Displaying results 35731 - 35760 of 35828 in total
- Conference Session
- Aerospace Division (AERO) Technical Session 1 - Experiential Learning
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Michael C. Hatfield, University of Alaska Fairbanks; Denise Thorsen, University of Alaska Fairbanks
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Aerospace Division (AERO)
5 Peer Eval 5 Final Briefing 5 Instructor Points 5 Table 1: Point weighting summary for courseGrades. Grades are assigned on an individual basis, with input based upon the team’s performanceand instructor assessment of the individual’s performance. The instructor factors in feedback fromguest reviewers during presentations, as well as peer input. Detailed guidance on content and gradingfor each deliverable is provided by the instructor at the beginning of the semester and then reviewedprior to the period of time where the student teams are expected to begin work on these.Class Participation. The grade for class participation
- Conference Session
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 10: Institutions and Structures
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Saskia van Beers, University of Toronto; Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
assessment, intensifies gender and racialinequities within engineering workplaces [15]. Their analysis of data from a nationwide multi-year study suggests that while women were more likely to be shoulder-tapped for theseassignments, men experienced more favourable career advancement upon completing theseassignments [15]. Further, racial minorities within engineering workplaces, such as Black andIndigenous engineers, were granted the fewest opportunities to showcase their aptitude throughstretch assignments for advancement purposes [15].Engineering CultureThe culture within engineering has often been described as ‘hostile’ and ‘chilly’ to under-represented groups [16]. Cech and Riley, among others, have identified a dominant meritocraticideology
- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Team-Based and Experiential Learning
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Elissa Ledoux, Middle Tennessee State University; Brian James Slaboch, Milwaukee School of Engineering
- Tagged Divisions
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
includeother projects. The highest scored areas (92-93%) were SO’s 1a (STEM problem solving), 2a(just discussed), and 6 (testing and analysis). All these items are heavily emphasized in thecapstone process using the engineering trident of “design, build, test,” so it is reassuring that thestudents recognize this in the survey and clear based on course grades and project quality thatstudents can apply these principles to their projects. The guide to an ABET-focused engineeringcapstone course [8] based on this approach was developed to ensure that all required studentoutcomes were met regardless of the instructor teaching the course. The additional non-ABET-related aspects of the course assessed in the survey, addressingpractical applications and
- Conference Session
- GSD 1: From Recruitment to Retention
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Anne Lynn Gillian-Daniel, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Rebecca Cors, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Wendy C. Crone, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Victor zavala, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Derek Johnson, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Kerri Lyn Phillips, University of Wisconsin - Madison
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
- Conference Session
- GSD 2: Identity and Motivation
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Gouri Vinod, Cornell University; Allison Godwin, Cornell University; Trevor Franklin, University of Colorado Boulder
- Tagged Divisions
- Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
- Conference Session
- Track 4: Technical Session 7: An exploration of the relationship between physical, social, and emotional resource access and the development of engineering identity and belonging
- Collection
- 2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
- Authors
- Anne-Marie C.A. Zamor, Rowan University; Justin Charles Major, Rowan University
- Tagged Topics
- 2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE Zone 1 Conference
- Authors
- Kai Hu
- Conference Session
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 2: Identity, Professionalization, and Belonging I
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines; Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines; Junko Munakata Marr, Colorado School of Mines; Jeffrey C Shragge, Colorado School of Mines; Jonah Klemm-Toole, Colorado School of Mines
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
network with alumni of the program.Before the orientation, all students take a survey that tracks students’ FOK as well as graduationcertainty, belongingness, engineering role identity, and demographic information. The surveywas previously developed and validated as part of another NSF grant and is available openaccess [28]. The survey was administered by our external evaluator, who also removedidentifying information and sorted the data for the faculty team to examine. Students took thesame survey after they graduated, to help the team assess changes over time. A subset of ourstudents who have demonstrated unmet financial need receive a scholarship funded by the NSFS-STEM program. (At the graduate level, demonstration of unmet financial need
- Conference Session
