, professional, and higher-level thinking skills.Lastly, the collaboration with the industrial representative has proven fruitful. They reinforce thegoals of the course and instantly add a professional component to the student’s activities.Response from the industrial representatives has been very positive. One summed up hisobservations by saying “I wish I had taken a class like this when I was in school.” A couple of Page 9.289.11others stated the following. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering The
facilitators to buildon regional and university strengths in innovation and because engineering innovation fosterscreativity and synthesis of knowledge as described above. As such, curriculum developed withinnovation as its theme has the potential to both inspire and inform students about STEM andassociated careers. Furthermore, innovation and engineering design can be incorporated intonearly any content area.Several organizations including UD, the DRSC and local industry and not-for-profitorganizations, collaborated on this project to provide a meaningful professional developmentopportunity for teachers and pre-service teachers and to support teachers in the design,development, and pilot-testing of STEM curriculum under the guiding principles of the
introduces major advanced security to support sustainable, 3 undergrads Intensive concepts using a case study secure collaboration. 30 grads Environment of the security architecture of two open systems under Course material for the 1st course will Mix of CS, IE, consideration by DoD. be delivered through presentations and EE by speakers from industry and 2nd course [Spring 2011] is government; lectures, and interactive On-campus an actual
EE courses; the group developed and offers an industry certificate inwireless systems in close collaboration with Keysight. More recently the group begun hostingstudent-led workshops (see student organized forums below), which provide an excellent forumfor students to serve in leadership positions, learn about the various subdisciplines within EE,and connect with industry and government experts. The intent is for the wireless systems TFABto serve as a model for the other tracks as they launch their own TFABs and begin their directinteractions with industry. During the first year of RED two additional TFABs were created(Micro and Nano-systems and Mechatronic, Robotics and Embedded Systems). The two TFABshave held a several virtual meetings
AC 2009-1064: APPLICATION OF WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS IN AMIDWESTERN MANUFACTURING COMPANYAbed El Hameed El Madwar, University of Northern Iowa Hameed Madwar is currently a doctorate student in Industrial Technology at the University of Northern Iowa. He has received his B.S in Electrical and Computer Engineer at Beirut University, Lebanon in 2005. He got his Master degree in Industrial Supervision and Management at UNI, Iowa in 2008. His research interest are in the area of wireless systems of sensor networks and virtual reality for manufacturing applications.Hong "Jeffrey" Nie, University of Northern Iowa Hong (Jeffrey) Nie is an assistant professor of Electrical and Information Engineering
work focused on product development to promote economic growth in less industrialized economies. Krista has taught at Kenyatta University and the University of Cape Town, and worked as an engineer and designer in a variety of capacities. She is the author of the Engineering Student Survival Guide.Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard is the Burton J. and Deedee McMurtry University Fellow in Undergraduate Education, associate vice provost for graduate education, and professor of mechanical engineering at Stanford University. She is also a consulting senior scholar at the Carnegie Foundation, having directed the Preparations for the Professions Program (PPP) engineering
economy is well recognized within the engineering education communityworldwide. The United States, however, is tardy in the acceptance of globalization. The U.S.construction industry has been slow to recognize the effects of globalization and manyconstruction programs at universities across the United States are hindered as a result. Ifeducation is behind the current industry, in incorporating courses that adequately preparestudents to compete and work in the global work place, their value as engineers is diminished.The construction industry is unique in that design, construction and maintenance of the physicaland naturally built environment on a global level requires not only technical information but alsorequires knowledge of local, regional
Session 2457 Elements of an Activity-Based Statistics Course for Engineers Steven E Butt, Tycho K. Fredericks, and Bob E. White Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering College of Engineering & Applied Sciences Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5336 USAAbstractCommon criticisms of undergraduate engineering statistics courses are that they are tooacademic in focus, excessively theoretical, and divorced from real problems that appear inindustry. This paper describes our effort to make statistics
