engineering, the role of engineers, and global health. Bycombining technical training with critical reflection on systemic inequities, this course equipsstudents with the skills and mindsets necessary for inclusive, impactful engineering practice. Thefindings underscore the potential of integrating AOP into engineering education to cultivatesocially conscious, globally engaged engineers capable of co-creating equitable solutions withdiverse communities.1. IntroductionAs global connectivity and communication networks continue to grow, so too does awareness ofthe disparities in health, resources, and opportunities across different regions of the world. Thisheightened awareness has spurred a shift among engineering students, who are
average score was 3.66.While the students displayed their belief in the importance of intuition, they also displayedoverwhelming support for the teaching styles implemented in the course that were designed tocater to visual learning. When asked the importance being able to visualize concepts as theylearn, the total average score was above 3.6. Q: I feel that developing intuition for control is important Figure 3.1: Student Feedback on importance of developing intuition for Controls When asked questions on how the students preferred to be introduced to concepts in ControlSystems, the results were in favor of engaging techniques such as visual, hands-on activities, 3Dpuzzles, and communication-based exercises, as each
knowledge to home institution. I learned so many useful strategies for teaching! I had a huge gain in understanding of semiconductor/electronics field. I enjoyed this experience tremendously. It was fun and stimulating to interact with researchers with a high level of thinking and reasoning, at the cutting edge of the field. It was also fun and stimulating to be around other community college teachers and educators who were extremely invested in teaching itself.Faculty also described how the experience would have a direct positive impact on their students. Engaging in engineering research that has societal benefits that I can contextualize for my class room. This I believe will get my students
within aglobal and societal context, lifelong learning, and a knowledge of contemporary issues [17].These skills became the foundation for 6 of the 11 outcomes that all engineering graduatesshould possess: (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams, (f) an understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility, (g) an ability to communicate effectively, (h) the broadeducation necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic,environmental, and societal context, (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage inlife-long learning, and (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues. Additionally, outcome (c) “anability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within
@mtu.eduAbstractThe traditional way engineering and engineering technology courses are taught is based ontraditional lecture and laboratory experiments, which are still the most frequent teaching methodsused nowadays around the world. On the other hand, active learning methodologies grounded inscientific research in education have been attracting considerable attention over the past yearswith numerous research studies indicating the efficacy of such learning styles.In this article, the author addresses the main challenges and shares active learning strategies usedto encourage active learning and engagement among students in face-to-face ElectricalEngineering Technology (EET) courses. The implementation of active learning, cooperativelearning and problem
Mechanical Engineering program at Utah Valley Universityis now building up across the curriculum, and the students who learned this skill on this projecthave been impacted for the better by development of this skill.Additionally, working on this project helped students to improve their teamwork andcommunication skills. They learned how to carry out their independent responsibilities throughinterdependent interactions, sharing their insights and talents freely with each other to helpeveryone to be better at their job. They learned effective communication skills. One student saidthe following: “Each week we put together short presentations detailing our progress for theweek and presented it to the other members of the lab. This process taught me how
with the engineering facultyat the university. When events were held on the community college campuses, the goal was forthe university students to learn more about the engineering programs at each of the communitycolleges and to develop relationships with the community college students. The global pandemicrequired significant pivoting from the original plan for activities and recruitment of students.This paper outlines the recruitment and retention of S-STEM scholars at the three partneringcommunity colleges. In particular, this paper will discuss the three very different approacheseach community college took to offering classes and activities on campus during the Covid-19pandemic and how that impacted course offerings and program
