AC 2007-2210: PRACTICAL ENGLISH: TEACHING TECHNICALCOMMUNICATION ABROAD BASED ON A PREEXISTING TECHNICALWRITING COURSE IN MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY'S BAGLEY COLLEGEOF ENGINEERINGAlexis Powe, Mississippi State University Alexis D. Powe is a technical writing instructor for the Mississippi State University Bagley College of Engineering’s Shackouls Technical Communication Program. She received her B.A. in English from Mississippi State University in 2002, graduating summa cum laude with a minor in history, and her M.A. in English from Louisiana State University in 2004. She is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education and the Modern Language Association. Address: P.O. Box
-upThe details of each Day activities are the following:Day 1 began with introducing the fundamental knowledge of rhetorical writing and writingpedagogy, which is designed to address the workshop objective (i). More specific, theparticipants are introduced to the rhetorical situation (writer, audience, purpose, and context),rhetorical appeals (logical as logos, ethical as ethos, emotional as pathos), and the definition ofgenre.Days 1 and 2 were designed to the rubric development process, addressing workshop objective(ii), which began with deep reading sessions. In these deep reading sessions, small groups of 3-4participants from both engineering and English worked together to describe the strengths instudent writing samples from FYC and
development.Hx2 (1 pt): What happened to cause their injuries? Need really good and believable story line.Dx (1pt): What is the diagnosis (C5 incompl, C3 compl, T6 Compl)? Describe the injuries in some detail.Tx (2/3 pt): Triage and treatment give limited resources? Basis for this allocation? Any ethical questions?Rx (1 pt): Cost of rehab, and who should pay? What factors will affect quality of life (i.e., abilities, disabilities?). Cite references for costs.Style (1/3 pt) Wow Factor/ Writing Style/ GrammarFor a perfect grade of 5, the story needed 1) superb character development, 2) an excellent plotoften with a seminal event and with twists, 3) a triage component (hopefully with ethical dilem-mas); and
Paper ID #33208Academic Writing at the Doctoral and Professional Level in Engineering:The Current State of the Field and Pathways ForwardMs. Kate Caroline Batson, University of Georgia KateBatsonis a PhD candidate within Language and Literacy Education at the University of Georgia. Her research is centered around writing practices at the doctoral and professional levels within engineering. Previously, she served as an instructor in the Intensive English Program (IEP) at The University of Missis- sippi, where she taught 18 different courses and served as the IEP Operations Coordinator. She was also the IEP in-house
“experts” and were able to provide appropriate guidance to students regardingtheir experimental work and materials selection. In writing their individual abstracts, studentswere required to conduct background literature reviews on how these problems have beenpreviously addressed. For the “Test Your Mettle” phase, students provided a written abstract oftheir findings and proposed future experiments that might better test their proposed solutions.The “Go Public” phase involved presenting the team presentation of their work via oral andposter presentations at the end of the semester. These presentations were evaluated by facultyoutside the department. Similarly, Enderle et al 4also has demonstrated that there is a direct correlation between
-writing, hiring and supervising staff and student workers as well as coordinating program evaluation.Dr. Adam K. Fontecchio, Drexel University Dr. Adam Fontecchio is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Associate Dean for Un- dergraduate Affairs in the College of Engineering, Co- Director of the A. J. Drexel Nanotechnology Institute, an affiliated member of the Materials Engineering Department, and a member of the Center for Educational Research. He is the recipient of a NASA New Investigator Award, the Drexel Gradu- ate Student Association Outstanding Mentor Award, the Drexel University ECE Outstanding Research Achievement Award and the International Liquid Crystal Society Multimedia Prize. In 2003, he
the Spring 2020 semester. Lab Title Overview Students write a documented program that will implement a Utilizing Door Simulator hardwired reciprocating motion machine. Simulation is done with a door simulator. Students write a documented program for traffic flow on a one-way street, which is to be controlled by means of a Utilizing Traffic Simulator pedestrian pushbutton. Simulation is done with a traffic simulator. Students write a
Paper ID #37625Work-in-Progress: Developing an IoT-based Engaged StudentLearning Environment and Tools for Engineering andComputer Science ProgramsMehrube Mehrubeoglu Dr. Mehrubeoglu received her B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin. She earned her M.S. degree in Bioengineering and Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from Texas A&M University. She is currently a Professor and Program Coordinator at the Department of Engineering at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. She is interested in multidisciplinary research in imaging applications using a variety of imaging
