and practitioners. In order to improve its globalcompetitiveness, the United States must grow its science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM) workforce. Although the engineering sector has grown in past years, in2012, engineers comprised only 1.2% of the U. S. workforce.18 The U. S. Department of Laborforecasts growth in workforce needs among all of the major engineering disciplines (chemical,civil, electrical, industrial and mechanical); however, the projected demand for civil engineers isfar greater compared to the other disciplines (Table 1). 19 This is largely due to the need for civilengineers to address issues related to the country’s aging infrastructure and to the design anddevelopment of new infrastructure needed to
Paper ID #12583Humanizing Signals and Systems: A Reflective AccountProf. James L. Huff, Harding University James Huff is an assistant professor of engineering at Harding University, where he primarily teaches multidisciplinary engineering design and electrical engineering. His research interests are aligned with how engineering students develop in their career identity while also developing as whole persons. James received his Ph.D. in engineering education and his his M.S. in electrical and computer engineering, both from Purdue University. He received his bachelor’s in computer engineering at Harding University
servicesAbstractThe Master of Science in Engineering Technology (MSET) program was developed at DrexelUniversity to provide a graduate level educational opportunity on a full- or part-time basis. Theprogram is designed to be extremely flexible; it permits the student to select a combination ofcourses relevant to individual career goals in technology or to provide the foundation for furtheradvanced study. The multidisciplinary curriculum includes core courses and electives in suchareas as rapid prototyping, programmable devices and systems, modern energy conversiontechnologies, lean manufacturing principles, project management, to name a few. The program iscurrently available entirely online and several of the courses employ web-based laboratoryexercises
also very common for theinstructor in 1016 to assign as their major group project the ASEE design competition activity.Last year, the Division of Engineering Fundamentals became the Department of EngineeringEducation. One development related to this change is the recent award of two NSF grants to thedepartment (Connor et al. 2004) to continue and expand its hands-on, activity based, curriculum.The past and future contributions of materials and tools by the SEC are essential to successfulimplementation of these grants.History of the SEC’s ContributionVirginia Tech’s Student Engineers’ Council (SEC); the student-run organization has given nearly$220,000 to the College of Engineering in the past six years. In addition, it has awarded anaverage of
. Professor Washington received his BS, MS and PhD degrees from NC State. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Integration of Entrepreneurship in a First-Year Engineering CourseAbstractThis evidence based practice describes the integration of entrepreneurship into a project-basedfirst-year engineering course to encourage student innovation, and to develop student leadershipand self-efficacy. A module featuring a series of lectures on entrepreneurship and business plandevelopment was introduced as part of the curriculum. The module was further enhanced withthe introduction of multiple company founders and industrial leaders who were invited to deliverpresentations and interact with students
TeamworkEffective instructor-to-student communication Oral and written communicationsEffective student-to-instructor communication Incorporation of leading edge technologiesEffective student-to-student communicationAnytime, anyplace learningSelf-paced scheduleSimulates an in class "feel"Class sizeFeedback clear, timely, and meaningfulAdequately prepared for online courseIncorporation of leading edge technologiesSelf reported learningChallenging learning The Genesis Project, a Texas Engineering and Technical Consortium (TETC) and NationalInstruments Initiative, brings together electrical engineering programs from throughout Texas todiscuss and implement new ways to engage students early and throughout their electricalengineering experience with
2013.Dr. Otsebele E Nare, Hampton University Otsebele Nare is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Hampton University, VA. He received his electrical engineering doctorate from Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, in 2005. His research interests include System Level Synthesis Techniques and K-16 Integrative STEM education.Lumumba Harnett, University of Kansas Lumumba Harnett is an Electrical Engineering doctoral student in the Electrical Engineering and Com- puter Science department at University of Kansas and Graduate Research Assistant at KU’s Information and Telecommunication Technology Center. He received his BS in Electrical Engineering at Hampton University in Hampton, VA. While at Hampton
