Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL, 2006.[15] R. Toto and H. Nguyen, “Flipping the Work Design in an Industrial Engineering Course”, in Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2009.[16] S. Zappe, R. Lieicht, J. Messner, T. Litzinger and H.W. Lee, “"Flipping" the Classroom to Explore Active Learning in a Large Undergraduate Course”, in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX, 2009.[17] B. McCabe, “Flipped learning in a civil engineering module: student and instructor experiences,” Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, Vol 4, Issue 1, 2019. 9
variables are the type of class, the situation, and thestudent's class standing. In STEM, particularly in the sciences and engineering disciplines,courses are harder to transition to an online platform since most of them have a laboratorycomponent. This hands-on experience is crucial for students' learning and preparation for theworkforce. As Feisel and Rosa reported [3], engineers need to be familiar and learn fromlaboratory practices and not only from lectures in class because labs provide experimental data,answers to questions about nature, and the ability to evaluate the performance of a design. Plus,online learning is not the same as a traditional classroom, as stated by [4]. The interactionbetween the professor and student is essential for
design and manufacturing discussions of the design concepts andparticipate during selection of the final design project. The design team taps into their technicaland field experiences during the design discussions. A case study of this model is presented withthe capstone project on 2021 Air Force Research Lab University Design Challenge. Theintegration of subject matter experts into the process of capstone design projects widens the scopeof engineering design solutions that the teams accomplish. Also, the students gain better fieldengineering design experience by interacting with the subject matter experts. This approachsupports the idea of increasing senior design or capstone design component in engineeringcurricula as part of the effort to
laboratory, the students then had to designan experiment to address three objectives: 1) demonstrate isotonic and isometric contraction andcompare the EMGs, 2) demonstrate the effects of fatigue and 3) demonstrate the effects ofmotion artifact. Students were asked to formulate a hypothesis and design and test itexperimentally. They were asked to specify which muscle was used and they had to measurefrom at least two different muscle groups. Their laboratory report was in the style of a BMEjournal article. Page 12.445.4Electroretinogram ModuleThis module was more challenging because the recordings were done on anesthetized rats. Thisrequired several
laboratory settings (all scale items provided inAppendix 1). The protocol included foundational questions designed to provide insights intoparticipants' backgrounds and their experiences across cross-cultural contexts. The foundationalquestions in the protocol were followed by the ECQS items, which were grouped into fourcategories according to their CQs: Cognitive CQ, Metacognitive CQ, Motivational CQ, andBehavioral CQ. Each group of items was preceded by primers to help participants understandwhat was being asked at each stage. Cognitive prompts were designed into the protocol to helpexplore participants' thoughts more deeply whenever they seemed hesitant during the interviewprocess, employing targeted prompts (Table 1). Table 1
laboratory. In the laboratory studentswork with each component of the system individually and finally with the system as a whole. A"Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 8.35.3Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education"typical laboratory experience starts with students using the AutoCAD or Pro- Engineer solidmodeler to design and produce a drawing of a part to be produced using the CNC machine. Theythen use a CAM software to determine the tool path, to select proper tool and machining process,and to generate the NC Code. The CAM software also allows them to
junior years. The laboratory courses are not directlylinked to specific lecture classes, but the experiments are carefully designed to synchronize to agreat degree with the standard curriculum. The focus of this paper is the first sophomorelaboratory course (hereinafter referred to as Lab I), which provides an introduction to safety,instrumentation, analog circuits and devices, and digital circuits and components.In Lab I, it is often the case that students require some background, which they have not studiedin any lecture, to understand and conduct a given experiment. For example, Lab I includes anexperiment using operational amplifiers, although op-amps are not formally introduced in lectureuntil the second electronics course. The latter
mechanical and civil engineering laboratorycontent. One of the objectives of the proposed experiments will help the students to recognizethe need for life-long learning.Bibliography1. Dally, J. W. and Riley, W. F., Experimental Stress Analysis, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991.2. Younis, N. T., “Stress Analysis Experiments for Mechanical Engineering Students,” Proceedings of the 2003American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, June 22-25, 2003. Session1566.3. Kadlowec, J., “Combining Laboratory Innovation and a Design Experience into Tools for Mechanics,”Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee,June 22-25, 2003. Session 1368.4. Younis, N. T
