. (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2001).2. Tomlinson, C. A. The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners. (2001).3. Levy, H. M. Meeting the Needs of All Students through Differentiated Instruction: Helping Every Child Reach and Exceed Standards. Clear. House J. Educ. Strateg. Issues Ideas 81, 161–164 (2008).4. Cusumano, C. & Mueller, J. How Differentiated Instruction Helps Struggling Students. Leadership 36, 8–10 (2007).5. McTighe, J. & Brown, J. L. Differentiated instruction and educational standards: Is détente possible? Theory Pract. 44, 234–244 (2005).6. Tomlinson, C. A. et al. Differentiating Instruction in Response to Student Readiness, Interest, and Learning Profile in
, instructional, and staff support strongly contribute tothe feeling of belonging. We also found that the efforts to create a community, using programs,are beneficial to belonging and success.As per the Integrated Interest Development for CS Education (IID/CS) framework [32], matchingcollege students’ interests contributes to increasing diverse students’ sense of belonging in CS,which also can improve retention. Moreover, Garcia et al. [33] showed that incorporatingelements of inclusive design in “regular” CS (non Human-Computer Interaction) courses acrossan undergraduate curriculum resulted in significant improvements in students’ course outcomes,especially for marginalized groups, and that also significantly improved inclusion and teamworkin the
construction management would be mandated as one of the four technical areas of civil engineering. This was not the intent of the CEPCTC, so the cognitive level was lowered to: “…explain basic concepts in project management, business, public policy,…” • Focus on curriculum. The first draft version of the proposed CEPC read “The program must prepare graduates to…”. The CEPCTC changed the proposed CEPC to read “The curriculum must prepare graduates to…” When documenting student outcomes in accordance with Criterion 4 of the baccalaureate level general criteria, programs are required to assess and evaluate the extent to which students have attained the Criterion 3 a-k student outcomes and any other
cell research used under a wide range of operational conditions for the US Army, as well as battery research, and the implementation of alternative energy power sources in autonomous ground vehicle robots. He is also working with his students supporting DTE Energy in the operation and optimization of their Hydrogen Power Park in Southfield, Michigan, a photovoltaic, biomass, water electrolysis, hydrogen storage, hydrogen vehicle fueling station and fuel cell power demonstration project, funded by the Department of Energy. He has also established an alternative energy laboratory at LTU that contains integrated fuel cell and hydrogen generation systems, as well as equipment
technical aspects that are often interlinked (Figure 1). However,Jonassen has argued that the typical U.S. engineering curriculum limits students’ opportunities todevelop sociotechnical thinking in an engineering context [4], thereby potentially leavingstudents ill-prepared for this complex part of their engineering careers. Figure 1: Engineering practice as a bridge connecting technical and non-technical considerations.In this project, we have conceptualized sociotechnical thinking as the interplay between relevantsocial and technical factors in the engineering problem definition and solution process [5]. Weconsider “social” to be a broad term inclusive of environmental, ethical, economic, health
basedcollaboration may also present several challenges, mostly stemming from the “lean” nature oftechnology [23]. To develop new and better-suited educational approaches that serve to meet the ASCEvision, along with current industry trends, technology was studied in a capstone setting as part ofan ongoing curriculum enhancement to be more industry mimicking. Over the last 10 years,trends were monitored focusing on how communication, collaboration, and project managementsoftware impacted student teams and their results. It should be noted in this study, projectmanagement software is considered outside of learning management software (LMS) thatuniversities often use. With an educational application of software, four trends in how studentswere utilizing
study also carries out a statistical analysis of 5-year student performance based on weekly Labs, Projects and Mid-Terms using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The result shows the existence of differences in the yearly average performance of students. Post Hoc Tukey’s pairwise multiple comparison tests reveals consistency in performance up to the period of the semester where possible dropouts would have occurred. Students’ delay in tackling challenging projects also accounts for the significant differences in the mean scores.IntroductionTime plays an important role in decision making in every human endeavor – from personal tobusiness/management decisions. In these, the education sector is not left out. Hence, it is
