there was recognition that professional development should provide thenecessary math skills that match up with the new content and activities.What are design and implementation implications for engineering design professionaldevelopment?The workshop brought up additional issues to consider when organizing a professionaldevelopment program. For instance, a common concern was how to design a program for adiverse teacher population. Teachers and developers acknowledged that different schools anddistricts have different standards and curricula guidelines for teachers to follow, a situationthat could result in limited opportunities for teachers to incorporate new content knowledgeor activities into their classrooms.Although the teachers were excited
on technological topics at a level that is appropriate for non-engineers. However doing so requires appropriate curriculum and course materials. To facilitatethis process, a review was conducted of technological literacy courses already being taught byengineering faculty. It was found that courses can be classified in four categories. These fourgroups are survey courses, focus courses, design courses and connections courses. The surveycourses aim to cover a wide range to technological products, systems, and issues. The focuscourses address a more narrowly defined area such as energy or nanotechnology. The designcourses emphasize developing a familiarity with the engineering design process. Connectionscourses concentrate on the
1graduation rate aligns with the overall national average for veterans of 40-50% identified in theVeteran Economic Opportunity Report (2015). Of concern though is the fact that, of the veteranswho entered as freshmen from 2008 through 2011, only 78% of that cohort were still in school in2011. This rate compares poorly with the retention rate of 90% for the non-veteran students in thatsame cohort. There is significant room to improve the retention and graduation rates of veteranstudents. In an earlier paper, Landry and Jackson (2016), the authors presented educational modelsof student learning in a STEM environment and offered a vehicle for developing a program tomitigate these issues and improve graduation and retention rates by increasing the
for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #19693projects include developing new ways to teach about climate change issues in general education classesand linking environmental changes to evolutionary changes in various fossils. She received her B.S.in Geology and Marine Science in 2000 from Rider University and her Ph.D. in Geosciences from theUniversity of South Florida in 2010. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Role of Customized Mentoring in a Successful STEM Scholarship Program for Underrepresented Groups1AbstractIn 2011, STEM faculty members at Penn State Harrisburg
trying to implement, it is easy to forget other tools that may have been dismissed in the past but, with the current changes in context, are now feasible alternatives. This is particularly the case with tools that were too complex or expensive when originally considered, but have continued to evolve and/or decrease in price. • Not re-examining the wheel – new technologies mean that new teaching tools may be incorporated into them to increase the potential learning opportunities for students. Many faculty were still using large lecture hall-based delivery mechanisms when the courses shifted to being offered remotely. Rather than re-examining the efficacy of this delivery method and
„parent organization.‟ This meeting is to initiate the development of a forum for the department heads of „non-traditional programs.‟ Our objectives include the delineation of the problems, solutions, and unique opportunities available to this community. We believe that ASEE provides a natural base for consideration of these issues. “Those present expressed a concern with the term „nontraditional,‟ on the basis that it is a term stating what the group is not. After discussion, the consensus (was) to use the term “multidisciplinary” engineering programs.Another important topic of that initial meeting was the accreditation of such programs, whichhad no “program-specific” criteria. The following points were recorded from the meeting
with navigating the career of a woman faculty.3) Work/Life balance: Around 23% of the literature reviewed indicated barriers related toachieving work-life balance among women faculty. These barriers encompassed severalchallenges, including inadequate job flexibility, familial responsibilities, insufficient support forchild care, and teaching-related concerns, such as negotiating workload.4) Underrepresentation of women faculty: About 20% of the literature highlighted anunderrepresentation of women faculty in many areas of academics. For example, there are fewerwomen in the upper ranks, leadership roles, collaborative research groups, and academiccommittees. This affects the dynamics of the academic environment in different ways
