“engineering is not just engineering”, the course is an attempt to recognize the importance of theunderstanding that engineers are responsible for the social change that their profession creates.Traditional engineering courses typically focus on the development of technical skills but oftenfail to help students develop the professional or “soft” skills that engineers need today and to createa sense of social responsibility [1]. It was very important to the instructional team that studentsdevelop the needed cultural awareness and that they would be inspired to use their technical skillsto practice social entrepreneurship with the intention of making a difference in their communitiesand society at large. Unlike many courses that engage engineering
feel strongly thatthey are helping the communities and that their experiences could change the type of volunteerwork some students pursue in the future.IntroductionTo be fully prepared for a professional career in the engineering field requires students todevelop different types of skills. According to ABET, engineering baccalaureate graduatesshould possess a set of five “hard” skills and a set of six professional skills3,4,5. The professionalskills, outlined below, are skills that employers desire from engineering professionals.(1) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(2) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(3) an ability to communicate effectively(4) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of
Paper ID #13934The Impact of Summer Research Experiences on Community College Stu-dents’ Pursuit of a Graduate Degree in Science and EngineeringMs. Lea K. Marlor, University of California, Berkeley Lea Marlor is the Education and Outreach Program Manager for the Center for Energy Efficient Electron- ics Science, a NSF-funded Science and Technology Center at the University of California, Berkeley. She manages undergraduate research programs to recruit and retain underrepresented students in science and engineering and also outreach to pre-college students to introduce them to science and engineering career opportunities. Ms
communities: LasQueseras; Fatima; and Cerro Verde. Each of these communities had approximately 200-300residents and was looking for an improved water distribution system. The first two projects, inLas Queseras and Fatima, dealt with a groundwater source while Cerro Verde’s primary sourcewas a surface stream.It is important to note that the students in the course do not build anything while on-site.Although many students begin the course with the expectation that they will aid in construction,the first semester exposes them to the consequences of going into a community and building asystem as a charitable undertaking. Not only does this impact the amount of ownership thecommunity feels they have of the system, the students also come to realize that
understanding what went well and what could be improvedfrom both the student and community partner perspectives.Student Feedback Partner ImpactThere was a lot of positive feedback from the Student Impact on Community Partnerstudents after the project. 79% of the students 4%were willing to participate in an optional 5%anonymous survey about their experience withthis project. On a scale from 1 to 4, with 1being little community impact and 4 being a 32%large community impact, 86% of those who
Learning are promising. Improved student retention, interpersonal skills, cultural andracial understanding, academic achievement, sense of identity, sense of social responsibility,commitment to continued service, and involvement from underrepresented populations inengineering are all among the marked benefits of student participation in Service Learningprograms.”To further augment the impact on the community, this project seeks to identify the needs of thecommunity as stated and decided upon by the community members themselves. To facilitate thisprocess, the University of Louisville chose to identify a partner on the ground in Calca, Peru, thesite for the project.The Andean Alliance for Sustainable Development is a unique non-profit organization
for the critical multiyear HCD approach. Followingthis, a brief overview of the different community-based learning courses at OSU is included.Next, a comprehensive reflection on the journey undertaken by the authors is discussed. Itoutlines the strategies employed, the successful interventions, challenges faced, and thesubsequent modifications made to the HCD model. The authors aim to provide insights into whatworked and what didn't during the evolution of engineering service learning at OSU. In theoutcomes section, the authors make the case for using the Intercultural Development Inventory(IDI) as a tool to assess impact on student intercultural competence and provides data from oneof the courses.Challenges with the traditional service
tailings andmake the bricks in local businesses so revenues are reinvested in local economy; and 3) capacitybuilding and diverse local job creation such as the formation of local masons, brick makers, etc.that can benefit from the new locally available materials [30].Political self-reliance of communities. This criterion includes: 1) autonomy in decision makingsuch as the kind enhanced by associative organizations where ASGM communities come to theirown decisions and voice them in front of more powerful actors like government agencies andmulti-national mining corporations; 2) reducing dependency from external expertise andknowledge as it happens when ASGM miners engage our students on a leveled playing field toco-define problems and solutions
the communities or do not always provide theexpected long-term benefits to communities. For example, in water, sanitation, and hygiene(WASH) projects, the extensive monitoring, evaluation, and maintenance required for effectiveWASH interventions decrease the likelihood student-led projects will be successful in positivelyimpacting a community’s health over the intended design life [8], [9]. Furthermore, theconstraints of the academic calendar and the high turnover rate of students from year-to-yearoften results in students only being engaged for a single year, while many infrastructure projectstake multiple years to complete from planning to construction to monitoring and evaluation.As a result, it is often a challenge to identify service
communities. Page 23.685.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Impact of Internet Use on the Academic Advancement of Engineering StudentsAbstract: This study investigates the impact of internet use on engineering students and how ithas contributed to their academic advancement. The participants are engineering students (n =1376) enrolled in three universities in Lebanon who completed a survey that collected variousdata related to demographics, how long they have been using the internet, how many hours/weekthey spend on the internet, and the purpose of