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 1: Critical Reflections on Teaching and Learning
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Jennifer Howcroft, University of Waterloo; Kate Mercer, University of Waterloo; Julie Vale, University of Guelph; D'andre Jermaine Wilson-Ihejirika P.Eng., University of Toronto; Stephen Mattucci, University of Guelph
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
assessments that promote problem solving skills rather than promoting memorization. The second is about how and why values-based learning outcomes should be scaffolded into STEM curricula and capstone experiences. Dr. Vale believes that building student and faculty appreciation of the intersections between social justice and engineering is crucial to empowering engineers to fulfil their mandate to serve the public. She brings this view to the classroom, to curriculum design and development, and to her research.D’andre Jermaine Wilson-Ihejirika P.Eng., University of Toronto D’Andre Wilson-Ihejirika is currently a PhD candidate at the University of Toronto within the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering
- Conference Session
- Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 9
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Carolyn M Rodak, Union College; Luke Dosiek, Union College; Andrew Burkett, Union College; Christine Henseler, Union College; Christopher Chandler, Union College; Sohini Chattopadhyay, Union College; Nick Webb, Union College
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)
? ● How do we generate sound? ● How do we make music from data? ● How do we map data to sound? ● Can we “hear” the data in music and sound art?The students will be assessed with several low-stakes assignments plus three projects. In the firstproject, students will design a device that transforms data into sound. Focusing on practical, real-world applications, students will identify a specific problem or need and conceptualize a devicethat provides auditory feedback. Their designs may address diverse fields, such as monitoringenvironmental changes or enhancing healthcare diagnostics, encouraging students to explore thesocietal impacts and benefits of auditory data representation. The project will challenge
- Conference Session
- First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 13: Equity in Action - Identity, Mentorship, and Inclusion
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado Denver; William Taylor Schupbach, University of Colorado Denver; Tom Altman; Michael S. Jacobson, University of Colorado Denver
- Tagged Divisions
- First-Year Programs Division (FPD)
well as leadership development [11]. Inour program, incoming first year students that self-select into the learning community receivementorship for one year, and some of them continue and serve as mentors in their sophomoreyear. Moreover, since the program has been in effect for 5 years, we invited the participatingstudents from all five cohorts to be involved in our study, although only some of themresponded. An important aspect was being able to include students from previous years whichprovided a unique perspective having participated as both mentee and mentor, while otherstudents provided feedback only having been a mentee. Analysis of the data identified keyfindings: peer mentorship improves assessment performance for both mentee and
- Conference Session
- Broadening Participation in Civil Engineering
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez, Colorado State University; Kristen L. Sanford P.E., Lafayette College; Frederick Paige, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Scott Rosas; Philip J. Parker P.E., University of Wisconsin - Platteville
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)
and our increasingly polarized society.Group Concept Mapping (GCM) MethodGCM is a participatory, mixed methods approach used extensively in behavioral and socialresearch for over 35 years. The GCM method has enabled evidence-based advances in fieldssuch as medicine, psychology, and civil engineering [10], [25], and [26]. One example of theseadvances is the needs assessment of the Science of Team Science (SciTS) field in 2010, a well-established research community of practice [27]. Another example is the advance of theoreticalframeworks, such as the Social Sustainability Framework for Construction Projects [28] and[29]. GCM also has supported university planning, curriculum development, and equity-relatedinitiatives [9] and [30].In applying
- Conference Session
- Programmatic Design and Resiliency Among Women Engineers
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- hongyan miao, Union College; Elsie Mae Lewin Paxton, Union College; Jaqueline Nicole Anderson, Union College; Maia Chapin, Union College; Leza Sorn, Union College
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering Division (WIED)
enhanced academic support,including female faculty advisors, supplemental instruction roles for female students, andmentorship for high-attrition courses such as Thermodynamics and Solid Mechanics.To assess the impact of these initiatives, this paper employs qualitative coding analysis ofstudent testimonials and survey responses. Using the Braun and Clarke thematic codingframework [14], [15], [16], key themes have emerged, including the significance ofmentorship in overcoming self-doubt, the role of peer networks in academic persistence, andthe impact of structured career exposure on professional confidence. By analyzing theseinsights, this paper provides data-driven recommendations for strengthening femaleengagement in mechanical engineering.This
- Conference Session
- Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL) Poster Session
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Kevin Quinn Walsh PE, SE, University of Notre Dame; Eric Horvath, University of Notre Dame; James Edward Alleman; Brian J Smith P.E., University of Notre Dame
- Tagged Divisions
- Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)
- Conference Session
- Poster Session-Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Miguel Velez-Reyes, University of Texas at El Paso; Barry J. Sullivan, Electrical & Computer Engineering Department Heads Assn; Elizabeth Hibbler, Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration (CIEC); Michelle Klein, Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept. Heads Assoc. (ECEDHA); Bruk T Berhane, Florida International University; Petru Andrei, Florida A&M University - Florida State University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)
project, new programmatic elements are focused on the very different andgeographic distant student experiences at the 20 local hubs because transfer processes and local supportinfrastructures vary greatly by institution and state. Supported students will be brought together in-personin March 2025 to build their personal professional networks by working together on mentored teams.2TO4 assessment is focused on the extent to which each programmatic component isimplemented with fidelity and whether the program has built the necessary capacity to supportstudents. Formative feedback from each participant is collected and student progress is tracked.Key to the success of the project is building and maintaining trust and equitable partnerships,along with
- Conference Session
- Computers in Education Division (COED) Poster Session (Track 1.A)
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Rawan Adnan Alturkistani, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Mohammed Seyam, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
- Tagged Divisions
- Computers in Education Division (COED)
Intelligent Agents,Culturally Responsive Pedagogy, Automated Assessment and Feedback, CollaborativeLearning with AI, Long-term Learning Analytics and Adaptation, and Ethical Considerationsand Bias Mitigation. By tackling these research challenges, generative AI and pedagogical agents could becombined to produce highly engaging, personalized, and adaptive learning environments thatwould transform education for a range of student populations.7. Conclusion The integration of Pedagogical Agents (PAs) and GenAI in education holds transformativepotential, particularly for students in K-12 education. PAs, enhanced by advances in GenAI,have evolved from static, pre-programmed tools into dynamic, adaptive systems capable ofengaging students in personalized
- Conference Session
- Military and Veterans Division (MVD) 1 - Access and Integration
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Alyson Grace Eggleston, Pennsylvania State University; Ronald W. Welch P.E., The Citadel
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Military and Veterans Division (MVD)
Paper ID #48638Green Zone Training – Aligning Faculty and Staff Perceptions of StudentVeteransDr. Alyson Grace Eggleston, Pennsylvania State University Alyson Eggleston is an Associate Professor in the Penn State Hershey College of Medicine and Director of Evaluation for the Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute. Her research and teaching background focus on program assessment, STEM technical communication, industry-informed curricula, and educational outcomes veteran and active duty students.Dr. Ronald W. Welch P.E., The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from
- Conference Session
- First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 8: Division Best Papers
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University; Haritha Malladi, University of Delaware; Marcia Gail Headley, University of Delaware
- Tagged Divisions
- First-Year Programs Division (FPD)
, there areabout 28 NPMs assigned to the course. Each NPM holds weekly discussion sessions andmanages approximately five student teams within their assigned discussion session. They gradestudent assignments and review Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness(CATME) peer evaluations [29, 30] associated with team submissions related to the semesterdesign project. Before the start of the semester, NPMs undergo a day-long orientation sessionthat is primarily focused on course logistics. During the semester, NPMs attend a weekly groupmeeting with the course instructor where they can troubleshoot any concerns with their studentteams [31]. NPMs are expected to notice, investigate, and address team conflicts, but do not gothrough any formal
- Conference Session
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 1: Critical Reflections on Teaching and Learning
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Jenna Tonn, Boston College; Brit Shields, University of Pennsylvania; Ryan Hearty, The Johns Hopkins University; Adelheid Voskuhl, University of Pennsylvania
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators (NEE) Technical Session 3 - Professional and Faculty Development
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Gracie Kerr, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Hayden J Wulf, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
