“relevant employability skills… before graduation.” In this case, employabilityskills are skills employers look for in potential hires that can serve as a metric for evaluatingperformance [2]. Due to the broadness of the term “employability skills” there is no definitive list ofwhich employability skills students are to gain, or what skills are to be transferred. Thismakes skill development difficult to track. There is, however, an expectation for co-opstudents to perform according to a standard. Competency lists exist for engineering bodiesand curriculums (such as CEAB and ABET) that schools adhere to. This gives programdirectors a focal point to develop curriculums around and a list of skills can then emerge.Even with these lists and the
are mandated toreflect state career and technology education (CTE) curriculum frameworks, but the frameworksare not designed to measure graduates' abilities to meet AM employers’ current needs. Becausethis technology-reliant industry changes so quickly, faculty are challenged to source, develop,and implement responsive educational experiences. Through consultation with industry leaders,the Department of Labor (DOL) developed an AM competency model to illustrate and promoteworkers’ necessary knowledge, skills, and dispositions. To determine whether the AMcompetency model can function as an exit assessment for AM program graduates, we comparedAM program syllabi from five rural Northwest Florida state colleges to the DOL AMCompetency Model. We
sustainable future. The example presented in this paperdemonstrates that such a training is possible through an in-depth approach to a societal problem.It also sets the stage for further development of the Chemical Engineering curriculum at Page 10.260.13Manhattan College to include grounding in alternative energy sources and sustainability “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”following the call of Sutherland, J.W. et al.,19 of Michigan Technological University for the needfor “globally aware students
students experience in both team and individual communicationcovering a wide range of styles. The assignments naturally serve to propel the project, but alsoinvolve and demonstrate important aspects of team cooperation and lifelong learning. The intentis to assure personal and professional growth on the part of the students as engineers, teamplayers, and societal members, in conformance to the program outcomes and to enhance theirfuture success as prescribed by the program objectives.Our writing communication requirements have been developed over many years of teachinghundreds of senior electrical engineering students. The normal expectations of three major teamreports are guided by specific clearly communicated content and style requirements. But
. Only after all of them are verified and satisfied, should a physical suspensionsystem then be manufactured in a CAM environment.Two avenues exist to bridge design and manufacturing via VP curriculum development. The firstalternative would be an independent course in Computational Multibody Dynamics (CMD) orApplied Multibody Dynamics to fill the gap between design and manufacturing. The otherintegrates VP directly into a CAD/CAM course and treats VP as an independent section afterdiscussion of assembly modeling and before geometric dimension & tolerance (GD&T) andcomputer numerical control (CNC) programming. The first way will provide much deeper andbroader discussion of the principles of CMD and related software applications and also
andreliability of the part.Both ISO and ASME current standards on surface texture have a range of 3D surface qualityparameters. This is further aided by the availability of modern equipment to accurately measurethem. Despite these advances, design and quality professionals continue to specify surface finishbased solely on the value of Ra. The same outlook trails in graduate and undergraduate educationand their textbooks. This article explores how these multitudes of 2D and 3D surface qualityparameters are to be understood in the design and development of high performance surfaces,and the strong need for them to be incorporated into graduate undergraduate engineeringcurriculum, and be taught as an improved toolkit to the aspiring engineers, process
was there any accountability with respect to those missionstatements. They were out there as frameworks within which we operated, but we did not haveany means to show that we were actually working towards those goals. In essence, we were alldesigning our own courses and teaching exactly what we wanted to teach without any idea ofhow well we were doing collectively. Of course we did work together to design our curriculumand we frequently updated our curriculum based on the literature in our field, (e.g., ComputingCurriculum for Software Engineering, SWEBOK, etc.). But what we did not do was identify anyobjectives, or goals, for our department, nor any goals or outcomes for individual courses, andconsequently, we were unable to assess whether
