International Higher EducationMakerspaces Paper presented at 2017 ASEE International Forum, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/29284[6] V. Wilczynski, J. Zinter, and L. Wilen. Teaching Engineering Design in an Academic Makerspace: BlendingTheory and Practice to Solve Client-based Problems Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.27351[7] L. Dosse, I. Mena, and W. Clark. “Assessment of a University Makerspace Using a Quantitative and QualitativeStudent Survey.” Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida.https://peer.asee.org/32125[8] M. Galaleldin, A. Hanan, and P. Dumond. "Board 32: The Impact of Integrating Making Activities IntoCornerstone Design Courses
research spans education and practice, working on the in- tegration of community research into project based learning. Her work overlaps areas of GIS mapping, global sustainable urbanism, design and creativity. She undertook a Fulbright in Valpara´ıso, Chile, to investigate, and map, devices of landscape as inspirations for the orders of community space. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Mapping as Design-Thinking: Can GIS Help Engineering Students Approach Design?AbstractSpatial site design, accessed through GIS mapping, teaches three-dimensional data analysis skillsinvaluable for the contemporary engineering student. Integrating design-thinking
, M., (2011) Arduino Cookbook: Recipes to Begin, Expand, and Enhance Your Projects, Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.33. Asimov, I., (2004) I, Robot, Bantam Books.34. Sudol, L.A. and C. Jaspan (2010) “Analyzing the strength of undergraduate misconceptions about software engineering,” Proc. The Sixth International Workshop on Computing Education Research. Aarhus, Denmark: Association for Computing Machinery.35. Cunningham, C., et al. (2005) “Assessing elementary school students’ conceptions of engineering and technology,” Proc. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Portland, OR.
Paper ID #48716Creating a Course ”Dashboard” to Continually Assess and Improve the Qualityof EducationTabe Ako Abane, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Tabe Abane is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He holds an MA in Leadership in Education (2023) from Liverpool John Moores University (UK), a Bachelor of Technology in Renewable Energy (2018), and a Five-Year Diploma in Mechanical Engineering and Teaching (2015) from the University of Bamenda (Cameroon). His dissertation research focuses on how engineering students develop systems thinking in socioenvironmental contexts. Using Social
of this paper, I propose three definitions aligned with engineeringresearch, and then later examine attributes of other possible definitions from the data collected inthe study.Macroethics and microethics were defined by Joseph Herkert in [8] in a paper that reflected onvarious viewpoints of engineering ethics: “Putting all these frameworks together, an interesting pattern emerges. Engineering ethics can be viewed from three frames of reference—individual, professional and social— which can be divided into ‘microethics’ concerned with ethical decision making by individual engineers and the engineering profession’s internal relationships, and ‘macroethics’ referring to the profession’s collective social
knowledgegained.This study seeks to influence and engage engineering educators and program designers, who are uniquelypositioned to empower engineers for impact. This work is a component of a larger research agenda and continuingconversation with organizers and participants. A deep dive into understanding the impact of the program isplanned in the next project of this multi-phase research study, aiming to understand how to effectively involve a 6diverse set of professionals in the interdisciplinary and international work on society's biggest challenges, inparticular, the challenge of the responsible propagation of AI.Context: Program in
Research and Education Partnerships across the Globe ASEE ERC Meeting, Washington, DC March 2010 Elizabeth E. Lyons, Ph.D. PIRE Program Coordinator Office of International Science and Engineering (OISE) National Science Foundation elyons@nsf.gov March 15, 2010 Outline Context – NSF and OISE Partnerships – the PIRE model Insights into building and sustaining partnerships Global dimensions of partnerships March 15, 2010 NSF context for international partnerships Domestic agency but international essential! access to expertise, equipment, placebased phenomena collaborative advantage globally
. Utschig is president of the International Society for Engineering Pedagogy’s National Monitoring Committee USA, and past presi- dent of the Academy of Process Educators. Dr. Utschig completed his PhD in Nuclear Engineering at the University of Wisconsin – Madison.Dr. Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology Sunni Newton is currently a Research Associate II at the Georgia Institute of Technology in the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on assessing the implementation and outcomes of educational interventions at the K-12 and collegiate levels. She received her MS and Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from Georgia Tech in 2009 and
