through a New Concept Mapping Approach - Tree of DynamicsAbstractDynamics is a sophomore-level course that many engineering students are
The Untapped Pipeline and the Math Myth Amy J. Moll, Patricia A. Pyke, and John F. Gardner College of Engineering Boise State UniversityIntroductionThis paper is meant to initiate a discussion instead of proposing a solution. It representsthe authors’ discussions over the past few years on how to increase enrollment inengineering programs as well as attract more women and minorities to study engineering.The authors hope that these ideas will prompt discussion among engineering educators onhow to interest more students in studying engineering and how to interest more women inthe field.In the last 20 years, in the United States, the
Copyright c 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationReferences[1] M. G. Morrow, “University of Wisconsin at Madison,” 2004. http://eceserv0.ece.wisc. edu/~morrow/software/.MICHAEL G. MORROW, P.E., is a Faculty Associate in the Department of Electrical and Computer En-gineering at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. His research interests include real-time digital systems,embedded system design, software engineering, curriculum design, and educational assessment techniques. He is amember of ASEE and IEEE. E-mail: morrow@ieee.org Page 10.362.8 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
productivity. Sadly, physical scientists who want to learn such things usually have to teach themselves.The project described here provides an authentic context in which our undergraduatemechanical engineers gain such computing expertise and more. Programming, design,simulation, and analysis are all intertwined in a project-based setting designed to beengaging for engineering students. We have patterned our approach after what cognitivepsychologists call a macro-context [7], connecting lessons and assignments to ameaningful overall goal that gives learning purpose. Research has shown that suchcontextualized learning is significantly more effective than traditional classroom learning[1,2,6].In addition to enriching the educational experiences of
of iterative processes (also called evolutionary orspiral processes)3,15, in all aspects of development. A second, related theme is the value of peerreviews16,29. For example, the product proposal is developed in the following sequence: 1. The class works together to brainstorm a wide variety of product ideas. 2. Students work alone or in pairs on a concept proposal and presentation that describes a Page 9.858.1 product’s major functions and requirements (not design or implementation). Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
practicemanipulating experimental data. Thus, the FPB laboratory has recently been upgraded through the Page 7.574.1inclusion of automated data acquisition (DAQ) hardware and software. This upgrade hasProceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationfacilitated increased understanding of flexural theory, introduced modern experimental methods inboth lecture and laboratory, given students a more robust data set upon which to base theiranalyses, and enhanced student experiences with technical report writing. The
://www.hacc.edu/DACUM/dacum.html. February 15, 2002.RICHARD CIOCCI is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Penn State Harrisburg after having held a similar position at the Harrisburg Area Communit y College. Ciocci is a registered professional engineer with the PhD in mechanical engineering from the University of Maryland. His research interests include design for the environment, lead-free electronics, sustainable engineering, and advanced manufacturing methods. Page 8.492.7 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003
detected in theprevious architecture, the Intel Pentium Pro4, 5. Formal verification—the mathematical proof ofcorrectness of hardware and software—is gaining momentum in industrial use, but has so farfailed to scale for realistic microprocessors, or has required extensive manual intervention byexperts—factors that have made formal verification impractical to integrate in existing computerarchitecture courses. Page 8.737.1 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Traditionally, the
over theInternet, (3) scope and objectives for the new laboratory, (4) laboratory administration, (5)design project benefits, (6) ABET benefits, (7) university benefits, (8) faculty benefits, (9)student responses-outcomes, and (10) general laboratory content with two labs featured withphotographs.IntroductionMost university engineering laboratories have been underfunded and neglected over the pastdecades. This has resulted from the university not providing adequate workload credit fordevelopment and teaching of labs as compared to that given for research [2]. These deficiencieshave allowed many of our engineering labs to become obsolete as faculty interest in providingon-going laboratory development and supportive computer related skills has
further development of their written and oral communication skills. The emphasis is placedon small and medium-sized companies, where an engineer’s duties require versatility andcompetence in a variety of tasks.A course coordinator, who is responsible for establishing and maintaining links with theindustrial sponsors, administers the course. In addition the course coordinator also schedulesregular seminars and safety training, oversees coordination of resources, signs for expenses, and Page 6.580.1 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001
Mathematical ability to deal with solution of differential equations Getting lost in the details Page 6.55.1“Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education”As we speculated about student interest in the subject, we wondered what could we do to bettermotivate the students. Perhaps the key to promoting student interest was to present the subjectless as static facts and more as a journey or dynamic process in knowledge acquisition. Observevibration phenomena, recognize need to control or change the phenomena, then search for
Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, 121 (4), 259-261.12. Koehn, E. (1995b). “Practitioner and Student Recommendations for an Engineering Curriculum. “Journal ofEngineering Education, ASEE, 84 (3), 241-248.13. Landis, R.B. (1997). “Enhancing Student Success.” ASEE Prism, 7 (3), 30-32.14. Mendelsohn, R. (1998). “Teamwork – The Key to Productivity.” Journal of Management in Engineering,ASCE, 14 (1), 22-25.BiographyEnno “Ed” Koehn is Professor and Chair of the Department of Civil Engineering at Lamar University, Beaumont,TX. Professor Koehn has served as the principal investigator for several research and development projects dealingwith various aspects of construction and has experience in the design, scheduling, and estimating of facilities. In
