thatstudents did very well in discussion of past research, mixture design, and economics, but lackeda complete understanding of life-cycle assessment. However, this was not the case with allgroups. One group specifically researched the manufacturing locations for all materials includedin their design (i.e. cement, water, rock, sand, recycled concrete aggregate, etc…) and was ableto determine CO2 emissions for their mixtures based on emissions from material manufacturingand transport.Design Project GradesProject grades ranged from a class high of 93% to a low of 88%. Table 1 shows the scores givenfor each Part I-IV of the project. The two lowest scoring areas were Part II – QuantifyingSustainability and Part IV – Final Report/Presentation.Table 1
for Today’s Practicing Engineers”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 1997 Conference •”Successful Model for Corporate-University Col- laboration”, International Association for Continuing Engineering education (IACEE), 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor •”Designing Engineer Educa- tional Partnership Model”, IACEE 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with Michigan Technolog- ical University •”Reengineering a Successful Graduate Program”, IACEE 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute •”Developing Product and Manufacturing Integra- tion Engineers”, IACEE 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with
] Ellis, G.W., Ory, E.C., Bushan, N. Organizing a K-12 AI Curriculum using Philosophy of the Mind. Proceedingsof the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, Oregon, (2005)[8] Stavy, Ruth and Dina Tirosh. “How Students (Mis-)Understand Science and Mathematics.” Teachers CollegePress, New York, NY. (2000).[9] Halloun, Ibrahim Abou, and David Hestenes. “Common Sense Concepts About Motion.” American Journal ofPhysics, 53: 1056-1065. (1985)[10] Public School Review "John F. Kennedy Middle School- Florence, MA Public School Profile." Public SchoolReview: Public Elementary, Middle, and High Schools... (2007)[11] Smith College Office Of Educational Outreach. Smith College Science and Engineering Program
is an inventor and entrepreneur, and Dave is amechanical engineer with extensive business experience. They proposed a course thatwould teach the new product development process by simulating it in class. Studentteams would come up with ideas for new products, design and prototype a concept,develop a bill of materials and manufacturing plan, and prepare a financial analysis, amarketing strategy, and a business plan. Each team’s final presentation for the coursewould be a briefing to a group of venture capitalists – appealing for funding for their newcompany. Each team was also expected to submit a disclosure document or provisionalpatent to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. I assumed responsibility for this coursein 1998. Since then, the
students in electricalengineering; advances the state-of-art for effective, efficient, cost saving transfer education inengineering; and advances the knowledge and understanding of models that are effective inrecruiting and retaining women and minorities into electrical engineering.The activities described in this paper include: coordinating and articulating with North SeattleCommunity College; planning laboratory, service learning, and industrial project content for coreand elective classes in the curriculum; designing a detailed recruitment/retention plan forunderrepresented students; developing systematic assessment methods for evaluating the EEprogram; and finally solidifying industrial and community partnerships.Motivation for ProjectA
AC 2008-1466: IT'S ALL THERE: TEACHING COMPLEX MANAGEMENTCONTENT USING FEATURE FILMSZbigniew Pasek, University of Windsor Zbigniew J. Pasek is an Associate Professor in the Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering Department at the University of Windsor. His interests include industrial automation, informal engineering education and engineering applications in health care. Page 13.820.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 It’s All There: Teaching Complex Management Content Using Feature FilmsAbstractWe all learn in a number of different ways and the
-year Radiation Protection Technology Program. The program will be developed to meets the needs of new hires as radiation detection technician trainees at the new plants. 3. Texas State Technical College will lead establishment and development of a two-year Digital Instrumentation and Control Curriculum. Because much of the instrumentation and control systems in current nuclear power plants in the U.S. are based on analog technology, there is need for graduates with a knowledge base of digital I&C systems for future nuclear power plants. 4. The Department of Nuclear Engineering at Texas A&M University will coordinate