specificcourse requirements, and based on our earlier experience with integrated classes, we developed acourse that combines instruction in both history and materials science. Titled “Steel and theIndustrial Revolution,” the course was offered in the Winter of 2001.The class served as both an introduction to materials science for Mechanical and ManufacturingEngineering students and as an introductory course in the history of the Industrial Revolution.Classroom instruction was a seamless blend of material from both disciplines, with bothinstructors in the classroom at all times and combined homework and examination assignments.This paper describes the development of the course, its advantages and disadvantages, and ourplans to use what we learned to
computerskills across courses, particularly those being offered at the junior and senior levels. Ofsignificance is the improvement of courses in automation, introduction of additional courseworkin engineering design including finite element analysis. The department continues to expand its relationship with the surrounding industrialcommunity and would like to further enhance these ties to develop an outstanding METcurriculum. This partnership is extremely important as manufacturing needs change quicklyover time and the department would like to remain agile in terms of preparing graduates ready tomeet contemporary challenges. These collaborative efforts with industry have also helped us inestablishing a new automation laboratory and adding
sessions.The first session introduced the foundational concepts, theories, and methodologies. An industryexpert shared practical insights and related experiences in the second session. The third sessionengaged participants in collaborative activities and discussions, with students and industryengineers forming teams to complete various tasks. Additionally, Session 3 included multiple-choice questions (MCQs) to assess participants' comprehension of the material. The course waswell received by the industry and drew considerable interest. Furthermore, the assessment resultsprove the ability of the student to comprehend the topic even without prior deep knowledge ofpower grid equipment. Accordingly, a full course is under development and will be offered
AC 2011-898: CURRICULUM GLOBALIZATION: INTERNATIONAL EX-CHANGES BETWEEN AMERICAN AND CHINESE UNIVERSITIESBob Lahidji, Eastern Michigan University Bob Lahidji Ph.D, is Professor and The Director of the School of Engineering Technology at Eastern Michigan University. His primary interest and expertise are in the areas of manufacturing process and CNC/CAM. Dr. Lahidji has been involved with the auto industry manufacturing firms as a consultant in the areas of improving manufacturing processes and productivity. He has written numerous articles and is the co-author of the textbook ”Maximize SURFCAM”.Walter Tucker, School of Engineering Technology, Eastern Michigan University Walter Tucker, Ph.D., holds the rank of full
programs have gradually been re-populated with research Ph.Ds. instead ofjourneymen engineers, and the apprenticeship model of teaching engineering has been replacedwith a pedagogical model. We hire and reward professors for writing research grants rather thanfor stimulating innovation in the students or creating collaboration with engineering activity inindustry. Due to lack of experience in industry, what is taught in the curriculum is often notplaced into the context of the engineering risk reduction process. Consider how many of thegreat aircraft designers of the past century -- American or otherwise -- had a Ph.D. The answer,of course, is none. How many of these, regardless of their success in industry, could get a jobteaching aircraft design
implemented. Some majors naturally associate on projects. Multidisciplinary engineering projects are intended to reflect “real-world” situations that students will face in industry. The ideal is that co-workers with diverse backgrounds will be asked to collaborate on a project. However, as in the professional world, the senior design teams should reflect the competencies needed to successfully complete the project, which means that some majors will work together more naturally than others. Collaboration with non-engineers can be problematic but worthwhile. The current project failed to foster an environment where an IT student felt he could be successful. Continuation of the multidisciplinary
- ing practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering.Ms. Courtney S Smith, Virginia Tech Courtney S. Smith is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research interests span the mentoring experiences of African American women in engineering, campus climate and best practices for diversity and inclusion in the STEM classroom. Page 26.1425.1 c American Society for
