engaged student experiences. Carmellia received her Masters Degree in Higher Education from Michigan State University. Page 15.589.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 First-Year Engineering: A Comprehensive ApproachIntroductionOver the past four years, the College of Engineering at Michigan State University (MSU) hasplanned, developed, and implemented an integrated first-year engineering program andresidential living-learning program. This single initiative of both curricular and co-curricularactivities has given us a holistic approach to engaging and
instructor explain the theory ina simple, interesting and direct way. It covers a wide area of subject like microcontroller,robotic system, smart sensors, and process control. Automatic north-facing robot can beeasily reprogrammed for more complicated automatic navigation.2. The orth-facing Robotic System Hardware:Parallel Boe-Bot, shown as Picture 1, is a popular educational robot. It is controlled by aBASIC Stamp microcontroller. The robot is programmed through a personal computer.Then the control program is downloaded to the microcontroller. The robot can be standalone, disconnected from PC, and powered by its own battery. Different types of sensorscan be added to the robot, for more advanced navigations. Commonly used sensors are IRsensor, light
/Champaign under the direction of Prof. Nick Holonyak, Jr. Her areas of research include design of optoelectronic materials, devices, and systems; optical spectroscopy; high heat load packaging; and electrical engineering pedagogy.Mr. Justin Adam Cartwright, Virginia Tech Page 23.842.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Lab-in-a-Box: Strategies to Teach Online Lab Courses While MaintainingCourse Learning Objectives and OutcomesThe Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech has institutedseveral nontraditional on-campus laboratory courses during the
the curriculum.In 1828, the Institution of Civil Engineers defined engineering as “the art of directinggreat sources of power in nature for the use and convenience of man.” 1 By 1956, thisdefinition expanded beyond harnessing physical phenomena to include “application ofknowledge” and “design and production.” 2 What remained consistent however, was theidea that engineering is artfully disposed. This suggests a level of care and understandingthat conjoins thought and feeling. If the transformation of science and technology intoproducts and systems requires empathy or “emotional union,” 3 (i.e., the projection of selfinto objects) then the education and training of engineers should include an understandingof intuitive processing.Engineers must
metrics that we can use to compare this with other standardteaching methods: Cohen’s d (effect size) and absolute scores on post-quizzes. Walberg [5] andBloom [6] presented effect sizes for several standard educational methods including assignedhomework (d=0.30), graded homework (d=0.80), and one-on-one tutoring with a teacher(d=2.00). These indicate that 62% (small effect), 79% (large effect), and 98% (huge effect) ofstudents participating in these interventions had greater learning gains than students who did notparticipate in these interventions. The effect size for our method of collaborative homeworkwhile watching a dialogue example video is d=2.54 (categorized as a “huge” effect), indicatingthat 99% of students doing homework this way
. Knight, D.W, L.E. Carlson and J.F. Sullivan, 2007, “Improving Engineering Student Retention through Hands-On, Team Based, First-Year Design Projects”, ASEE International Conference on Research in Engineering Education, Honolulu, HI.5. ASEE, 2012, “Going the Distance: Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering, Engineering Technology and Computing Students”, http://www.asee.org/retention-project/best-practices-and- strategies/ASEE-Student-Retention-Project.pdf .6. Dimitriu, D. and Karimi, A. “Exploring the Engineering Profession-A Freshman Engineering Course,” ASEE 2004-1793, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon, June 12-15, 2005.7. Karimi, A., 2002
, "Modeling of student academic achievement in engineering education using cognitive and non-cognitive factors," Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 178-198, 2019.[4] D. Visco, N. Makki, E. Stevic, J. Phillips, E. Bonnema, D. Dunn and L. Carey, "Zip to Industry: A First-Year Corporate-STEM Connection Program," in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, 2022.[5] A. Van Wart, T. C. O'Brien, S. Varvayanis, J. Alder, J. Greenier and R. L. Layton, "Applying Experiential Learning to Career Development Training for Biomedical Graduate Students and Postdocs: Perspectives on Program Development and Design," CBE- Life Sciences Education, vol. 19, no. 3, 2020.[6] M. Moriarty, S
years.Program goals include: (1) Use the scholarships and programs to improve scholars’ academicperformance in engineering foundational courses; (2) Develop a resiliency program to increaseCollege of Engineering (CoE) student retention by building upon a sense of community createdthrough existing peer-based programs (Geisinger & Raman, 2013; Ikuma et al., 2019); and (3)Increase employers’ recognition of low SES students’ strengths and valuations of their employablecompetencies through a paid internship program.The general objectives were established including; (1) New pathway to success. Scholars areprovided a pathway to complete an engineering degree including direct education and interventionapproaches for their engineering academic career