Paper ID #36460When is Automated Feedback a Barrier to Timely Feedback?Andrew Deorio (Lecturer) Andrew DeOrio is a teaching faculty member at the University of Michigan and a consultant for web and machine learning projects. His research interests are in engineering education and interdisciplinary computing. His teaching has been recognized with the Provost's Teaching Innovation Prize, and he has twice been named Professor of the Year by the students in his department. Andrew is trying to visit every U.S. National Park.Christina Keefer (University of Michigan) © American Society for
“forging stronger ties between communitycolleges and four-year institutions.”7However, the existence of articulation agreements is not enough. Most literature also includesdescriptions of the challenges encountered when institutions such as these work together.Funded projects to increase the number of underserved individuals completing a degree to enterengineering must also seek to remove barriers and integrate program curricula as a bridge withthe Community College.8 The Wisconsin Technical College System (WTCS) and theMilwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE) jointly addressed the enrollment difficulties ofWTCS students to MSOE through the development and implementation of statewide transferagreements in Electrical Engineering Technology (EET).9
efforts.IntroductionFinancial, physical, and human capital resources are used to provide additional efforts intendedto support undergraduate students in STEM, particularly underrepresented racial, ethnic, gendergroups in certain disciplines [1]-[3]. With U.S. demographic projections indicating a growth indiversity of the population, we can anticipate an increasingly diverse population ofundergraduate students. In preparation for this shift in demographics and in response to historicalissues of diversity in STEM, it is important that we begin to rethink our offerings of studentsupport.The larger project in which this paper is situated aims to help colleges improve their studentsupport investments by developing and testing the validity evidence for an instrument
Paper ID #32342Computational Thinking Frameworks used in Computational ThinkingAssessment in Higher Education. A Systematized Literature Review.Ms. Laura Melissa Cruz Castro, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Laura Melissa Cruz Castro is a M.S student in the Department of Electrical and Computer engineering under the advice of Dr. Mirelle Boutin and a Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education under the guidance of Dr. Kerrie Douglas, both at Purdue University. She holds a B.S. in Statistics from Universidad Nacional de Colombia and a M.S. in Business Intelligence from Universit¨at de Barcelona. Her
this web app has been specifically customized for this curriculum. The application takesthe necessary input, such as a student’s ACT Math score, the courses the student completed, andthe courses the student is taking currently (if any). Once the required information is entered inthe corresponding fields, the application provides a detailed output of semester-wise proposedcourses that the student needs to take to graduate on time.The application has options for adding summer courses, reordering specific courses, andchanging the anticipated hours per semester. Thus, a student can vary the parameters and createthe optimum semester-wise course plan for the remainder of their education at SouthernArkansas University. The adviser can print it for
implementations through the Massachusetts Health Information Exchange. At Wentworth, Dr. Feldman is focused on project-based instruction, hands-on simulations, experiential learning approaches, and first year curriculum. Dr. Feldman is one of the lead instructors for Introduction to Engineering courses, with enrollments in the hundreds each fall. His research and teaching interests, in addition to first year engineering, include telemedicine, health informatics, rehabilitation engineering, and medical robotics. Dr. Feldman has collaborated with researchers and engineers from organizations including Tufts School of Veterinary Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Vecnacares, and Restoreskills.Miss Callie Cherry, Wentworth
university-industryrelationships, there is a common tendency to focus on research and development projects.Research and development is a very important factor in developing industry-universityrelationship, however contacts should not be limited to R&D exclusively. There are many otherpotential areas for bringing faculty and academic programs closer to industry. The faculty canparticipate, contribute and also learn from their industrial counterparts through variousapproaches that might include the hiring of adjunct faculty, technology transfer projects,consulting work, graduate placement etc.One of the most important concerns in the university-industry relationship is how responsive theuniversities must and should be. There are two aspects of
working together. This generatesinstitutional, student and staff benefits from the process outside of the narrow financial concerns-important though they may be.The second partnership with KBU, although initially identified as a business opportunity, has beenshaped by academic considerations to provide greater opportunities for both Malaysian and UKstudents. It has been calculated that there would be an economic advantage for UK students tostudy the courses in Malaysia.Devon et. al.10 cite a 1996 OECD study on factors that were found to contribute to successfulefforts to internationalise higher education in OECD which are as follows: • Sufficient institutional autonomy • Sufficient flexibility in curriculum regulations and restrictions