simulations as a teaching aid is very useful, perhaps even more so in a distancelearning environment. Southern Polytechnic State University’s (SPSU) Electrical and ComputerEngineering Technology (ECET) program is engaged in converting its curriculum to a distanceor hybrid distance format. Since all but two of the ECET courses have a laboratory component,this creates a significant challenge in providing a similar laboratory experience for the off-campus students. An obvious choice is to require distance students to visit the campusperiodically to perform hands-on lab exercises. This can be difficult for some students to do andwill limit enrollment to students who can.The laboratory for the department’s Telecommunications Engineering Technology (TCET
Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department at the United States NavalAcademy has introduced a novel project-based thematic learning approach by incorporating arobotics project into its curriculum. This project first and foremost captures the student interest,while being flexible enough to present ECE topics at all levels of the undergraduate ECEprogram of study. The robot project spans from Introductory Circuits and Digital Logic Coursesthrough to Capstone Design. In the introductory courses, the student receives a broad overviewof ECE with projects designed to capture the student’s interest while covering the many facets ofthe course. Additionally, students in the first year digital logic course are presented withinnovative projects that
Paper ID #33518Virtual Technical and Professional Development Program for ECEInternship PreparationMs. Phuong Truong, University of California, San Diego Phuong Truong is currently a fifth year PhD candidate in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at UC San Diego. Following her passion for research and education, she has worked closely with faculty at the Jacobs School of Engineering since 2016 to develop and improve curriculum for ex- periential learning courses. Her areas of focus include experiential learning, curriculum design, outreach program design, and engineering leadership.Dr. Karcher Morris
of the funding. • Support and recruit students for the SAMSWI • Improve the effectiveness and increase participation in concurrent enrollment programs within the school districts. • Make students aware of articulation agreements between partners, recruit, mentor and support students through completion of their chosen credentialed pathway. • Develop articulation agreements between partners as programs evolve. • Train, mentor and support high school instructors and counselors so they are proficient with the curriculum and career options available to students completed through bi- semester visits and summer workshops. • Develop and coordinate job shadowing, internships and industry led
AC 2008-2421: CAREER DEVELOPMENT AND PROFESSIONALISM WITHIN ABIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING CAPSTONE COURSETimothy Allen, University of Virginia Dr. Timothy E. Allen is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. He received a B.S.E. in Biomedical Engineering at Duke University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Bioengineering at the University of California, San Diego. Dr. Allen's teaching activities include coordinating the undergraduate teaching labs and the Capstone Design sequence in the BME department at the University of Virginia, and his research interests are in the fields of computational systems biology and bioinformatics.Shayn Peirce-Cottler
, “Execution engine for robotic surgery support functions in an unmanned operating room,” Proceedings of the 7th IEEE international symposium on computational intelligence in robotics and automation (CIRA), Jacksonville, FL. 10. Purvis, J., and Klarer P.R., 1992, “RATLER: Robotic All Terrain Lunar Exploration Rover”, Proceedings of the 6th Annual Space Operations, Applications and Research Symposium, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX., pp. 174-179. 11. Lee, K., and Edwards, R., 1996, “Combined research and curriculum development for power plant intelligent distributed control,” Proc. of the American Society of Engineering Education, Washington, D.C. 12. Akbar, S., and Dutta, P., 2000, “A research
the group remains on track. Finally, prompt instructor feedback isintegrated into the course design.Establish a Course Development Team – One of the most important resources in theauthoring phase was the inclusion of an instructional designer to work closely with facultyduring course development. The instructional designer provided pedagogical assistance aswell as the needed technical expertise in web design and multimedia effects. A teamconsisting of the program head, the instructional designer, and four faculty membersresponsible for the development of the first four courses in the curriculum sequence wasformed as the key group to lead the development effort. The group met regularly and facultywere encouraged to share their thoughts on
http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/FD-Model(JFD).pdf. Page 14.389.6 Brooks J G Brooks M G In Search of Understanding : The Case for Constructivist Classrooms Alexandria Va Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 4. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., and Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher,(18)1. 5. Browner, C.E., Felder, R.M., Allen, R.M., and Brent, R. (2002). A Survey of Faculty Teaching Practices and Involvement in Faculty Development Activities, Journal of Engineering Education, 91(4
