. Page 9.993.6 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering"Associate Degree in Nanofabrication Manufacturing Technology – Science Option First Semester Second SemesterBasic Biology and Biodiversity 4 Chemical Principles I & Laboratory 4Electrical Circuits I (DC circuits) 3 Introduction to Algorithmic 3Electrical Circuits Laboratory I 1 Physics: Mechanics 4English Composition 3 Humanities
wireless sensor networks, intelligent agents, agent-based manufacturing scheduling, systems control and automation, distributed control of holonic systems and integrated manufacturing, agile manufacturing, virtual reality and remote laboratory applications in edu- cation. He has authored or co-authored various journal and conference publications in these areas. Mert Bal is currently the Chair and Associate Professor at the Miami University, Department of Engineering Technology, Ohio, United States of America. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Developing Robotics Engineering Technology Program to Address the Workforce Skills Gaps in
case of drones, that might includeairworthiness test per FAA regulations.AcknowledgmentThe authors would like to acknowledge the direct financial support of NASA’s MinorityUniversity Research and Education Project (MUREP) under cooperative agreement number80NSSC20M0013. The authors also thank Chevron for its support to our manufacturinginfrastructure.References[1] Grand View Research, "3D Printing Metal Market, 2021-2028”, Report ID 4751756, October2021[2] I. Gibson, D. W. Rosen, B. Stucker and M. Khorasani, Additive manufacturing technologies.Vol. 17. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2021.[3] International Organization for Standardization. Additive Manufacturing: General: Principles:Terminology (ISO/ASTM 52900:2015)].[4] Transformation In 3D: How
assisting learners to build on their own experiences and to useexperimentation and problem solving in authentic contexts to acquire new competencies.Further, learners are asked to demonstrate their competence in ways that emulate how thecompetencies are used in real-world work and life situations. Activity-based learning is alsoespoused in the new TAC of ABET criteria as one effective method of learning. This paperdescribes ways in which activity-based learning can be applied across the curriculum inmechanical, manufacturing, and industrial engineering technologies. The examples given canalso be adapted to other engineering technology disciplines as well as by many other academicdisciplines in a wide variety of educational fields.Background for the
Breidi joined the School of Engineering Technology at Purdue University as an Assistant Professor in Aug 2020. Farid received his B.E. in Mechanical Engineering degree from the American University of Beirut in 2010, his M.S. in Mechanical EngineDr. Faisal Aqlan, University of Louisville Dr. Faisal Aqlan is an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering at The University of Louisville. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering form The State University of New York at Binghamton. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Annual ConferenceTeaching Manufacturing Assembly Processes Using Immersive Mixed
thinking, and programming skills.Dr. Liyu Zhang, University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley Liyu Zhang is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley. He received his Ph. D. in Computer Science from the State University of New York at Buffalo in SeptembDr. Hansheng Lei ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Infusing Raspberry Pi in Computer Science Curriculum for Enhanced LearningAbstract— With the advent of cloud computing, the Internet of Things (IoT), and mobilecomputing, CS faculty are continuously revamping the curriculum material to address suchburgeoning set of technologies in practical and relatable
R. Haapala is an Associate Professor in the School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering at Oregon State University, where he directs the Industrial Sustainability Laboratory and OSU Industrial Assessment Center.Dr. Christopher A. Sanchez, Oregon State University Dr. Sanchez is a cognitive psychologist with explicit interests in STEM education; specifically in the areas of engineering and design. He is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering Psychology at Oregon State University where he heads the Applied Cognitive Theory, Usability and Learning (ACTUAL) Lab- oratory. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Do I need to know this?: A comparison of
-20 as well as theenhancement of education and training of individuals as implemented in one of the consortiummember institutions. The outreach components involved the training of undergraduate studentsthrough summer exchange at universities as well as through summer internship placement atnational laboratories. A local outreach to middle / high schools was established through theimplementation of an advanced manufacturing skills development after-school program formiddle school students. The paper also presents the model curriculum for the outreach programand shows the integration of undergraduate students and K-12 teachers working together.Introduction to MSIPP Program In 2012, the National Nuclear Security Agency (NNSA) established the
