Page 1.519.7 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings8. J. F. Marchman, II and W.H. Mason, “Freshman/Senior Design Education,” AIAA Paper 94-0857, Jan. 1994.9. Mark Gordon, Dan Schrage, Joel Greenstein, Jack Hebrank, Doug Hirt, Bill Mason, Tom Miller, and Jim Nau,“Early Design: Lessons and Strategies from SUCCEED”, Session 3225, 1996 ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Washington, DC, June 23-26, 1996. Html version: http://succeed.ee.vt.edu/edm/begin.html10. B. Grossman, Director, MAD Center, see http://www.aoe.vt.edu/mad/mads.html11. Michael P. Deisenroth and William H. Mason, “Curriculum Development in Aerospace Manufacturing”Session 0402, 1996 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Washington, DC, June
is significantlydifferent between South Asia and Australia. These differences seem to explain largeproductivity differences. Low productivity in South Asia results in very high end user costsfor essential services such as electricity supplies and drinking water. Engineering education,however, is remarkably similar in content with minor differences in course delivery, andgraduates emerge with little understanding of engineering practice. While industry employersin industrialized countries complain that engineering graduates lack practical skills, this gapbetween education and practice is even more extreme in South Asia. Interviews and fieldstudies in manufacturing plants have identified several dimensions of difference in practice.These
contentsof the educational sessions, outside readings, and recommended homework and projectassignments are described in this presentation. Also discussed is the use of pre- and post-testing, and the use of an skilled teaching-effectiveness-and-innovation observer, to evaluate theeffectiveness of, and make enhancements to, the CM instructional sessions and materials.I. IntroductionConfiguration management is a significant concern for any manufacturer. As a typical productprogresses from prototype design to initial unit manufacture and then through the later stages inits life cycle, the number of changes made to that product in terms of refinements to componentparts, part suppliers used, assembly methods employed, testing protocols applied
, NIDRR, VA, DOD, DOE, and industries including Ford and GM. Currently, Dr. Kim is the site director for the NSF Industry and University Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC) for e-Design. Dr. Kim is an editorial board member of Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science. Dr. Kim received top cited article award (2005-2010) from Journal CAD and 2003 IIE Transactions Best Paper Award. Dr. Kim was a visiting professor at Kyung Hee University, South Korea from September 2013 to June 2014. Dr. Kim’s education includes a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from University of Pittsburgh.Carolyn E Psenka PhD, Wayne State University Carolyn Psenka, PhD is a cultural anthropologist with research interests focused on the study
populations are covered by the 2+2 onlineprogram.3. curriculum and delivery approachThe 2+2 online degree plan is displayed in Table 1. For community college transfers, “WorkDesign” and “Engineering Materials and Processes” are moved to the 3rd year and history andgovernment courses are moved to the first and second years as compared to our recommendeddegree plan for on campus students. Several community colleges have Calculus III,Thermodynamics I, or Dynamics as part of their Associates of Science in Engineeringcurriculum. The department accepts both courses as technical electives with a limit of 2 lowerdivision technical elective courses. The department does not accept a lower division 1st year levelcomputer aided design course and only accepts one
has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Dr. Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan Lisa Lattuca, Professor of Higher Education and member of the Core Faculty in the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. She studies curriculum, teaching, and learning in college and university settings, particularly how facDr. Joi-lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan Joi Mondisa is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering and an Engineering Education Faculty Member at the University of Michiganˆa C”Ann Arbor. Dr. Mondisa holds a PhD in Engineering Education, an MS in Industrial
materials and test it as a part ofa design challenge competition.Entrepreneurial MindsetThe Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN) framework encourages developing anentrepreneurial mindset (EM) via the 3Cs: curiosity, connections, and creating value [7]. KEENstudent learning outcomes for curiosity are to (i) demonstrate constant curiosity about ourchanging world and (ii) explore a contrarian view of accepted solutions [8]. The integration ofbiomimicry in the design process encourages development of the concept of Curiosity. Thepractice of using nature to inspire new design solutions inherently challenges our existing ideasof accepted solutions.First year engineering courses offer tremendous opportunity to introduce both