contributed to the training and development of faculty in developing and evaluating various engineering curriculum and courses at UPRM, applying the outcome-based educational framework. She has also incorporated theories on social cognitive career choices and student attrition mitigation to investigate the effectiveness of institutional interventions in increasing the retention and academic success of talented engineering students from economically disadvantaged families. She’s also involved in a project that explores the relationship between the institutional policies at UPRM and faculty and graduate students’ motivation to create good relationships between advisors and advisees.Dr. Christopher Papadopoulos, University of
Paper ID #244002018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Spring Conference: Washington, District ofColumbia Apr 6Disruptive Technologies: An Educational PerspectiveDr. Wagdy H Mahmoud, University of the District of Columbia Wagdy H. Mahmoud is an Associate Professor of electrical engineering at the Electrical Engineering Department at UDC. Mahmoud is actively involved in research in the areas of reconfigurable logic, hard- ware/software co-design of a system on a chip using reconfigurable logic, application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), digital logic design, image compressions, digital signal processing, computer architec
Education at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research is focused on examining translation of engineering education research in practice, assessment and evaluation of dissemination initiatives and educational programs in engineering disciplines. He holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, M.S. in Electrical Engineering from University of Southern California and B.S. in Electronics and Communication Engineering from India.Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University In February 2021 Dr. Huang-Saad joined the Bioengineering faculty at Northeastern University and be- came the Director of Life Sciences and Engineering Programs at The Roux Institute (Portland, Maine). Dr
AC 2012-3476: DEEPENING MATH AND SCIENCE SKILLS IN MIDDLESCHOOL STUDENTS USING CIVIL ENGINEERING-BASED LEARNINGMODULESMs. Courtney A. Peckens, University of Michigan Courtney A. Peckens is a doctoral student in civil and environmental engineering at the University of Michigan. Peckens obtained a M.S. degree from the University of Michigan in civil and environmen- tal engineering in 2008 and is also currently working toward completion of a M.S. degree in electrical engineering, along with a Ph.D. in civil engineering. Prior to attending the University of Michigan, Peck- ens received her B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Hope College in Holland, Mich. While Peckens’s primary research interests include
, from first-year students in engineering projects courses tothird-, fourth-, and fifth-year students enrolled in the program’s core engineering courses (statics,circuits, materials) or senior capstone design. Classes range from engineering projects courses tocore engineering courses (statics, circuits, materials) to senior capstone design.SettingLaunched in 2014, the University of Colorado Boulder’s ABET-accredited Integrated DesignEngineering program allows undergraduate engineering students to select from among one of sixengineering areas of study (aerospace, architectural, civil, electrical, environmental, mechanical;called an emphasis) and combine that with an additional area of study outside of engineering(called a concentration). In the
central analysis method isshown in Table 1. In a playground design problem, Atman et al.16 compared performances offirst-year engineering students, advanced engineering students, and experts. Individuals wereallotted a maximum of three hours to complete the design, and it was often completed in lesstime. The researchers coded transcripts from a verbal protocol for design activities (problemdefinition, information gathering, generating ideas, modeling, feasibility, evaluation, decision,communication, and other) and then produced a chronological graphical representation of theseactivities. The representation allowed the researchers to conclude that experts continuouslytransition between activities throughout the project. This characteristic of
from University of Illinois, Urbana. Her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering from University of California at Berkeley in 1992 and 1994. Following graduate school, Amy worked for Hewlett Packard in San Jose, CA and in Colorado Springs, CO. Amy’s research interests include microelectronic packaging, particularly 3-D integration and ceramic MEMS devices.Pat Pyke, Boise State University Patricia Pyke is Director of Special Programs for the College of Engineering at Boise State University. She oversees projects in freshman curriculum development, retention, math support, mentoring, and women’s programs. She earned a B.S.E. degree in Mechanical Engineering from
learn science.11MethodsThe project we are currently involved with, made possible from funding from the NationalScience Foundation – Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) program,involves the implementation and adaptation of research-based instructional materials andongoing education research. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of these materials onpromoting student learning we utilize a number of research tools common to the field of PhysicsEducation Research (PER). It is the combination of these different methods that lead to theidentification and understanding of fragmented knowledge. These tools include responses tomultiple-choice diagnostic instruments, written responses to open-ended pretest and posttest