deliver the final year, on the two-year college’s campus. This novel andinnovative model will allow students to achieve a high-quality associate and baccalaureatedegree in mechanical engineering technology for close to the cost of a single year at someinstitutions. Rigorous assessment methodologies have been included in both programs and willensure the consistency of performance measures longitudinally between both institutions.BackgroundIn an effort to offer high quality and affordable educational pathways to students, Rowan Collegeat Burlington County (RCBC) and Rowan University (RU) have partnered to offer engineeringtechnology degrees supporting Advanced Manufacturing competencies. These efforts havestemmed from a National Science Foundation
education in the core mechanical engineering program at Kettering University." Mechatronics (2002): 343-356. 5. Bannerot, Richard. "Hands-on Projects in an Early Design Course." ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Pittsburgh, PA, 2008. 6. Starkey, John M., et al. "Experiences in the Integration of Design Across the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum." 1994 Frontiers in Education Conference. 1994. 464-468. 7. Tsang, Edmund and Andrew Wilheim. "Integrating Materials, Manufacturing and Design Page 26.904.16 in The Sophomore Year." Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference. Atlanta, GA, 1995. Session 3c4.8
. Page 12.1274.6Fr 25.108 S 2 Intro. To Sammy Design, and Temp. meas. in, solar 13 69 Eng. II - ME Shina ovens; for Grtr. LowellTech HSSo 22.201 F 2 Design Lab I Robert Design device to help 59 59 Parkin relative/friend with disability with everyday activitiesSo 22.202 S 2 Design Lab II Robert Design/manufacture of assistive 3 52 Parkin tech devices - some in Machine shop; some to senior PlasticsSo 22.213 S 3 Kinematics
deal with educatingourselves, changing our beliefs and attitudes, and changing the way we do things. Further, weare often told “what” to do, but not “how” to do it. Faculty, especially engineering faculty due totheir scientific background and training, need a structured step-by-step methodology to follow on“how” to transform to their curricula, along with being told “what” to do. After participating in amulticultural curriculum transformation institute at Northern Illinois University during summer1996, I began exploring how to transform my courses in manufacturing and related topics toaddress gender equity and multicultural issues and realized that I also needed a structuredmethodology to follow and that other faculty could also benefit from
curriculum documents was revisited and used as thefoundation for a new document, Curriculum 2015 3. The current structure of this document isshown below. Part I - Surveying the landscape: What Industry Needs From Our Graduates Predicting the future through research Innovation in education K-12 recruiting and outreach Part II - Surveying the educational process: 2 year program issues and recommendations 4 year program issues and recommendations Graduate program issues and recommendations Part III - Goals and Strategies: The role of education in preparing for our future in manufacturing A plan to revitalize
remaincompetitive1. The major problem was the shortage of appropriately educated employees 2.Likewise, education has been the subject of major budget reductions, fewer students choosingmanufacturing, and lower resources to develop new curriculum. The number of manufacturingengineering programs was growing until 2001 when the number of programs began to shrink6.The growth before 2000 could be attributed to a great deal of planning and support6 formanufacturing education3,4,5.In 2006 the Manufacturing Education and Research Community of the Society of ManufacturingEngineers (SME) recognized and prioritized the issues permeating manufacturing education. Inresponse a number of events were developed including two forums7,8, one summit9, strategicmeetings, and
Paper ID #40890Navigating the First Year: Adapting Engineering Education for DiverseStudent PersonalitiesDr. Mazen I. Hussein, Tennessee Technological University Mazen is an Associate Professor in the General and Basic Engineering Department at Regional University. His research interests include: Freight modeling and logistics, facilities planning and material handling, optimization and simulation modeling, production planning and control, reverse logistics and recycling, modern manufacturing systems, microalloying and mechanical behavior, teaching statistics and increasing the data analytics content in engineering