formal assessment plan will be developed by the authors to develop itseffectiveness.1. Aglan HA, Ali SF. Hands‐On Experiences: An Integral Part of Engineering Curriculum Reform. Journal of Engineering Education. 1996;85(4):327-330.2. Sheppard SD. Mechanical dissection: An experience in how things work. Proceedings of the Engineering Education: Curriculum Innovation & Integration. 1992:6-10.3. Smith KA, Sheppard SD, Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom‐based practices. Journal of engineering education. 2005;94(1):87-101.4. Pomalaza-Raez C, Groff BH. Retention 101: Where robots go... students follow. Journal of Engineering Education. 2003;92(1):85.5. Singh KV, Khan F. Embedding
, Manufacturing and Marketingramp-up, is the responsibility of the industry sponsor. It is this element that is missingfrom our approach when we do individual student and faculty entrepreneurial projects.In order to fill this missing aspect our program, we hope to establish a global network ofentrepreneurial alumni. The vision, goals, program components and assessmentmeasures of the proposed LEN are shown in Figure 2.Under curriculum development the proposed initiative will apply our award-winningundergraduate model to graduate entrepreneurial education by developing a technicalentrepreneurship curriculum involving MBA students, research faculty and graduatestudents from across campus and will require the redesign of Phase 1 and new supportstructure for
University of California, Berkeley. Her research interests are sustainable design and manufacturing, and engineering education and K-12 outreach. Page 23.1196.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 The Engineering Design Process as a Problem Solving and Learning Tool in K-12 ClassroomsAbstractIt can be difficult for teachers to develop engineering curriculum for the classroom due to timeconstraints, limited access to resources, and lack of knowledge about the benefits and potentialsuccess in the classroom. Another challenge to incorporate
areas? While the face of Americanmanufacturing continues to evolve, opportunities for IET and IE employment in theservice industries are on the upswing. Still, few newly-minted graduates seekemployment in the service industries. So, if the opportunities for service industryemployment are increasing, why aren’t more IETs and IEs seeking employment there?One reason may be that undergraduates may not have thought about seeking serviceindustry jobs. There may be a lack of awareness of how to apply their tools andtechniques outside of manufacturing. They may not be able to picture what a typicalworkday might be like. A review of textbooks, teaching materials, and courses shows alack of examples provided during their education. This lack of exposure
in the development of a novel and flexiblecurriculum that we believe will address the needs of engineering graduates in the modern, globalworkplace. Page 10.429.1 In this paper, we provide some background, and then describe several of the processes used todevelop the program and its curriculum. In particular, we present the planning process leading to Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationthe program creation, the development of program objectives and outcomes, the development ofbrand values
-1853, 2008.[3] S. R. Brunhaver, R. F. Korte, S. R. Barley and S. D. Sheppard, "Bridging the gaps between engineering education and practice," in US engineering in a global economy, University of Chicago Press, 2017.[4] M. Iansiti, J. West, David and i. Horii, "Technology integration: Turning great research into great products," in Magazine, Harvard Business School, 1997.[5] R. C. Yam, W. Lo, E. P. Tang and A. K. Lau, "Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries," Research policy, vol. 40, pp. 391-402, 2011.[6] J. J. Vauterin, K.-E. Michelsen and L. Linnanen, "Attracting and retaining student talent from around the world: the
men can forego formal education, and engineering design, why should I waste my time? What value is there in a process that is so stifling [7]?” -Kahn, Week 1The advisor then brought to bear an anecdotal account of modern manufacturing practices and thecomment that: “The design process is not THE answer, it is a framework for getting closer to what is right on the first attempt, then allowing for iteration afterwards [4].” The author’s perception of his future self at the beginning of the study was delineated byan inflated self-concept , evidenced in the excerpts of auto-ethnographic notes [6], [7]. The lack ofmotivation and competence
sustainability. Hence this requires an approach to education that is learner-centered, participative, experiential, case/problem-focused, and team-based. As long asthese criteria are met, the goal of this program to educate professionals with the capacityto transform theory into practice in collaborative and empowering ways can be achieved.This modular structure produces a flexible curriculum design where adding or dropping a Page 15.404.5particular course can be done at any time in response to the changing needs in the 4marketplace. Also, the list of application courses can be constantly modified based on theneed of