. Page 25.97.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A Quarter-Century of Teaching Spacecraft-Mission DesignAfter more than twenty five years of teaching a capstone spacecraft-mission design course in anaerospace engineering curriculum, the instructor looks back on the evolution of the course andchanges in student capabilities. The evolution in course structure, types of projects, projectdepth, and instructor understanding of the design process are discussed. The effect of thetremendous increase in information available to students through the Internet is discussed.Instructor BackgroundThe author became a member of the faculty at The University of Texas at Austin in September1965. From 1965
Paper ID #43874Racialized Trauma for Black, Latin, and Indigenous Engineering Students:A Systematic Literature Review.Dr. Elahe Vahidi, University of CincinnatiMark Okoth Onyango, University of Cincinnati Mark Onyango is a graduate assistant in the Department of Engineering and Computing Education (DECE) in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. He earned his Master’s degree in Information and Communication Engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology’s School of Electronics and Information Engineering in Harbin, China and holds a Bachelor of Education (Electrical
and a Senior Lecturer in Structural Design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #20622Dr. Isaac L. Flory IV, Old Dominion University Isaac L. Flory IV received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Virginia Tech in 1984, 1993 and 2008 respectively. He has over 17 years of experience in the lighting industry, serving in several positions as an employee of Hubbell Lighting Incorporated including Manager of Electrical Engineering and Intellectual Property Coordinator. He has been awarded 25 United States Patents and is a licensed Professional Engineer
Engineering Society (AES).Dr. Jeanne Christman Ph.D., Rochester Institute of Technology Jeanne Christman is an Associate Professor in the Computer Engineering Technology Department at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Her expertise is in the area of Digital and Embedded Systems Design and her research focuses on equity in engineering education.Prof. George H. Zion, Rochester Institute of Technology George H. Zion, Ph.D. Professor & PLTW Affiliate Director Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Zion is a Professor in the Electrical, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering Technology Department at Rochester Institute of Technology. Additionally, Zion is the Affiliate Director of RIT’s Project Lead the Way (PLTW
major (Biomedical, Civil, Chemical,Electrical, Environmental, Materials Science, or Mechanical Engineering, Computer Science &Engineering, or Engineering Physics), academic ability based on GPA or SAT/ACT test scores,passion for engineering based on letters of recommendation from high school teachers, financialneed based on criteria determined by the Office of Financial Aid and Scholarships, and acommitment to participating in the program’s required activities. The admissions processes wereconducted by the project team, not the research team, using criteria already established for otheruniversity programs that were adapted to this program [5]. As the criteria were not established bythe research team they did not center anti-deficit
thinking strategies? And how have researchersexamined design thinking? Atman et al.14 examined the design thinking process amongengineering experts and engineering students. Using verbal protocol analysis methods, Atmanasked expert engineers to design a playground in lab settings, and think-aloud the design process.Compared with undergraduate engineering students, the experts spent significantly greateramount of time on scoping design problems, and collected significantly more informationbelonging to a greater variety of categories. Atman pointed out that they chose to focus on fivethemes in the engineering design process, including problem scoping, project realization,alternative solutions generation, distribution of activity over time, and
Paper ID #29255Women in Engineering: Promoting Identity Exploration and ProfessionalDevelopmentDr. Maureen C Smith, San Jose State University Dr. Smith received her BA in Psychology from U.C. Davis and her Ph.D in Developmental Psychology from Cornell University. Dr. Smith is a Professor of Child and Adolescent Development in the Lurie College of Education at San Jose State University. She has significant experience with curriculum and program development, including the development of a combined BA-Credential for her department and a First Year Experience program for the university. Her research interests include development
Systems Development; Computing Sciences Pedagogy; Assistive Technology for Persons with Disabil- ities and the Elderly; Cyber Security Analytics, and Interdisciplinary Data Analytics. He has published about 90 peer-reviewed technical articles in international conferences, journals, and book chapters. Dr. Seliya is proactive in computing sciences scholarship and pedagogy enhancement, including grants, un- dergraduate research, and curriculum and course development. His prior professional endeavors include: Assistant (& Associate) Professor of Computer and Information Science at the University of Michigan- Dearborn; Adjunct Instructor of Computer Science and Technology at the State University of New York, Orange; and