frequency should these educational contextsbe woven throughout an already overloaded curriculum?Community-engaged service learning has the dual goal of enriching student learning andgenerating value for communities [11] . Students that participate in community-engaged learningoften benefit from a number of additional learning opportunities, including increased criticalthinking and intercultural skills, increased communication skills, ability to engage with a varietyof stakeholders during the design process, identifying unmet user needs, integrating informationfrom many sources to gain insight and assessing and managing risk. Because of the complexitiesof students learning through projects engaged with real-world communities, faculty aresometimes
Paper ID #30325Our guiding star: engineering design. But where is it guiding us?Robyn Paul, University of Calgary Robyn Paul is a second-year PhD student at the Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary. Her work is looking at using best practices from ecofeminism to deconstruct the culture of engineering education and bring awareness to engineering’s hidden curriculum. Robyn also has a master’s degree in engineering education where she studied engineering leadership education, and she has managed the engineering accreditation process for three years at her University.Prof. Laleh Behjat P.Eng., University
student strengths.The realityBefore the first year of the project began, 1301 was added to the university’s core curriculum andmade available to all first-year engineering students. Students from civil engineering, computerscience, electrical engineering, engineering innovation and leadership, industrial engineering,metallurgical and materials engineering, and mechanical engineering enrolled in 1301 andparticipated in the program. Additionally, three sections (approximately 80 students) of 1301were offered during the fall semester. During the spring semester, one section of 1301 and onesection of 1402 (approximately 62 students combined) were offered. Enrollment in 1402 wasonly available to students whose declared major was in the piloting
attends the GUPPIEsessions in the morning and Neupulator sessions in the afternoon. The other group attends thesessions in reverse. For WIE and ESP, one group works on Guppie only, and one group works onNeupulator only. Each student receives a package containing electrical and mechanicalcomponents, instructional materials, activity worksheets, and extra papers for taking notes. Referto [9] for more details about the week-long curriculum. Figure 1. Schedule for week-long robotics campsMethodsWe collected several forms of data during each week. Students completed a pre-camp survey onMonday morning and a post-camp survey on Friday afternoon. The pre-camp survey askedabout hobbies, career interests, and prior experience with robots
, CA, 2021.[2] National Science Board, “Higher Education in Science and Engineering. Science and Engineering Indicators 2022.,” Alexandria, VA. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20223/., 2022.[3] M. W. Nielsen et al., “Opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 1740–1742, 2017.[4] Jonathan Vespa, Lauren Medina, and David M. Armstrong, “Demographic Turning Points for the United States: Population Projections for 2020 to 2060,” in Current Population Reports, Washington, DC.: United States Census Bureau, 2020, pp. 25–1144.[5] National Academies of Sciences, Barriers and Opportunities for 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees: Systemic Change to
at the Texas Tech University. The aim was to help undergraduate studentslearn more about the objectives and procedures of laboratory experiments in order to be betterprepared for performing their tasks during the physical experiment. The intention of this project was to assess the benefits of both web based training inperforming the actual experiments and in the learning of students. Furthermore, we wanted toassess the perceived effectiveness of the software as a function of the student learning style andGPA performance. Access to modules was given to several sections of Materials ScienceLaboratory Course. A pre-lab quiz was given to all students to test the students’ understanding ofobjectives, procedure and the anticipated results
program.IntroductionEngineering education aims to prepare students to meet the complex interdisciplinary challengesfacing the world today. Undergraduate engineering curriculum has evolved to include moreactive, project-based learning to provide students the opportunity to address “real-world”problems, such as the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Grand Challenges forEngineering [1]. The skillset that engineering education teaches students has become broader,expanding beyond the technical to include skills such as communication, leadership, and projectmanagement. An emphasis on mindset, or how students approach the interdisciplinary problemsthey solve, has also become increasingly important. In particular, there have been many recentefforts focused on helping
to motivatethem to use their teaching duties as opportunities for professional development. Transitionalteachers tend to be competent and even passionate about teaching, but have professionalaspirations that are unrelated to teaching. They often also have difficulty developing astrong EDS identity. Miller et al. found that EDSs who possess identities ancillary to theengineering identity [student, GTA, researcher] still have a desire to do good research. Theirwork can result in positive societal contribution, helping them to develop deeper interest andautonomy in their work, which also reinforces their EDS identity. They recommend givingthe GTAs with a transitional teaching identity different teaching roles such as lecturer,curriculum