amajor worldwide deployment surge adding generating capacity at a remarkable rate, alsoincreasing employment opportunities [2]. While many universities offer classes in powerelectronics and its role in renewable energy development, the enormous breadth of a modernelectrical curriculum leaves little room to expose students to the issues of grid integration [3]. Atypical first course in power electronics may well focus on the underlying power switchingtechnologies, but the relevance to the associated technologies may be limited [4],[5].Compounding this problem, the enabling technologies for renewable integration, embeddedcomputing, and controls, are seldom taught within a context in which their applicability toenergy production and distribution is
configure an optimal brewingsystem, the author needed to understand how fluids and heat flow, as well as the effect thesevariables would have on the system’s end product. Additionally, the author’s attempts to improveon the coffee-making process required further development of fundamental engineering conceptslike centripetal force and pressure. In retrospect, these identified competence gaps illuminated theimportance of the author’s follow-on engineering coursework that would help fill these gaps (Table2). The lack of engineering competence displayed by the author may suggest that the independentstudy began too early. However, finding this gap in competence served only to increase theauthor’s anticipation for the forthcoming formal curriculum. In
undergraduate institutions. These included, teaching, evaluating students,handling accreditation, student advising, undergraduate research experiences, student disciplineand curriculum development. Often a new faculty member at a small university, like manyundergraduate institutions, must do all these things from the moment they step on campus. Thisdiverse set of expectations can be overwhelming.The development program used evidence based best practice components. During the face-to-face workshop, participants were surveyed to identify what aspect of their work was mostimportant to them. Some participants felt the need to learn to create new courses, others wantedto learn to write educational proposals. Once they identified their priority, they were
Paper ID #11121The Paul Peck Program: A Multi-Year Leadership Development ProgramMs. Alistar Erickson-Ludwig, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Ms. Alistar Erickson-Ludwig serves as the STEM Program Coordinator in the College of Engineering at Drexel University. She focuses on outreach and education programs for current undergraduates, k- 12 students, and the community. She concentrates on the Greater Philadelphia Seaperch Underwater Robotics Competition, Summer Diversity Program, Introduce a Girl to Engineering Day, and Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) at Drexel, among others. In collaboration with
SIMPLE Design Framework for Interactive Teaching Development and a research initiation grant: Student-directed differ- entiated learning in college-level engineering education. Her research centers on facilitating and studying her role in faculty development self-study collaboratives.Dr. Lori C. Bland, College of William and Mary Lori C. Bland, Ph.D., is a clinical associate professor of curriculum and research, and the Director of Curriculum, Center for Gifted Education at The College of William and Mary. She teaches courses in program evaluation, educational assessment, educational psychology, data-driven decision-making, and gifted education. Bland received her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of
integrating design education throughout the engineering curriculum at Northwestern University.Gregory Olson, Northwestern University Gregory B. Olson, Fellow of ASM and TMS, is the Wilson-Cook Professor of Engineering Design and Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at Northwestern University, Associate Director for Research of the IDEA Institute for Design Engineering & Applications, Director of the Materials Technology Laboratory/Steel Research Group, and a founder of QuesTek Innovations LLC. He received the B.S. and M.S. in 1970 and Sc.D in 1974 in Materials Science from MIT and remained there in a series of senior research positions before joining the faculty of Northwestern in
AC 2007-360: DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTI-LEVEL MECHANICALENGINEERING EDUCATION TOOLBenson Tongue, University of California-Berkeley Page 12.515.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Development of a Multi-level Mechanical Engineering Education Tool1 AbstractThe design and structure of a student-based learning portal is presented. Progress throughthe program is determined by the particular user. No “right” way through the materialis presupposed; one can move in a linear progression from low to high levels of informationalong a particular thread, move laterally across threads, and so on. The targeted audience aremechanical engineering