Paper ID #26270Practice Exam Program Impact on Student Academic Performance and Stu-dent RetentionMs. Dawn Patterson Shew M.Ed., University of Kansas Dawn Shew is the Director of Undergraduate Academic Services at the University of Kansas School of Engineering.Dr. Lorin P. Maletsky, University of Kansas Dr. Lorin Maletsky joined the Mechanical Engineering faculty at the University of Kansas in 2000. He is currently a full professor and serving as the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs in the School of Engineering. He has created and taught a project, team-based freshmen course in Mechanical Engineering as well as
Paper ID #16363Impacts of Sustainability Education on the Attitudes of Engineering StudentsDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado - Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice
-cohort surveys. Furthermore, the participants' scores on the Likertscale for the "Seven C's" increased by 33%, with the most significant increase observed in"Collaboration" at 68%. After the data from the third and fourth cohorts have been collected andanalyzed in May 2023, a more in-depth and meaningful analysis of the results will be conducted. Fig 1. Average pre- and Post-cohort survey results, with percent change, evaluating confidence in performing each objective.Fig 2. Average pre-and post-cohort survey results, with percent change, evaluating agreement on the Likert scale with the “Seven C’s.” The impact of the CoP program on community building was also monitored
technical knowledgeas well as the broad set of professional skills needed to succeed in today’s global economy.Efficient, high impact approaches are needed to create efficiencies in the curriculum.Experiential learning is one approach that allows students to develop disciplinary andprofessional skills and can help students transition into professional practice more effectively.Community-engaged learning is a form of experiential education that brings the added benefitsof impact to the broader community. Community-engaged learning, also called service-learning,integrates work within an underserved area of society with academic content. Needs within thelocal or global community are addressed by learning and applying academic content within acourse or
engineering education and practice, while also reinforcing foundational disciplinaryknowledge for students [2]. Devices that enhance instructional delivery include augmentedreality (AR) which provides immersive simulations for construction management education [16]and 3D hologram projectors that improve the presentation of STEM concepts in classrooms [17].These technologies collectively aim to enhance engagement by fostering active learning andmaking complex subjects more accessible and interactive [14] - [17].2.2. EdTech integration definitionTo facilitate the integration of EdTech into engineering education and support the assessment ofits impact on students' technical and professional skill development, it is essential to establish aclear
active student engagement is hands-on experience. This method allowsstudents to put what they have learned theoretically into practice [3]. In addition, it helpsstudents connect theoretical knowledge with real-world applications. Internship is an educationaltool that offers such hands-on experience to students and, at the same time, improves theirchances of getting employed after graduation [4]. Other advantages of hands-on experiencebased educational tools are promoting the development of different skills such as teamwork,communication, and adaptability, which are important for success in a professional workenvironment [5], [6]. Furthermore, they also help in improving creative thinking, criticalthinking, and problem-solving skills [7].The
outside the classroom, researching new engineering education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that is focused on supporting the 21st century student demographic he continues to innovate and research on how we can design new methods of learning to educate both our students and communities on
courses and areas they could consider adding or adapting the feedback they provide. By compiling the [1] A. L. Pawley, “Shifting the ‘default’: The case for making diversity the expected condition forSelf-Determination Theory (SDT) [5] is the framework used to explore results and creating tables showing what activities are employed, which of those activities feedback is engineering education and making whiteness and maleness visible,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 531–533, 2017.feedback and its impact on student engagement
aptitude (cognitive factors). Historically, engineering educationresearch has emphasized making improvements in how students learn primarily from a content-oriented or cognitive perspective. More recently, attention has been given to improvinginstructional modes to make them more student-centered, but little has been done beyond the K-12 level to understand how connections-to-community (CTC) contribute to student engagement Page 15.59.2in higher education, particularly in STEM fields.The literature on belonging, gathered from higher education, K-12, and organizationalpsychology clearly supports the importance of community in influencing engagement
The Impact of Strength-Based Projects on the Engagement of Students in the Mechanics of Materials Course Sarira Motaref Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut Topic: Work in progressAbstractThe Mechanics of Materials course has been offered in flipped modality over the past 8 years atthe University of Connecticut. This course is an entry-level course required for severalengineering majors such as Civil, Mechanical, Biomedical, Materials Science, andManufacturing Engineering. The goals of this flipped course are to improve student learning inlarge enrollment classes and promote inclusive teaching by
paper we outline organizational change efforts to impact student retention that require lowfinancial investments paired to increased student engagement systems enabled by an NSF-HSIgrant. The sequential macro changes and the organizational change we have executed areoutlined in Table 1.Table 1: Macro-change and organizational change for student recruitment and engagement Year College Environmental Conditions Organizational efforts 2003- New college, 2 doctoral degrees Student enrollment in engineering and 2014 R2 Carnegie Status computer science based on interest/no application of SAT/ACT score criteria