Director and an award-winning instructor for the Cain Project in Engineering and Professional Communication at Rice University. She supports written, oral, and visual communication instruction in science and engineering courses. In addition to working with students, Dr. Volz has conducted communication seminars about oral presentations, interviewing, and technical poster design for the Texas Society of Professional Engineers and Baylor College of Medicine. Page 13.708.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Implementing Calibrated Peer Review™ to Enhance Technical
Above the Gathering Storm, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.2. National Science Board, 2003, The Science and Engineering Workforce: Realizing America’s Potential. URL: http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/2003/nsb0369/nsb0369.pdf.3. Report of the Second Annual Technology Workforce Development Workshop (Texas Engineering and Technical Consortium and the U.S. Department of Education), 2007, Recruiting and Retaining Engineering and Computer Science Students.4. Hilborn, R., Howes, R., Krane, K., 2003, Strategic Programs for Innovations in Undergraduate Physics, American Association of Physics Teachers, College Park, MD.5. URL: www.pltl.org.6. Gafney, L., Varma-Nelson, P., 2008, Peer-Led Team Learning: Evaluation, Dissemination
Paper ID #47096Fruitful Endeavors: Continuous Peer Feedback to Develop Positive TeamDynamicsBrian Patrick O’Connell, Northeastern University Dr. O’Connell is an associate teaching professor in the First-Year Engineering program at Northeastern University. He studied at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst in 2006 then worked in industry as a Mechanical Engineer working on ruggedized submarine optronic systems. He returned to academia in 2011 at Tufts University planning to work towards more advanced R&D but fell for engineering education and educational technologies. His research now focuses on developing
diagnose student misconceptions arethe main goals behind the conjunction of both models in PTITS. The developed architectureopens the door for more participation from teachers and instructors in developing their owncourses using ITSs and hence for more conviction with ITSs’ role in education.1- IntroductionIt is known that the development of any applied ITS is an extremely difficult and complexproblem. This is because most of the developers start their ITSs from scratch, and thereforethey have to build all of its complex parts, which take great effort and long time. In general,applied ITSs are developed on the basis of preliminary elaborated Expert Systems (ES) in thedomain under study. These ES model the processes of problem solving in certain
alarge increase in the use of small motors, not only for mechanical driving but also for control andother specialty purposes. Energy conversion courses, as measured from available texts, have notkept up with the rapid changes. The result is a course which has lost its relevance to manyspecialty areas of electrical engineering and one that has failed to keep up with the changes in theway machinery is used in society [2].MOTIVATIONThe consequence has been predictable. The last few decades have seen a continued reduction inthe number of schools requiring an energy conversion course. In the late 70's, energy conversionwas still a required course in a model electrical engineering curriculum [3]. Since then thenumber of schools requiring a course in
component. The course features manyelements including: design and software engineering, writing for broad audiences, oralpresentations, staged development of the student product, use of modern software tools, andcontact with alumni to bridge students towards their future work environments. Two types ofdata have shaped the lessons learned: formal focus groups conducted with each class of seniordesign students, and informal feedback from well-meaning alumni. The interesting conclusion isthat the very features seniors tend to complain about – design, writing and oral presentation – arethe ones alumni report as the most valuable.1.0 IntroductionCapstone courses in American higher education are thought to date back to the 1850’s, whencolleges like
Opportunities for AI Integration in Project Management: • Identify areas within project management where AI can be effectively applied to enhance efficiency and decision-making. • Evaluate the potential benefits and challenges of integrating AI into project management processes. 3. Examine Real-world AI Applications in Project Management: • Explore and analyze case studies and examples of successful AI implementations in project management across various industries. • Assess the impact of AI on project outcomes and organizational performance. 4. Evaluate AI Tools and Technologies: • Familiarize with different AI tools and technologies used in project management. • Evaluate the capabilities and
