mass(kg) benefiting those who had light-weighted their design effectively.To assess student learning outcomes, students were asked technical questions related to their knowledge ofprosthetic technology components, manufacturing techniques, and sustainability prior to the start of theproject and again at the end of the semester. Additionally, this module assessed EOP learning objectives (1)Systems Thinking, Core 3, (2) Responsible Business & Economy, Core 2, (3) Material Selection, Core 5and Core 6 (4) Social responsibility, Core 4, (5) Design, Core 1 and Core 2, and (6) Communication andTeamwork, Core 6 [13].2.3 Junior Module: Waste Reduction in Medical DevicesJunior engineering students were exposed to a sustainability module focused on
participate Module 1.1 FWG - 7 attendees in Faculty Workgroup (FWG) Sessions Module 1.2 FWG - 5 attendees Module 1.3 FWG - not held, summer break Module 1.4 FWG - 7 attendees At least 2 Peer mentors per cohort 4 faculty agreed to peer mentor next cohort Expectation next round of Pilot Actual Results At least 3-5 Cohort A members continue to Tier 2 5 members (62%) of Cohort A continued to Tier 2 5 attended Module 2.1 delivery or listened to recording
Brook University, and SUNY Office of Provost. He received A.T. Yang award for the best paper in Theoretical Kinematics at the 2017 ASME Mechanisms and Robotics Conference and the MSC Software Simulation award for the best paper at the 2009 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences (IDETC) . He is the recipient of the Presidential Award for Excellence in Teaching by Stony Brook University and the winner of the 2018 FACT2 award for Excellence in Instruction given to one professor from the entire SUNY system. He also received the 2021 Distinguished Teaching Award from the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Mid-Atlantic Division. He has been twice elected as a member of the ASME
university; (3)Become a crossroads of discussion on the important national and international issues of ourtime; (4) Attract a diverse community of the brightest educators and students from throughoutthe country and the world; (5) Link intellectual curiosity, moral reflection and a commitment toservice, shaping ethically informed leaders to serve humanity.”Figure 6: The Wake Forest Engineering PEOs (Program Educational Objectives) mapped to the ABET Student Outcomes. From the Wake Forest Engineering ABET Self-Study Criterion 2 section prepared by Pierrakos.Understanding our Distinct IdentityAlong with our vision and mission, it was important to know who we are in the landscape ofengineering education (Figure 7). Upon
learning.Learning by teaching is an experience-based pedagogical method which has been implementedat every level of education to increase motivation to learn, improve understanding of material,develop important non-technical skills, and encourage creativity 15 . In graduate education, it iscommon for students to have opportunities for learning by teaching, for example by holdingteaching assistant positions, presenting at international conferences, and peer mentorship withintheir research lab. Mentoring undergraduate research can impact graduate student developmentpositively for future faculty careers as they gain skills in project management, supervision, andcommunication 16 . Because graduate students are familiar with this style of learning, it could
lived experience for all our students.References[1] Langhout, R. D., Drake, P. and Rosselli, F. (2009), “Classism in the university setting: Examining student antecedents and outcomes”, Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2(3): 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016209[2] Brennan, J. and Osborne, M. (2008) “Higher education’s many diversities: of students, institutions and experiences; and outcomes?” Research Papers in Education, 23(2): 179-190, DOI: 10.1080/02671520802048711[3] McKay, J. and Devlin, M. (2016) “‘Low income doesn't mean stupid and destined for failure': challenging the deficit discourse around students from low SES backgrounds in higher education”, International Journal of
-making authority upon whom three institutional forces act, 1) managerialism enacted byemployers, clients, and the government, 2) scientific training shaped by discipline-specificuniversity programs, and 3) ethical commitments shaped by early growing up experiences and 4formal non-technical education. The diagram illustrates these three external forces using arrowsand the related institutions using boxes. The agentic aspect of the diagram will be fleshed out inthe next phase of this project when I interview early career engineers. The two axes are alsobased on sociological notions of professional identity and professional status. In contrast to
Annual International Symposium of the International Council On Systems Engineering, Toulouse, France.[2] Passig, D., 2004. “Variations to the Imen-Delphi procedure aimed at helping in the emergence of communities of interest”, Intellect, 1 (2-3), 95 – 109.[3] Passig, D., 1997. “Imen-Delphi: A Delphi variant procedure for emergence”, Human Organization, 56 (1), pp. 53 – 63.[4] Linstone, H. A. and M. Turoff, 1975. “The Delphi Method: Techniques and applications”, Addison Wesley.[5] Hsu, C. and B. Sandford, 2007. “The Delphi Technique: Making Sense Of Consensus”, Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12 (10), pp. 1-8