visualization by the student to promoteaffective learning in a comprehensive curriculum. Important emerging technologies, such asEEG and muon radiography using cosmic rays for home land security applications are among thetopics discussed. The learning assessment rubric of Highly Competent, Competent, and NeedsImprovement versus Participant Deliverables was used. An improvement was observed in thegrades of discussion sections of lab reports and the written interpretation of numericalcalculations. The sustainability of such triggered learning motivation through the teaching ofperspectives in science, technology and society could be enhanced if an independent collegecourse in Science, Technology and Society has a STEM course as pre-requisite.I
Infrastructure Decision-Making Game for Exploratory Equity Learning Abigail L. Beck University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Eun Jeong Cha University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignAbstractIn structural engineering education, social considerations, beyond life-safety, have not beenincorporated or highlighted within the curriculum. With ABET’s EAC Criterion 5 expansion, wesee calls for increased embracement of diversity, equity, and inclusion as a profession. It is theduty of educators to convey to students that engineering decisions have broad reaching impactson the community beyond their pure technicalities. As
Paper ID #11148First-Year Engineering Courses Effect on Retention and Workplace Perfor-manceDr. Gregory Warren Bucks, University of Cincinnati Gregory Bucks joined the Department of Engineering Education in 2012. He received his BSEE from the Pennsylvania State University in 2004, his MSECE from Purdue University in 2006, and his PhD in Engineering Education in 2010, also from Purdue University. After completing his PhD, he taught for two years at Ohio Northern University in the Electrical and Computer Engineering and Computer Science department, before making the transition to the University of Cincinnati. He has taught
semester is completed.ConclusionsOur findings showed that the student learning outcomes were not significantly improved whentraditional textbooks were used in teaching energy and its sustainability in each of theparticipating campuses. Results also showed no institutional differences. These are promisingfindings for us because when the online textbook is used, any significant improvement of studentlearning outcomes over the course of a semester will show favorable results for our project goals.Our iterative research design informs the similar educational efforts aimed to help improve thestudent learning experiences in higher education. Particularly in the engineering courses thatinvolve dynamic content, university faculty and curriculum developers
encouraged to participate and engage inthe innovation lab to expand their learning experiences from the first semester to senior year. Asstudents move through an innovation and entrepreneurship environment they can increase theirresponsibilities by moving from team member to managing small project teams. Thus, the Centeris designed to foster interdisciplinary, project based, and collaborative activities with internaland/or external constituencies which can bring together cross-curricular interests and projectsthat may occur in three different formats: (1) integral part of the curriculum, (2) extra-curricularprojects among departments and/or subject matter areas, (3) projects focusing on outside
project functions.Students were challenged to assess the dam with the established infrastructure model, developcreative mitigating measures, and outline the inter-related technical and non-technical concerns.The result of the student’s experience in wrestling with the Mosul Dam addressed several of theprogram’s ABET student outcomes which require students to incorporate knowledge ofcontemporary issues into the solution of engineering problems, anticipate the impact ofengineering solutions in a global and societal context, and explain the basic concepts of businessand public policy. The assessment of these specific ABET student outcomes included direct andindirect embedded indicators. Additionally, the impact on the cognitive and
, softwareV&V course curriculum is being improved at author’s institution via a NSF-funded project. Thebasic objectives of this project are to improve software education to make it well aligned withacademic research as well as industry best practices. In addition, it is aimed that the coursematerial could also be used to enhance on-the-job professional training in SW industry settings,thereby helping to increase the pool of professionals with contemporary V&V knowledge andskills.The new course curriculum enhancement described in this paper is guided by academic researchand industry best practices that focus on four specific V&V focus areas: requirementsengineering, reviews, configuration management, and testing. Among many educational