controlled studies on the effect of co-op experiences on academicperformance, this study seeks to add to the research by examining whether co-op experience hasany impact on grades in core engineering courses across a variety of engineering disciplines.The overall hypothesis guiding this analysis is that students who engage in co-op programs willbenefit from active, contextual learning experiences obtained on the job and when compared totheir non-co-op counterparts, this learning will be reflected in higher grades in requiredengineering courses. Additionally, it is hypothesized that these gains will be cumulative—thatis, students with multiple co-op experiences will perform better in coursework than those withsingle experiences or no experiences at
allowsstudents from both Florida A & M University (FAMU) and the Florida State University (FSU) toattend a single, joint college located in Tallahassee, Florida. This COE is dedicated to botheducation and research across multiple engineering areas, allowing students and faculty theopportunity to engage in innovative research skills. The COE Library is a tight space confined intwo rooms within the COE building itself, managed by librarians and staff from FSU Libraries,while employing student assistants from both institutions. This case study explores how FSU’sCOE Librarians have used this distinctive opportunity to create a model of embeddedlibrarianship in both relationships and improve outreach to make an impact on the lives of thefaculty, staff
is important. Krupczak, et al.,1 discuss how the general populace needs tounderstand technology, including its creation and its impact on society. They also differentiatebetween technological literacy and engineering literacy. The American Association for theAdvancement of Science, and the National Academy of Engineering have weighed in on theimportance of everyone being literate with respect to technology and the role of engineering insociety.2,3 Klein and Balmer4 summarize some of the reasons for increasing technologicalliteracy, particularly among students majoring in the liberal arts. In the preface to itstechnological literacy standards, the International Technology Education Association points outthat while society is increasingly
andDr. April Dukes, University of Pittsburgh Dr. April Dukes is the Faculty and Future Faculty Program Director for the Engineering Educational Re- search Center (EERC) and the Institutional Co-leader for Pitt-CIRTL at the University of Pittsburgh. April also collaborates on the national educational research initiative, the Aspire Alliance’s National Change. April’s research and teaching efforts engage graduate students, postdocs, and faculty to inform and sup- port systemic change toward excellence and inclusivity in higher education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Inclusive Engineering Classrooms and Learning Communities: Reflections and Lessons
://CSEdResearch.org.[26] Mazyar Seraj, Eva-Sophie Katterfeldt, Serge Autexier, and Rolf Drechsler. Impacts of creating smart everyday objects on young female students’ programming skills and attitudes. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 1234–1240, 2020.[27] Monique M Jethwani, Nasir Memon, Won Seo, and Ariel Richer. “i can actually be a super sleuth” promising practices for engaging adolescent girls in cybersecurity education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(1):3–25, 2017.[28] Lauren E Margulieux, Briana B Morrison, Baker Franke, and Harivololona Ramilison. Effect of implementing subgoals in code. org’s intro to programming unit in computer science principles. ACM
pathways out of high schools, community colleges, and four-year universities.Dr. Sanjukta Bhanja, University of South FloridaGeeti Anwar, University of South FloridaElise Kuechle, University of South Florida ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 How Community College Transfer NSF S-STEM Scholars in Engineering Spend Scholarship Funds to Enhance Their Academic SuccessAbstractThis paper presents preliminary findings from a study investigating the impact of the NationalScience Foundation (NSF) Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM) program on community collegetransfer students pursuing engineering degrees at a four-year university. S-STEM fundsscholarships to support academically talented low
andeducational activities focused on computational science and high-performance computing. Visitingfaculty and students are recruited from a variety of institutions including minority serving, women’s,liberal arts, community colleges and other educational institutions. Selected qualified faculty applicantsattend a matching workshop in which both, faculty and Laboratory researchers briefly present theirwork, learn about potential research collaborations, engage in one-on-one discussions, and developcollaborative research proposals. Faculty who are matched to Laboratory researchers engage in anintensive summer research experience at the Laboratory with a few of their students or in some casessend students to engage in a summer Laboratory research
-transfer scholars provided context for howscholar participation in a collaborative cohort experience exemplified by the Engineering ScholarsProgram (ESP) community of practice contributed to students’ membership within the STEMcommunity. Scholars articulated that they constructed their own STEM identity as a majoroutcome of this community membership. As a result, evaluation and research findings of this S-STEM project have provided evidence that future work to sustain the program components withthe maximum impact on students’ community membership and identity construction in additionto supporting the transfer process. These programmatic components included peer connectionbetween transferring and transferred students, engagement in engineering