graduation in 2025, Gracie will be pursuing a master’s degree in structural engineering and plans to further continue her education with a PhD in engineering education.Hayden J Wulf, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Hayden Wulf is a fourth-year civil engineering undergraduate at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln (UNL). She has been an undergraduate research assistant within the Engineering Education Research department at UNL for the past two years under the guidance of Dr. Grace Panther and Dr. Heidi Diefes-Dux. Her research during this time has focused on instructor adaptability, active learning and assessment practices, and transparency between instructors and students. She has presented one previous paper on
- Conference Session
- Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 4
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Ian Bermudez Rivera, University of South Carolina; Fitya Syarifa Mozar; Christian Harito; Dianing Novita Nurmala Putri; Alessandro Vittorio Zago, Oregon Institute of Technology; Mohsin Al Mufargi, Oregon Institute of Technology; Vitaliy Vasilyevich Tveritin, Oregon Institute of Technology; Keora O'Meara, Oregon Institute of Technology; Roni Jack Rountree, Lehigh University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering; Tim Pasang, Western Michigan University; Bens Pardamean; Feng Shi, Oregon Institute of Technology; Derrick Speaks, Arizona State University; Endang Djuana; Arief Budiman, Oregon Institute of Technology
- Tagged Divisions
- Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)
- Conference Session
- New Approaches and Leadership Development Frameworks
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Victoria Kerr, University of Toronto; Brandon Aldo Lista, University of Toronto; Patricia Kristine Sheridan, University of Toronto; Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)
teamwork and leadership learning into the upper-year courses. She previously designed an online team-based self- and peer-assessment system that was used in multiple Canadian universities. She has also taught leadership and teamwork courses at Northwestern University, where she is a Leadership Fellow. Prof. Sheridan holds a BASc and MASc in Mechanical Engineering, and a PhD in Engineering Leadership Education. She has previously worked on large plant-design teams in industry, and on algorithms to develop co-operative multi-agent systems in robotics.Dr. Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto Professor Emily Moore is the Director of Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University
- Conference Session
- ERM Technical Session: Quantitative Instrument Development
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Dina Verdín, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
56%and 66% indicates that the achievement goal measures are well-aligned with the motivationalprocesses and educational experiences of White students, making them more reliable predictorsfor this student demographic. Mindful of the concerns regarding the low sample size for Whitestudents, I assessed the reliability of the results via a posthoc power analysis using G*Power. Themodels reached a statistical power level of 0.99, indicating a 99% probability of detecting theeffect size (i.e., adjusted R-square value) if it truly exists. Said differently, there is a very highchance that the results for White students are not due to random chance and the analysis is highlyreliable in identifying this adjusted R-square value for this sample
- Conference Session
- Empowering Pre-College Students through AI and Computer Science: Standards, Self-Efficacy, and Social Impact
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- S. Shailja, Stanford University; Thomas John Williams, University of California Merced; Ayush Pandey, University of California Merced
- Tagged Divisions
- Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
were taught in the course.Two surveys were conducted as part of the regular course instruction for continuous improvement.These surveys used a 5-point Likert scale to assess students’ outlook, career readiness, role models,comprehension of AI, programming usage, and the importance of math and calculus. The questionsalso covered the participants’ current school level, prior experience with computer programming,their planned major in college, and career interests and preferences. From the onset of the programto the focus group (refer to the timeline of activities in Figure 1), two years have elapsed, makingthis a two-year impact study. To study the impact of the program on student self-efficacy andcollege readiness, we conducted focus group
- Conference Session
- Building Community and Inclusion in Pre-College Engineering Learning
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Chelsea Joy Andrews, Tufts University; Jessica Watkins, Vanderbilt University; Kristen B Wendell, Tufts University; Rae Woodcock; Shannon Jean Keaveney Rausch, Tufts University; Vera Gor, Tufts University; Naina Sood Fox, Tufts University; Rachel Bandi; Molly Malinowski
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
their underlying concepts, take a perspective ofcare in engineering design, and learn to listen, empathize, and communicate.One interesting aspect of these findings is that in their reflections on Design Talks, teacherscentered what students do during the conversations. They did not focus on the designbreakthroughs that occurred as a result of the conversations or on the assessment evidence theconversations generated. Instead, teachers who have been enacting Design Talks primarily valuethem for the discourse and design practices they foster among students in the moment. Thisfinding is aligned with prior research on science talks in elementary classrooms, where the keygoal was to help students express ideas about phenomena in ways that made