andtechnology curriculum. One answer is that ENTPP courses can help satisfy Accreditation Board Page 15.1172.2for Engineering and Technology (ABET) program outcomes h “The broad education necessaryto understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context” and j “ Aknowledge of contemporary issues”, and f “An understanding of professional and ethicalresponsibility”.5 Another way is to design a course in such a way that it may be used to meet auniversity requirement such junior English which would allow the course to be taken as analternative to an existing English course.Course design Upon establishing a need for an ENTPP
frequently as possible in their engineering education 8. Some educators evenfound than FEA can be introduced to students at an even earlier point in the curriculum, i.e.Statics by introducing first the deformation theory 9 or without deformation theory 10.Obviously the approach of introducing FEA has been used in both a statics and a mechanics ofmaterials class. However, there is a wide diversity of university backgrounds, course sequenceand structure, students’ and local industry’s needs, pedagogical objectives and approaches, etc.This paper describes the introduction of FEA in the first course of statics and solid mechanics inour specific context.BackgroundGrand Valley State University (GVSU) is located in the west part of Michigan and is
combined undergraduateand graduate degree programs5-7 are emerging strategies. In addition, programs to recruitand retain underrepresented minorities into graduate engineering programs have alsobeen reported.8,9 Indiana University–Purdue University Fort Wayne’s (IPFW) approachto increase graduate educational opportunities has been to establish an engineeringprogram at our regional campus. This has been motivated by the needs of local industry.Fort Wayne is the second largest city in Indiana and is home to a number of engineeringfirms in the defense, aerospace, automotive, wire die and orthopedic industries.Historically, northeast Indiana was a hub for manufacturing with products that supportthe transportation, electronic and logistics sectors
Department of Mechanical Engineeringbelieves that the sooner problem solving can be introduced to students, the stronger theireducational experience and problem solving abilities will be. Two new courses are beingdeveloped at the freshman level to facilitate this education. This year ROSES students have theunique opportunity to take these two new courses: ME 101 Creative Engineering Solutions I ME 102 Creative Engineering Solutions IIIn both of theses courses students will learn about the practice and disciplines of mechanicalengineering. Problem solving techniques will be introduced that will use hands-on experiences,calculation experiences, and computer experiences to solve many real world
not done before starting the GT2C. Some of the participant’s also recognizedthe intricate and necessary connections between the educational models and technology whendeveloping course content. Some of the comments students provided include: ‚ “The most important thing I learned was how to integrate teaching principles with technology. At first, I thought we would only learn the technology available, but I absolutely loved how we discussed how to design a lesson plan and to be more attentive to student needs.” ‚ “I now know how to be a better teacher and how to disseminate information to students so that they can learn better and also how to assess their progress.”Overall the course was very well received
. Marzano, K, D. Pickering, and J. Pollock, Classroom Instruction that Works: Research-based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2001.12. National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century, Before It's Too Late: A Report to the Nation from the National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21 st Century. U. S. Department of Education, 2000.13. Katehi, L., G. Pearson, and M. Feder (editors), Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. National Academies Press, 2009
ABET Criteria 3(a-k) and ME Program Criteria (l-s)a. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering;b. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data;c. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs;d. an ability to function in multidisciplinary teams;e. an ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems;f. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility;g. an ability to communicate effectively;h. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context;i. a recognition of the need for and an ability to
societal impacts also occur in domestic projects,these aspects are sometimes overshadowed by economic and political concerns. One student in2003 stated: “The main thing that this course told me about civil engineering is that there is adefinite need for bright and responsible civil engineers everywhere in the world. One of theother things I like about civil engineering is that you are doing projects for the good of society.”Outcomes EvaluationOne potentially useful tool to evaluate the impact of curriculum changes is the PittsburgFreshman Engineering Attitudes Survey (PFEAS)4-6 (http://www.flaguide.org/tools/attitude/pitts_freshman_attitudes.php). The survey contains 50 questions that students respond to on aLikert scale from 5 (strongly agree) to
