.BiographyANGELA BECK, Ph.D.Currently an Assistant Professor in the Dept. of Humanities/Communications and the General Education coordinatorfor the College of Arts and Sciences at ERAU/Prescott. Her research interests include the development of teachingstrategies (such as collaborative teaching) that help students move from novice to expert writers in their chosendisciplines.JAMES F. HELBLING, M.S.A.E.Currently an Assistant Professor of Aerospace Engineering at ERAU/Prescott where he teaches structural analysis,computer aided design, and aircraft detail design courses. He has 21 years of industry experience with McDonnellDouglas (now Boeing) and Northrop Grumman Corporation where he specialized in structural fatigue loading andserved as manager of F-5/T
Session 2531 Cross-Disciplinary Approach to Developing Challenge-Based Instruction Ann McKenna, Matthew Parsek, Gülnur Birol, and Christopher Riesbeck Northwestern UniversityAbstractThis paper describes our cross-disciplinary collaboration to design and implement educationalmaterials in the domain of biotechnology. We designed our course activities to follow achallenged-based model of learning and constructed our learning environment to align withcurrent theories of how people learn. The nature of our work was cross-disciplinary since itinvolved applying
functions are often easy to use, since the functions were designed towork together. For example, a course management system (CMS) such as the Moodle (OSS)provides a variety of functions designed to work smoothly together, and includes functions thatcan support team projects; this can be a good first approach for institutions that already have aCMS. Similarly, the Trac project management system combines SVN, a wiki, and task tracking;we use it for industry projects and student team projects. There are a variety of other groupwaresystems designed to support communication, collaboration, and coordination.Although some multifunction tools are more difficult to install and maintain than individualtools, the total effort is usually less than the effort
product markets, and/or developing products that have an appeal on theinternational market1. More and more projects are now distributed across global sites andeffective collaboration requires professionals who can work productively with colleagues whoare very different from themselves.Academic, industry and government institutions have recognized the need of globalcompetencies for engineering students. Grandin (2009) discussed the value added through theexperience of engineering work and study abroad, as well as on the lessons learned over theseventeen year history of the University of Rhode Island program3. The paper emphasized thatto be competitive in global workplace engineers must be educated as global citizens, trained towork in global teams
international education and cross-border collaboration, she manages academic operations, student advising, and global partnerships. Dr. Li holds a Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) in Educational Leadership and has over 10 years of experience working with universities in the U.S., China, and beyond. Her expertise lies in building sustainable academic programs, supporting international faculty and students, and creating inclusive, globally engaged learning environments.Dr. Farzad Ahmadkhanlou, University of California, Irvine Farzad Ahmadkhanlou, Ph.D., P.E., is a faculty advisor for the Professional Master of Engineering Program at the University of California, Irvine, where he has supervised over 100 industry-sponsored projects
and educational applications. Dr. Zhou has conducted a large number of funded research projects totaling over $21 million and collaborated with many experts from over 110 organizations including academia, national laboratories, and industries. Dr. Zhou has published more than 350 technical papers, five copy- righted CFD codes, and two patents. She has received numerous awards including the R&D 100 Award in 2004, the Medal Award by the American Iron and Steel Institute in 2005, the J. Keith Brimacombe Memo- rial Lecture Award by the Association of Iron and Steel Technology (AIST) in 2010, the 2012 Chanute Prize for Team Innovation, and the Gerald I. Lamkin Fellow Award for Innovation & Service 2017-2018
the development of a novel high school engineering textbook. This developmentis unique within engineering in several different ways. First, the text is a Flexbook – an open-sourcebook developed with the support of and within the context of the CK12 Foundation; the Flexbookformat and open-source licensing allows anyone to extend and customize the book. Second, writingthe text was a collaboration between university engineering and education faculty with input fromCK12 personnel; this collaboration has led to a textbook structure that supports constructivistapproaches to learning. Third, the text conforms to a draft K–12 standard for engineering content.CK12 is a non-profit foundation launched in 2007 to reduce the cost of textbooks for the K–12