choiceand course development continued through the Spring of 2015. During this period in which asingle instructor developed and delivered the course, student and faculty perceptions of the useof online video lectures and the in-class active experiential learning (i.e., how both methods wereused, their impact on student affect and cognition, as well as facilitators and barriers) anddocumentation of the process of continual development used to refine the implementation of theflipped classroom approach, were documented in a series of papers and book chapters. Althoughmany students have some prior experience with video lectures, their comfort levels have notbeen consistently. A major focus of this development effort has been to provide students
settings and lends her technical background to her research with the Collaborative Learning Lab, exploring ways to to promote collaborative problem solving in engineering education and provide students with team design experiences that mimic authentic work in industry.Dr. Ava R. Wolf, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Ava Wolf, PhD supports faculty in developing courses that emphasize active and engaged learning, and conducts research on interactive learning spaces, effective teaching strategies, and the integration of tech- nology.Mr. Nattasit Dancholvichit, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Nattasit Dancholvichit was born in Bangkok, Thailand in 1990. He received a B.A. degree in mechan- ical
environment with lecture, self-paced practice, hands on activities as needed to promotestudent engagement and success.AWS Educate platform is a free form environment that faculty use for cloudification offoundation courses. As examples, the database class can deploy various relational and non-relational databases as needed, with no local lab setup, maintenance or student softwareinstallations. In the Linux class, it provides access to multiple Linux virtual machines and labs,giving opportunities for risk free exploration of the manipulation, installation and utilization ofLinux tools.Survey MethodsStudent Survey & AnalysisStudents who were enrolled in the advanced cloud computing course, known as CloudInfrastructure and Services, were requested
describes tools and practices for creating, living, andsustaining partnerships between community colleges and B.S.-granting colleges of engineeringand computer science by drawing from our experiences in a multi-institutional partnershipfunded via an NSF S-STEM ENGAGE (Engineering Neighbors: Gaining Access, GrowingEngineers) program designed to support pre-transfer, low-income, academically talentedengineering and computer science students where participating institutions include twoCalifornia Community Colleges – Allan Hancock College and Cuesta College – that are highly-ranked Hispanic-Serving Institutions and a predominantly white College of Engineering atCalifornia Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly) in the California State University system
backgrounds engage with engineeringconcepts. Researchers were drawn to this project not only for its pedagogical impact but alsobecause it provided an opportunity to reflect on their own identities and biases in teaching STEMsubjects.Positionality Dimension: MethodologyThe research team had the liberty to design and test the lessons during the planning stage of theEngineering learning experience. Each iteration in the design process led to more choices aboutthe way to communicate and practice new content in the classroom. The researchers reflected onwhich decisions were more relevant to their work and delved into the reasoning behind. Luis hasexperience working with students from Venezuela’s public education system, and he expected tosee similar
task. At times, this results in students dropping out of projects. Manystudents may have family, financial, or health challenges that may prevent them from continuingtheir participation. For example, a student’s lack of research experience can lead tounderestimating the time required for a project, resulting in missed deadlines and at times,creating real conflicts with students’ classes, family commitments, and outside employment.Research projects and the extracurricular activities can have a negative impact on a student’sGPA if they are not properly advised and projects are not effectively managed. Finally,community college students do not get any curriculum credit for their involvement in MESAactivities as students do for various projects at
students and can lead to deeper student learning when properly implemented Prince, 2004). Inaddition, the real world nature of PBL modules can lend itself for engineering design experiences that mayalso include broader Entrepreneurial Minded Learning (EML) (Kriewall and Mekemson, 2010). The aimis to develop students who are better at adapting to new trends, embracing creativity and leadership,understanding engineering impacts on society and business, as well as providing more opportunities toexperience engineering design (Fairweather, 2008). Engineering design courses at the freshman or seniorlevels are the most common way that universities use to give students opportunities to work on real worldengineering problems (Shartrand and Weilerstein
