while participating in this opportunity. This hurdle can be exacerbated if requiredcourses are only offered during one semester per year. In other words, the system of REEFE andthe system of the graduate curriculum were in conflict. We do not see a way to reduce thisconflict.GoalsOur review of the project revealed that both graduate students and graduate faculty expressedconcerns that participation in REEFE would pose a threat to a student’s achievement of theirgoals. In the REEFE context, student goals often referred to the student’s progress towardcompletion of their degree and whether participation in the experience would slow down or delaydegree completion with the possibility that REEFE would be a “distraction” from dissertationwork (Gaff
AC 2010-59: UNDERSTANDING COOPERATIVE EDUCATION ANDINTERNSHIPS: THE INFLUENCE ON ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ PROBLEMSOLVING SKILLSAlexander Yin, Pennsylvania State University Alexander C. Yin recently completed his PhD. in Higher Education and the Master's in Applied Statistics at Penn State with a minor in Educational Psychology. Prior to his graduate studies at Penn State, Alex earned his B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology Page 15.1296.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Understanding Cooperative Education and Internships: The
with the factualbackground data of this experience, followed by some of the several issues that an early adoptermuch consider, some of the important lessons I learned, some of the emotions that I and mystudents experienced, and finally a couple of concluding comments. II. Factual BackgroundAll this experience is with EE201, Electric Circuits, a course that is required for students in theelectrical engineering and in the computer engineering curriculums at Iowa State University(ISU). This course has the very traditional content of a first course in electric circuits. Thetextbook is Electric Circuits, Fifth Edition, by James W. Nilsson and Susan A. Riedel, AddisonWesley, 1996. (I am told that this textbook
, aremodeling a freshman engineering course on a project called “Design Your Process of Becominga World-Class Engineering Student” to provide students a curriculum that would furtherencourage their interest in engineering while giving them the tools to help them succeed in theirengineering academic and professional careers [12]. However, the curriculum does notspecifically focus on information literacy or question formulation. Yet, as in our experience withFED101, other engineering educators have found that students are still lacking the logical andcritical thinking skills that are required to develop a compelling inquiry of a topic, and havedifficulty performing effective information searches [14, 16]. Teaching students how toformulate research
, primarily in the mechanics area. His pedagogical research areas include standards-based assessment and curriculum design, including the incorporation of entrepreneurial thinking into the engineering curriculum and especially as pertains to First-Year Engineering.Dr. Todd France, Ohio Northern University Todd France is the director of Ohio Northern University’s Engineering Education program, which strives to prepare engineering educators for grades 7-12. Dr. France also helps coordinate the first-year engi- neering experience at ONU. He earned his PhD from the University of Colorado Boulder in Architectural Engineering, and conducted research in K-12 engineering education and project-based learning
of such devices. Personnel requirements not only include material scientists and engineers but a host of competent support people who together will implement the technology roadmap for this industry. The task at hand is to develop a workforce that must have a new skill set which has not previously been the focus of any existing organized technical curriculum. This paper will address one approach to presenting the important process steps in microdevice fabrication to a non-materials major audience. Particular attention will be spent on the problems and challenges associated with introducing what the technical demands and expectations of the industry will be, presenting the material
Paper ID #37078Feedback Matters: Self-and-Peer Assessment Made Betterwith Instructional InterventionsWanju Huang (Clinical Assistant Professor) Dr. Wanju Huang is a Clinical Assistant Professor of Learning Design and Technology at Purdue University. Prior to joining the LDT program, she was an instructional design manager at Teaching and Learning Technologies, Purdue Online, where she led a team of instructional designers and video producers for course design and development. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction (with a concentration in Technology) from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Research Scientist at Aggie STEM, Department of Teaching, Learning, & Culture and Senior Lecturer in Department of Mathematics at Texas A&M University, where she has taught 10 different courses in mathematics and mathematics education. She has served on several committees in the mathematics department, including course development for teacher education in mathematics. Her research agenda includes engineering calculus success, including high school preparation for college. Previously, she taught 8 additional courses at the college level and 13 different high school courses in mathematics and science. She has worked with teacher professional development for over 20 years, and served as mathematics curriculum