. Thesediscussions contribute to the GSMs’ breadth of teaching experiences. Also, through theinteraction with the GSIs, the GSMs are exposed to situations that may not have come up in theirown teaching. These situations compel the GSMs to consider educational methods thatappropriately respond to various situations and that can improve student learning under a varietyof situations. Overall the GSM program is a great opportunity for the graduate students who areselected to participate in it because they are able to provide a valuable service to the college ofengineering while making themselves more attractive as future faculty candidates.5 Examples of GSM/GSI InteractionThroughout the term GSIs present GSMs with any number issues, some very minor, while
(2) education andtraining. New graduate level interdisciplinary education programs are being developed to addressthe need for translating medical innovation into practical clinical solutions. According toKurpinski et. al., “a new generation of medical innovators must be taught to recognize, acceptand effectively navigate the challenges of translational medicine” [7]. Key areas of focus includebiomedical technology, clinical issues, leadership and technology management [7]. Theeducational programs currently offered are primarily Master’s level programs focused ontechnology innovation, design and product development [3-6]. Noting the Grand Challenges andneed to identify and train individuals to facilitate biomedical innovation, the goal of
engineering flavor. Another lingering concern wasthat the Engineering Physics degree, as the only engineering program at Southeast, requiresabout 12 more credit hours than most other programs on campus, which might tend to reduce itscompetitiveness when recruiting majors. In order to address these concerns, we developed asenior capstone course that has been accepted into the University Studies Program, which isSoutheast’s liberal education program. It therefore counts both in the major and for the liberaleducation program, thus reducing the total number of hours required. The course requiresstudents from at least two departments on campus to work on a project requiring expertise fromboth disciplines. In Spring 2004, in collaboration with a faculty
the project, and should be much less of an issue next year.Amusingly, the next biggest student complaint was the size of the budget; $10,000 does not govery far for major landscaping projects, nor for the purchase of any electronic assistance devices.However, as this is the actual budget for ADA compliance, we feel justified in continuing to useit (and perhaps will in the future try to make it more clear that the students’ budget frustrationsshould be directed elsewhere).In summary, both the faculty and student reaction to the new project was positive. In the studentsurvey given immediately after the project, students gave “This project was worthwhile” a ratingof 3.9/5. On the final, overall course survey, a similar question “the wheelchair
below.One concern throughout the project has been how to address perceived barriers to facultyimplementation of failure case studies. Therefore, the faculty that were part of the project at thedifferent universities were surveyed by email. Results are provided below. While the student Page 24.217.2survey results have been previous reported 2, the results from faculty surveys and student focusgroups are new to this paper.Importance to Civil Engineering EducationPrevious work has suggested that failure case studies may be used to address AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology Engineering Accreditation Commission (ABET EAC)general and civil
theubiquitous access to information (see Figure 7). In the recent past the advancement of cloudcomputing technology has taken access and sharing of information to another level furthering theubiquity around the world. The X and the millennial (or Y) generations will form the bulk of adulthigher education in the near future, have uniquely settled on these wireless technologies (andsocial media) and are very comfortable with it. They are also looking for quick/immediate andtimely feedback on their class performance, and SCL practices can help to provide for this quickfeedback. This needs further changes in how Faculty can work under these new norms which willbe new a lot of the current faculty. They need to prepared and trained – university IT
Processes and Modest Means (A Case Study)IMAGE 01: The complete the community event- and maker-space in South Africa in only 7 daysand for less than $1500, the team had to rely upon a new process of building delivery. (Imagecourtesy of the International Design Clinic)AbstractDuring the summer of 2019, a team of eleven students, faculty and professionals withbackgrounds in architecture, design and engineering traveled to Port Elizabeth, South Africa,where they partnered with local community members to design and construct an event- andmaker-space from scavenged materials (Image 01). Now completed, the work has offered thecommunity a physical and inspirational base of operations. Physically, the makerspace providesthe members of
(Table 4). Scenario creation beginswith a scoping phase to determine the need and subject for a new scenario. This phase beginswith the recognition of the need for a new scenario. New scenarios may be generated when aninstructor finds a new, compelling engineering topic or sees that existing scenarios are no longersufficiently current. A good practice is for the author of the scenario to review the best existingscenarios. The author then brainstorms possible topics by reviewing current issues receivingmedia coverage. The author then selects a topic that is most likely to satisfy the requirementspresented in the scenario assessment form (Table 3) while considering the likely audience.The scenario is incrementally developed in the second phase of