. Communication and networking courses, especially wireless communication andnetworking courses, have become an integral part of the Electrical Engineering, ComputerScience, and Computer Engineering curricula. However, most of these courses are taught atmany institutions without a laboratory. For those courses associated with labs, often specialhardware based experiment systems are used. These experiment systems are expensive so mostschools cannot afford them. More importantly, such systems lack the flexibility to evolve overtime and adapt to different environments. In our previous NSF funded CCLI project “Evolvablewireless laboratory design and implementation for enhancing undergraduate wireless engineeringeducation”, we have developed and demonstrated
AC 2008-1196: EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTAL LEARNING OPPORTUNITIESDESIGNED TO ENGAGE DIFFERENT LEARNING STYLESKay C Dee, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Kay C Dee is an Associate Professor of Applied Biology and Biomedical Engineering, and the Founding Director of the Center for the Practice and Scholarship of Education at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She is primarily responsible for the experimental design and analyses reported in this paper. Her educational research interests include learning styles and student evaluations of teaching. She has received a number of honors for her teaching, including the opportunity to serve as the 2003 Fellow at the National Effective Teaching
still others had no experience at all. Oftentimeswhen students were divided into groups of three or four to perform the experiments involving theoscilloscope, the student with the most experience would breeze through the procedures and datacollection, and some of the less experienced students would not adequately understand theoperation of the oscilloscope and how to use it. This handicapped these students in later labs,when the oscilloscope was used to take data and, having been introduced to it in the first lab,there is little to no time designed into the lab procedures for those students to become proficientat operating the oscilloscope.The WebLab was conceived as a tool to familiarize the students with laboratory equipment beforethey enter
Marie Spence, Baylor University Clinical Professor Mechanical Engineering ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Thermal and Fluids Laboratory Learning through the Integration of the Heat Exchanger ModuleAbstract This paper explores the integration of active learning in engineering education through anovel Heat Exchanger Module (HEM). The HEM enables students to experiment hands-on withheat transfer concepts using varying parameters and materials. The design incorporatesversatility in flow direction and speed, inner tube material, and hot side temperature. The recentstudy has recently shown that the intervention improves students’ understanding of the
designing AI-proof assignments. Her educational background includes a Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of California, Los Angeles. Reem has also engaged in post-doctoral research at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and the University of California, Irvine.Dr. Alyssa Catherine Taylor, University of California, San Diego Alyssa C. Taylor is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Shu Chien-Gene Lay Department of Bioengineering at the University of California San Diego. She was a faculty member at the University of Washington from 2010 – 2022 before joining University of California San Diego. Dr. Taylor has over thirteen years of experience teaching across bioengineering laboratory, introductory, and
development that will reshape the way digital logic design is taught in the electricalengineering technology programs. The new curriculum development will provide students with ahands-on educational experience well-respected by industry. I. IntroductionProgrammable Logic Devices in general and FPGA-based re-programmable logic design becamemore attractive as a design medium during the last decade, and as a result, industrial use ofFPGA in digital logic design is increasing rapidly. As would be expected following technologychange in industry, the need for highly qualified logic designers with FPGA expertise isincreasing at a fast rate. According to the United States Department of Labor, the job outlook ison the rise and will continue to expand for
offered by theDepartment of Computer Science. Both courses are sophomore-level courses that are requiredfor the departments’ undergraduate majors. The two courses cover almost identical material:representation of information, both combinational and sequential circuit analysis and design, andcomputer organization and control. Both courses use the same text3, but they are not jointlyoffered, primarily due to their large enrollments of 200 and 120 students per semesterrespectively. In both courses, students attend three hours of class every week; two hour-longlectures are taught by faculty and one hour-long recitation is taught by graduate teachingassistants. Students complete schematic-capture and simulation-based laboratory assignments ona bi