educational systems that involve technologies which are neither simple nor inexpensive.One suggestion is to focus on new and innovative models for facilitating collaboration with otherhigher education institutions. The reason is evident. A majority of the more than 3,500 collegesand universities in the United States that have fewer than 2,000 students cannot afford to makecostly, recurring investments. The benefits of on-line lab course offerings range from definedand anticipated to unexpected and extensive1. Moreover, globalization has changed the landscapeof manufacturing industry. More and more manufacturing companies in US are moving out tooversea due to inexpensive labor cost and other resources. Manufacturing industry becomessensitive about
engineering graduate students, faculty and research practitioners in industry; 4. Expose students to real-world issues of importance to engineers; and 5. Provide mentoring and teaching opportunities for graduate students in engineering.A successful pilot of the GLUE program was completed in Spring 2003 with a total of 26undergraduate and graduate participants (13 pairs) and two sponsors providing $4,500 infunding. A formal course for the program was established in Spring 2004 with a total of 42participants (21 pairs) from six engineering departments and sponsorship of $23,400 from fivecompanies. The Spring 2005 program will encompass all UT Austin College of Engineeringdepartments with 68 participants (34 pairs). Sponsorship for the 2005
College and University Partnership – Year Two ProgressAbstractIn rural locales like Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, students and employers alike can struggle intheir search to find STEM-based educational opportunities or qualified graduates to fill openpositions. Due to the diverse needs of the small employers found in such an area, Bay de NocCommunity College quickly realized that creating a different degree for each industry needwould be an unsustainable and unreasonable approach. Instead, a partnership was formed withMichigan Technological University to create highly customizable and stackable credentials inthe fields of mechatronics, robotic systems, and electrical engineering technology. By co-developing this curriculum and partnering on a
Session Number 3557 Internationalizing IE: A Unique Minnesota - Sweden Case David A. Wyrick, P.E. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Minnesota DuluthAbstractEngineers are working in a global setting as never before. The University of Minnesota Duluth(UMD) has a unique exchange program with the Luleå University of Technology (LUT) inSweden that has proven beneficial with undergraduates, graduate students, and faculty membersat both institutions. The Industrial Engineering program at UMD and the Manufacturing andMaterials Engineering program
not effective to keep students’ interest in their majors. This is particularlytrue for the engineering majors.There are efforts to cultivate more student-centered learning pedagogies in higher education(Bransford, Brown, and Cocking, 2000; McKenna, Yalvac, and Light, 2009). Transformingengineering education context from a teacher-centered orientation to a learner-centeredorientation is a common interest in engineering education research. Group work, formativeassessment, contextualized instruction, use of peer review and self-reflective tools, and out-ofclass collaborations are some learning-centered instructional strategies (Bransford, Brown, andCocking, 2000; Yalvac, Smith, Hirsch, and Troy, 2007; Yalvac, Smith, Hirsch, & Birol, 2006
petroleumindustry and energy sector at large. It continues to evolve through collaboration betweenacademia, the government and energy industry. This is also the context within which ourstudents are exposed to on a regular basis.All members of the pioneer women cohort enrolled in a foundation year, housed in a standalonefacility (known as Arzanah), where segregated course sections were opened parallel to those forthe men. These pioneers were held to the same academic standards and professional expectationshowever under a different learning environment. Page 23.1374.5One clear indication of the quality of the curricula in place and its compatibility with
being pursued by the WFEO Committee on CapacityBuilding: • Engineering for the Americas – capacity building throughout Latin America and the Caribbean, utilizing both a ‘bottoms-up’ approach involving initiatives for Page 11.1366.4 engineering educators and a ‘top-down’ approach with policy level decisions at the Ministerial level of government. The Ministers of Science and Technology of the Organization of American States have endorsed this program in their November 2004 “Lima Declaration”, and a major symposium of government, academic, industry and NGO leaders was held from 30 November through 2 December
