(CEED) at Virginia Techfor providing us with the opportunity to host a workshop for incoming students during theirsummer bridge program. This material is based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant No. 1943811. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] American Society for Engineering Education, “Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology, 2022,” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, D.C., 2023. Accessed: Mar. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Engineering-and-Engineering-Technology
Undergraduate Women in Engineering and Science," Frontiers in Education Conference, Pittsburgh, 1997, pp. 134 - 143.[2] C. Allen, "WISER women: fostering undergraduate success in science and engineering with a residential academic program," Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 265-277, Page 22.1555.10 1999.[3] Meredith Thompson Knight and Christine M. Cunningham, "Building a Structure of Support: An Inside Look at the Structure of Women in Engineering Programs," Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 10-30, 2004.[4] Mary Fox, Gerhard Sonnert, and
support systems.This paper increases our knowledge regarding Canadian graduate engineering schools byidentifying realities parallel to formal admission practices, describing institutional culture, andanalyzing graduate students’ perception of support systems. It concludes that informaladmission practices should be acknowledged to widen access, that institutional cultural changeregarding DEI is problematic and support resources could be improved to better serve allgraduate students, particularly women and other under-represented groups.IntroductionThe proportion of women in graduate engineering programs remains stubbornly low. WhileCanadian medical schools achieved gender parity in 1995 [1], the proportion of womengraduating from graduate
where this study was undertaken, continuing education studentscan choose any of the above modalities for industrial engineering programs, unlike regularstudents, whose only option is synchronous classes. The format of the continuing educationprogram (which is known as the Advance study program) is a shorter, continuousuniversity degree, when compared to the traditional one. Students who enroll in anAdvanced study program already have work experience, a professional degree and a priorbody of knowledge, all of which has been validated and recognized by the University. Thisallows students in this program to obtain their industrial engineering degree in 2 or 3 years,compared with the 4 or 5 years a regular program would take, plus supported by
doctoral students, exchange programs for students, rotational programs forfaculty and better utilization of all existing mechanisms for bringing ideas to market10, 11. Tocreate a sustainable change of higher engineering education toward innovation, it is necessary toinvolve and include all teaching personnel in training activities. These activities are based on anumber of training workshops where expertise from the entire PIEp is utilized.The overall aim of PIEp Education is to lead and support a system shift of higher engineeringeducation, toward innovation and entrepreneurship, and the mechanisms for this shift is appliedon all levels in the engineering structure.PIEp Nodes, International Partners and Innovation FriendsPIEp consists so far of
Paper ID #37697Learning in Transition: Developing and Employing Pedagogical Supports toEnhance Student Learning in Engineering EducationDr. Eleazar Marquez, The University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley Dr. Marquez is a Lecturer in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley. His research efforts focus on dynamics and vibrations of mechanical systems under various loads. The mathematical models developed include deterministic and stochastic differential equations that incorporate finite element methods. Additionally, Dr. Marquez research efforts focus on developing and implementing
program. It is necessary for engineers to be well versed in managementskills because they spend most of their working lives managing people more than technicalproblem solving. Most engineers work on teams and often it is necessary for them to take on theleadership role of the team, which may lead them to take up management of the team’s projects(Richardson, 1996).Thamhain (1993) indicated that the needs of the engineers should be addressed by includingmanagement skills in engineering education. He stressed the fact that most of the professionalengineers who have had several years of experience believe that management skills are requiredand are essential to success in engineering. According to Visser (2005), management skills areimportant for