her leadership in the development of technologies to enable areal density and reliability increases in hard disk drives and was elected a National Academy of Inventors Fellow in 2018. Dr. Hipwell is currently the Oscar S. Wyatt, Jr. ’45 Chair II at Texas A&M University, where she has developed new classes on innovation and technology development as part of her leadership of the INVENT (INnoVation tools and Entrepreneurial New Technology) Lab. She is Co-PI on a National Science Foundation engineering education grant to develop a culture of and tools for iterative experimentation and continuous improvement in curriculum development. ©American Society for Engineering Education
Society for Engineering Education Figure 2 – Continuous Improvement/Assessment PageAs shown in Figure 2, the Purdue University Calumet MET Program continuousimprovement process consists of six types of related documents: I. The METS Department Strategic Plan http://www.calumet.purdue.edu/mets/mission.html#dept_sp ) The METS Department Strategic Plan outlines the department’s vision, mission, constituencies, and goals with assessment methods. This plan encompasses the four programs in the department: Computer Graphics Technology, Industrial Engineering Technology, Mechanical Engineering Technology, and Organizational Leadership & Supervision. The department goals are aligned
Excellence in Engineering Network at UNT advised by industry and academia. She is an alumni of Leadership Texas (Class of 2013).Hector R. Siller, University of North Texas Dr. Siller is Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of North Texas. He holds a Ph.D. degree in Technology Innovation from Jaume I University, Spain and holds a master and a bachelor’s degree from Monterrey Tech, Mexico, in the fields of Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering, respectively. His research areas include advanced manufacturing processes, additive manufacturing, micro-manufacturing, and metrology. During his career he has advised more than 30 graduate students and has published around 60 research
and construction industry. Page 24.272.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Changing the Course Design to Include Habitat for Humanity Improved Course Outcomes and Broadened Student’s Perceptions of Community ServiceIntroductionArchitectural education often includes course(s) pertaining to the creation of architecturalworking drawings. Working drawings require the individual creating them to have knowledge ofprinciples, conventions, standards, applications, and restrictions pertaining the manufacture anduse of construction materials, components
assignment based on such questionnaires does notalways guarantee successful teamwork. The instructors do not gain any insights on thebehavioral aspects of the students as potential team members that have to interact with cross-cultural and distributed team members. An assessment workshop and final team formationduring a face-to-face meeting is now being considered.4 Securing FinancesA significant amount of funding is necessary in GPD for (i) acquisition and maintenance of ITinfrastructure, (ii) manufacture of the prototypes and, (iii) for international travel of students toattend the two face-to-face meetings per semester. These weeklong meetings are critical and allstudents are required to participate. The first face-to-face meeting is
importantlyimplement the DLMs. We gratefully acknowledge the insights gained from our NSFcollaborators in the WSU School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Andrew Easley (MS),and Professors Jennifer Adam and Shane Brown, who paved the way for the interview,assessment, and modified design implementation strategy. Finally, we acknowledge theimportant design contributions and manufacturing of the DLMs by Gary Held, Machinist in theWSU College of Engineering and Architecture Machine Shop.References1 Prince, M., Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 2004. 93(3): p. 223-231.2 Coyle, E.J., L.H. Jamieson, and W.C. Oakes, 2005 Bernard M. Gordon Prize Lecture*: Integrating Engineering
University of Puerto Rico, MayagA¼ez Campus. She has a M.S. in Clinical Psychology from the Caribbean Center of Advanced Studies in Puerto Rico [today the Carlos Albizu University] and a Ph.D. in EducationDr. Aidsa I. Santiago-Roman, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Dr. Aidsa I. Santiago-Rom´an is a Professor and Former Chair in the Engineering Sciences and Materials (CIIM) Department at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez Campus (UPRM). Dr. Santiago earned a BS and MS in Industrial Engineering from UPRM and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Dr. Santiago has over 20 years of experience in academia and has been successful in obtaining funding and publishing for various research projects
