delivery site for the curriculum. The educational experience at the CAT providescandidates with a diverse technological education integrating the manufacturingresources available on the shop floor into an applications-based engineering education. The Coalition’s overall educational model entails hands-on training in theprogramming, operation, maintenance, and repair of manufacturing equipment; Page 3.209.1interdisciplinary study of pertinent mathematics, science, engineering, business, andgeneral education courses; as well as structuring and delivery of knowledge within aproduction environment to provide context. Another goal of the Coalition is to
professional quality. The in-class component is part lecture; partdemonstration; and part in-class exercise, both guided and independent. The course is taught onfour tracks. The first track is hand sketching and engineering graphics principles; the second issolid modeling, including assembly and formal drawing generation; the third track is the reverseengineering project and the forth track is a small design project. The first two tracks start withinthe first 2 weeks of the semester. Both the initiation of learning solid modeling and theintroduction of the reverse engineering project occur early in the semester with solid modelingstarted on the 3rd day of class while the project is introduced on the 7th day of class. Thestructure of the class and the
electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, materials engineering, industrialengineering, chemical engineering, environmental science, geography, physics, biotechnology,film studies, and social anthropology. The team includes undergraduate and graduate students,professional mentors, and staff advisors. This paper presents an engineering service-learningproject conducted by a multidisciplinary group of students and mentors on a solely volunteerbasis. The main goals of the project, achievements, concepts incorporated, and lessons learnedduring the last two years are described. Funding, including budget and fundraising efforts, arealso briefly described.IntroductionEngineers Without BordersTM – USA (EWB-USA) is a non-profit organization established
; principles of bridge design; and electricity. Students experience hands-on, inquiry-based instruction through simple investigations and apply engineering concepts in afour-week internship. This paper presents the course objectives and content, the teaching andlearning model, and the student-conducted experiments.IntroductionCompetency in science and mathematics is regarded as a basic skill for high school graduates.Similarly, making connections among mathematics and other disciplines1 and among science andother disciplines2 are key components of professional standards for K-12 teachers. Connectionsbetween mathematics and science provide natural opportunities for students to engage in activestudy of both disciplines3. An exceptionally appropriate
the Graduate Reference Curriculum for Systems Engineering (GRCSE). Before joining Stevens, Henry spent nine years with the Aeronautical De- velopment Agency, Ministry of Defense, India, working on aircraft design, aerodynamics, performance, optimization, and project management of the Air Force and Navy versions of the Indian light combat air- craft. He was also actively involved in promoting systems engineering among the aerospace community in India.Dr. Charles Daniel Turnitsa, Regent UniversityProf. Cheryl Beauchamp, Regent University Current Position: Chair, Engineering and Computer Science Department of the College of Arts & Science, Regent Univer- sity, Virginia Beach, Virginia Education: •Ph.D
and Engineering Department). Her research interests include materials science, physical chemistry and non-conventional technologies for materials and process engineering. 2018 FYEE Conference: Glassboro, New Jersey Jul 25 Work in Progress: Fundamentals of Engineering Design (FED) for Chemical Engineering 1st Year UndergraduatesThis is a work-in-progress report on continuous improvement of our first-year chemicalengineering design / laboratory course. Such courses continue a tradition identified severaldecades ago of the importance of freshman engineering experiences [1, 2]. We present amodified structure of our traditional introductory course successfully running since 2006. Thiscourse, and
Foundation sponsored Decision Center for a Desert City.Dale Baker, Arizona State University Dale Baker, Ed.D., is an international expert in equity issues in science education. She was honored in 2006-07 as a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science for this body of work.Stephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause, Ph.D., is professor of Materials Science and Engineering. His research in engineering education has focused on misconceptions and he has expertise in the development of concept inventories to assess student learning.Chell Roberts, Arizona State University Chell Roberts, Ph.D., is an expert Engineering educator and Department Chair of Engineering
technology literacy courses. Page 11.1239.13 Table 3: Sampling of Texts Used Within Conference Courses on “Technology Literacy.”Course BookExplore Engineering (instructor materials)Technology and Human values Volti, Society and Technological Change Teich, Technology and the FutureThe Hidden World of Engineering (instructor materials)Science & Tech of Everyday Life Macaulay, The New Way Things Work Bloomfield, How Things WorkThe Digital Information Age Kuc
