gradually introducestudents to the ethical implications of class topics [17] (see also [18]). A project designed byMohagheghi for an electrical engineering course is an example of this kind of teaching. Studentsare given a scenario related to working for a Colorado power utility that has received funding fora wind farm. While calculating the technical specifications needed to build wind energyinfrastructure, the students must also consider the project’s potential environmental andcommunity impacts [19].Although the medical analog is a loose metaphor, this is in keeping with the basic medical theoryon small doses. “Microdosing,” one of the forms that low dosing can take, is a common practicein pharmaceutical drug development whereby human subjects
experience (i.e., apprehension). They later transformthese experiences through internal reflection (i.e., intention) or manipulation of externalphenomena (i.e., extension). In our courses, we use case studies and simulation/game-likeactivities. Prado et al. [15] found that both simulations and case studies as pedagogical toolsworked well to convey the main ideas in a course on sustainable development.In this paper, we describe our approach within a Civil and Environmental Engineeringdepartment, where we have developed two policy-oriented courses for upper-level undergraduateand graduate students. The primary questions we answered when developing the policy forengineers courses were 1) what learning objectives to prioritize and 2) what teaching and
projects byfully measuring the impact of sustainable initiatives and adding value for stakeholders. Page 23.455.8Bibliography1 Eagan P., M. Gustafson and C. Vieth. (2012). Building a Competency Model for Sustainability” in ProceedingsElectronics Goes Green Conference 2012+. Ed. K. Lang, N. Nissen, A. Middendorf and P. Chancerel (FraunhoferVerlag). ISBN 978-3-8396-0439-7.2 McClelland, D.C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 28, 1-14.3 Eagan et al. Page 23.455.9
EUR-ACE Implementation Project (2006-2008) within Socrates II.Sarah Rajala, Mississippi State University Sarah A. Rajala, Ph.D., is Professor and Department Head of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Mississippi State University. She also holds the James Worth Bagley Endowed Chair. She received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Rice University in 1979. In July 1979, she joined the faculty at North Carolina State University, where she served as faculty member and administrator for over twenty-seven years. Dr. Rajala's research interests include engineering education and the analysis and processing of images and image sequences. Dr. Rajala has received numerous awards, including the
facilities design and inventory control. He has written numerouspapers on educational innovation and has contributed to several textbooks.ROBERT B. ANGUS is a Senior Lecturer at Northeastern University with 52 years of teaching experience coveringmathematics, physics, and electrical engineering courses. He has authored or co-authored eight textbooks andnumerous technical papers. He has also been an engineer, engineering manager, and senior engineering specialistfor more than 20 years and has been an engineering consultant for the past 18 years, specializing in circuit andsystem design, curriculum development, and technical manual writing
Paper ID #43087Undergraduate Engineering Education: Creating Space for Multiply MarginalizedStudentsDr. Janne Mishanne Hall, Morgan State University Dr. Janne Hall is an adjunct at Morgan State University and Texas Southern University. She teaches undergraduate electrical and computer engineering courses. She is also a committee member for the implementation of new engineering programs and curriculums for existing programs. Dr. Hall earned a BS in electronic engineering and a MS in computer science from Texas Southern University, and a PhD in electrical engineering from Jackson State University. Dr. Hall worked as a RF
begin to take coursework specific to theirconcentration of mechanical, electrical, civil, or industrial engineering, along with more coreengineering coursework, which continues with Circuit Analysis I, Engineering Probability andStatistics, Thermodynamics, Engineering Materials, and Fluid Mechanics. By this point in thecurriculum, many of these required core curriculum courses have included laboratorycomponents: Chemistry I, Physics I and II, Electronics I, Circuit Analysis I, and EngineeringMaterials. Other “upper division” courses have laboratory components, including ElementarySurveying, Concrete Design, and Geotechnical Engineering for the civil concentration,Electronics II, Circuit Analysis II, and Microprocessors for the electrical
Mechanical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 1998, and has five years of experience as a Mechanical Design Engineer at General Electric Aircraft Engines.David Burnette, Ohio University David Burnette was both an undergraduate student who participated in the OU ME Sr. capstone design project, and an OU ME graduate student who helped compile the student comments and complete the literature search for this study. He is currently an employee of the Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory. Page 13.1349.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 USING PERFORMANCE REVIEWS IN CAPSTONE