Paper ID #24906’It’s Nothing Like October Sky!’: Spurring 9th and 10th Graders to ThinkLike Engineers via Rockets Custom-Designed for Maximum AltitudeDr. Matthew J. Traum, Engineer Inc. Dr. Matthew J. Traum is founding CEO at Engineer Inc., a Florida-based STEM education social enter- prise start-up. Traum invented @HOLMTM lab kits to enable students in on-line courses to build and run engineering experiments remotely at home. Before founding Engineer Inc., Dr. Traum was a well-known higher education administrator, fund raiser, educator, and researcher with co-authorship of 12 peer-reviewed research journal articles, 18
Paper ID #22105Misconceptions and the Notional Machine in Very Young Programming Learn-ers (RTP)Prof. Tony Andrew Lowe, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Tony Lowe is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has a BSEE from Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology and a MSIT from Capella. To pass the time between classes he works for Anthem as a software architect and teaches as an adjunct at CTU Online. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Misconceptions and the Notional Machine in Very YoungProgramming Learners (RTP)AbstractThis study looks at very
Academies Press.14. National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. National Academies Press.15. Plummer, J. D. (2010). “Educating Engineers for the 21 st Century.” International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco.16. Sheppard S. D., Sullivan W. M., Macatangay K., Colby A. (2008). Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. Jossey-Bass.17. Sibthorp, J., Schumann, S., Gookin, J., Baynes, S., Paisley, K., & Rathunde, K. (2011). Experiential education and lifelong learning: Examining optimal engagement in college students. Journal of Experiential Education, 33(4), 388-392.18. Tranquillo, J. (2013). The T-Shaped Engineer: Connecting the STEM to the TOP
, have launched an Engineering School-Industry Outreach Program inwhich students and faculty from the USA and Mexico reciprocate visits in order to teamup and "work together" in industrial projects in realistic professional settings. Studentsfrom both universities get credit from their home institution and are assessed based ontheir engineering performance on each project, despite the evident cultural, languageand environmental differences between people, universities and industries from bothcountries. While the main objective is to bring an international dimension toengineering education a proactive approach brings new perspectives to industry andacademia from which new lessons have been learned. For the participating students it was made
Education Conference (FIE), 2016 IEEE.Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom‐based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87- 101.Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and individual differences, 16(1), 1-12.Wang, X., Yang, D., Wen, M., Koedinger, K., & Rosé, C. P. (2015). Investigating How Student's Cognitive Behavior in MOOC Discussion Forums Affect Learning Gains. International Educational Data Mining Society.Weinstein, C. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies
AC 2007-1092: STUDENT DESIGN OF LEHIGH UNIVERSITY GOLF FACILITIESKristopher Lengieza, Weitz Golf International Kristopher M. Lengieza is a Project Engineer at Weitz Golf International. He earned a BS from Lehigh University. He is currently involved in constructing several buildings at Bella Collina, a Ginn Development in Montverde, FL. Kristopher has used his involvement in the 2003 Golf Practice Facility project to springboard his career into the Golf and Resort Construction Industry. Weitz Golf International is considered to be one of the top Golf Course and Hospitality Contracting companies in the world. He is also a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers and the
student design processes. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(2), 121-132.[22] Haluschak, E. M., Stevens, M. L., Moore, T. J., Tank, K. M., Cardella, M. E., Hynes, M. M.,... & Lopez, R. D. L. P. (2018). Initial Problem Scoping in K-2 Classrooms (Fundamental). InProceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt LakeCity, UT.[23] English, L. D., & King, D. (2017). Engineering education with fourth-grade students:Introducing design-based problem solving. International Journal of Engineering Education. 33(1),346-360.[24] Scho¨n, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. NewYork, NY: Basic Books.[25] Svarovsky, G., Cardella, M., Dorie, B., & King, Z. (2017). Productive