2006-2549: DOCTORAL DEGREES IN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY: WHATARE THE REAL ISSUES?Lawrence Wolf, Oregon Institute of Technology Page 11.494.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 DOCTORAL DEGREES IN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY: WHAT ARE THE REAL ISSUES?ABSTRACT In 1982 I published a paper in the ASEE, Journal of Engineering Education, which attempted to bring the issues concerning graduate education in engineering technology into focus.i At that time it was the masters degree that was the point of contention. Engineering technology educators wanted masters degreesii, but the broader engineering education community was still ambivalent about
Society for Engineering Education”manufacturing floor simulation involving the entire class2 and smaller group-based controlsprojects that use classical control experiments: solar tracking, water level control, salinitycontrol, temperature control of a chamber. For the control experiments, the system behavior isobserved rather than modeled and the control is performed with National Instruments equipmentand LabVIEW graphical programming language. Students first develop a basic level ofcompetency in the LabVIEW g-code, and then use simple programming techniques to develop anapplication-oriented understanding of feedback control.Control is an integral part of many engineering and applied science majors in the school ofengineering and applied science
several dimensions but in practice they often act together, particularly in conjunction withself-determination, which I discuss next.Another theory that helps us understand student engagement, not just with service learningprojects but with all educational activities, and is particularly useful in guiding the design oflearning activities is self-determination theory (SDT) (Deci & Ryan, 1985; Ryan & Deci, 2000;La Guardia, 2009)14, 15, 16. According to SDT three basic psychological needs – autonomy,competence, and relatedness – form the essential constituent of psychological development.Autonomy refers to actions that are self-initiated and self-regulated. Competence refers toexperience of mastery and challenge and is evidenced in curiosity
Automation (SIGDA).© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A Two Course Sequence in Computer Engineering Principles for Electrical Engineering StudentsAbstractTraditionally computer architecture courses emphasize either a programmer’s or logic designer’sperspective with regard to computer engineering. Recognizing the value of both approaches, asequence of two mandatory courses has been developed that addresses both of these aspects ofcomputer engineering for the curriculum in Electrical Engineering at the Rochester Institute ofTechnology.The lectures of each course are complemented by weekly lab sessions, in which the studentscomplete assignments of increasing difficulty. In the labs associated with the course
Computers Really Better than Paper? Subjective Comparisons of Computer and Paper Administered Workload Questionaires. HCI International 2003: Adjunct Proceedings. 2nd International Conference on Universal Access in Human - Computer Interaction. 22-27 June 19. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning Development. Eaglewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall. 20. Lumsdaine, M. and E. Lumsdaine (1995). "Thinking preferences of engineering students: implications for the curriculum restructuring." Engineering Education 84.Biographical InformationNIALL SEERY is a Lecturer of Process Technology and Engineering Pedagogy in the Manufacturing andOperations Engineering Department
give my points of view.Multiplicity- Atthis level theyrecognize that I feel no need to There is no one Experts explaindiversity in Knowledge is a I listen to experts, commit to any right solution to a course material tothinking exists. matter of educated but have a right to specific belief or problem, because
keeping the project on track.” (from a team member) Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2007, American Society for Engineering Educatioṅ “Originally I had no intention of being a team leader for the project; however I am glad that I was given this opportunity. My skills as a team leader were enhanced and will continue to grow. Another plus is that when I start working fulltime, my job responsibility is to be a team leader for a manufacturing department. This project has given me the ability to coordinate project logistics, delegate responsibilities, and personally adjust to the needs of the team.” (from a team leader
courses.Conceptual Framework The technology literacy curriculum needs to be firmly founded in the context ofthe student. Every student is alive, and has an interest in sustaining life. This notion iseloquently stated in John Dewey's famous pedagogical declaration. It was published inThe School Journal, Volume LIV, Number 3 (January 16, 1897), pages 77-80. He states: I believe that all education proceeds by the participation of the individual in the social consciousness of the race. This process begins unconsciously almost at birth, and is continually shaping the individual's powers, saturating his consciousness, forming his habits, training his ideas, and arousing his feelings and emotions. Through this