integrating design education throughout the engineering curriculum at Northwestern University.Gregory Olson, Northwestern University Gregory B. Olson, Fellow of ASM and TMS, is the Wilson-Cook Professor of Engineering Design and Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at Northwestern University, Associate Director for Research of the IDEA Institute for Design Engineering & Applications, Director of the Materials Technology Laboratory/Steel Research Group, and a founder of QuesTek Innovations LLC. He received the B.S. and M.S. in 1970 and Sc.D in 1974 in Materials Science from MIT and remained there in a series of senior research positions before joining the faculty of Northwestern in
solving and design skills.This type of student engagement is viewed as a national need; legislators have passed theAmerica COMPETES Act,10 part of which mandates the development of instructional programsdesigned to integrate laboratory experience with classroom instruction.To provide a meaningful learning environment and acknowledge the ideals echoed in EducationStandards for years, students must be given the opportunity to engage in problems, to developand provide solutions that are perceived as authentic. Students must be given the opportunity totackle ill-structured problems (as opposed to typical text-book problems); these types ofproblems compel learners to seek knowledge and understanding for themselves. Often they learnthe most through
, multidisciplinary engineering program. At Kettering he received Rodes Professorship award for outstanding teaching. He was one of the authors whose work in developing an introductory level design course received ASME Curriculum Innovation Award. Dr. Jawa enjoys teaching and is always in search of ways to make learning meaningful, relevant, and engaging.uei-jiun Fan, California State Polytechnic University-Pomona Dr. Fan is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Associate Dean of the College of Engineering at Cal Poly Pomona. For over fifteen years of tenure at Cal Poly Pomona, he has taught a variety of engineering courses and has diverse engineering experiences in his areas of
organizations Employment insurance 1-2weeks - - - 61 36 23 support Foreign Instructors Training 2 weeks 16 14 20 69 17 - Page 11.1233.4 Professionals Training Overseas 1-2 months - - - - 8 - Fig. 1: A picture showing the state-of-the-art classroom facilities at HRDI, KUT Fig. 2: A picture showing the state-of-the-art laboratory facilities at HRDI, KUTLecturesTo be able to design CMOS logic gates and circuits, it is important to understand the switchingcharacteristics and
that they had had a first course in communications4.Topics include the block-diagram level study of the air interface, antenna design,modulation theory, coding theory and an introduction to the supporting protocols.Performance under conditions of interference and techniques to minimize the impact ofinterference are also considered. The laboratory component of the course utilizes amixture of hardware-based experiments using higher-end instrumentation along withMATLAB/Simulink block-level simulation. Experiments include analog and digitalmodulation, antenna design and build, cellular topology, media access control and spreadspectrum techniques.Course Objectives and Topic CoverageCourse ObjectivesThe course objectives are given below. These
informal special topics courses managed asindependent design experiences: ECE 773 – Bioinstrumentation Design Laboratory. This 1-hour design experience is tightly coupled with ECE 772 – Theory & Techniques of Bioinstrumentation, a 2-hour lecture course that addresses various facets of biomedical instrumentation. ECE 773 projects currently focus on the elements of a bed sensor suite. ECE 690/890 – Wearable Medical Devices for Disabled Children. This informal, variable-credit ‘special topics’ course set was developed to support design experiences for the severely disabled children at Heartspring. These projects address various facets of child health, well-being, and development. BAE 536/636
, Virginia TechMr. John Harris, Virginia Tech Page 25.875.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Lab-in-a-Box: Techniques and Technologies to Manage Large and Not soLarge Laboratory CoursesA project known as Lab-in-a-Box (LiaB) was developed in 2004 by faculty members in theVirginia Tech (VT) Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department to improve studentlearning by allowing students to make their own observations on concrete examples offundamental concepts in electrical engineering.1 LiaB is a set of hands-on exercises in whichstudents design, build, and test at home circuits using