grants focusing on professional development, curriculum, and assessment. In addition, he is a member of the assessment committee for chemical engi- neering. Page 25.846.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Introducing Middle School Students to Engineering and the Engineering Design ProcessAbstractMiddle school is an important time for students to begin thinking about future careers becauseproper academic preparation for college must begin early for students who choose to enter thefields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM
will be the lecture with a rich assortment of examples 2. Students will demonstrate their understanding of the course materials through HW/PR assignments, tests and exam. ABET category content: Engineering Science 3 credit or 100% Course Requirements: 1. Full attendance is required for class hours. 2. Absolutely no make-ups on exam/tests or quizzes. If a student knows that he(she) will not be able to take an (a) exam/test on the given test or exam date, arrangements must be made with his(her) instructor before the date of the exam/test to determine if he (she) needs to take it before or after the given date. If he (she) fails to do
popular tool in enhancing engineering education. TheCollege of Engineering at Rowan University received NSF funding in integrating digital imagingexperiences throughout their curriculum. Students are exposed to hand-on experiments that usesimple digital imaging techniques. Experiments have been developed by different engineeringdisciplines. However the experiments are such that any engineering or science core course canadapt the developed material easily. The project comprises 8 modules that introduce students tofundamentals of DIT and its applications. All engineering students from their freshman year tothe senior year are exposed to these DI modules. Some modules are also used for K-12 outreachthrough our women in engineering and match and
efficiency offers a promising outlet toachieve the desired integration. To encourage students with varied interests, however, anyprogram must have a broad base that fuses a variety of engineering science topics with relevantpolicy considerations.5 Engineering Design and Public Policy Programs at The University of VirginiaThe University of Virginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science (SEAS) recognizes theneed to introduce engineering students to policy applications for their technical backgrounds. Inresponse, programs now provide relevant and interdisciplinary academic environments and real-world, hands-on experiences both at the university and in Washington, D.C.5.1 Science and Technology Policy MinorThe UVa SEAS created a minor in science
of inserting atrebuchet into the dynamics course originated with a student who completed the Spring 2001dynamics course. Knowing nothing about medieval siege engines, a web search found a plethoraof medieval siege engine sites and trebuchet enthusiasts, both academic and hobbyists5,6. Searchesof the educational literature revealed a few reports of trebuchet learning projects used in anengineering course7,8,9. The trebuchet appeared to be a good candidate for an EPBL insertion intothe engineering dynamics course because it would require knowledge and application of generalplanar rigid body kinematics and kinetics and because it could be constructed with readilyavailable materials. On the other hand, the classical solution to the trebuchet and
-plinary team laboratory experience for our engineering freshman. In addition, a major focus ofthis clinic is on problem solving skills, safety and ethics. The current freshman clinic uses a cof-feemaker to demonstrate the fundamental principles of engineering (Hesketh[7]). This consumerproduct exposes students to engineering design through reverse engineering and introduces basicprinciples of momentum, heat and mass transfer, thermodynamics, electronics, process control,materials, and manufacturing.In summary these activities• demonstrate the role of laboratory experiments in the engineering decision-making process.• show the interrelationship of engineering and science required for the design and fabrication of a single product.• give
Page 11.340.4commercial software packages have been developed.The last strategy is to encourage and provide opportunities for self assessment of the quality oftheir work. In Engineering and Design II, they are required to make the mass comparison.Students know even before we sit down to assess their solid modelling whether they have donewell or not. In the electronic reassembly exercise, the student’s get immediate feedback on thequality of their work just based on the quality of the fitting that they see. In Material Science,students are required to compare their FEA results against their own simplified hand calculations.In Fluid Mechanics, students are required to compare results against literature or laboratory data.All of these self checks