2006-78: DISCOVERY BASED LEARNING IN THE ENGINEERING CLASSROOMUSING UNDERWATER ROBOTICSLiesl Hotaling, Stevens Institute of Technology Liesl Hotaling is Assistant Director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education (CIESE), Stevens Institute of Technology. She received a B.S. in Marine Science from Fairleigh Dickinson University, a M.A.T. in Science Teaching from Monmouth University and a M.S. in Maritime Systems from Stevens.Richard Sheryll, Center for Maritime Systems, Stevens Institute of Technology Richard Sheryll is a Research Associate and Ph. D. candidate in Ocean Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology. He received a B.S. in Oceanography and an A.S
Paper ID #15142Integrating Research and Education in Engineering Design ProgramsDr. Martin Edin Grimheden, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Martin Edin Grimheden is an associate professor in Mechatronics at KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, and head of the Mechatronics and Embedded Control Systems Division. Martin Edin Grimheden is also Program Director of the KTH Degree Program in Mechanical Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Integrating research and education in engineering design programsAbstractThis paper addresses some of the challenges related
Paper ID #24082Establishing an Engineering Core – What Does Every Engineer Need to Know,Particularly About Systems Engineering?Dr. Devanandham Henry, Regent University Dr. Devanandham (Deva) Henry is an assistant professor at Regent University in Virginia Beach, Virginia where he leads the systems engineering program. Previously, he was a research engineer with the Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) at Stevens Institute of Technology. He has supported the develop- ment of Systems Readiness Levels, Graduate Software Engineering Reference Curriculum, the GUide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK), and
, Massachusetts Jul 28 Full Paper: Supporting Students’ Educational Robotics Experiences through Generative AI ChatbotsAbstractThis full paper describes a first-year engineering course that leveraged Generative ArtificialIntelligence (AI) chatbots to support students' educational robotics experiences. Students in afirst-semester introduction to engineering design section, that used a robotics platform tointroduce students to the fields of engineering, were provided access to a custom generative AIchatbot system to use throughout the semester in support of all class assignments. The chatbotsystem had several different chatbot options (customized based on different task needs, frombrainstorming and building to coding and
University 5 Morgan State University 6 / New Jersey Institute of Technology 7 Rochester Institute of Technology AbstractThis is the third of three papers prepared for a special panel session of the National Collaborative TaskForce on Engineering Graduate Education Reform that addresses reform of faculty reward systems toadvance professional engineering education for creative engineering practice and technology leadership.This paper presents a roadmap for planned reform in defining a model template for professionallyoriented faculty reward systems that supports professional scholarship, teaching, and engagement inadvanced engineering practice for the
learning with hands-on RTOS development in real-time systems course," Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008. FIE 2008. 38th Annual, vol., no., pp.S2H-11,S2H-16, 22-25 Oct. 2008.6. Yu JX, Zhao YG, Li Y and Duang HY, “An Example of Course Project of Real-Time Multitask Programming”, I.J. Education and Management Engineering on MECS, 2012. Page 24.1307.11
Paper ID #6613Effectiveness of an Online Writing System in Improving Students’ WritingSkills in EngineeringDr. Patricia R Backer, San Jose State University Dr. Backer is director of General Engineering at San Jose State University. Her research interests are in broadening the participation of women and URM students in engineering and assessment of engineering programs. Page 23.466.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Effectiveness of an Online Writing System in
Ponaganset High’s Fuel Cell Education Initiative gained momentum and equipment,the learning opportunities were significant. In science class the projects-based learning involvedthe creation of an operational fuel cell vehicle, and the benefits of fuel cell technology wereshared with students school-wide and beyond as numerous fuel cell demonstrations wereperformed by Protium.Fuel Cell Systems Class To further develop the fuel cell program, a curriculum outline and curriculum for a year-longpilot Fuel Cell Systems course was created. Having completed the pilot Fuel Cell Systemscourse at Ponaganset High, two concurrent full year Fuel Cell Systems courses were offered tostudents for the 2004 - 2005 academic year. The course is currently running for