capstone designsequence at Wentworth, an external collaborator is defined as a practicing professional engineer.Sources of external collaborators include intern/co-op employers and bosses, industrial advisorygroups, and colleagues of the faculty. In addition to meeting regularly with externalcollaborators, the student can also attend professional seminars/conferences and visit local civilengineering firms. The end result of this approach is the off-track student being provided with anintradisciplinary team-based engineering design experience with out postponing the studentsanticipated graduation date by more than one semester.Student PerspectiveTo gain insight into the off-track student’s prospective of the design experience and to be used
reviewers recommend that this paper be accepted).Specifically, in addition to an online collection point for important resources related to women inengineering, the WEPAN Knowledge Center Professional Community provides a space in which Page 15.425.2to share interests, identify experts, mentor, and collaborate. Moreover, it provides theopportunity to develop customized online communities of practice for project, researchcommittee and other shared interest communities.Communities of practice are groups of people who share a concern or a passion for somethingthey do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly (Wenger, 2006). Wenger
dissertation in elementary STEAM education. She also worked as a professional engineer in the athletic footwear and medical device industries for 10 years before joining the faculty at Northeastern University in 2006.Ms. Claire Duggan, Northeastern University Claire Duggan is currently the Executive Director for The Center for STEM Education at Northeastern University and Co-Principal Investigator for The Engineering PLUS Alliance. She is also current the Co-Principal Investigator for the REU site, REU Pathways and the S-STEM initiative, S-POWER.Ms. Elizabeth H. Blume, Northeastern University Engineering PLUS Alliance Elizabeth Blume is Manager of the Dept. of Homeland Security PEERs, SENTRY and Engineering PLUS Alliance
Paper ID #47715Data-Informed instruction: pedagogical responses and obstacles in using learninganalyticsMr. Chuhao Wu, Pennsylvania State University Chuhao Wu is a Ph.D. candidate in Informatics at the Pennsylvania State University. He holds a master’s degree in Industrial Engineering from Purdue University. His research focuses on the human-centered design of educational technology and the application of artificial intelligence in higher education.Sarah Zipf, Pennsylvania State University Sarah Zipf, Ph.D. is a researcher with Teaching and Learning with Technology at the Pennsylvania State University.Ms. Na Li, Penn State
Paper ID #48465BOARD # 180: Implementing Mini Modules in Core Mechanical EngineeringCourses to Enhance Student EngagementProf. Jingru Benner, Western New England University Dr. Jingru Benner is currently an Associate Professor at Western New England University (WNE). Before joining WNE she worked at Corning Inc as a research scientist. In addition she has been a consultant for various industries. Dr. Benner received her Ph.D. degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from Rutgers University. She has been working on various projects in the thermal-fluid field. Dr. Benner has more than 15 years’ experience in electronic
the University of Texas at Austin School of Social Work.Dr. Angela Shartrand, VentureWell Angela Shartrand is Director of Research and Evaluation at VentureWell, a non-profit higher education network that helps emerging scientists and engineers launch products and ventures that improve life for people and the planet. Since 2005, she has contributed to the growth and development of VentureWell’s entrepreneurship and innovation initiatives, which include grants, competitions, faculty development, in- novator training, and network building. In addition, she has collaborated on many NSF-funded projects that are advancing entrepreneurship education in STEM fields, including Epicenter and I-Corps(tm). She and her
technology test-bed leading to thedevelopment, demonstration, integration and qualification of advanced fabricationtechnologies for the semiconductor industry [11].Albany Nanotech has been involved in multi-year research partnerships with bigcorporations, and sponsored research collaborations with national defense agencies andstart-up companies. All the partners, small, large, medium size corporations, anduniversities, have access to the state-of-the art laboratories and an array of scientificcenters serving their long and shorter-term technology development needs. These AlbanyNanoTech partners are able to collaborate, establish alliances, or form joint ventures andconsortia within a technically and financially competitive environment [7].CNSE has
the School of Technology at Michigan TechnologicalUniversity was very successful in establishing collaboration with the industry. This, in turn,triggered nearly all the capstone projects conducted in the EET program to be industrysponsored. Only during the last four years, EET program has successfully completed 12 capstoneprojects with 10 of them being industry sponsored. The benefits of having SD projects industrysponsored are very significant for both the students and faculties. On the other hand, the facultysponsored projects gain popularity as well. Students working on faculty sponsored projects havean opportunity to participate in externally funded research or conduct faculty defined projectsresulting in the equipment that can further be
