Engineering Managementtargeted at working professionals who wish to develop their business, strategic thinking, andleadership skills [11]. At Northeastern University professional engineers or interns completing amaster’s degree can simultaneously earn a Graduate Certificate in Engineering Leadershipthrough courses and workshops [12].The goal of this paper is to share how the Troost Institute for Leadership Education inEngineering (Troost ILead) at the University of Toronto (U of T) develops graduate students’leadership potential. We discuss our approach to leadership and how it applies to graduatestudents. We then provide an overview of our leadership learning ecosystem and its threelearning environments: for-credit courses, co-curricular programming
capital,depicted in Figure 2 below. The black lettered boxes in Figure 2 display to which layers thevarious forms of aspirational capital belong.Figure 2. C2WEST Mapping of Darius’ Aspirational Capital where the A – D black barsrepresent aspirational capital in their respective layersBar A in the innermost orange layer describes aspirational capital in the microsystem. Dariuswas asked in the interview what his education and career goals were and he mentioned hisresearch on automation, saying “that’s what my research is on right now and that’s what I’mgoing to be interning with this summer. I like it so far.” This response contains information aboutthe system in which Darius is involved; his research is a microsystem with him at the center.However
inclusion in engineering educational cultures at large, research intensive,university programs. Through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 18 current or formerBME undergraduate students, we collected data and analyzed how this subset of students deploycultural and social capital within a BME disciplinary culture.ParticipantsThe participants for this study were undergraduate students currently enrolled or weretemporarily enrolled in BME at Purdue University. Eighteen students (approximately 6% of totalundergraduates in BME) volunteered to be interviewed. Out of 18 participants, ten were womenand eight were men. No ethnicity, race, or SES data was formally collected from theseparticipants, although two disclosed that they were international
, to f-j of ABET criterion 3 (a)-(k): (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issuesQuestions and Themes. The course began with a screening and discussion of the Errol Morrisnon-fiction film, Fast, Cheap, and Out of Control6, which profiles four men who are obsessedwith their respective vocations as robotics professor, naked mole rat expert, topiary gardener, andlion tamer. Footage of
has published more than 30 research articles in international journals and conference proceedings. He has led several research projects as a Principal In- vestigator and has been funded by the Office of Undergraduate Research, Office of the Vice President for Research at KSU, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. He has also led multiple projects for the development of open access instructional and learning resources for Engineering Electronics, Circuit Analysis, and Renewable Energy, which have been funded by the Board of Regents, University System of GA. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Design and Development of a Rooftop Photovoltaics Laboratory
University of Arkansas in May 2017. At Arkansas Tech University, Matthew is focused on establishing research experiences in photovoltaics for undergraduate and graduate students and investigating new methods to enhance engineering education in the classroom. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 WIP: Adopting the Entrepreneurial Mindset in an Upper Level Engineering Electromagnetics CourseIntroductionThis work in progress paper provides details about the current status of transforming a junior-level undergraduate engineering electromagnetics course by adding entrepreneurially mindedlearning (EML) activities to the course. The EML
EngineeringBased on the author’s experiences regarding HVAC education, I have submitted a proposal toestablish the Building Energy System Option in the Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate andGraduate Programs. A minimum of three technical electives in HVAC related courses should betaken by the student in their senior year. This proposal would encompass three typical courses,which are delineated below: [1] The Fundamentals of HVAC This course should address the basic design process of HVAC Systems. Additional topics include the indoor air quality and computer simulation. [2] Building Energy Systems and Management This course should focus on the energy conservation, alternate energy systems
Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. His research includes engineering design thinking, systems engineering, engineering education professional development, technical training, and adult learning cognition. He is currently working on a USAID funded project in Egypt, ”Center of Excellence in Water”, and Department of Education funded GEARUP projects in the area of STEM education related to engineering education. He has extensive international experience working on technical training and engineering projects funded by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Countries where he has worked include Armenia, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, China, Egypt
Ashley Taylor is a doctoral candidate in engineering education at Virginia Polytechnic and State Univer- sity, where she also serves as a program assistant for the Center for Enhancement of Engineering Diversity and an advisor for international senior design projects in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Ash- ley received her MS in Mechanical Engineering, MPH in Public Health Education, and BS in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include access to higher education, broadening participation in engineering, the integration of engineering education and international development, and building capacity in low and middle income countries through inclusive technical education.Dr. Homero
for Engineering Education 39 Figure 2- Top view of buildingStructural Design Project OutcomeDuring the 10-week internship program, the four students were expected to acquire necessaryknowledge on structural design and evaluation of a steel moment-resisting frame. Toaccommodate their different educational backgrounds, the CiPair Program set up a two-levelinstructional team that includes a faculty advisor and a graduate student. Fundamental conceptsin steel design were explained to the intern students by the graduate student and then reinforcedby relating the concepts to the equations in the design
Paper ID #30723Implementation of the Question Formulation Technique as a TeachingStrategy in Renewable Energy Engineering EducationDr. Claudia Torres Garibay, Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Claudia Torres Garibay is an associate professor in the Electrical Engineering and Renewable Energy department at Oregon Institute of Technology. Her educational background includes a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin (2007), a M.S. in Materials Science at the Advanced Materials Research Center (Mexico, 2000), and a B.S. in Electrical and Industrial Engineering at Chihuahua Institute
, contributingsignificantly to the global endeavor of making quality engineering education accessible to all.AcknowledgementRHL-RELIA project is funded by the National Science Foundation’s division of undergraduateeducation under award number 2141798.References [1] Shuowei Li, Heran Wang, Luis Rodriguez-Gil, Pablo Ordu˜na, and Rania Hussein. Fpga meets breadboard: Integrating a virtual breadboard with real fpga boards for remote access in digital design courses. In Online Engineering and Society 4.0: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, pages 144–151. Springer, 2021. [2] Pablo Ordu˜na. Transitive and Scalable Federation Model for Remote Laboratories. PhD thesis, Universidad de Deusto
WISE 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Workshop on Long-Term Industrial Collaboration on Software Engineering, Co-located with ASE 2014, Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 2014, pp. 63–68. doi: 10.1145/2647648.2647657.[12] M. Wronowski et al., “Effect of a Serious Educational Game on Academic and Affective Outcomes for Statistics Instruction,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 2053–2084, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1177/0735633118824693.[13] J. A. A. do Amaral, I. P. Meister, V. S. Lima, and G. G. Garbe, “Using Competition to Improve Students’ Learning in a Project-Based Learning Course: The Systemic Impacts of the Data Science Olympics,” Journal of Problem
Paper ID #11906Gendering Engineering Leadership: Aspirations vs. Shoulder TappingDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto, ILead Cindy Rottmann is a Research Associate at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership, engineering ethics education, critical theory, teacher leadership and social justice teacher unionism.Dr. Robin Sacks, University of Toronto Dr. Sacks is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto teaching leadership and positive psychology at both the
Mayaguez and Director of the International Service Systems Engineering Lab. Alexandra holds a Masters and Ph.D. degrees in Industrial and Systems Engineering, both from Virginia Tech, and a BS in Production of Materials Engineering from the Federal University of Sao Carlos, in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Her research interests are systems thinking, systems dynamics, service operations, economic design issues, performance measurement using DEA, evaluating success factors in engineering and the cognitive processes that occur during their acquisition. Page 12.1159.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007