retention can be increased by addressing these factors [4].Engineering education research has helped to advance our understanding of engineering studentlearning and teaching [5]. Several studies have shown that active learning methodologies engagestudents in their learning and are more effective than traditional lecturing [6]. Moreover,strategies such as project-based learning (PBL) can help not only with student academiclearning; but they can also develop relevant soft skills among college students; PBL has shownto facilitate learning, to encourage student collaboration, and to help students apply new contentto solve problems [7], [8]. Cabrera et al. [9] explain that teaching styles are more important inpredicting student success than other
Paper ID #38545A Novel Approach for Teaching System Architecture at the UndergraduateEngineering LevelDr. Eric B. Dano, George Washington University Dr. Eric Dano received a B.S. in Physics from the U.S. Naval Academy, and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engi- neering from the University of Michigan, where his research focused on radar design and the Experimen- tal Study of the Microwave Radar Backscatter. Upon graduation, Eric worked 25 years at Sanders/BAE Systems serving as a technical director and system architect on multiple diverse defense systems. He is currently an Associate Professor of Practice in George Washington
appropriate experimentation,analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions.”HardwareAll five Machina experiments are run by an Arduino-based board developed to facilitate avariety of projects and experiments across the engineering curriculum known as the Factorem(Latin for maker). This board combines an Arduino Uno clone (the Adafruit Metro Mini 328)with other hardware needed for these and other experiments including a 16 bit analog to digitalconverter, a motor driver, a voltage divider, and a low-pass filter with adjustable cutofffrequency. Key components are shown in Table 1. While the exact cost of these experimentsvaries with the component costs, they are inexpensive. The prototypes presented here werefabricated for
are outcomes of the mixed-methods analysis of student datawith discussion of results.Background “Engineering design is a process of devising a system, component, or process to meet desiredneeds and specifications within constraints” [1]. To help meet these goals, developingopportunities for students to experience engineering design prior to their capstone projects hasbeen identified as a priority [2], [3]. The development of communication and teamwork skills inengineering undergraduates is also important [4], [5], and previous researchers have noted thatengineering design and communication share essential features, allowing their co-incorporationinto curriculum to provide a valuable learning experience.The ENG 003 engineering design and
Boise State University. She oversees projects in freshman programs, math support, mentoring, outreach, and women’s programs. She earned a B.S.E. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Duke University and a master’s degree in journalism from the University of California at Berkeley.Cheryl Schrader, Boise State University Cheryl B. Schrader is Dean of the College of Engineering and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Boise State University. Dean Schrader has an extensive record of publications and sponsored research in the systems, control and engineering education fields. She received the 2005 Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Engineering and Mathematics
socialization includes an implicit understanding of what constitutes'evidence' to base engineering decisions [5-6]. The joke quoted in Donna Riley's Engineeringand Social Justice synthesis lectures satirizes the engineer's method of 'brute force' problem-solving that ultimately takes much longer than the sociologist's method of valuing localknowledge. As an added value, the rapport between the sociologist and the sexton may provehelpful in future stages of the project that could require local engagement and community buy-in.Students learn what counts as engineering knowledge in the engineering curriculum and can bequick to employ such 'brute force' methods of problem-solving. However, what perceptions ofproblem-solving are these students coming into
, 2005. [5] James Pembridge and Marie Paretti. The current state of capstone design pedagogy. In 2010 Annual Confer- ence & Exposition, pages 15–1217, 2010. [6] Susan M Lord and John C Chen. Curriculum design in the middle years. Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, pages 181–200, 2014. [7] Sandra Ingram and Anne Parker. Gender and modes of collaboration in an engineering classroom: A profile of two women on student teams. Journal of business and technical communication, 16(1):33–68, 2002. [8] Trevion Shamir Henderson. Understanding access to learning opportunities in collaborative projects: Gendered social hierarchies in student teams. 2023. [9] Joanna Wolfe and Elizabeth Powell. Biases in interpersonal