increase students’ success, persistence and engagement wasintroduced into our department with an NSF funded project to adapt and augment the TekBoT®mobile robot platform developed at Oregon State University to the undergraduate curriculumfrom freshman through senior year in a vertically integrated manner. 1 By the end of this verticalarticulation project spanning 2005 – 2008, the TekBot was completely integrated into thefreshman year sequence, in one sophomore lab, and in one junior level experiment. 2 In thisproject, it was discovered that the TekBot was not well suited for the department’s upper levelclasses.2 As a result of this discovery, in 2008, a team of students and faculty came up with anew design for a brand new robot learning platform
related fields. an ability to engage in, life-long learning.3. To provide students with experience in using Outcome 5: Have an ability to identify, formulate computers and information technology in problem and solve engineering problems. solving and learning. Outcome 11: Have an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.4. To provide students with hands-on experience Outcome 2: Have an ability to design and conduct through laboratory courses
of the experiential learning modules for soilmechanics and foundation design [4], [8]. RHIT is a small, private, four-year, highly residential university without doctoralprograms, classified as special focus four-year: engineering schools; SLU is a large,private, four-year, highly residential university with doctoral programs and high research activity(R2). Both geotechnical related modules require the use of a self-contained load frame. Neitherinstitution had a large-scale structural engineering laboratory prior to this implementation, butboth focus heavily on the undergraduate learning experience. The project utilizes the ModularStrong-block Testing System [2] when needed to test larger-scale specimens. While a fullstructural
, Chemical& Biological Engineering, Civil Engineering, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering,Environmental Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, andNuclear Engineering are led through three ten-week terms of hands-on design, culminating in afinal term where teams of four or five design, build and test an engineered structure, machine,system, or computer code. The course is structured with a one-hour lecture where techniques arepresented and a two-hour lab where they are practiced. Module topics vary, but are typicallydesigned to be relevant to emerging technologies. Current examples include nanotechnology andsustainable energy. Laboratory experiences are supplemented with weekly guest lectures, givenby
Body of KnowledgeAbstractCivil engineering curriculums culminate in capstone or senior design experiences, oftenconsidered a critical component to the academic training of the undergraduate population.Entities such as ASCE and ABET, along with other accrediting programs, university standards,departmental and college expectations present broad standards and requirements for capstonecourses. The ASCE Body of Knowledge (BOK) recently identified capstone experiences assupporting the developing abilities for young civil engineers entering the profession in fivedistinct outcome areas. While some similarities exist across the U.S. and Canadianundergraduate programs, many elements of the courses are still quite diverse allowing for veryunique
projects that will convey design methods used inindustry to freshman students in a user-friendly manner. Based on the freshman student'sbackground he or she may not be familiar with industrial design practices because of a variety ofreasons: lack of cooperative or internship positions available to first year students or not exposedto electrical laboratory experiments in physics or circuit design and analysis. Therefore, it is themandate of the EC engineering educator to devise innovate methods to illustrate engineeringdesign techniques to the freshman ECE (Electrical-Computer)engineering student withoutoverwhelming them with Calculus or Differential Equations. By using an innovative toy createdby the LEGO TM company as a pedagogical tool for
supplemental training curriculum was developed andimplemented by upperclass students to meet the needs of freshmen students for the Introductionto Engineering (InterEgr 160) design course at our university in the Fall 2007. The success ofthis supplemental training curriculum has inspired the BME Department to collaborate with theInterEgr 160 staff to provide hands-on training to BME students at all levels. The content of thesupplemental curriculum is dictated by the experiences of fellow undergraduate engineeringstudents when working on their design projects. Since the supplemental training curriculum isdeveloped and implemented by the students, it results in the ability to offer just-in-time learningto students based upon their needs during the
& professional help and cleanup video 20 Compliance/Import-Export Controls (guest speaker) 21 Principals of research and laboratory In-class design of bio and chemical labs design/Importance of ventilation 22 Tour of lab construction areas and building infrastructure, speak with lab designers 23 Audits: Preparation and Inspections Presentation of EH&S examples 24 Risk Analysis /Standard Operating Procedures Risk assessment homework 25 Reporting Incidences, Accidents, and Near-Misses In-class discussions 26 Electrical /Radiation/ Laser safety