project objectives targeted at specific levelswithin the domains.In addition to expectations of institutional and department mission statements, the authorsbelieve that the engineering education profession is setting an expectation for studentdevelopment in both the cognitive and affective domains as evidenced in the American Societyof Civil Engineers (ASCE) Body of Knowledge 2 (BOK2) 7. Additionally, the departmentmission statement emphasizes design and innovation and the authors agreed that thedevelopment of the requisite skills must begin at the beginning of the curriculum and be taught inconjunction with technical content. This paper focuses on recent innovations primarily intendedto more effectively address program outcomes #2 and #8 early
gender gap can be found within different engineering disciplines. One of themost commonly-cited reasons for why systems and industrial engineering attracts more womenthan other engineering disciplines is that it is perceived as having more feminine qualities.Brawner et. al [3]surveyed 70,000 students and concluded that feelings of “warmth” and the ideathat systems engineering is more generally applicable to a career led women to choose theconcentration. Blosser [4]made a similar conclusion, presenting evidence that systemsengineering is seen as feminine while mechanical and electrical engineering are seen as moremasculine pursuits. Other research suggests that math confidence, a common explanation usedby researchers to explain why women choose
accepted academic definition is from Bringle & Hatcher [8, p. 112]: “Course-based, credit bearing educational experience in which students participate in an organized serviceactivity that meets identified community needs, and reflect on the service activity in such a wayas to gain further understanding of course content, a broader appreciation of the discipline, andan enhanced sense of civic responsibility”. In 1995, the Engineering Projects in CommunityService Program (EPICS) became the first service-learning program integrated intoan engineering curriculum, which provided an innovative educational experiencefor engineering undergraduates at Purdue University [9]. Service-learning has since stronglyemerged as an important complement to
pursuing their major [10] [12] [13] [14].Hutchison-Green et al interviewed first-year engineering students to determine what factors, inthe students’ first semester, begin to affect self-efficacy [15]. They found that performancecomparison (i.e., a student comparing his/her performance to his/her peers) makes a significantimpact on self-efficacy, and that depending on the student and the situation, self-efficacy couldeither increase or decrease in response to the situation. Team-based project courses can thusmitigate the possibility of decreasing students’ confidence because they do not require studentsto work individually and then compare their performance to that of their peers. Instead, studentswork together toward a common goal. Team-based
appropriatecontent? What teaching methods and curriculum models are preferable? Which works best:required course, ethics across-the-curriculum, integration of ethics and science, technology andsociety, or integration of the liberal arts into the engineering curriculum? Which outcomeassessment methods are most suitable?According to a “Survey of Ethics-Related Instruction in U.S. Engineering Programs”4, it wasfound that only 27 percent of ABET-accredited institutions listed an ethics related courserequirement, even though an increasing number of philosophers, engineers, and ethicists focustheir research and teaching on engineering ethics. What complicates the problem is that differentfaculty have provided varying definitions for what “understanding ethical
C ING EDUoperating costs. Start-up costs are incurred only once over the systems but is usually regarded as a hidden cost as academiclife of the project while operating costs are continuously tutors are not officially paid for this work. However, costs areincurred over the life of the project. The list of opportunity incurred because the time spent with the students representscosts identified are described below. time that might have been spent completing chargeable work3.1 Start-up costs
engineering programs house writing orcommunication programs or centers to support engineering instructors in writing pedagogies [5,6]. Communication experts often oversee these institutional organizations to incorporate writing-intensive curricula within engineering programs. These models are robust approaches tointegrating writing into the curriculum [7] and/or training engineering faculty in writingpedagogies [8,9]. Nevertheless, not all engineering programs possess the financial resources ortime to allocate support for such extensive and customized writing instruction. According to asurvey result (n = 190) conducted by Buswell et al. [10], numerous engineering instructorshighlight significant challenges in incorporating more writing into their