firms want to increase the diversity of their management.[10]4. There are lower rates of entrepreneurship by underrepresented groups and women.[11]5. There is a need for increased networking, mentoring, and access to capital for these groups.Local:1. The percentage of ECE students that are female is below national averages, but the retention rate is high.2. Underrepresented engineering students graduate at a lower rate than university and national averages.3. Most high-tech internship and employment is outside the university’s geographical area.4. Underrepresented groups need increased industrial mentorship and networking opportunities.5. Financially needy students find it challenging to participate in mandatory international
acceded to the Washington Accord so far, which is not theend of achieving internationalization of engineering. The Washington Accord onlycorresponds to engineering education at the undergraduate level. As far as the Chinais concerned, engineering and technology education at the higher vocational level isresponsible for cultivating millions of high-quality front-line engineering andtechnical talents. China has not yet accessed the Sydney Accord for the accreditationof engineering and technical experts, while Hong Kong China and Chinese Taipeihave taken the lead. It seems imperative for China to access the Sydney Accord. As apart of the engineering education and the international mutual recognition system ofengineers, the Sydney Accord is mainly
technology policy. In particular, his research has recently focused on cybersecurity topics including intrusion detection and forensics, robotic command and control, aerospace command and 3D printing quality assurance. Straub is a member of Sigma Xi, the AAAS, the AIAA and several other technical societies, he has also served as a track or session chair for numerous conferences. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Operations of a Research Experience for Undergraduates Program During a PandemicAbstractCOVID-19 dramatically changed research experience for undergraduates (REU) programsduring the summer of 2020. Given
flow visualization to undergraduate students. This course aims tobridge the gap between two distinct areas of knowledge: the art and science of fluid mechanics.Designed for students with minimal to no background in photography or physics, this non-mathematical course provides an opportunity for students to explore a variety of aesthetic issuesthrough practical and creative assignments. The course consists of lectures on photography skills,fluid physics, visualization techniques, critique sessions, and a guest lecture. Assignments consistof images paired with written technical reports, and critique sessions. The primary objective ofthe course is "integrative thinking". Other course objectives evaluated through students’assignments and projects
accessible as aprimary focus to engineering students with tight degree plan requirements within their majors.The proposed specialization is an important long-term programmatic creation effort to advancesustainability education within engineering. The department chair has supported a multi-yeareffort to support and create student-centric community-engaged learning opportunities. Thisdepartment driven (top-down) effort is also supported at college level by the Associate Dean andDirector for Academic Programs in the College of Food, Agricultural and EnvironmentalSciences.The Engineering for One Planet Mini-Grant resources were to develop General Education courseofferings within the Sustainability theme as well as technical electives that promote
graduate of Dayton Public Schools. Dr. Long has a B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Wright State University and Ohio State University. He also has a Ph.D. in STEM (Engineering) Education from Ohio State. Dr. Long has interned with Toyota and he owns a small education-based company. For more details see: leroylongiii.comJenna Korentsides, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Jenna Korentsides is a Ph.D. student in the Human Factors department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, FL. Jenna works under the advisement of Dr. Joseph R. Keebler in the Small Teams Analog Research lab where she studies various topics including team performance and training across domains including
interview process and ends with a session on how to negotiate an offer.Table 1. Seminar on Entering Academia Weekly Schedule (75-minute periods) Wk Topic Format Lecture – Course 1 Duties of a Tenure Track (Pre-tenure)e Faculty Part 1: Do I want to Instructors be a faculty Panel Discussion – 3 member? Types of 2 Professional Track (non-tenure line) Faculty Positions Professional Track Faculty Positions &