Investigator on the NSF funded STEM Guitar Project. He also manages the guitar manufacturing lab @ Sinclair which produces over 1700+ guitar kits a year for the STEM guitar project distributed across the United States. A PLTW affiliate professor for IED, NISOD Teaching Excellence award winner, Certified Autodesk instructor and ETAC-ABET Commissioner, and text book author, Tom has taught both at the high school and collegiate levels. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Multi Institutional Collaboration in Additive ManufacturingAbstractDuring the Fall 2018 semester, two community colleges and one university shared their designand additive manufacturing (AM) facilities and capabilities
describing the discipline, a new clarity of opportunity arises for accelerated reform of curricula leading to degrees in Manufacturing Engineering. One such opportunity incorporates medical device manufacturing within a curriculum, along with concomitant support in broader study in basic sciences. This paper will examine some of the practical aspects of an extension to embrace biomedical product manufacturing and offer some experiences (successes and tribulations) encountered along this path.A Broadening of Manufacturing Engineering: The argument for extending the dimensions ofManufacturing Engineering education is both familiar and remains a challenge. While there hasbeen some change in the perceptions of the world of manufacturing (and
. These graduates must rely on theirundergraduate engineering education to prepare them to succeed at these jobs. The majority ofworking engineers do not pursue further graduate degrees. Only a small percentage go on tograduate school and most do not further their education in Engineering 3,4.Industry professionals have identified a strong need for manufacturing education inundergraduate engineering curriculum. Incorporating manufacturing awareness, concepts,application, and terminology, particularly in mechanical engineering departments, creates astrategy to prepare students to contribute as entry-level engineers in industry.1 In order toprovide some foundation in manufacturing, the College of Engineering at Boise State Universityintroduced a
of agile competition in practice will depend on “an agile education system” thatwill impart the right skills, knowledge, and motivation to participants. With these objectives in mind, andto address manufacturing education needs to promote and understand agile manufacturing concepts, aunique graduate level course is being offered at the Department of Industrial Engineering, SUNY-Buffalo. Theobjective is to provide young manufacturing engineers with core competencies in both manufacturing andinformation technology, and the creative integration of the two to accomplish an agile industry. In this paper we discuss the curriculum design and experiences of this course. In a more general sense, itis our desire to share the motivation behind
Commercialization of Technical Education.3.0 CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT The AICTE has established ten boards of studies namely:- i) Board of Architecture ii) Board of Hotel Management iii) Board of Information Technology iv) Board of Management Studies v) Board of PG Education and Research vi) Board of Pharmaceutical Education vii) Board of Town and Country Planning viii) Board of Technician Education ix) Board of Undergraduate Studies in Engg and Tech x) Board of Vocational Education Out of the ten boards, two boards deal with engineering education. The boards advise the Executive Committee of AICTE on academic matters falling in its area of concern including norms, standards, model curricula, model facilities and structure of
simulation program is a distinctive component of the Department of TechnologicalStudies, and provides excellent opportunities for student field experiences and applications ofadvanced computer technologies. The curriculum provides the opportunity for real-worldprojects, internships and jobs for our students, and is providing modern industrial companies with Page 11.910.11effective management and manufacturing engineering professionals. The local industrialcompanies have been very receptive and supportive of the partnerships which improve the qualityof the students’ education and better prepares them for future opportunities in
. Page 11.1388.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Using Hollywood Movies as a Supplementary Tool to Teach Manufacturing ProcessesAbstractIntroductory courses on manufacturing processes are difficult to teach and it is challenging todeliver the information in an interesting or entertaining way. As one of the attempts to promotestudents’ learning, Hollywood movies have been used as a supplementary tool to teach such acourse at Kansas State University. This paper presents the experience of such attempt. Examplesof using Hollywood movies are presented and discussed. Students’ feedback and comments arealso provided.1. IntroductionAt Kansas State University, “Introduction to Manufacturing Processes