in thePublic Research populations. All essays selected for this analysis were from native Englishspeakers in order to reduce the confounding effects of language proficiency on the analysis.C. Instruments1. AssignmentThree highly similar writing assignments were provided to the students in this study. For PublicResearch 1 students, the writing assignment consisted of three components: a scholarly article,writing directions, and guiding questions. The article students were to read and write about is a14 page scholarly article by Sepulveda et al. entitled “A review of the environmental fate andeffects of hazardous substances released from electrical and electronics equipment duringrecycling: Examples from China and India”.37 This article
using less-than ideal communication venues. Inaddition to the time required to navigate team formation and other interpersonal issues, logisticalissues such as time zone and cultural differences add additional complexity.Especially within team science contexts, Stokols et al.2 recommend that teams explicitly discussresearch outcomes, timelines, and expectations with the understanding that teams tend towardconflict, since "[u]nrealistic expectations for complete cooperation and harmony, along withambiguity of goals and intended outcomes, can impede the teams' collaborative efforts. Membersmust be aware of the collaborative constraints, disagreements, and conflicts that they are likely toencounter over the course of the project and be prepared to
general observation of the authors that the accuracy of the results might be improved byconsidering certain factors, such as capturing images in a well-lit central zone with highmagnification and in a dark room to avoid interference from surrounding light.5. Development of Interdisciplinary Curriculum: 11As a critical by-product of the current project, the methods highlighted can be utilized across amultitude of disciplines (from bioengineering to electrical, materials, nanoengineering, etc.) forone of the most fundamental areas of experimental research in STEM at the undergraduate level:accurately identifying multiple systems from optical images. A broad, relevant, and timelycurriculum can be built
NSF S-STEM Funded iAM Program: Lessons Learned Implementing a Collaborative STEM Workshop for Community College and University PartnersAbstractIn alignment with the NSF Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering and MathematicsProgram (S-STEM) [1], a Two-Year Community College, Nassau Community College (NCC) andfour-year university, Hofstra University (HU) are within a five-mile radius of each other and arecollaborating. The objective is to recruit academically talented low-income students through twopipelines, retain them through transparency of the hidden curriculum, and see them through tograduation in a STEM field from HU [2]. The Integrated and Achievement Mentoring (iAM)Program is a Track 3 (multi
AC 2007-439: PROPOSED BEST PRACTICES FOR PREPARINGBIOENGINEERING AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAMS FORABET ACCREDITATIONSusan Blanchard, Florida Gulf Coast University SUSAN M. BLANCHARD is Founding Director of the U.A. Whitaker School of Engineering and Professor of Bioengineering at Florida Gulf Coast University. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Biomedical Engineering from Duke University in 1980 and 1982, respectively, and her A.B. in Biology from Oberlin College in 1968. She is a Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, the Biomedical Engineering Society, and the American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering and is an ABET Program
Paper ID #35320Embedding Engineering Ethics in Introductory Engineering Courses usingStand-Alone Learning ModulesDr. Ashish D Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Ashish Borgaonkar works as Asst. Professor of Engineering Education at the New Jersey Institute of Technology’s Newark College of Engineering located in Newark, New Jersey. He has developed and taught several engineering courses primarily in first-year engineering, civil and environmental engineer- ing, and general engineering. He has won multiple awards for excellence in instruction. He also has worked on several research projects, programs, and
oftechnological systems, coupled with the concentration of diverse knowledge specialization [75].This evolution emphasizes a transition from individual design to a more prominent focus oncollaborative or team design. Consequently, there is a growing need for engineering colleges toimpart knowledge, instruction, and practical experiences in interpersonal and team skills. Thisgoes beyond the traditional capstone fourth-year design project, where instructors group studentsinto teams with the expectation of navigating complex team dynamics without rigorousknowledge or guidance [76].Access to design knowledge and practice within the undergraduate curriculum is often confinedto a segment of introductory courses and a fourth-year capstone project, occasionally
aerospace engineering course: A model rocket,” Acta Astronaut., vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 1525–1533, 2010.[14] N. Correll, R. Wing, and D. Coleman, “A One-Year Introductory Robotics Curriculum for Computer Science Upperclassmen,” Educ. IEEE Trans., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 54–60, 2013.[15] M. Reynolds and R. Vince, “Critical management education and action-based learning: synergies and contradictions.,” Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 442–456, 2004.[16] C. F. Siegel, “Introducing marketing students to business intelligence using project-based learning on the world wide web,” J. Mark. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 90–98, 2000.[17] E. Bütün, “Teaching genetic algorithms in electrical engineering education: a