Managing the ProjectEffective project management practices are employed to ensure a path to success. Our team offaculty, graduate, and undergraduate students provide technical assistance in advancinginnovative process improvements at partnered industrial facility. We stay in constant contactwith the industry personnel through several plant visits and we monitor the processimprovements they make based on our recommendations. Web-based conferencing technology isused for regular work update meetings when more frequent interaction between faculty/studentsand our industry liaison is needed. Formal mid-year review sessions are conducted where thestudents present their semester long research to the team of industrial liaisons which includeplant managers
studentsopportunity to solve real-world engineering problems [2]. Learners demonstrate the ability toplan, select, and locate information; engage in critical analysis; apply multilayered decisionmaking; and generate new meaning [3]. Mosher found that the purpose of capstone programs isto give students the opportunity to apply technical tools, techniques and knowledge learned inthe classroom to an open-ended, realistic, and creative problem-solving experience [4, 5, 6, 7]. Inaddition to the value of the application of engineering concepts, these educational experiencesare lauded as excellent preparation and are strongly encouraged by industry [2]. Ha contends thata capstone project can be an extremely useful application in high demand in the real world
Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors," Interntational Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 914-925, 2013.[2] N. Honken and P. Ralston, "Freshman Engineering Retention: A Holistic Look," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 29-37, 2013.[3] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.[4] S. Sheppard, A. Colby, K. Macatangay and W. Sullivan, "What is Engineering Practice?," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 429-438, 2006.[5] J. E. Froyd, P. C. Wankat and K. A. Smith, "Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 100, no. Special Centennial
-founder and the Director of Innovation Programs and Operations for the non-profit research group, Advancing Engineering Excellence in P-12 Engineering Education and has launched PROMISE Engineering Institute Global, for international future faculty development. Dr. Gurganus teaches several first and second year Engineering classes along with the Mechanical and Multidisciplinary Engineering Senior Capstone design courses at UMBC. She is also leading and redeveloping a Global Engineering elective. She has also served as this year’s Program Chair for the Pre-College division and on the task force for Weaving in students versus weaving them out with the President of ASEE. This year she was elected as a team leader for
Ability: Construction and Validation of the Spatial Reasoning Instrument for Middle School Students,” Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 709–727, Oct. 2017.[4] M. Hegarty, M. Keehner, and C. Cohen, “The Role of Spatial Cognition in Medicine: Applications for Selecting and Training Professionals,” p. 49.[5] H. B. Yilmaz, “On the Development and Measurement of Spatial Ability,” International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83–96, Mar. 2009.[6] D. L. Shea, D. Lubinski, and C. P. Benbow, “Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 604–614, 2001
, 2014, pp. 8410-8415.[2] R. B. Stone and D. A. Mcadams, "The Touchy-Feely Side of Engineering Education : Bringing Hands-on Experiences to the Classroom," in Proceeding of the American society for engineering education conference, 2000.[3] N. Ackovska and V. Kirandziska, "The importance of hands-on experiences in robotics courses," in IEEE EUROCON 2017-17th International Conference on Smart Technologies, 2017.[4] M. T. Chi and R. Wylie, "The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes", vol. 49, Educational psychologist, 2014, pp. 219-243.[5] T. Tsoy, L. Sabirova and E. Magid, "Towards Effective Interactive Teaching and Learning Strategies in Robotics Education," in 2017 10th International
instructor, the second assignment is a guided group programming exercise, the next twoassignments are performed during a laboratory session and the last assignment is an independenthomework.Data CollectionThis study was conducted in Fall 2024. Three undergraduate students who had completed theintroductory course the previous year were recruited to use ChatGPT to perform the courseassignments. We will refer to them as subjects 1, 2 and 3. They had limited programmingexperience beyond the course and no prior knowledge of how to use generative AI to write code.They did not receive any formal training on generative AI tools. They were added to the course'slearning management system for the Fall 2024 semester and were given access to all coursematerials
abstract and the vehicle concrete 2 Root Includes a metanarrative, and entire new worldview 4¥ Indicates level of sophistication, imagination, creativity and articulation of the languageA week after this exercise, the candidates were asked for feedback on the exercise, esp. onthe merits of the tool to facilitate their message and scaffold their arguments, and how theyperceived the tool had allowed them to convey a multi-dimensional and complex messagemarrying technical details and personal, reflective feelings. These statements were receivedanonymously in a written format and their quotes used to aid our observations in thediscussion section below.3. Findings and DiscussionThis section is