Session: 3430, paper 727_ Development of a Modularized Co-constructivist Learning Environment for Electrotechnology Gary Boyd, Geza Joos, Allan Insleay Education, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada / Industrial Electronics, Vanier College, Montreal, CanadaAbstractThis paper outlines our POWERGUIDE project to develop a new computer basedlearning environment to help University and College students develop a deeperunderstanding of industrial Electrotechnology. This subject includes electromagnetic andelectromechanical devices and
].Team-based senior design courses rely heavily on collaboration and provide ample opportunityfor students to practice the leadership skills they learn in these lectures. However, applying theseskills requires that students also understand the implied value of developing these skills and canexemplify the development of these skills through their current team experience. Hence, thehypothesis is that students need to be motivated in order to actively pursue to develop leadershipskills. This study explores whether students appreciate having leadership lectures taught by guestspeakers with industry experience and if they think they learned valuable information from theselectures with respect to three categories: personal lives, professional careers
. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2014-99230- 309&site=ehost-live14. Mondisa, J.-L. (2015). Increasing Diversity in Higher Education by Examining African- American Stem Mentors' Mentoring Approaches Bt - International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning15. Oh, S. S., & Lewis, G. B. (2011). Stemming Inequality? Employment and Pay of Female and Minority Scientists and Engineers. The Social Science Journal, 48(2), 397-403. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2010.11.00816. Ross, M. S., & Godwin, A. (2016). Engineering Identity Implications on the Retention of Black Women in the Engineering Industry Bt - 123rd Asee Annual Conference and Exposition17. Ross, M. S
Industrial Solutions at the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Science at University of North Carolina – Charlotte. His industry positions include president of Robo-Tech Systems,Inc., senior market development engineer at GE and manager of engineering at Advanced Products Corp. Page 12.1308.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Student Deliverables and Instruction for a Senior Design Program CourseAbstractNearly all of the senior design courses at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte (UNCCharlotte) were project-only courses. The
schools followed a trend of ever increasing focus on thedetails of one particular sub-discipline of engineering. Our program emphasizes breadth not onlyacross engineering disciplines, but also uses a solid foundation in the liberal arts that provides thebroad worldview on which effective leadership arises. Our outcome-based assessment of recentyears appears to reflect an industry need for more breadth and thus less depth. While depthprovides good preparation for entry level positions and the first five years or so of a career,contextualization better supports the full career span, which requires continual self-learning andoften has leadership opportunities in technical and non-technical areas.While engineering analytical skills are important
with businesses to allow experiencedengineers to spend a sabbatical year in EWU. The partnership could include reciprocalexchanges, where the faculty at Eastern Washington University would spend time in industry topromote technology transfer and other collaborative research between academia and industry. Tothis, and other ends, the new program in SET at Eastern Washington University will have acutting-edge culture, with a commitment towards keeping up with advances in SET practice andeducation.Appendix A Freshman Year Course Title Credits Number MATH 106 Pre-Calculus II 5 MATH 161 Calculus I
Page 10.1486.1truly mentor the new faculty through all aspects of the tenure process. As a result, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Educationuntenured peers, further along in the tenure process, have stepped forward to provideleadership and guidance for their newer untenured colleagues.Peer Mentoring and LeadershipPeer mentoring and leadership is the “pasta” of the model discussed in this paper. Theguidance of a peer is particularly vital for first-time faculty entering academia from abusiness environment. In industry, tasks and time frames are strictly defined by eithersuperiors or the industry in which
have long thought to be the most central pedagogical issue in engineeringeducation. Noting the important role university and industrial training programs have inaddressing this dilemma, Penn State Professors Salamon and Engel suggest that designinstruction cannot be successful without academic instruction that "exercises studentcreativity and other non-analytical talents."16 Several authors and educators note theimportance of colleges and universities teaching effective writing skills, interpersonalcommunications, and collaborative working skills as a necessary foundation for learning Page 13.1131.6effective design skills.17,18,19