flow drag andlift. Examples of laboratory exercises include: measuring the major and minor losses in fittingsand valves, measuring parallel flow, use of online software tools to investigate series pipelinesystems and pump’s system resistance curve, measurements of fluid flow, and calculatingpump’s characteristics curves. A proficient grounding in these concepts is critical for solving awide range of engineering mechanics problems, and therefore it is essential for success in theengineering profession.Project Description o Information LiteracyOne of the industries that hires our graduates is the HVAC industry, and in order to betterprepare our graduates for the workforce, the authors collaborated to develop, and to add, a newPBL experience in
determining the frequency of communication types, it was foundthat students learned more about these forms of communication during their internship than theydid from their college curriculum. While this result highlighted a key benefit of completing anindustrial internship, it also indicated a gap between the communication skills taught in theclassroom and those required of a career in industry.To begin to address this gap, a workshop was developed to teach students key communicationskills that are required for success in industry. All students completing an internship during theSpring 2020 semester were invited to participate, but attendance was voluntary. Skillshighlighted through the workshop include: audience analysis (how to correctly
: 1. Making contact 2. Fostering the relationship 3. Maintaining the relationship2.1 Making ContactThere are several variations of international partnerships—University-backed and initiated,faculty-initiated, and industry-initiated. Each of these has their own advantages anddisadvantages, and some require more energy to build and maintain. Regardless of the type ofpartnership, contact must be made between institutions, but first, an institution with acompatible vision and goals is necessary.2.1.1 Finding the right partnerThe most important factor when seeking international partnerships is finding the right partner.All participants must be fully aware of their current and desired identity as an institution.Participants must have clear
Mechanical Engineers(ME 335) at a moderate sized research university in the Midwest U.S. ME students take this coursein their sophomore year. In spring 2017, students in this course have been given a couple ofintroductory lectures on modeling and simulation techniques using ADAMS software. Thissoftware is used in many industries for multi-body dynamics, crash and safety and othersimulations and is freely available for students. ADAMS based semester long projects weredesigned to accommodate ME 335 course contents and that outside of the students’ major(s) toinvolve real product operation cycles and to promote undergraduate research in engineering (URE)and self-directed learning readiness (SDLR). A dynamic rubric is also designed to empowerlearners to
-solving, and the changingrole of art institutions. Osborn's CPS model describes divergent thinking as anThis research will help clarify whether AI is merely a tool, an essential phase, where multiple ideas are explored beforeactive collaborator, or a disruptive force in the creative industries. converging into actionable solutions.Keywords—Artificial Intelligence; Creativity; Divergent To create original and meaningful artwork, an artist mustThinking; Design Thinking; Artistic Innovation; Museums channel passion, adventurousness, and boldness rather than
ASEE 2014 Zone I Conference, April 3-5, 2014, University of Bridgeport, Bridgpeort, CT, USA. Application of the Problem Based Learning Method in the Discipline ‘Statistics for Engineering’ Fernanda Gobbi de Boer (Author) Carla ten Caten (Co-author) M.Sc. Student of the Graduate Program in Industrial Vice Dean of the School of Engineering Engineering Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre, Brazil Porto Alegre, Brazil
on to the market faculty outsideGraduates of the program intraprenuership of classwere asked to complete a Figure 2. Graduates rating the importance of program components.survey that asks them torate which aspects of the program were most beneficial to them, provide open-ended responsesto how the program benefitted them, and suggested areas to be improved or enhanced. To date,15 students have responded to the survey. Graduates were asked to rank five aspects of theprogram. As shown in Figure 2 [10], having an industry and faculty member were noted as themost important aspect of the program. Collaborative work with classmates and
. 82, no. 2, pp. 187–216, 2011.[4] J. M. Blaney, J. Kang, A. M. Wofford, and D. F. Feldon, Mentoring relationships between doctoral students and postdocs in the lab sciences, Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, vol. 11, no. 3. 2020.[5] H. fen Lee and M. Miozzo, “How does working on university–industry collaborative projects affect science and engineering doctorates’ careers? Evidence from a UK research- based university,” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 293–317, 2015.[6] Yang, Jiale and Shen, Wenqin, “Master’s Education in STEM Fields in China: Does Gender Matter?,” High. Educ. Policy, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–22, Jul. 2020.[7] J. Posselt, “Normalizing Struggle: Dimensions of Faculty Support for Doctoral