- Conference Session
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 3: Identity, Professionalization, and Belonging II
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Sarah Appelhans, Lafayette College; Rebecca Thomas, Bucknell University; Jenny Tilsen, Bucknell University; Alan Cheville, Bucknell University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
ofloops, in which individuals consistently make choices whether or not to continue to pursue their areas ofinterest. Repetitive loops create momentum, or “patterns of acceleration” toward science occupations,which simultaneously result in a “thickening” of science identities [19]. Conflicts between gender and racial identities and engineering identities are commonly cited assources of low self-efficacy and/or poor outcomes expectations. Outcomes expectations appear to beparticularly important for persistence. In her groundbreaking work on women in male-dominated fields,Eccles [20] found that rather than lacking positive self-concept, women were simply making rationalchoices based on their assessment of the expected outcome. Specifically
- Conference Session
- Interdisciplinary Approaches to High School Engineering: Perceptions, Pathways, and Pedagogies
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Abeera P. Rehmat, Georgia Institute of Technology; Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Michael Helms, Georgia Institute of Technology; Marc Weissburg
- Tagged Divisions
- Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
’ perspectives on nature, particularly the incorporationof biology into engineering courses, which are often taught as electives. The insights,experiences, and beliefs they hold about this integration play a crucial role in shaping theircourse selection and career choices, ultimately influencing the future of innovation in both fields.Background & Literature ReviewStudents’ Perceptions of NatureStudents' perceptions of learning, encompassing their views on the process of acquiringknowledge, their self-assessed abilities, and the significance of education, can impact theirmotivation, engagement, and overall academic success [15-17]. A variety of factors, such aspersonal experiences, social dynamics, educational settings, and cultural norms, influence
- Conference Session
- Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND) Technical Session 4
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Tamara Pearson, Georgia Institute of Technology; Pamela M Leggett-Robinson, PLR Consulting, Inc.; Kathaleena Edward Monds, Albany State University; Monica Stephens Cooley, Spelman College
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)
Racial Climate on Latino College Students’ Sense of Belonging,” Sociology of Education, vol. 70, no. 4, p. 324, Oct. 1997, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2673270.[24] S. Hurtado, D. F. Carter, and A. Spuler, “Latino Student Transition to College: Assessing Difficulties and Factors in Successful College Adjustment,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 135–157, Apr. 1996, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01730113.[25] C. E. Thompson and B. R. Fretz, “Predicting the Adjustment of Black Students at Predominantly White Institutions,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 437–450, Jul. 1991, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1991.11774141.[26] “Interruption,” Merriam-Webster
- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - AI and Digital Futures in Design Education
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Daniel D. Jensen, Westmont College; William Johnston Allison; Camila Rapalo; Mark Rogers; Gregory Reich, Air Force Research Laboratory, Aerospace Systems Directorate; Landon Thomas Vanderhyde
- Tagged Divisions
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
the assessment of application of a variety of common AI-T to acommon set of DI methods. The results are wide spread, in that some AI-T significantlyenhanced in the DM and some were not helpful at all. The results should support others usingthe DI design process, or similar design processes, as they attempt to use AI to augment theirengineering design work. Specifically, this work recommends that designers using a DI (orsimilar) process consult Table 1 for initial recommendations and then consult the section in thepaper that describes details for implementation of AI-T for that DI method. Of course, ourinsights are limited in particular by the specific design context and problem we used to evaluatethe effectiveness of the AI-T. The use of the
- Conference Session
- Undergraduate Career Development
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Edward Latorre, University of Florida; R. Keith Stanfill P.E., The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
- Tagged Divisions
- College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)
experience?e. Do engineers enjoy the project liaison experience?f. What actions or approaches can liaisons take to improve the project experience?Through exploring these questions, the authors identified a collection of best practices thatindustry liaisons can employ to provide the students and themselves a successful and enrichingexperience.Literature ReviewMultiple studies have assessed the working relationship of faculty and industry liaisons todetermine how to provide a successful experience for everyone involved. These studies havelooked at this challenge from the perspective of the faculty, the students, the sponsoringorganization and the liaisons, and the results have been congruent. The review in this paper willfocus on the experience of