colleges and universities to the workplace, two talentand organizational development internal consultants conducted a 0–2-year employee experiencestudy, including focus group interviews, peer firm interviews, exit interview data, and experiencemapping workshops. Our findings indicated that new hires were struggling with three mainthemes: (1) imposter syndrome, (2) lack of assertiveness, and (3) generational stereotypes. Thesefindings offer engineering and education professionals insight into students’ challenges as theytransition from school to the workplace and how to mitigate them through mentorship andsupport. This paper examines the findings of the 0-2-year employee experience study andrecommends ways to address imposter syndrome, lack of
-fiveyears.KENNETH J. FISHER, M.S.M.E., P.E., Professor of Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University,The Behrend College, since 1988. Currently the Assistant Director of Engineering and EngineeringTechnology at Behrend College. Served as an adjunct faculty at Gannon University prior to joining PennState Erie. Engineering experience totals 20 years and includes responsibilities as a Research Engineer for atelecommunications firm, and as a Design Engineer and Director of Engineering for a health care industry. Page 9.800.8 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
careercounseling in science and engineering[4]. Page 9.199.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationEstablished in 2001, the Puget Sound Consortium for Manufacturing Excellence(PSCME) is a regional education-industry partnership aimed at enhancing the connectionbetween manufacturing technology education, student career goals, and private sectordemand. The PSCME, a three year project funded through the National ScienceFoundation (NSF), is interested in promoting science and engineering careers to K-12students. In
successful.References 1. Manual for Model 210/210a Rectilinear Control System, Educational Control Products, Bell Canyon, CA, 1999. http://www.ecpsystems.com 2. Burchett, B. T., “Parametric Time Domain System Identification of a Mass-Spring-Damper System”, submitted to 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 3. Burchett, B. T., and Layton, R. A., “An Undergraduate System Identification Laboratory”, Proceedings of the 2005 American Control Conference, Portland, OR, June 8-10, 2005.Author BiographyBRADLEY T BURCHETT is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering. He teaches courses on the topicsof dynamics, system dynamics, control, intelligent control, and computer applications. His research
. Page 7.304.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationAmerican Association for Higher Education (AAHE) defines service learning as “… a methodunder which students learn and develop through thoughtfully organized service that: is conductedin and meets the needs of a community and is coordinated with an institution of highereducation, and with the community; helps foster civic responsibility; is integrated into andenhances the academic curriculum of the students enrolled; and includes structured time forstudents to reflect on the service experience.” 2The University of San Diego (USD), understanding
theUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville, his research interests are in engineering design, automotive systems,mechatronics, product development, and design for manufacturing. He is a licensed professional engineer. Page 7.1019.8 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education
7.1084.9 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationBiographical InformationMATTHEW I. CAMPBELLDr. Matthew Campbell received his PhD from Carnegie Mellon University in the summer of 2000. He is currently anAssistant Professor at the UT Austin in the ME Department. His research focuses on theories of engineering designand how the computer can be leveraged to solve complex and conceptual design problems. His teaching activitiesinclude undergraduate Machine Elements (as described in this paper), a graduate class in optimization, and acollaborative Engineering/Art Project class
Paper ID #49644Accidental engineer’s accidental university engagement and mentorshipDr. Hoo Kim, LeTourneau University Hoo Kim, Ph.D., P.E., is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering and Engineering Technology at LeTourneau University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from POSTECH, Pohang, South Korea, and his Ph.D. from the University of Texas at AustinJaden Schuster, LeTourneau UniversityRay Holt ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Accidental engineer’s accidental university engagement and mentorship Hoo Kim1, Jaden Schuster1, Ray Holt2
., works for Communication across the Curriculum (CxC) at Louisiana State University (LSU). She is a Ph.D. candidate in LSUˆa C™s cultural geography and anthropology program, and has over 10 years of qualitative research and teaching ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Celebrating 20 Years of the Engineering Communication Studio at Louisiana State UniversityAbstractThis practice paper reviews the 20-year history of the Engineering Communication Studio(Studio) at Louisiana State University (LSU), highlighting its role in improving communicationskills among engineering students to promote leadership, teamwork, and understanding ethicaland professional
Paper ID #37083Student competency, autonomy, and relatedness in a practice-oriented engineering program: An application of self-determination theoryBethany PopelishTobias Reynolds-TylusMelissa Wood Aleman (Professor) Dr. Melissa Aleman (Ph.D. University of Iowa) is Professor of Communication Studies at James Madison University and has published research using qualitative interviewing, ethnographic and rhetorical methods to examine communication in diverse cultural contexts ranging from multicultural families to engineering education and makerspaces. She has advised undergraduate and graduate students in
educational objectives of Sophomore Clinic.II. The Engineering Clinics at Rowan UniversityRowan University has an eight-semester Engineering Clinic program intended to provideEngineering students with experience solving practical, open-ended engineering problems. Thesequence culminates in the Rowan Junior/Senior Engineering Clinic, in which students work onreal engineering research and design projects. Project teams work with close faculty supervisionand usually consist of 3-4 students; sometimes drawn from a single discipline and sometimesrepresenting several, depending on the needs of the particular project. Most projects areexternally sponsored, either by local industry or government agencies. However, students alsohave the opportunity to propose