the limitations of our bodies in the natural world. InFrankenstein, a creature is fashioned from the body parts of the dead. In today’s world, we are modifyingour own bodies and mapping our own DNA in order to create a new and improved genetically modifiedbody type. Perhaps it will be the engineering students who design, practice and develop policies aroundsome of these technologies, which is why it is vital to think about these ideas now in the traditional, as wellas the virtual classroom. We use Second Life to look at how students create their identity, collaborate andalso what they learn in the virtual world. The initial focus of the theme of identity is important in the virtual world for several reasons, one beingthat the user must
case studies for students to reflect on positive and negative teamworking behavior; develop a plan to evaluate team strengths and weaknesses; come prepared to team meetings so that one’s time is being used efficiently; and getting student testimonials on their experience participating in the Leadership seriesReferences[1] E. Dowell, E. Baum, and J. McTague, “Green Report: Engineering Education for aChanging World.” American Society for Engineering Education, 2010. Accessed: January 15,2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/The-Green-Report.pdf.[2] K.C.K. Lo, “Engineering Program Accreditation: ABET Engineering Criteria 2000,”Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering
has served as PI/Co-PI on multiple educational projects sponsored by NSF programs including NSF S-STEM, NSF GK-12, and NSF TUES.Dr. Jianyu ”Jane” Dong, California State University, Los Angeles Jianyu Dong is a professor in electrical and computer engineering and currently serves as the Associate Dean for the College of Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology at Cal State LA. Her area of expertise is video compression/communication, multimedia networks, QoS, etc. With a strong passion in Engineering Education, she has been engaged in multiple funded projects and initiatives to increase the participation and success of students from undeserved, low-income communities in engineering areas.matthew jackson PhD
studentswho did not participate in a fall FIG. While FIGs have been 1.1 Teamwork measurementshown to increase retention[1] and we have observed a Section 2 of the survey measured the students’positive impact on attitudes toward engineering, we have perception of their teamwork ability, which is relatednot yet been able to correlate these successes to engineering directly to ABET Student Outcome d: an ability to functionstudent outcomes as defined by the Accreditation Board for on multi-disciplinary teams. This included 9 Likert-scaleEngineering and Technology (ABET). In order to better questions adapted from Tseng et al. (2009) in measuringunderstand if the FIG success is correlated to engineering the
withinengineering education over time.We also discuss whether Sheeran & Web’s ‘Intention - Behaviour Gap’ could offer anexplanation of the dissonance between the Higher Order Value and the decision to act inaccordance with it (for example, a Higher Order Value of Self Transcendence, a communalvalue, was hypothesised to lead to designs promoting community, but this did not occur).In taking this forward, the principles behind identifying Communal Designs were found toalign to ‘Placemaking’, a term used in architectural urban design to cultivate spaces forcommunity engagement. We propose that Placemaking could be integrated into civilengineering’s conceptual design education, as it may provide a framework for civil engineersto consider social impact of
, “The Double Bind: The Next Generation,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 162–171, SUM 2011.[19] D. Dutta, “Negotiations of cultural identities by Indian women engineering students in US engineering programmes,” J. Intercult. Commun. Res., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 177–195, May 2016, doi: 10.1080/17475759.2016.1165727.[20] D. Dutta, “Sustaining the Pipeline: Experiences of International Female Engineers in U.S. Graduate Programs,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 326–344, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1002/jee.20077.[21] D. Dutta, “Cultural Barriers and Familial Resources for Negotiation of Engineering Careers Among Young Women: Relational Dialectics Theory in an Asian Perspective,” J. Fam. Commun., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 338–355, Oct
from Visveswaraiah Technological Uni- versity (VTU), India in 2007 and Ph.D. from Old DominioJohn JanowiakSinais AlvaradoProf. Petru Andrei, Florida A&M University - Florida State University Dr. Petru Andrei is Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Florida A&M University and Florida Stat University (FAMU-FSU) College of Engineering. He is the FSU cam- pus education director for the NSF-ERC Future Renewable Electric Energy Delivery and Management Systems Center (FREEDM) and has much experience in recruiting and advising graduate, undergraduate, REU, and K-12 students, as well as in working with RET teachers. Dr. Andrei has published over 100 articles in computational