efficiency. Votes for specific references were normalized bynumber of students to ensure uniformity as the reference/inspiration groups had variablepopulations across the study. 3.1. Technicality of Biological Reference TextReading ease for the biological references is plotted against normalized votes for each referenceto discover if a specific reference difficulty level was preferred by the students. Lower readingease values (closer to zero) indicate a more technically advanced reference, while higher values(closer to 100) indicate an easier-to-read reference. Figure 3 displays the relationship for theadvanced technical papers, Fig. 4 for the general public references, and Fig. 5 for the basicreferences.Figure 3 shows that the reference (gecko
. Fathi, M. Iranmanesh, P. Maroufkhani, and M. E. Morales, "Industry 4.0 ten years on: A bibliometric and systematic review of concepts, sustainability value drivers, and success determinants," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 302, p. 127052, 2021.[3] K. Rojko, N. Erman, and D. Jelovac, "Impacts of the Transformation to Industry 4.0 in the Manufacturing Sector: The Case of the US," Organizacija, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 287-305, 2020.[4] L. Georgios, S. Kerstin, and A. Theofylaktos, "Internet of things in the context of industry 4.0: An overview," 2019.[5] M. O. Gokalp, K. Kayabay, M. A. Akyol, P. E. Eren, and A. Koçyiğit, "Big data for industry 4.0: A conceptual framework," in 2016 international conference
& Interfaces (CSI) and editor boards of International Journal of Data Mining, Modeling and Management (JDMMM) and American Journal of Industrial and Business Management (AJIBM). He is currently a Senior Member of Institute of Industrial Engineers, Society of Manufacturing Engineers and the Division Chair of Manufac- turing Division of American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). He is also actively involved in several consortia activities.Mr. Md Fashiar Rahman, The University of Texas at El Paso Md Fashiar Rahman is currently a doctoral student at the University of Texas at El Paso in Computational Science Program (CPS). He earned a Master of Science in computational science at The University of Texas
) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1]. Lattuca, L. R., Knight, D., & Bergom, I. (2013). Developing a measure of interdisciplinarycompetence. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(3), 726-739.[2]. Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., van Baalen, S.,Klaassen, R., & Boon, M. (2020). Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision,teaching, and support. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 508-555.https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20347[3]. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (2021). 2022-2023 Criteria forAccrediting Engineering Programs. ABET.https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2022-23-EAC-Criteria.pdf[4
developed were included as part of this pre-class preparation. During the class,the instructor starts with a single overview slide, and allows for any general questions. After that,students have time to work on homework problems, with 1-3 problems being relevant to any oneday’s reading. Students are encouraged to work in groups, and the instructor is available to assiststudents as they work on the homework problems.Over the course of the semester, students in the statics classroom were exposed to 31 of 42 newproblems developed, which is why the evaluation focused on statics rather than dynamics. Inparticular, one new chapter was added to statics on internal forces, and all worked examplevideos covered during the one-week period were done by the
their constructive comments that helped us improve the paper.References [1] R. L. S. De Oliveira, C. M. Schweitzer, A. A. Shinoda, and L. R. Prete, “Using mininet for emulation and prototyping software-defined networks,” in 2014 IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing (COLCOM). IEEE, 2014, pp. 1–6. [2] R. R. Fontes, S. Afzal, S. H. Brito, M. A. Santos, and C. E. Rothenberg, “Mininet-wifi: Emulating software-defined wireless networks,” in 2015 11th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM). IEEE, 2015, pp. 384–389. [3] R. Ruslan, M. F. M. Fuzi, N. Ghazali et al., “Scalability analysis in mininet on software defined network using onos,” in 2020 Emerging Technology in Computing
International Collaborative Experiential Program,” in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2023.[3] S. Shandilya, G. Raju, S. Y. Yoon, and C. A. Kwuimy, “Exploring Transformative Learning from a Summer Bridge Program,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , 2023.[4] J. Mezirow, Transformative dimensions of adult learning, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104-1310: Jossey-Bass, 1991.[5] H. L. Bell, H. J. Gibson, M. A. Tarrant, L. G. Perry III, and L. Stoner, “Transformational learning through study abroad: US students’ reflections on learning about sustainability in the South Pacific,” Leisure Studies , vol. 35, no. 4, 2016. T. M. Chiang and J. F. Yao, “Transformative Learning Experiences through Short-term