“…an ability to function effectively on a team whosemembers together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establishgoals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.” This assessment is performed by measuring each of thecomponents of outcome (5): leadership, collaboration, inclusion, goal setting, task management,and an ability to meet objectives.ABET requires each program to be assessed independently without data from students of differentmajors, even if taking the same course. The capstone project sequence at Grand Valley StateUniversity (GVSU) is well-suited to assess students’ ability to work in a team; however, thecapstone class consists of multidisciplinary teams drawn from multiple engineering programs,making
each other. The main problems were scheduling meetings andaccess to labs. The next most important problems had to do with developing technologicalresources and technological compatibility and the options currently available are discussed.Cultural differences, while not large, were present and some aspects were measured before andafter the project. The project itself, which was industry based, was entirely successful. Evenmore important were the institutional changes that took place in both institutions. This approachwill be used in the future using a variety of engineering schools around the world.The CollaborationThe collaboration between Penn State and d'Artois began in 1994 and has been describedelsewhere1. It should be mentioned that
gamification to enhance students learning and engagement.Dr. Alexis Ortiz-Rosario, The Ohio State University Alexis Ortiz-Rosario is an associate professor of practice in the department of biomedical engineering at The Ohio State University. He holds a B.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Puerto Rico Mayag¨uez, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from The Ohio State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A New Community-Led Virtual Share and Learn by the Biomedical Engineering Education Community (BEEC)Christine King, PhD1,*, Yanfen Li2, Roza Vaez Ghaemi3, Alexis Ortiz-Rosario41 Department of Biomedical Engineering
was a technical communication course offered to Mechanical Engineering students. ENG 110 was the introductory course for the Mechanical Engineering program. The Engineering Librarian collaborated with these two courses during Fall 2018. Despite changes in instructors for both of these courses, progress has been made in adding a lesson plan to each course. In EGL 120, students were introduced to the literature of their discipline, specifically standards. In ENG 110, students were introduced to business and industry research as they begin considering future careers. • HUM 310 (Spring Senior Year). This was the engineering ethics course taken by all seniors in engineering programs. The
Student, Family Studies and Human DevelopmentDr. Vignesh Subbian, University of Arizona Vignesh Subbian is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering and the De- partment of Systems & Industrial Engineering at the University of Arizona. His primary interests are biomedical informatics, healthcare systems engineering, and STEM integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Re-envisioning the Role of the Engineering Education Chapter at a Research-I Institution: Lessons from a Cross-disciplinary ModelAbstractEngineering Education Chapters at academic institutions are largely student-led, confined
. This approach allowed students to function in an environmentsimilar to an industry project, where students would deliver brief, weekly reports and other pairscould ask questions and get updates pertaining to their portion of the project.The faculty experience and feedback from the students indicates that this prototype structurewould provide value for other institutions that would like to create collaborative capstoneexperiences. Introducing new concepts to students can be facilitated with assignments that stillrequire self study, but focus students to demonstrate their understanding of these skills.Identifying core features of the project and then grouping students from multiple institutions towork together is also advised. The hope is that
way to prepare students forthe industry design process. Traditionally, PBL at CSULA has been implemented as follows.During the lectures, the instructor models the design process for the students and then thestudents apply the process in their project assignment after class. However, in this case, thefeedback loop is not immediate to either the instructor presenting the material or the student Page 12.1195.3trying to apply the concepts. The desire for an efficient and effective way to teach designcomponents motivated us to propose an in class PBL model which progressively trains thestudents using small collaborative in-class projects.Figure 1(a