BS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez, a Masters in Manufacturing Engineering from the Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico and a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from the University of Tennessee Knoxville. Before becoming a professor, he worked for several years in the Eolic and Aerospace industry. Nelson’s research interest revolved around Sustainable Development looked through the lens of the triple bottom line and a system thinking approach. Nelson believes that education is the key to achieve a sustainable world.Dr. B. David Tyler, Western Carolina University David is an associate professor in the College of Business at Western Carolina University. His
Giants football stadium, the Statue of Liberty restoration project, 3Dmedical imaging, and the Mattel gloveball designed for use with the Nintendo Super Gloveball game.Following this brief introduction, the students are divided into 6-8 groups with each group assigned anIPFW engineering student escort. These student escorts are members of SWE or one of the otherengineering technical societies, such as the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), theInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration,and Air Conditioning (ASHRAE), the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) or the Society ofAutomotive Engineers (SAE). In addition to the obvious benefit of efficiently navigating the
assessment within an engineering academic department [C]//Proceedings of the 38th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference. IEEE, 2008.[10] LOUIDOR M G. Quality assurance in engineering education: A systems perspective [D].A thesis presented for the master of science degree, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 2010:V.[11] Program self-study report for electrical and computer engineering [R].Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester, 2008:25-29.[12] LI J. Student-centered, project-driven and result-oriented in WPI [J]. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2013(3):115-119.[13] WARD M. Implementing EC 2000: perspectives from both sides of the assessment trench[C]//Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for
AMPS/CBSI fellow at NYU through the NSF G-K12 program. Henry is primarily interested in using robotics to help people with disabilities and promoting STEM education in underrepresented demographics.Ms. Allison Graham Brown, New York University Allison Graham Brown, MAEd, is the Director of Professional Development for The ASD Nest Support Project at New York University. After receiving her B.A. in Psychology at The Ohio State University she received a M.A. and dual certification in Childhood and Special Education from NYU. Ms. Brown has been an adjunct professor at Hunter College and New York University, teaching courses on instructional methods for students with disabilities, and behavior theory and interventions
Paper ID #34041Resilience and Innovation in Response to COVID-19: Learnings fromNortheast Academic MakerspacesProf. Victoria Bill, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering Victoria Bill is the Director of the MakerSpace Lab and an Adjunct Professor in the First-Year Engineering Program at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. She studied electrical engineering and received her B.S. from the Ohio State University and her M.S. from the University of Texas at Austin. Her previous work included co-directing and teaching the Summer STEM Program for high school students at the Cooper Union.Ms. Anne-Laure Fayard, New York
Paper ID #10642New Inexpensive 3D Printers Open Doors to Novel Experiential LearningPractices in Engineering EducationProf. Nebojsa I Jaksic, Colorado State University-Pueblo Nebojsa I. Jaksic received the Dipl. Ing. degree in electrical engineering from Belgrade University in 1984, the M.S. in electrical engineering, the M.S. in industrial engineering, and the Ph.D. in industrial engineering from the Ohio State University in 1988, 1992, and 2000, respectively. From 1992 to 2000 he taught at DeVry University in Columbus, OH. In 2000, he joined Colorado State University-Pueblo, where he is currently a Professor and the BSE
engineering tasks,” In Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, D. Olanoff, K. Johnson, S. Spitzer, Eds. Philadelphia: PME-NA, 2021. pp. 807- 811.[20] A. Simpson, Q. Zhong, and A. Maltese, “Spontaneous mathematical moments between caregiver and child during an engineering design project,” Early Childhood Education Journal, Advanced online publication, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10643-021-01296-w[21] M. H. Goodwin, “Occasioned knowledge exploration in family interaction,” Discourse & Society, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 93-110, 2007, doi: 10.1177/0957926507069459.[22] M. A. Callanan et al., “Exploration, explanation, and parent–child