needle on equity.Karen Rambo-Hernandez, Ph.D.Associate Professor, Texas A&M UniversityI have served on P4E as the principal investigator for West Virginia University (WVU),facilitated the quantitative data collection efforts at all four campuses, and led the quantitativedata analysis. My background is as an educational psychologist/statistician, and I am largelyinterested in quantifying the psycho-social processes that influence student responses andbehavior related to diversity, equity, and inclusion. Although I am not an engineer or computerscientist because I have a background in mathematics, I am very comfortable around both. Istarted this grant as a faculty member at WVU and transitioned to Texas A&M in year three ofthe grant.One of
Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Associate Professor of Education, and Director of Engineering Education Research at University of Michigan. Her research areas include student resistance to active learning, the impact of the classroom space on teaching and learning, the use of classroom technology to increase student learning and engagement, and faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices. She recently led an international initiative to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research. Dr. Finelli is a Fellow of the American Society of Engineering Education, Associate Editor for the IEEE Transactions on Education, and past
were selected: The Journal of EngineeringEducation, Advances in Engineering Education, and the International Journal of EngineeringEducation. These journals were selected for their engineering education specific audience andfull article content availability online. Selection criteria for the articles included theclassification of the article as “mixed methods” by the author(s) or by the specific mention ofqualitative and quantitative data collection in the abstract. Following an initial review of thearticles in each publication, the sample (nine articles) was insufficient to fully characterize mixedmethods research in the field. In light of this an internet search was conducted for additionalengineering education research articles featuring a
Paper ID #12909Blending a Spatial Skills Intervention into a Mainstream Technology TeacherEducation Degree ProgramDr. Diarmaid Lane, University of Limerick Dr. Lane is a Lecturer in Technology Teacher Education at the University of Limerick. His research interests are in the areas of freehand sketching, cognition and spatial visualization. He is currently Director of Membership of the Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD).Dr. Sheryl A. Sorby, Ohio State University Dr. Sheryl Sorby is currently a Professor of STEM Education at The Ohio State University and was re- cently a Fulbright Scholar at the Dublin Institute
Conference and Exposition.12. Gephardt, O., Wyrick, R., Kuzan, M., Braun, D., Krause, S., Santino, M. and Wellspeak, E. 2007. Developing global engineers: an integrated approach to international projects. Proceedings of ASEE 2007 Annual Conference and Exposition.13. Gereffi, G., Wadhwa, V., Rissing, B.E.N., Ong, R. 2008. Getting the numbers right: International engineering education in the United States, China, and India. Journal of Engineering Education 97 (1): 13-25.14. Webster, M, Korth, D., Carlson, O., and Jensen, C. 2007. PACE global vehicle collaboration. Proceedings of ASEE 2007 Annual Conference and Exposition.15. Esparragoza, I., and Devon, R. 2007. Forming global engineers: a freshman engineering design course
Marietta Energy Systems, and later GE Superabrasives. Cindy is active in assessment and accreditation activities at MSOE and has been exploring ways to include on-line education in her classes.Mr. James R. Kieselburg II, Grohmann Museum at Milwaukee School of Engineering Director and Curator, Grohmann Museum at Milwaukee School of Engineering Adjunct Professor, Visual Design, Milwaukee School of Engineering Page 24.784.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Integration of Art and Engineering: Creating Connections between Engineering Curricula and an Art
, P1mentioned, “it was in a journal that I never would have looked at probably because I was so ENE[Engineering Education] focused”. The second reason is just the opposite. The researcher isinterested in a very new, broad and not well-defined topic. They are usually aware that they needto draw literature from many other disciplines, but it is very challenging to do so. For example,P4 described her bibliography “There is a bunch of econ [economics] stuff. There is law stuff.There is education stuff. There is philosophy stuff. There is cognitive stuff. Like God knowswhere I get these things.” Both of the reasons reveal the highly interdisciplinary nature ofengineering education research.Theme 1.2 Different stages of novelty, different challengesAlthough
currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Physics, State University of New York at Oswego. Dr. Ieta is a member of Professional Engineers of Ontario.Rachid Manseur, State University of New York at Oswego Rachid Manseur is currently the Director of Engineering Development and a member of the Computer Science faculty at SUNY Oswego where he is actively developing a new modern and innovative Electrical and Computer Engineering Program. His academic interests lie in Engineering Education and Engineering Program Development, Robotics, Visualization and Simulation Software Development, and Digital and Embedded System Design. He holds a Ph.D in Electrical Engineering from the University of Florida, an MS degree in
, Page 12.779.6 ‘I knew that I was not good at motivating myself, so I need a group to work in, not for depending on the group members to do the job for me, but for myself to be responsible for work. I need a way to motivate myself… If I have to do all the technical things alone, I would not be able to finish…’In the interviews in both studies, men do not express similar lack of confidence in motivation fortechnical content. In that sense the co-operative approach with teamwork may have an additionalpositive influence on women’s experience of the choice of education. However, as the main factor isregional recruitment, compared to other universities, the PBL university do not recruit more women. Atother engineering universities
Session 2530A Combined Engineering and Education Class at the University of Oklahoma: Preparing Authentic Science and Math Educators Teri Reed Rhoadsa, Mark Nannyb, and Mary John O’Hair c The University of Oklahoma a School of Industrial Engineering b School of Civil and Environmental Engineering c Center for Educational and Community Renewal and the College of EducationAbstractOne result of the receipt of a
UC-Engineering – UTFSMMotivation Become a world-class institution and a top Create a world-class consortium in leader in Latin-America engineering education in ChileGuiding principles Curricular harmonization Transform engineering education Entrepreneurship Face societal grand challenges Technology transfer Orchestrate effective I+E networks International alliances Build a world-class community Change management New liaison with societyOrganizational
students use their funds of knowledge to belong in engineering,” Engineering Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2016.[12] C. E. Foor, S. E. Walden, and D. A. Trytten, “‘I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group:’ Achieving individual diversity,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 103–115, 2007.[13] K. A. Fadigan and P. L. Hammrich, “A longitudinal study of the educational and career trajectories of female participants of an urban informal science education program,” Journal
, Team Based, First-Year Design Projects‖ Proceedings, International Conference on EngineeringEducation Research (ICREE), Honolulu, HI, June 2007.[3] Zarske, M.S., Sullivan, J.F., Knight, D., Yowell, J.L. and Wiant, D. (2007) ―The TEAMS Program: A Study of aGrades 3-12 Engineering Continuum,‖ Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conf., Honolulu, HI.[4] Sullivan, J.F. and Zarske, M.S. (2005) ―The K-12 Engineering Outreach Corps: A Service-Learning TechnicalElective,‖ Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference, Portland, OR.[5]Lima, Marybeth, and Oakes, William, Service Learning: Engineering in Your Community, Great Lakes Press,2006.[6] Jacoby, B., and Associates, (Eds.), Service Learning in Higher Education: Concepts and Practices, Jossey-Bass,San Francisco, CA
design thinking, teaching, and learning,” Journal of engineering education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, 2005. [9] T.-K. Laamanen and P. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, “Constraining an open-ended design task by interpreting sources of inspiration,” Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 135–156, 2014.[10] J. Kojmane and A. Aboutajeddine, “Strengthening engineering design skills of first-year university students under resources constraints,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 148–164, 2016.[11] A. Goncher and A. Johri, “Contextual constraining of student design practices,” Journal of Engineering Educa- tion, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 252–278, 2015
-8. [7] I Calvo, M Marcos, D Orive, and I Sarachaga. Building complex remote learning laboratories. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 18:53–66, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20239. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/cae.20239. [8] Philip Hunter. The virtual university. EMBO reports, 16:146–148, 2 2015. ISSN 1469-221X. doi: 10.15252/embr.201440016. URL https://www.embopress.org/doi/10.15252/embr.201440016. [9] Wahab Ali. Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of covid-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10:16, 5 2020. ISSN 1925-4741. doi: 10.5539/hes.v10n3p16.[10] Jing Ma and Jeffrey V. Nickerson. Hands-on, simulated, and remote