specializations in educational curricula. There are two primary reasons why engineering management should be included as part of asystems engineering curriculum. The first is that, as noted above, the design and engineering ofsystems is itself a systems process and is therefore embodied as a system. As INCOSE’sstatement was quoted above, it is a blending “of appropriate technologies and managementprinciples in a synergistic manner”. The second reason, perhaps less compelling but none the lessas valid, is that some systems, especially those complex systems of systems, tend to requirehuman involvement and decision making and in some cases management – not necessarily themanagement of just an engineering process, but the management of technology: its
at Zane State College in Zanesville, Ohio, where he developed and taught courses that included CAD, solid modeling, statics, strength of materials, machine design, and statistical process control. He is currently active in curriculum development and education research focused on design.Dr. Clifford A Whitfield, Ohio State University Clifford Whitfield currently functions as an Assistant Professor of Practice for the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department and Engineering Education Innovation Center at Ohio State University, and se- nior engineer for Whitfield Aerospace LLC. He received his doctorate in aeronautical and astronautical engineering, and teaches aerospace engineering courses, and teaches and
Department of Industrial and Engineering Technology of Murray State University. His teaching and research interests are in the field of design and manufacturing. Page 14.1020.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Remote Laboratory CollaborationAbstractThis current NSF DUE Project titled --The development of a Remotely Accessible RapidPrototyping Laboratory-- is promoting an awareness of rapid prototyping technology through thedevelopment of a remotely accessible rapid prototyping laboratory. This project is: (a)introducing cutting-edge rapid prototyping technology to four-year engineering
. Eames) Because students were not able to access the makerspace and were collaborating virtuallywith their “garage in a box” more collaboration and time was spent in the prototyping process.This focus on purposefully designed inclusive pedagogy was a lesson learned and a moment ofreflection for makerspace staff and faculty to re-evaluate their curriculum, pedagogy andinstructional practices.Taking these lessons beyond the shift The COVID-19 pivot is an abrupt and disruptive event in engineering education. Ourhope is that this lessons learned paper contributes to and furthers discussion of how to supportfaculty development in an engineering makerspace. We recognize that these lessons learned arespecific to a single university
developed simulation based train- ing programs for shipbuilding and repair industry under a grant from the National Shipbuilding Research Program (NSRP). He is well known internationally and has been invited to deliver keynote addresses and invited papers at more than 12 national and international conferences on Lean/Agile manufacturing. Dr. Verma has received the Regional Alumni Award for Excellence for contribution to Lean Manufacturing research, the International Education Award at ODU and Ben Sparks Medal by ASME. He is active in ASME, ASEE, SME, IIE and SNAME. Dr. Verma continues to serve the Hampton Roads community in various leadership positions
capstone design sequence has providedour students with a great design experience opportunity. This paper describes the content of thecapstone design sequence, provides short descriptions of projects proposed by industrialcompanies, and includes examples of completed design projects.II. General Description of Capstone Design SequenceThe content of capstone design course sequence are briefly describe bellowME 4811-Design Project Planning: This is a one credit hour course, which meets 3 hours perweek. It offers students an opportunity to select a meaningful, major engineering design topicthat its completion requires utilization and integration of the knowledge acquired in theengineering core curriculum. It provides professional development in: i
ASEE 2003 Nashville TN Marvin C. Abrams, R. Frank Smith, and Hofu Wu California State Polytechnic University, Pomona CA SOFTWARE-HARDWARE LABORATORY INTEGRATION AND DISSEMINATIONAbstractA course has been developed under an NSF grant to demonstrate a pedagogicalapproach for integrating software solutions and physical measurements into theexperimental curriculum, and to allow interactive access of shared resourcesbetween educational institutions.The rapidly evolving nature of technology makes it impossible for most schools tokeep current with