education delivery techniques.IntroductionMotivationBased on Gibbons[5], the number of Master’s-degree students enrolled in engineeringmanagement programs doubled between 2003 and 2006, despite an overall decrease of9% in engineering Master’s enrollment. In 1999, the total engineering managementMaster’s enrollment was about 1,767 students. In 2003, this number went further up to2,229 and it was up to 4,625 in 2006. This trend is also supported by the continuedincrease in the number of programs over the past 30 years. As reported in Alvear et al. [1],about 30 engineering and technology management programs existed in 1970s, andcurrently this number is over 160.According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics[4], the need for Engineering and NaturalScience
2006-103: THE FACULTY PERSPECTIVE ON THE STATE OF COMPLEXSYSTEMS IN AMERICAN AND AUSTRALIAN MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPROGRAMSNadia Kellam, University of South Carolina NADIA KELLAM is currently conducting research in the Laboratory for Sustainable Solutions while completing her Ph.D. in mechanical engineering. Her research interests include engineering education, sustainable design, and complex systems science. She is a recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship and institutional support from the University of South Carolina.Veronica Addison, University of South Carolina VERONICA ADDISON is a PhD Student in Mechanical Engineering conducting research in the
Calgary’s 2019 Top 40 Under 40 recipients. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Development of a Framework to Support Technology-Life Balance in Undergraduate Engineering StudentsAbstractTechnology-life balance, also referred to as digital wellness or digital health, can be defined asthe pursuit of an intentional and healthy relationship with technology and digital media. Due tothe COVID-19 pandemic and the surge of digital technology usage in the 21st century,technology-life balance has become a much-needed field of research. The extreme extent towhich many individuals use and consume technology and digital media can have seriousphysiological and psychological health effects
continually assessed using both qualitative and quantitative feedbackmeasures, and redesigned as necessary to promote engineering success and retention. Wrappingthe academic components of the course is an engaging two-year living and learning communitythat our data shows is highly valued by the program’s participants.Early on, the program’s design and implementation team realized that evaluation of programoutcomes would be complex, would go far beyond the academic component, and would require adifferent way of looking at system inputs. We soon came to appreciate that better understandingof early program outcomes required knowledge and experience beyond that of our engineeringfaculty. We sought help from School of Education faculty experienced in
available through thecourse web site at the address: http://www.cours.polymtl.ca/mec4530/Anim/Menu.swf Page 7.205.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education2 Project contextThe Center of Teaching and Learning at École Polytechnique de Montréal strongly supports thedevelopment of new multimedia teaching tools with the Information and CommunicationTechnologies (ICT) program. Therefore, a mechanical engineering student developed theanimations described in this paper during a four months internship.Two
engineering course on computer organization,” 4. “Impact of computers on electrical engineering education-a view from industry,” 5. “An undergraduate computer engineering option for electrical engineering,” 6. “Digital systems laboratories,” 7. “Computer-aided circuit design,” 8. “Computers in electrophysics.”Thus, from the earliest days of computers in academia, there was a strong impetuous tocreate computer engineering specializations within electrical engineering. By 1971, 87 of203 electrical engineering departments responding to a survey indicated that they had anundergraduate computer engineering option or program.18One of the earliest to formalize computer engineering was the University of Illinois atUrbana-Champaign
ofscholars comprised of engineering and education faculty members proposed this project entitled“Promoviendo el Éxito Estudiantil a través de un Sistema de Apoyo (PromESA): PromotingStudent Success through a Social, Academic, and Institutional Support System in EngineeringEducation.” This multidimensional initiative implements a holistic, socio-culturally responsivepeer-mentoring program by adapting the Promotores de Educación Program (PED) and itsevidence-based practices developed at California State University at Long Beach (CSULB) [16].Literature indicates that peer-mentoring is particularly beneficial for helping Hispanic/LatinX/XicanX students develop a sense of belonging [17]–[19]. Moreover, formal mentoring programs,such as PED, effectively
provided technical leadership for a number of advanced manned and unmanned air system programs. Responsibilities included assignments as Chief Engineer - F-35 Weight, Chief Engineer and Corporate Lead for Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles. He also served as Chief En- gineer for the National AeroSpace Plane Program (NASP) and Manager of Advanced Design at General Dynamics Fort Worth. He is an AIAA Fellow and a former member of the USAF Scientific Advisory Board. His degrees are in Aerospace Engineering from Texas A&M. He is a FAA certificated flight instructor and an active instrument rated pilot. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 System Engineering Education for All Engineers