and processes. In addition, he serves on the Greater Charlotte Region BioFuels Center conducting Life Cycle Assessments on BioFuel production. Page 14.10.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A Collaborative “How To”: Making Engineering Interesting to Middle and High School StudentsAbstract:The U.S. has seen a recent shortage of engineers and the outlook of those interested in the fieldlooks bleak. The shortage is due in part to the baby-boomer generation of manufacturing andengineering workers retiring. However, the stigma surrounding manufacturing and engineeringas “boring” or “too
2006-1635: DESIGN OF A MICROELECTRONIC MANUFACTURINGLABORATORYStilson Applin, Montana State UniversityTodd Kaiser, Montana State University Page 11.407.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Design of a Microelectronic Manufacturing LaboratoryAbstract The design of an undergraduate microelectronic manufacturing laboratory forteaching will be described in the following paper. This laboratory emphasizes learningthe processes of semiconductor manufacturing and clean room protocol. The laboratory ishoused in a 500 square foot, class 10,000 facility. In the laboratory the students, with a junior standing and a science basedbackground, will use a pre-made
AC 2011-1271: VIRTUAL IDEATION PLATFORM AND ENTREPRENEUR-SHIPRobert W Simoneau, Keene State College Robert W. Simoneau has 39 years of academic and industrial experience in manufacturing related dis- ciplines and plastics engineering specifically in the areas of product design and development. He is currently an Associate Professor at Keene State College in the Management Department. He recently served two years as a Program Director in the Division of Undergraduate Education at the National Sci- ence Foundation. Prior to Keene State College he taught in the Manufacturing Engineering Technology department at Wentworth Institute of Technology (WIT). Before teaching at WIT he gained considerable experience in
Paper ID #27199Listening to Makers: Exploring Engineering Students’ Recommendations forCreating a Better Makerspace ExperienceMadeleine Jennings, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Madeleine Jennings is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant at Arizona State University - Polytechnic Campus, pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education Systems & Design. She received a B.S. in Manufacturing Engineering from Texas State University - San Marcos. Madeleine’s research interests in- clude investigating and improving the experiences of invisible identities in engineering, such as LGBTQ+ and first-generational
AC 2010-2343: MARRYING MANUFACTURING PROGRAMS WITHBIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING FIELDSArif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris UniversityJohn Mativo, The University of Georgia Page 15.854.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Marrying Manufacturing Programs with Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering Fields and MoreIntroductionThis paper focuses on program and curriculum development in order to sustain and enhancemanufacturing engineering programs. The idea of emphasizing product design and developmentor integration of micro- or nano-manufacturing into manufacturing curriculum is attractive andimportant for the survival of the discipline. On
Milacron; and the Society of Manufacturing Engineers. The goal of the Coalition is todevelop a new approach to the education of technicians, technologists and engineers working in Page 4.353.1the manufacturing field. The CAT is the primary delivery site for the curriculum. In thisinnovative educational model, selected full-time employees working at the CAT (calledcandidates) are given the opportunity to pursue degrees in Manufacturing Engineering orManufacturing Engineering Technology. Taking appropriate on-site courses is a requirement ofhaving ’candidate’ status at the CAT. The educational experience at the CAT provides candidateswith a diverse
manufacturing process have been removed frommany undergraduate curriculums. The University of Alabama now offers an integrated pair of courses onmanufacturing processes and design. A central theme behind the courses is that manufacturing topics are cast ina concurrent engineering design context. The introductory first course is taught at the junior level, while thesecond course is a more comprehensive senior offering. Both courses require the student to participate in designand build projects. The students are placed in teams and must learn to communicate and work effectively in theteam environment. Further, both courses make use of the state’s educational manufacturing resources in anovel, collaborative arrangement. This approach allows the
. Page 23.907.4 Associate in Applied Science Degree (A.A.S) NANO-Science TechnologyGeneral Education and Supporting Subjects 45 hrsMEMS related courses NANO1100 Fundamental of Nanoscience I 3 hours NANO1200 Fundamental of Nanoscience II 3 hours NANO1210 Computer Simulation 1 hours NANO1211 Student Research 3 hours NANO2101 Nanoelectronics 3 hours NANO2111 Nanobiotechnology 3 hours NANO2121 Nanomaterials 3 hours NANO2131 Manufacturing Quality Assurance 2 hours NANO2140 Interdisciplinary Lab