inpostsecondary settings. In engineering, more than half of ASEE affiliated schools offerentrepreneurship training to undergraduate students [16]. In addition, several nation-wideprograms such as the National Science Foundation’s I-Corps [17], the Epicenter Program:National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation [18], and the Kern EngineeringEducation Network [19] have been initiated to provide entrepreneurial training to scientists,engineers and students; contributing to the growth of entrepreneurship education. For example,the Epicenter program provided entrepreneurial training to more than 450 students atapproximately 130 post-secondary institutions over the course of five years following itsinitiation in 2011 [20]. Similarly, the national I
Paper ID #41495Decoding Determinants: An Intersectional Exploration of Students’ Decision-Makingfor Graduate Engineering EducationDr. Najme Kishani, University of Toronto Najme Kishani (najme.kishanifarahani@utoronto.ca) is a research associate at the University of Toronto to advance gender analysis and equity in engineering. Najme did her PhD at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE) at the University of Toronto. Her research interests involve the role of education in enhancing young people’sagency to transform social conflicts and build peace and democracy. In her careers in international development at
-learning strategies, Fourth Industrial Revolution, Critical Thinking, Cognitive Flexibility and development of soft skills in engineering. She teaches courses on the implementation of Educational Innovation strategies as: Development of Creativity and Innovation Techniques, Development of Transversal Skills and Competencies, Development of Critical Thinking and Case Analysis, Problem Solving through Lateral Thinking and Design Thinking. Dr. Caratozzolo is Se- nior Member of IEEE and member of the IEEE Industry Applications Society (IAS), Power and Energy Society (PES) and Women in Engineering (WIE). She is also a member of the International Association of Continuing Engineering Education (IACEE).Prof. Anna Friesel
3 sections of the course. The sameinstructor taught each section of the course. The lab groups were set by the course instructor whoarranged groups by spreading GPAs so that there was a mix of A, B and C students in each group.This study had no control group. It would have been preferable to have a section that did notparticipate in the I-in-Team method; however, the course instructor did not want to have differentprocedures in different sections of the course. We would also like to note that this is commonpractice in engineering education. The students enrolled in the course were given a pre-survey on the first day of class beforethe rubric and I-in-Team method were presented and explained. The purpose of this first pre-survey was
Paper ID #6451Innovations in Software Engineering Education: An Experimental Study ofIntegrating Active Learning and Design-based LearningMr. Liu Junhua, Singapore University of Technology and Design Junhua is an undergraduate research technician of the International Design Centre (IDC) and pursuing a BE (Engineering Systems and Design) at Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD). He received a Diploma in IT from Singapore Polytechnic. Junhua was awarded the IT Youth of 2013 by the Singapore Computer Society.Dr. Yue Zhang, Singapore University and Technology and Design Yue Zhang is currently an assistant
: 10.1109/FIE.2013.6684828.[45] H. Martins, A. Freitas, I. Direito, and A. Salgado, “Engineering the future: Transversal skills in Engineering Doctoral Education,” 2021 4th International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education, CISPEE 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1109/CISPEE47794.2021.9507210.[46] “Engineering & Engineering Technology by the Numbers, 2023 | Enhanced Reader.”[47] K. A. Davis, M. Chen, and A. D. Wolf, “Is Curriculum Complexity Related to Study Abroad Participation? A Cross-Major Comparison at One University,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.18260/1-2--47706.[48] “Global Competencies Inventory (GCI) | Kozai Group Assessment.” Accessed
, 2012.[13] C. Chomyim, S. Chaisanit, and A. Trangansri, “Low cost mobile robot kits design as ateaching tool for education and research,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 752–753, pp.1010–1015, 2015.[14] I. Elbadawi, M. Aichouni, and N. Messaoudene, “Developing an innovative and creativehands-on lean six sigma manufacturing experiments for engineering education,” EngineeringTechnology & Applied Science Research, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1297–1302, 2016.[15] Tak´acs, G. Eigner, L. Kov´acs, I. Rudas, and T. Haidegger, “Teacher’s kit: Development,usability, and communities of modular robotic kits for classroom education,” IEEE Robotics &Automation Magazine, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 30–39, 2016.[16] R. Reck and R. Sreenivas, “Developing an