2006-1621: WHY SHOULD I CARE? STUDENT MOTIVATION IN ANINTRODUCTORY PROGRAMMING COURSEHelen Burn, University of Michigan Helen Burn is a doctoral candidate at the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan. She holds a master's degree in mathematics and focuses her work on undergraduate mathematics and science learning and teaching.James Holloway, University of Michigan James Paul Holloway is Professor of Nuclear Engineering & Radiological Sciences at the University of Michigan. His technical research is in the area of computational kinetic theory, especially neutron and gamma ray transport theory in nuclear reactor analysis and in inverse
Support Model for Innovation in Engineering Education and Technology-Enhanced LearningBackground and IntroductionThrough an educational reform initiative at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, faculty andstaff are beginning to transform their undergraduate program. This College of Engineering (CoE)initiative, aptly named Engineering Beyond Boundaries (EBB)1, addresses important shifts inengineering education2 3 4, including the need to “go beyond traditional engineering boundaries”of the classroom and conventional thinking. New technology and multi-media strategies allowfaculty to expand their educational approaches. New ways of thinking about engineeringeducation challenge faculty to reconsider their curricula and
AC 2007-810: DEVELOPMENT OF AN ENGINEERING MASTERS DEGREE INENTERPRISE SYSTEMS INNOVATION & MANAGEMENTThomas Duening, Arizona State University Page 12.523.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007Development of an Engineering Masters Degree in“Enterprise Systems Innovation & Management” Page 12.523.2IntroductionThis short paper describes efforts within the Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona StateUniversity to develop and deliver a trans-disciplinary engineering degree in Enterprise SystemsInnovation & Management. The degree program was created as a result of repeated requestsfrom a number of
roles on programs/proposals, Technical Lead for systeminstallation/demonstration/deployment, Customer Liaison, and System Analysis Manager; and mathemat-ics instructor, secondary/college level. Roedler holds degrees in mathematics education and mechanicalengineering from Temple University and the Expert Systems Engineering Professional (ESEP) certifica-tion from INCOSE. Roedler has numerous publications and presentations, and is the recipient of manyawards, including the INCOSE Founders Award, Best SE Journal Article, and IEEE Golden Core. Hisleadership roles across many technical organizations include editor of ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, Systems LifeCycle Processes, and several other standards
that seeks support to improve the quality of math, science, and technological educationin K-12 schools. One of the reasons for all these efforts is the alarming decline in AmericanSTEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education observed for over the lasttwenty years.The 2009 report from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) [2] on theperformance of 15-year-olds in mathematics and science literacy in 65 countries and othereducation systems found that in comparison with students in all 64 other countries and educationsystems, students in the United States on average scored lower than students in 23 countries in
Paper ID #20549Understanding the Impact of Strategic Team Formation in Early Program-ming EducationProf. Tony Andrew Lowe, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Tony Lowe is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has a BSEE from Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology and a MSIT from Capella. He currently teaches as an adjunct Assistant Professor at CTU Online and has been an on-and-off corporate educator and full time software architect for twenty years.Dr. Sean P. Brophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Sean Brophy is a mechanical engineer
Robotics Laboratory in an Industrial Engineering ProgramAbstractRobotics is the study of the design, manufacture and application of robots used in a variety ofexisting systems or systems to be created. The impact and benefits of robotics in education at alllevels have been documented by many researchers and educators all across the country, as wellas, the world. Several universities have developed robotics programs which provide uniqueopportunities for students to learn about robotic systems through coursework and conduct high-level research. When these courses are combined with hands-on laboratory modules, roboticsprovides a means for student to utilize their analytical skills learned in other Science,Technology