and prefer sequential orderingof their thoughts. This may be attributed to the lower number of female students, due to this therecommendations focus on the instrument results for the male students. Also, these resultssuggest that practitioners should be designing classroom experiences that focus on students whoare concrete/sequential and concrete/random styles, resulting in structured, predictable, andlogical presentation of materials. Overall, these students prefer iterative solutions and use ofintuition.IntroductionCurrently, administrators and practitioners who work with engineering technology students lackempirical research to guide their decision-making about their students.3 There is a small butgrowing body of scholarship in teaching
educators from Washington University, the Saint Louis Science Center, the Missouri Botanical Garden, and the Saint Louis Zoo in providing curriculum, professional development, kit materials, an interactive website, and a visiting science laboratory/classroom to schools throughout the St. Louis area. She serves on the national faculty of the National Science Resources Center’s Leadership Assistance for Science Education Reform (LASER) strategic planning institutes. She was a 2008 and 2009 fellow in the Psychodynamic Research Training Program at Yale University’s Anna Freud Child Study Center. McMahon has a distinctive ability to translate cutting edge concepts from various disciplines in science, engineering, and education in an
engineers gain the knowledge and experience they need tocarry out their work, gradually developing their professional judgment and growing moreindependent.Materials ObstaclesThe second type of obstacle we discovered were materials obstacles. Materials obstacles are notunique to early career engineers—they can happen to anyone. One of the important insights ofresearch in Science and Technology Studies, particularly in the work of Latour and Callon(Callon 1984, Johnson [Latour] 1988), was to show how material objects participate in scientificknowledge creation or social life, often through resisting or redirecting human effort. Thisinsight laid the groundwork for a body of work on how the material world plays an importantrole in social and scientific
disciplines. A number of these were examined in the planningphase of the Lapeer Pre Engineering program that revealed that most of the currently offeredprograms emphasized on content delivery resulting less than desired level of success. A numberof similar programs are briefly summarized in the following section.The “Mission Science” program of University Of Southern California for elementary schoolstudents2 was designed to stimulate natural curiosity of children and develop enthusiasm aboutscience and technology through “hands-on” activities, demonstrations and projects. A monthlong residential summer program for high school student, Discover Engineering introducesstudents to various engineering disciplines as well as field trips to manufacturing
future generations to meet their own needs.”1, has emerged as acritical component of research and education within the field of Environmental Engineering. Asreflected in presentations and lengthy discussions at the semi-annual gathering of the Associationof Environmental Engineering and Science Professors (AEESP, 2005), a major challenge forincorporating sustainability into a graduate research program is the need to identify appropriateprojects and interested students producing the quantity and quality of research results comparableto other traditional areas of Environmental Engineering. Often, research in sustainability mustbe boot-strapped from piecemeal funding opportunities, and it must leverage a diverse collectionof interested parties
students. In addition, OERcloses equity gaps because it provides students who cannot afford required course materialsaccess to the resources they need [11].For a long time availability of quality open textbooks and instructional materials was a majorbarrier for adoption of OER. However, in recent years, supply of open textbooks and coursematerials grew significantly. A search of “Engineering Technology” Textbook on OERCommons resulted in 32 textbooks, BCcampus showed 9 textbooks, Merlot showed 612textbooks. However, there is limited or no directly usable CAD textbook or course materials onthe OER sites. This project attempts to fill the gap and will create openly licensed OER CADmaterials which will allow anyone to freely use, adapt and share the
only apply the topics discussed above to thesesoftware packages, but they must also learn to apply these principles to hand sketching. Whiledetail drawings are rarely done by hand anymore, hand sketching is still an important skill forengineers to convey graphical ideas quickly. This course must emphasize sketching to helpstudents develop sufficient visualization and sketching skills.This course can be broken up into three sections: basic engineering graphics concepts andsketching, 2D drawing using AutoCAD, and 3D modeling using Inventor. No one textbook wasfound that covered all of these topics, so three different textbooks were chosen to encompass allthe material included in the course. Bertoline’s Introduction to Graphics Communications