from the on-going evaluation of the STEP program. The latter provides evidence for project spillover in theform of expanded connectivity and enhanced quality of connections between the partners, and ina redefining of the program stakeholders and incorporation of new project objectives. Page 10.1135.4* NSF Award Number 0086420† NSF Award Number 0338261 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationA key STEP evaluation issue has been whether the program enhances university-K
hasapproximately 700 students and 35 faculty as well as support staff. The ship has many of thefeatures of a land-based campus: computer center, library, fitness center, medical facilities, aswell as classrooms. Classes are offered with credit from the University of Virginia in a widerange of topics such as business and economics, communication, history, environmental science,biology, sociology, literature, the arts, and oceanography. In each course, traditional material isaugmented with in-port experiences which illustrate the practical application of that subject Thispaper will discuss a new class introduced in the Fall 2009 voyage around the world. The course,titled Engineering Design for Sustainability, was offered through the University of
post on-line asynchronously andthen respond to their peers’ posts. The purpose of this activity is to have students begindeveloping their own stance on ethical issues and questions of stakeholder relevance presentedthroughout the case prior to coming to class for a facilitated dialogue. Further, as most of thestudents in the course will not pursue careers that entail working on an oil rig, we seek to helpstudents make associations between this case and their own experiences or disciplinary issues.These prompts include: 1. How do we weigh the various stakeholder claims in this case? 2. In what ways do some engineers (e.g., those working on a rig in the Gulf of Mexico) have a different scope of ethical concerns than other engineers
, safetyeducation is still mostly reliant on individual faculty members to initiate rather than a formalprogram for graduate students. In an effort to address continuing issues in safety and enhanceprofessional attributes needed for these graduate student’s future careers, a course was createdentitled “Research Safety and Compliance for STEM Professionals.” The target audience for thesafety course was graduate students with at least one year of research experience.This new course was designed to provide an overview of governmental safety regulationcombined with direct application of safety requirements through real-life examples. Due to thesmaller class size of five graduate students, a uniquely tailored and interactive approach wastaken. The fundamentals
that they are unmanned, and hence are not as strictly regulated as conventional aircraft.The absence of tight regulations allows the UAS market to evolve very rapidly, according to theindustry demands, and UAS designers, maintainers, and operators must be able to rely on a solidengineering and technical background to anticipate and satisfy the rapidly changing needs of thenumerous activities involving drones. In August 2016, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)issued the Small Unmanned Aircraft Rule (Part 107), concerning the use of UAS for research,educational, and commercial purposes. These regulations will evolve over the years and it istherefore important to train future operators fully aware of the current restrictions on the use
writer really may notknow any better and the job of the reader is to get them to think along lines that will improvetheir ability to communicate. Here the positive takes over. "You are an idiot and this paper isatrocious!” will probably not come across as well as “Page 3 repeats the same points that weremade on pages 1 and 2. Is the repetition necessary?"The graduate students are mainly concerned with the technical information and its evaluation.Their primary responsibility is to make sure that they react to the information given. The issue of Page 9.554.4 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
2004- 2005 Mechanical Engineering Instructor of the year award, 1999 ASEE-GSW Outstanding New Faculty Award. Dr. Manteufel is a Fellow of ASME with teaching and research interests in the thermal sciences. In 2015-2016, he chaired the American Society for Engineering Education Gulf Southwest section and in 2018-2019 he chaired the Academy of Distinguished Teaching Scholars at UTSA. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Texas.Dr. Amir Karimi P.E., The University of Texas at San Antonio Amir Karimi, University of Texas, San Antonio Amir Karimi is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA). He received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of