developed the Ekranoplanvehicle project during a Technology Education course. An Ekranoplan or Wing-In-GroundEffect vehicle flies very close to a water surface. The vehicle uses design elements of bothairplanes and marine craft. Ground-effect flight enables a vehicle to carry either a larger payloador operate with greater fuel efficiency than a conventional airplane. The candidates testedseveral vehicle configurations, power sources and construction techniques. Vehicle constructionguidelines and curriculum outlines were developed to disseminate to other technology educators.The project has been used to teach the engineering design process to freshman students inWestern Washington University’s Engineering Technology Design Graphics
a digital direction challenge ourselves, push further, think of newwhere electronic books are becoming more pervasive in enhancements and plan for future potential books.both the educational and professional realms. I wanted totake this unique opportunity to develop my technology skills V. W HY IB OOK A UTHOR FOR THIS PROJECTespecially since I usually consider my computer savvy to beless than I would like. This aspect of the project is proves to In order to display
project was also beneficial. I was in a group where I didn’t know anyone so I had tobecome acquainted with them. We were able to combine our separate parts together and makethe project work. This helped for me to see how this could work in a career. I thought the classwas interesting and valuable.” Gregory Cool. Page 8.728.6 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationSummary This project course is successful in bringing new technology into the curriculum. Sincethe course was introduced, the PC
challenging problems in manufacturing education are related to improving thestudent–instructional technologies interface to incorporate the required learning tools, andimproving teaching and learning effectiveness in online course and training. The majorobjectives of our project are to design and use CNC machine control simulator systems toenhance the cognitive learning of online laboratories and design and use of simulator interfacesfor metrology and quality control systems to enhance the cognitive learning of online labs. Webriefly discuss the development of virtual 3-D laboratory activities (learning modules andtutorials) that provide students with a realistic interaction with CNC machine in the area ofprototyping, metrology, quality control and
Development of Palm Fruit Harvester X X X Design and Manufacture of a Rotorcraft* X X X *Indicated projects with substantial mechatronics design elementsBS-MS Degree ProgramIt is well known that industry needs people who not only have a sound education in mathematics,basic sciences, and engineering science, but who also have knowledge and experience in thesolution of real world, product-driven problems15, 16. However, these increasing demands on theundergraduate engineering curriculum could not be satisfied within the parameters of atraditional four year undergraduate curriculum. The five-year BS-MS program is designed tosatisfy the industry needs by
Material: o “The topics covered during class lecture were new to most of the class… This was the first class where the manufacturing process was discussed. This was especially beneficial.” o “My knowledge about hydraulic systems has greatly increased. I barely hand any previous understanding on the workings of hydraulics and pneumatics.”Discussion and ConclusionsThe design of a walking robot to compete in the SAE Walking Machine Challenge has proven tobe a very appropriate project vis-à-vis the course objectives and outcomes of MER-144 (Designof Mechanical Systems). This project-oriented course provides the main capstone designexperience for the mechanics area of the mechanical engineering curriculum at Union
Paper ID #9591A New Look at Involving Undergraduate Students, Real Life Applications,and Active Learning Activities in the Industrial Engineering UndergraduateCourse Delivery ProcessDr. Paul C. Lynch, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Paul C. Lynch received his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. degrees in Industrial Engineering from the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Lynch is a member of AFS, SME, IIE, and ASEE. Dr. Lynch’s primary research interests are in metal casting, manufacturing, and engineering education. Dr. Lynch has been recognized by Alpha Pi Mu, IIE, and the Pennsylvania State University for his scholarship
company. In the third sabbatical (one semesteronly), I wanted to develop a new safety engineering course for civil and construction engineers. Ihad met the president of a construction industry member group who served on our industrialadvisory board. Once I found out this group had a members’ Safety Committee and anOSHA/MSHA library on-site, I knew this would be an ideal location to carry out my objectives.Sabbatical #1: American Cast Iron Pipe Company (ACIPCO), AY 1990-91. This company,located in Birmingham, Alabama, was founded in 1905 by industrialist John J. Eagan, who leftthe company as a perpetual trust through profit-sharing for its employees. Known throughout theworld as a leading centrifugal casting manufacturer of ductile iron pipe, the