theirexploration and operations from a government body without receiving approval or acceptancefrom the people represented by those governments. The SLO became the way to avoidcommunity members stopping operations but fell short of the kind of meaningful communityengagement desired by many inside and outside of industry.The SLO, interestingly, rarely comes into discussions of community engagement in engineeringeducation, though we share evidence below that suggests it is poised to play a larger role in thisarena. In this paper, we draw on a five-year NSF study of the intersection of corporate socialresponsibility (CSR), engineering practice, and engineering education to investigate how acritical take on CSR shapes the ways in which engineering students
was Faculty Director of the Community Service Learning, Living Learning Major, SUNY at Stony Brook. From 1997-Present, she is Adjunct Professor, School of Social Welfare, SUNY at Stony Brook . From 1997-2004, she was Executive Director of Suffolk Psychiatric Service, Clinical Instructor SUNY at Stony Brook. She was Co-PI for several years with Paul Siegel, on TechPREP and STEM Tech. Tech- PREP is a program that provides 90 hours of education in the areas of computer science, mathematics, and physics, and engineering to middle school girls from under-served school districts. It also provides college mentors for each student. STEM Tech is a collaborative program that engages community and industry partners and WISE
office, and agreed to form engineering project partnerships with Texas A&M.Sponsors collaborated with ESSAP office to develop appropriate freshman projects. Theyserved as the “client” for whom the freshman students were working, and were professionalswho assisted teams with design and development. One of the goals of these projects was thatthey go beyond simply academic exercises. These projects were designed so that freshmanengineering students could see that they were having a real impact in the community. Projectsponsors helped achieve this goal.The ESSAP office administered the FEP program. Advertisement, recruitment, hiring,scheduling, and funding were handled through this office. Funding for the engineering mentorsand the freshman
workshopto occur over two half days (it has been discovered that this is favorable to one full day). Fundsfor materials are provided by Oxfam America and the project Cultivating Responsible Wellbeingin STEM (NSF 1449489).In addition to the community DIY workshops, the students are engaged in another project todevelop capacity at an off-grid restaurant called the Chef’s Garden in the neighboring town ofRincón. The students will build a wood-fired oven using clay/earth/cob as the primary material.But already, the students decided to contribute a model of the foot-pump sink to allow customersto wash their hands. The sink has been well received, and underscores the idea that DIYinnovations are not restricted to temporary emergency measures when the
officers work togetheras a team to plan, organize, and carry out a host of activities ranging from mentorship networks,career talks, middle school outreach events, and fundraisers. The team effort of these officers canmake a substantial impact on the support and the perception of engineering students at a schooland within the surrounding community. However, many groups struggle for much of the firstsemester each year to organize themselves and get activities up and off the ground because theproverbial baton has been dropped. Because the duties are generally the same for each officerfrom year to year, to ensure a smooth transition, it makes sense to establish a system for trainingthe incoming officers before they officially take office.This paper
not within University with ethical issues through critical policy bounds and so that's not... consideration of their impact on both a And I, I think it's wrong that... professional and personal level with Just because one has the more emphasis on ethical standards and how the participant's actions might have situation you think, but you an impact on the life of the student. should.” Reflecting upon the possible outcomesValues Commit to engaging in an active, “I tell them, ‘You can ask mepluralism purposeful, transparent and equitable anything that you have in mind
. For example, in a statics course fromthe spring semester of 2015, average attendance in normal sessions was about eleven studentswhere exam review sessions averaged seventy-four students in attendance. Upcoming quizzesand homework have a similar, but much smaller, impact on session attendance. During weeklymeetings, SIs often comment on the differences between a normal session and an exam reviewsession and difficulties the latter leads to. (For more information on the structure of this programat LSU’s College of Engineering see the paper published in 2014 (4).)Rationale for the study SIs at LSU’s College of Engineering were asked to write down their opinions on examreview sessions and how they compare to normal sessions. The responses
; faculty and staff fatigue; and loss of community – focus groupsof over 100 Sam Houston State faculty members identified student skill gaps as summarized inTable 1 on the next page.Interestingly, the Learning Loss skill gaps summary of Table 1 connects directly to the Gallup-Purdue Index Report [11] that identifies six important factors for student success; see Table 2 onthe page following.These six factors “so strongly related to graduates’ lives and careers [it] is almost hard to fathom. . . yet few college graduates achieve the winning combination [11].” The more of these factorssurvey respondents reported receiving in college, the greater their degree of well-being andcareer engagement later in life. So, what is the takeaway? Our actions as
andcolleagues [15] conducted a systematic review on nudging, finding 156 empirical studies. Ofthese studies, a mere 4% were related to education, and even less to STEM education. Basedon the limited STEM literature on nudging, studies have employed a few nudge strategies toimprove the students’ app engagement. Some examples include reminders (e.g., refocusingstudents’ attention; [16]), informational nudge (e.g.,[17]), and social comparison nudge (e.g.,providing peers’ behavior information; [18]).This study explores the impact of nudging interventions (reminder and social comparisonnudge) on students’ app engagement in an educational application. We will be using theCourseMIRROR (Mobile In-situ Reflections and Review with Optimized Rubrics)application