the profession such as “the lack of women inSTEM [Trina]”. Some stemmed from a desire to be a boundary spanner, contributing “tothe wide-boundary but nonetheless relevant body of knowledge in the engineering-education-entrepreneurial [community] [Michael]”.Two motivations students observed across the faculty was a passion for engineeringeducation research, and a willingness to be a trailblazer, comfortable with taking a non- Page 24.31.11traditional career path. As Molly notes, “I saw that the successful faculty (all) had onecommon link – their passion in EER [engineering education research].” This was bothinspiring and contributed to students
Complex Systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 247-298.9. Hobbs, R., Perova, N. P., Rogers, C. B., Verner, I. M. (2006). Teaching Basic Cardio-Vascular Mechanics with LEGO Models: A High School Case Study. American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Chicago, IL., June 18-21, 2006. Conference Proceedings.10. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books, Inc.11. Gray, J.T., Camp, P.J., Holbrook, J., Owensby, J., Hyser, S. and Kolodner, J.L. (2001). Learning by Design Page 13.1369.9 Technical Report: Results of Performance
assessment of student learning.Dr. Scott Streiner, Rowan University Dr. Scott Streiner is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department (ExEEd) at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, with a focus in engineering education. His research interests include engineering global competency, cur- ricula and assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education. His funded research explores the nature of global com- petency development by assessing how international experiences improve the global perspectives of en- gineering students. Dr. Streiner has
IBM, as well as owning a management consulting firm, Executive Education Services. Her research interests are in electronic marketing, multidisciplinary education, and entrepreneurial ventures.Susannah Howe, Smith College Susannah Howe is the Design Clinic Director in the Picker Engineering Program at Smith College. She coordinates and teaches the capstone engineering design course and serves as co-faculty advisor for entrepreneurial activity at Smith. Her interests include innovations in engineering design education, entrepreneurship education across disciplines at the undergraduate level, and durability and structural performance of cementitious and natural building materials.Robert Weissbach
– Stanford University. In 2006, she was awarded the ASEE Kauffman Outstanding En- trepreneurship Educator Award. Liz is currently co-Director of the Lion Launch Pad, a student-centric on-campus business accelerator program and is also involved in research funded by NSF and NCIIA (Na- tional Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance). Between 2008-2012, Liz supported ASME’s annual Innovation Showcase (I-SHOW), was a faculty adviser for the Kern Family Foundation’s KEEN (Kern Engineering Entrepreneurship Network) program, and served as Division Chair and Program Chair of the ASEE Entrepreneurship Division. In 2013, Penn State’s new Intercollege Minor in Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ENTI) was approved, with five focus
differences between educational research and SOTL. I also found the outline for papers to be extremely useful.” “A template for SOTL papers.” “Prior to this workshop I had no knowledge of SOTL; after attending the workshop, I know what SOTL means, how to leverage the benefits of EM, SOTL and VWG to reform our instructional practices, framework of a typical manuscript with examples and the various dissemination outlets for publishing research work.” “I learned that what I was doing before was SOTL, not engineering education research, and that there are several resources and publications that share and accept articles on what I'm doing.”4.2 Question #2: Please share at least one thing that was confusing or that we could havespent more time on. Example
being conducted by the Institute of International Education for the National Science Foundation with alumni of the Global Engineering Education Exchange (Global E3) program, as well as on-line research of the hiring practices and articulated needs of industry and anecdotal evidence from faculty and Global E 3 alumni. I. Traditional engineering education is not meeting marketplace needs Page 8.1043.1 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright January 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationIn recent years, even as engineering fields
2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationsimulation at any combination of events. For example, stop when RxD becomes low and RAMlocation $003F contains $BD or I/O register TCNT is greater than $3456.A number of (simulated) external components can be connected to the pins of the simulated68HC11 while debugging. For example: ‚ LED's, ‚ switches, ‚ analog sliders (variable voltage potential). ‚ serial transmitter and receiver. ‚ many more... (see http://www.hc11.demon.nl/thrsim11/comp.htm )There is also a 4 x 20 LCD character display mapped in the address space of the 68HC11.THRSim11 can communicate with the Motorola EVM and EVB boards