. Each ETK Page 12.655.2includes hands-on experimentation, data gathering and summarization, and evidence-based reasoning. The middle school students work in teams on a series of tasks andprojects. The ETK is carefully constructed to guide the students’ learning of particularconcepts and methods. The pedagogical technique is a variety of constructivism, knownas ‘guided inquiry’1.Educational StandardsAlthough most states have educational standards for science and mathematics, only a fewrequire technology or engineering knowledge and skills among K – 12 students.Massachusetts is the exception; its Curriculum Framework involves engineering andtechnology at
by-products, organic and inorganic contaminants and physical, chemical and biological drinking water treatment processes. He is one of the three faculty in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering at CU leading the Engineering for Developing Communities program at both the graduate and undergraduate levels.Jim Ruttenber, University of Colorado Dr. Ruttenber, M.D., Ph.D., co-developed and co-taught the Environmental Health for Developing Communities course in 2005 and 2006. He is an Associate Professor in the University of Colorado at Denver's Health Science Program. His research focuses on occupational and environmental health, risk assessment, and
the faculty advisor for the ASME student chapter.Prof. John F. Sweigart P.E., Southern Polytechnic State University John Sweigart is an Associate Professor in and Chair of the Mechanical Engineering Technology Depart- ment at southern Polytechnic State University in Marietta, GA. His teaching responsibilities are currently centered on Materials. Prior to his teaching career, John was in the aircraft and composite materials in- dustries. He received his BS degree in ME from Missouri University and his MS in EM from what is now the Missouri University of Science and Technology.Dr. Beth Stutzmann, Southern Polytechnic State University Dr. Beth Stutzmann, is the Director of Bands at Southern Polytechnic State
deploy them at local k-12 schools and community partners. It is a student-run organizationand a course offered at UC Berkeley. BEAM has made great efforts to constantly evolve, assess,and redesign itself into a flexible program to achieve our mission: to impact the future ofstudents in our community through hands-on learning. It is our belief that BEAM serves as amodel for effective student-led outreach and education partnerships between universities andtheir surrounding educational institutions. Our ten-week course consists of a day-long mentortraining followed by a guest lecture series, weekly volunteer site visits, and a final project. Thecourse adheres to engineering and education principles including: ABET Criteria, engineeringdesign loop
licensure from theState Department of Higher Education.Curriculum development and “The Engineer of 2020” key attributesMechanical engineering is probably the most diverse of the engineering fields, encompassingmany specialties such as mechanical design, energy, control systems and dynamics, aerospace,biomedical sciences, manufacturing, and material sciences (Fig. 1). The envisioned mechanicalengineering program is initially focused on two major specializations, namely: manufacturingand aerospace engineering. These specializations were based on local industry needs. In the development of the curriculum and
include: “Engineering design is the systematic, intelligent generation of specifications for artifacts whose form and function achieve stated objectives and satisfy specified constraints”14 “engineers ... apply their scientific and engineering knowledge to the solution of technical problems, and then to optimize those solutions within the requirements set by material, technological, economic, legal, environmental and human-related considerations.”15 “Engineering design is the communication of a set of rational decisions obtained with creative problem solving for accomplishing certain objectives within prescribed constraints.”16While commonalities exist within the above definitions, each one focuses uniquely on differentaspects
schools by the year 2000. IntroductionThis paper describes a high school program developed to provide high school students with hands-on designand project experience and to introduce them to the engineering profession. Called SEEHIGHS (forSimultaneous Engineering Experienced by HIGH School students), the program was initiated in 1993 by twoof our engineering students who submitted the concept at a Canadian engineering student competition. Astheir idea was well received (they won first prize), they decided to follow up by convincing one of theirformer high school teachers to experiment with the approach.Our engineering students were first introduced to the concurrent engineering approach through a
investigating the use of Oral Discourse Method for con- ceptual development in engineering, the impact of a four-year hands-on design curriculum in engineering, the effects of service learning in engineering education, and informal learning in engineering.Derek T Reamon, University of Colorado, Boulder DEREK REAMON is Co-Director of the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program, and a Senior In- structor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. He received his PhD in Educational Interface Design from Stanford University and has won numerous outstanding teaching awards. Dr. Reamon’s research interests encompass the foundations of educational theory, the practical issues involved in