students, three general factors played a role intutors’ reports that they felt favorably towards considering a teaching career: positive perceptionof the value of the tutoring work, positive perception of tutors’ aptitude for teaching, andperception of teaching as a complex endeavor10.2.2.1.2 K-12 Engineering specific educators Efforts to increase the number of STEM majors and thus the number of potential STEMprofessionals, including teachers, have in some cases focused on introducing engineeringprinciples to the K-12 curriculum. This is good news for Tech to Teaching participants, and maydrive some of the Tech to Teaching participation for K-12 relevant activities. One source of engineering specific K-12 educator demand is Project
) 2005.Gentile, J. R., Teaching methods. Salem Press Encyclopedia of Health, January, 2016Hunt, L. et al., “Assessing practical laboratory skills in undergraduate molecular biologycourses,” Assess. Eval. Higher Educ., vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 861–874, 2012.Miller, J., “Case study in second language teaching,” Queensland J. Educ. Res., vol. 13, pp. 33-53, 1997.Popil, I., “Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method, “ NurseEducation Today, vol. 31, pp. 204-207, 2011.Pugh, S. (1991), Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Radon, N., Zhou, C., Wingfield, A., Gu Shuo, Systems Engineering Research Project: Light RailSystem, Management of Systems Engineering ENM 505
prototyping in the Innovation lab at the beginning of their studies; can we increase both theoverall number of students in the ECS program and their persistence rates? Does this holdequally true for women and under-represented minorities?” The effects of this question on theoverall engineering curriculum, broader community engagement, as well as the obstaclesencountered during the pandemic will be discussed as the first three years of the five-yearprogram are examined.BackgroundSince 2006, the College of Lake County ECS program has managed three S-STEM awards. Acombined total of 199 students have received both financial and holistic academic support. Eachtime, the NSF Scholars population has included a higher proportion of underrepresentedstudents
Approach to affective, Orientation-Reflective Value Awareness Empathetic Electrical Engineering Courses [31] behavioral Being- Whole Profession Empathic approaches in engineering capstone Skill- Perspective Taking, Mode Switching cognitive, design projects: student beliefs and reported Orientation-Epistemological Openness, Reflective Value Awareness, Commitment to behavioral behavior [32] Values Pluralism Empathy and ethical becoming in biomedical
them valuable skills [1]. These experiences rely ondifferent pathways for students to find them and become involved. Yet, multiple challenges limitthe access to these learning experiences: scalability, space and resources, ‘white male privilege,’and the organization itself (for academic makerspaces this would be faculty and curriculum).Recommendations to cultivate these experiences included shared space, funding for projects, andfaculty participation [1].Gerber and colleagues, found that extracurricular design based learning (EDBL) support ABEToutcomes and can strengthen self-efficacy in innovation tasks. Three sources of this increase inself-efficacy were identified: 1) mastery experiences, 2) vicarious learning, and 3) socialpersuasion
engineering andcomputer science. Social influences, family influences, peer influences, fundamentalpsychological differences, and motivational issues have all been broken down, dissected, andresearched on numerous occasions. Typically, solutions call for 8, 9, 10:≠ Improved mentoring.≠ Increasing student exposure to professional women in computer science and engineering.≠ Providing a better sense of opportunities in computer science and engineering to young women.≠ Big sister programs.≠ Attempts to promote a larger feeling of belonging among the community of women involved in computer science and engineering.Studies have suggested the implementation of new improvements to curriculums, yet enrollmentsof women in computer science
AC 2011-1769: CREATING REAL-WORLD PROBLEM-BASED LEARN-ING CHALLENGES IN SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES TO INCREASETHE STEM PIPELINENicholas Massa, Springfield Technical Community College Nicholas Massa is a full professor in the Laser Electro-Optics Technology Department at Springfield Technical Community College in Springfield, MA. He holds BS and MS degrees in Electrical Engineering from Western New England College and a Ph.D. in Educational Leadership/Adult Learning from the University of Connecticut. Dr. Massa is currently Co-Principal Investigator on the NSF-ATE STEM PBL Project of the New England Board of Higher Education.Michele Dischino, Central Connecticut State University Michele Dischino is an assistant