used in senior design,especially with regard to service learning. Welch and Estes12 describe the experience of studentsat the US Military Academy who are given the option to choose community service projects fortheir senior design experience. The students’ interface with community stakeholders was foundto engender the client-consultant relationship. A similar service-learning approach is describedby Bielefeldt13 for on-campus clients used in senior design. These works in general describe theexperience of students acting as the design consultant to a third party client.The model of client-consultant interaction solely amongst student peers is relatively new. Chouet al.14 recently described the use of consultant or sub-contractor design teams
opportunity to develop and measure a number of professional skills,including communication and teamwork25,26. These abilities are often called “soft skills”although some engineering educators would rather they be called “the missing basics”, becausethey are essential for students to become successful engineers27.One team has developed measures for how well students can demonstrate contextualcompetence28, defined as “an engineer’s ability to anticipate and understand the constraints andimpacts of social, cultural, environmental, political, and other contexts on engineeringsolutions”29. This work goes beyond simple notions about transferring learning from one contextto the next, and defines the broader arena in which engineers work. The focus on
collaborationwith the teacher’s summer research mentor. A second example, based on the research project: “Tannic Acid and Potential FlameRetardant Improvements,” resulted in a module entitled: “Should there be a ban on e-waste inlandfills?” which was completed by ~200 students in 10th grade Biology at Penn High School(Mishawaka, IN) during two consecutive school years( 2016-2018). The module was based onthe following national and Indina standards: NGSS HS-LS2-7. Design, evaluate, and refine a solution for reducing the impacts of human activities on the environment and biodiversity. IN Biology 2016: SEPS.1 Posing questions (for science) and defining problems (for engineering);SEPS.7 Engaging in argument from evidence; SEPS.8
with 84faculty using a train-the-trainer model. As such, the JTFD project objectives include: shiftfaculty beliefs, strategies, and practice toward student-centered learning; assess faculty fidelity ofimplementation of engagement, reflection, and feedback pedagogy; develop sustainabledisciplinary communities of practice through the faculty development program; and assess theeffect on student achievement and persistence. The background and some preliminary data on theproject will now be discussed.BackgroundFacilitating Shift of Faculty Beliefs toward Student-Centered LearningThere are a number of different models of personal change processes in innovation that havebeen used in different fields such as public health, agriculture, and have also
the lecturer team to periodically seed the students reflective activities with probing, engaging, and open-‐ended questions to allow students to reflect on the material, cooperate with each other and share perspectives on the material. As a result the students will re-‐examine and re-‐express the concepts in terms of their personal perspectives and experiences. This is what concept maps, memory maps, and similar tools do in most cases. Students should also work on verbal, written, drawing, and other communications venues to express their thoughts. The essential part is that their work needs to be reviewed and critiqued by an
will examine the impact of seeing a visualization (Cartesian graph) on novicestudent’s problem solving strategy. Specifically, does seeing the value of visualization makestudents more likely to make a visualization? MethodParticipants Fifty-eight students at a local community college participated in this study for classcredit. No participant was an engineering major. Four participants reported having constructionor project management experience. After removing those with prior experience, 21 participantswere in the baseline condition and 33 participants were in the experimental condition asdescribed below.Design A two group, post-test comparison design was used. The experimental
instructors clearly state that this will not be enough to complete the entire project.Each project provides students with exposure to several aspects of Environmental Engineeringand has them exercise different communication methods for their deliverable.Project 1 Description: This project focuses on Environmental Impact Analysis, particularly onthe contents of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS). This documentation, or a waiverapplication, is required for federally funded projects and thus is of importance to all civilengineering students, not just those with future careers as environmental or water resourcesengineers. Students are provided with four different published EIS and select the topic mostinteresting to their group. Topics are listed
critically An elementary student tests herapply what they had learned to the context of their own drinking water filter design.lives. Malinda also gained an appreciation for effectivelesson motivation and closure. For example, without closure for reflection, students often did notremember the original objectives of the lesson and were often confused during the next week’slesson.The experience teaching engineering to elementary students was one that Malinda had notexperienced before. Besides learning how to communicate engineering concepts to a specificaudience, her acquired skills included adaptive strategies for diverse learners, collaborativeteamwork with educators and an appreciation for educational pedagogy.Subsequent Impacts