constraints and will be 3D printed. Studentslearn basic concepts related to materials design and 3D printing, as well as simple tools thatwould be useful in space in a microgravity environment. Students are introduced to Tinkercad©software and allowed to experiment to create a 3D multifunctional design tool that could be usedin space. Tinkercad is a simplistic online 3D CAD software created for beginners with thecapability of connecting to a 3D printer. Two designs from each class are selected and printed forthe class to keep.The STEM on Wheels curriculum for high school students included lessons on mechatronics,remote sensing and satellite tracking. Mechatronics is a combination of mechanical, electrical,and computer engineering. In the mechatronics
learning is not only knowledgeacquisition or participation in a social community but also about knowledge creation as in thecase of project based learning. Similarly the new developments in electronic media are leading toenormous challenges for teachers in regards to the role digital devices can and should play in thelearning process. For some educators, the view is that technology should only be utilized as atool to help facilitate student understanding and mastery of the current curriculum. Whereas forother educators, technology is as fundamental to learning as reading and writing and thereforemust become an integral segment of the school curriculum. The paper also discusses new trendsand teaching methodologies to help improve the state of
: Student Outcomes, and General Criterion 5: Curriculum [Online]. Availablehttp://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Proposed-Revisions-to-EAC-Criteria-3-and-5.pdf[2] ABET. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs [Online]. Availablehttp://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/E001-16-17-EAC-Criteria-10-20-15.pdf[3] Lozano, Rodrigo. "Diffusion of sustainable development in universities’ curricula: anempirical example from Cardiff University." Journal of Cleaner Production 18.7 (2010): 637-644.[4] Watson, Mary Katherine, et al. "Assessing curricula contribution to sustainability moreholistically: Experiences from the integration of curricula assessment and students' perceptions atthe Georgia Institute of Technology." Journal of Cleaner
Mathematical/Computational Methods. He is the recipient of numer- ous teaching and pedagogical research awards, including the NCSU Outstanding Teacher Award, NCSU Alumni Distinguished Undergraduate Professor Award, ASEE Chemical Engineering Division Raymond W. Fahien Award, and the 2013 and 2017 ASEE Joseph J. Martin Awards for Best Conference Paper. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, conceptual and inductive learning, and integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum and professional ethics.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests
a humanities course, and the archivist fromNYU Libraries. This activity shows how liberal education can have a natural fit within theengineering curriculum. In particular, we wish to demonstrate how even a small-scale project,using available resources, will help to accomplish ABET Criterion 3: Student Outcomes.ABET’s Student Outcomes encourage engineering education to follow an active learning model,to discuss the social context and ethics of engineering solutions, and to develop skills of analysis,teamwork, and communication. Our archival interventions, though admittedly limited in scope,embody the principles ABET’s Student Outcomes. By working in groups with primary sourcematerials related to science and engineering, we encouraged
State University propose a curriculum to improve students’ skills incommunication, technical presentation, and technical writing20. Gider describes a case study of acourse created to improve the transition of graduating students into the business world. Thecourse focuses on innovation management, communication in R&D, project management andemphasizes the need for team building20. Sanchez and his team emphasize the need to improveprofessional skills in engineering by developing a framework to integrate professionalcompetencies into the existing curriculum21. Other universities also provide various frameworksto integrate professional development skills after graduation into their existing curricula22.The standards of ABET, life and
way of delivering the same material tostudents in a more streamlined fashion. Specifically, we hypothesize it will: • Demonstrably impact teaching and learning: Create an actual climate curriculum that, due to its inherent nature, is interdisciplinary across departments. This will improve the quality of climate education within the university. • Pursue learning research: Testing a novel approach to content delivery where the faculty sit in on the previous course. This should reduce burden on instructors. • Providing course “bundles:” Streamline elective choices to assist advisors.If successful, our pilot program could be extended to other interdisciplinary domains (e.g.,energy with electricity focus, energy with