. Students will be given instruction and feedbackusing the usual instruments: class presentations, lab reports videos of presentations, visualpresentations and essays and written reports.Most of the courses will be taught be full-time faculty, but as a state-supported institution withlimited resources, it would be desirable if some other way to assist in delivering content andmaking assessment could be made. Some interesting models for these have been proposed byseveral universities concerning these facets of implementation. A team from the communicationdepartment at the University of Utah uses graduate students from that program to help delivercommunication skills to engineering students. 17 Another model, from Michigan StateUniversity, again uses
participated in the qualitative coding of the reflections, guided byrecommendations for analyzing narratives (Clandinin & Connelly, 2004). One important item tonote is that faculty were allowed to write their reflection in their preferred language (English orSpanish). Since the research team is multilingual and multicultural, the data was not translatedbut rather was analyzed simultaneously in English and Spanish. Translation issues in qualitativestudies have shown the importance of situating the participants’ languages with the researchteams’ languages for more accuracy in the interpretation of the data (Oxley, Günhan,Kaniamattam, & Damico, 2017). In the case of this study, the team members’ knowledge of thelanguage and the culture of the
freshman mechanical engineering courses described in this paper also give studentsearly exposure to the Faculty of the program. Students see the Faculty first as academicadvisors, then instructors, and ultimately as engineers. It has been the authors experience that thestudents in the freshman Materials course have been inclined to simply ask whenever an advisingneed arises. They know where and who their advisor is (are) and are less hesitant to seekassistance. This early familiarity with Faculty extends into the later semesters such that studentstend to see the various activities and expertise of the Faculty to a degree uncommon in lessintegrated programs.IV. Challenges and Successes One area of initial concern over the ME 240 & ME
376 A Proposed Grand Challenges Scholars Program in the Lyles College of Engineering M. Zoghi, L. Crask, B. Hyatt, V. Luo, and W. Wu Lyles College of Engineering California State University, Fresno, CAAbstractThere has been a growing concern regarding traditional engineering education - for notadequately preparing future graduates who will be able to address society’s increasingly complexproblems. Future engineers will need a new set of skills in the context of the global economy.Additionally, the retention of engineering
-madematerials for a mentorship training program were not available to meet the unique needs of two-year community college faculty mentors who bring diverse experiences and may or may not havethe same disciplinary background as the students’ intended majors at the four-year institution. Thispaper presents the development and implementation of the ESP’s guided mentorship program,summarizing program components designed for two-year community college faculty members andcurrent faculty/peer mentorship feedback. Results from the first semester of the guided mentorshipprogram indicate that faculty mentors utilized the new mentorship materials with success, thoughthe additional professional development in mentorship highlighted desire for more
for the CREATE program reflected on years when they werenot allowed to play outside as children because of radiation concerns from the Chernobyl nucleardisaster (see Figure 2). The Green Party and the Energiewende were both initiated in part out ofopposition to nuclear power. The German Energiewende began in the 1980s and matured overthe past several decades with the growth of the Green Party [9].The CREATE study group spent several days in the City of Freiburg and learned aboutGermans’ attitudes and awareness of energy issues that developed after WWII and were furtherreinforced during anti-nuclear protests of the 1970s. Through presentations from the municipalityand visits to the city’s public transportation authority, CREATE participants
g) undergraduate research and engineering work experience h) societal, economic, and environmental impact 14. resource sharing.Serving as a case study, the Fuel Cell Locomotive Project is an example of a possible futureengineering educational paradigm that could be incorporated into a strategic plan. The issue offaculty rewards arises because the fuel cell project and other like it do not necessarily qualify asprimary teaching responsibility; for the most part faculty work on the project is uncompensated.Public OutreachThe fuel cell locomotive project is a project with very high potential for public outreach. First,having students work on what is really the cutting edge of a new, environmentally friendly
faculty, and other employee categories by full-time and part-time status, sex and racial ethnic categories; 2) full-time faculty by rank and tenure; and 3) new hires by full-time and part-time status, sex and racial ethnic categories [11].Most academic institutions must also develop Affirmative Action plans that include classifyingthose positions likely to underutilize women and minorities, to describe likely career paths forthose categories, and to develop a plan to employ women and minorities in those positions innumbers commensurate with both the local population diversity as well as the diversity of thefield as a whole.With these sources of information, it would be possible and