Through a Humanistic Lens” in Engineering Studies 2015 and ”A Game-Based Approach to Information Literacy and Engi- neering in Context” (with Laura Hanlan) in Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference 2015. A classroom game she developed with students and colleagues at WPI, ”Humanitarian Engineering Past and Present: Worcester’s Sewage Problem at the Turn of the Twentieth Century” was chosen by the Na- tional Academy of Engineering as an ”Exemplary Engineering Ethics Activity” that prepares students for ”ethical practice, research, or leadership in engineering.” c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Negotiating a Nineteenth-Century Solution AbstractThis
systems.Saleh Sbenaty, Middle Tennessee State University SALEH M. SBENATY, Dr. Sbenaty is currently a Professor of Engineering Technology at Middle Tennessee State University. He received the BS degree in EE from Damascus University and the MS and Ph.D. degrees in EE from Tennessee Technological University. He is actively engaged in curriculum development for technology education. He has written and co-authored several industry-based case studies. He is also conducting research in the area of mass spectrometry, power electronics, lasers, and instrumentation.Jason Thurmond, Schneider Electric, Power Monitoring and Control JASON THURMOND, With more than a decade of engineering and management
guidance. • Engineering schools use the rankings and data for peer comparisons LIFE’S DECISIONS MADE HERE. Challenges and pressures U.S. News faces in doing Engineering Rankings Can better outcome measures be developed at the undergraduate and graduate level to measure post-graduate success of engineering graduates? Can statistical indicators be developed that could be used in the undergraduate engineering rankings so they are not 100% based on academic reputation? Should U.S. News develop separate Engineering Technology rankings? What would it take to do such engineering technology rankings? How should they be done? Doing any of the U.S. News engineering rankings is
ofdifferent configurations can be easily installed and angularly spaced. Hexadrone, [11], a Frenchcompany, developed a modular quadcopter drone with four quick release arms. Anothercompany, Clogworks Technologies [12], claims to have developed a drone with fully detachablearms and quick release payload attachment which is compatible with a wide range of payloadoptions. Airblock [13], a modular educational drone kit, which can be easily assembled intodrones of different configurations using magnetic attachments, was developed. Akasheh et al.[7], presented different modularity concepts for a quadcopter drone, including detachable dronearms which integrate electrical wiring for quick structural/electrical assembly to the drone bodyin a single step
State University Dr. Hayder is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at savannah State University, GA. He received PhD in Mechanical Engineering from McGill University, Canada in 2009. His research interest lies in the areas of fluid-structure interaction, flow-induced vibrations, syngas and blended fuel combustion, nanofluids, concentrating solar power technologies, and flow and structural simulations. Page 26.1024.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Introducing Kinematics with Robot Operating System (ROS)AbstractThe study
principles isrequired to mitigate climate change impacts by future architects [11], the recent versions of theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) and the American Council forConstruction Education (ACCE) are yet to emphasize on such criteria in construction and civilengineering program standards [12], [13]. Studies showed that engineering and constructionmanagement students tend to have a less conceptual understanding of resilience compared tosustainability due to the lack of inclusion of such topics in the curricula [14], [15]. Therefore, itis critical to integrate resilience design concepts in the curricula to foster the AEC students’interest in infrastructure resilience as well as to develop a resilient built environment
education,and as ABET 2000 emerged. In the detailed course objectives and syllabi, we are taking actionsto assure that we conduct the courses with relevant ABET 2000 criteria integrated into theirstructure. Such criteria are especially evident in the new courses in systems integration anddesign.The changes discussed herein provide us, we believe, with a structure that will better equip ourstudents with the basic engineering fundamentals that will serve them not only in the first fiveyears out of school, but in the last ten years of their careers as well; but will at the same timemake better connections of that material for design of aerospace vehicles and for service tosociety.V. References1 Postman, N. Amusing Ourselves to Death, Penguin Press
Research to Practice K-12 Engineering Resources: Best Practices in Curriculum DesignAbstractThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of a curriculum design-based (CDB)professional development model on K-12 teachers’ engineering knowledge, attitudes, andbehaviors. This teacher professional development approach differs from other training programswhere teachers learn how to use a standard curriculum and adopt it in their classrooms. In a CDBprofessional development model teachers actively design lessons, student resources, andassessments for their classroom instruction. In other science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM) disciplines, CDB professional development has been reported to (a)position teachers as