engineering identity in graduate school and underrepresented group. Nathan holds master’s and bachelor’s degrees in electrical engineering from Illinois Tech. He also worked as an engineer at LG electronics mobile communication company.Mr. Kevin A. Nguyen, University of Texas, Austin Kevin A. Nguyen is a Ph.D candidate in the STEM Education program at University of Texas at Austin. He has worked on NSF grant projects related to engineering students’ resistance to active learning and how funding impacts STEM graduate students. His own dissertation work examines learning, marginalization, and environmental citizen scientists. He has a B.S. and M.Eng in Environmental Engineering both from Texas Tech University.Dr. Maura
regular contributor to the Improve with Metacognition blog. Dr. Cunningham teaches a range of courses across undergraduate levels with spe- cialization in dynamic systems, measurement, and control. In his teaching he seeks to apply what he has learned from his research, spurring student reflection and metacognitive growth, so that they may become more skillful learners. Skillful learners are capable, independent, and adaptable thinkers who are able to succeed wherever their career paths lead. Dr. Cunningham has industry experience through 7 co-op expe- riences as an undergraduate student, 2 sponsored projects as a graduate student, and as a consultant after joining the faculty at Rose-Hulman. He holds B.S., M.S., and
?.” Figure 5. PLC Ladder Logic Diagram for Polishing OperationCycle 2During the second week, in the classroom, pneumatic and hydraulic circuits are introduced. Theoperating principles of valves are described using the audio/visual equipment. The advantagesand disadvantages of each mode of actuation (pneumatic, hydraulic, and electrical) are justifiedand tabulated as a result of class discussion. Then, as a part of second quadrant activities, twomore complex problems are solved on the board by the instructor (two flashing lights andstarting three motors with time intervals). Then, another four problems are in turn projected onthe board. Students are asked to form pairs or groups of three and solve these problems. Afterchecking their work, the
different projects since 2015. She was the Summer Pre-College Program Instructor for Systems Engineering and the IEEE Millburn STEM Coding Club Instructor in 2016. She was the recipient of the Stevens Outstanding Female Graduate Student Leader Award (2015) and the Stevens Distinguished Teaching Assistant Award (2014). She was the president of the INCOSE Student Division at Stevens (2013-2014). Hoong Yan earned her BS and MS in electrical engineering from the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). At UTEP, she worked in the Research Institute for Manufacturing and Engineering Systems and was the team leader for two NASA and Texas Space Grant Consortium design challenges. She was also the president of the Society of Women
variety of active learning pedagogies, like problem and project based learning, have beenincreasingly adopted to foster those interconnections and to address higher level learning outcomesnecessary for success in the profession [12], [18]. Problem and project based learning arefrequently referenced as pedagogical approaches with positive impacts on students’ cognitivedevelopment, affective dispositions, and professional competences [13], [19]. For example,Galand et al. found positive impacts of a PBL curriculum on students’ performance on theoreticalknowledge, computational skills, and problem solving [20]. Their findings support the use of PBLin helping students to develop critical and complementary skills in engineering – i.e. acquisitionof
students’ difficulties while learning different databasemodels, there are multiple reports of instructors including other database models into theirdatabase courses 2,3,4,5 . Mohan reported experiences of a database education curriculum thatincorporated NoSQL 4 . In Mohan’s work, students were exposed to several NoSQL paradigmsand had a set of projects, lab and research assignments to complete using the knowledge theygained during the course. However, their course did not provide labs for exploring the trade-offsbetween different database models. Other NoSQL databases have also been incorporated intouniversity curricula. For example, Fowler et al. reported their experience in two database courseswith teaching CouchDB, a NoSQL data management
Paper ID #42032Work-in-Progress: The Unique Impact of an Interdisciplinary ExperientialLearning Program on Undergraduate STEM Students’ Career ReadinessDr. Rea Lavi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Rea Lavi received his Ph.D. degree from the Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. He is Lecturer and a Curriculum Designer with the NEET program, School of Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, where he teaches thinking skills to undergraduate students. His research interests in STEM education involve the fostering and
design methodologies, such as ideation andmodeling techniques, (4) ability to adapt and work professionally, (5) project management andbusiness skills, (6) communication skills, and (7) teamwork skills. Others have classified designcompetencies based on critical stages of design processes: information gathering, problemdefinition, idea generation, evaluation and decision making, implementation, communication,teamwork, and process improvement (Davis et al., 1997). 2 While much effort has gone into studying and improving undergraduate engineeringdesign education, especially within the mechanical engineering discipline, much less work hasbeen