Educationteacher/leaders and college experts from each of the five regions) participated in a two-dayplanning meeting. The secondary school teachers are NYSTEA association leaders, and thecollege faculty have content expertise in the areas of materials/manufacturing and informationtechnologies. In the summer of 2003, the project management team and additional consultantsconducted an intensive, seven-day workshop at Fulton-Montgomery Community College for thePDC leadership teams. NSF-developed instructional materials were used to ensure thatexemplary, pedagogically sound curriculum is at the core of instruction. Classroom-testedmaterials in materials/manufacturing and information technologies, developed as part of apreviously funded NSF project, New York
, Bramhall, MD, Robinson, IM “Product Development: An Integrating Curriculum”, Keynote Paper and Address, 2nd Global Congress on Engineering Education, Conference proceedings pp 49-52, Wismar, Germany (2000).Biographical informationPROFESSOR MIKE BRAMHALLProfessor Mike Bramhall holds a Chair in Engineering Education in the Faculty of Arts, Computing, Engineeringand Sciences at Sheffield Hallam University and is the Faculty Head of Learning, Teaching & Assessment. He isalso the Associate Director of the UK Centre for Materials Education at Liverpool University. Mike is the Editor ofthe British Journal of Engineering Education.PROFESSOR IAN ROBINSONProfessor Ian Robinson is the Head of Undergraduate Studies in the Faculty of Arts
about teachingand learning in the process of building a learning community, 3) create a collaborativelearning environment with faculty and peers, 4) build confidence in curriculumdevelopment including designing, guiding, and assessing learning, 5) learn with andabout technology in the process of improving curriculum, and 6) connect teaching andresearch and bridge the gap between theory and practice. The twenty participantsrepresented ten universities; a team of two from each university included one facultyperson from engineering and one from another science, math, or computer sciencediscipline. Specifically, the professional development opportunity explored ways ofknowing including theories of learning, learning styles, disciplinary and
work is documented and further discussed in [5].DiscussionWe are currently looking at developing a zero-year curriculum for entering engineering freshmanstudents who are not calculus-ready. This pilot course, if successful, may become a mandatoryfreshman class for students ready for college geometry and trigonometry. For other students, itwould be available as an elective class.This pilot course mainly addresses retention problems of students who have poor mathematicalskills or who do not understand the important connections between math, science andengineering. Other educators have had success in integrating math and science classes [6, 7], butthese attempts have typically waited until the students are calculus-ready. The approach in ourpilot
. Scheller II, Development of a common core curriculum for all engineering students, ASEE-NCS 2000 Spring Conference, March 30-April 1 (2000).2. Hagler, M.O. and W.M. Marcy, Strategies for Designing Engineering Courses, Journal of Engineering Education, 88 (1), January, ASEE (1999).3. Director, S. W., Khosla, P. K., Rohrer, R. A., & Rutenbar, R. A., Reengineering the curriculum: Design and analysis of a new undergraduate electrical and computer engineering degree at Carnegie Mellon University, Proceedings of the IEEE, 83 (1246-1268), September (1995).4. Al-Holou, N., Bilgutay, N., Corleto, C., Demel, J., Felder, r., Frair, K., Froyd, J., Hoit, M., Morgan, J., and Wells, D. First-Year Integrated Curricula: Design Alternatives and
, do not develop the ability to fully solve and develop complete solutions, resulting in poor performance and expensive mistakes.DiscussionFrom the faculty member point of view, the internship was a successful experience. The wholeproject team was very supportive of the endeavor and contributed to the positive outcome of theexperience. They offered help and guidance, answered all the questions, and they were also opento hear the faculty intern suggestions and comments.Benefits of InternshipA field-based internship offers a different perspective on the subjects covered in the constructionmanagement curriculum, and an opportunity to evaluate teaching and assessment methods. Itprovides insight into issues of construction management not
, equipment installation, commissioning, andutilization, and curriculum development and the preparation of renovated coursewarematerial. PROJECT OUTLINE AND POLICIESActivities Supported by EEDPLoan support for engineering education development under the EEDP project includedprovisions for development of engineering curricula and engineering education technology,procurement and commissioning of laboratory equipment, supply of instructional materials,including textbooks and library resources, academic fellowships and industrial attachmentsfor staff upgrading (both teaching and technical support staff), consultants and visiting
Session 3553 Development of a Knowledge Based System for Advising Freshmen Engineering Students S. Keith Hargrove Tuskegee University College of Engineering, Architecture & Physical SciencesINTRODUCTIONOne of the greatest challenges faced by engineering faculty is balancing effectiveteaching, research, and service with time. Faculty are also responsible for advisingstudents to register for courses in the curriculum and other developmental matters.Probably the most neglected area in engineering education is advising, and researchindicates that advising