creators of knowledge, (c) empowered with theengineering fundamentals that is strengthened with the breadth of an exceptional liberal artseducation, (d) adaptive experts that recognize the strengths and limits of his/her knowledge andteam, (e) innovators by embracing inclusion, diversity, and equity, and (f) fearless in the face ofcomplex problems. This vision should apply to both faculty and students and the founding chairtalked about this often. Faculty modeling for students that kind of engineer we desired of themwas essential and this concept was embraced by the faculty team. Our WFU EngineeringMission is to Educate the Whole Engineer with a commitment and responsibility to betterhumanity (Pro Humanitate).By year three, we had articulated our
supplements and software; yet, when it comes to the corecircuit analysis methods that every student must learn, how much real progress has been made?Learning and being able to apply circuit analysis fundamentals well is foundational, but toooften engineering graduates find that the analysis techniques they learned in school seem to lackpractical application on the job. This is especially true when it comes to the understanding andanalysis of analog circuits. As result, young engineers find themselves uncomfortable in tacklingneeded analog designs. Even experienced engineers realize that there are probably moreefficient ways of solving design problems, but often feel they lack the time to pursue them. Allthe while, globalization has made us keenly
. Prompt 3: What plans do you have for approaching and solving this problem?Some examples of the problems analyzed include:Problem 1: When concentrations of formaldehyde in the air exceed 33µg/ft3 (1µg = 1 microgram= 10-6 gram), a strong odor and irritation to the eyes often occurs. One square foot of hardwoodplywood paneling can emit 3365 µg of formaldehyde per day. A 4-ft by 8-ft sheet of thispaneling is attached to an 8-ft wall in a room having floor dimensions of 10-ft by 10-ft. · If there is no ventilation in the room, write a linear equation that models the amount of formaldehyde (F) in the room after x days. · Find the total number of micrograms of formaldehyde that are released into the air by the paneling
, electric power and electronics for technology students, senior design, as well as a long-standing residential/online graduate course on the fundamentals of biorenewable resources and technology. He has leveraged this interest into over $10M in teaching-related grant funding over his career and has contributed broadly to the literature in areas of curriculum, student risk characterization, and mentoring. He believes well trained, curious, thoughtful people are crucial to a university’s research effort, and similarly to the function and survival of society. For this reason, the overarching goal of his teaching is to impart the core content needed by the students, and to do so while encouraging inquisition and higher
development by creating a LinkedIn profile, updating their resume, writing acover letter, and ultimately applying for an internship. OPCD staff were invited to support theEGR 112 assignments. The following figures showcase excerpts from the IDP assignment andthe 4-year curricular mapping spreadsheet. Prior publications describe more details about theIDP, 4-year curricular mapping, and EGR 111 (Kenny, 2024; Kenny, Pierrakos, O’Connell,2021).Individual Development Plan (IDP) AssignmentOverview - An individual development plan (IDP) is a tool to assist you in personal and professional development. Its primarypurpose is to help you reach short-term and long-term career goals, as well as improve current performance. It is a process thatshould be iterative
Paper ID #16997Hands-On STEM Lesson Plans Developed through Engineering Faculty andSTEM Teacher Collaboration (Evaluation)Sr. Mary Ann Jacobs, Manhattan College Mary Ann Jacobs, scc is an assistant professor in the School of Education. She prepares secondary teacher candidates in all content areas through her courses in secondary pedagogy. Her areas of interest include STEM education, brain compatible strategies, and action research in the classroom.Ms. Kathleen Christal Mancuso , Manhattan College Kathleen Mancuso is a Secondary Education Major with a concentration in Chemistry at Manhattan Col- lege located in Riverdale
andlabs were matched to align and maximize interests. Students also received formal collegeguidance and training in public speaking during the summer. The program ended with acolloquium, open to the university community and family members of students, whereparticipants gave short talks to present their work.The program includes two courses: Dimensions of Scientific Inquiry (DSI) and Basic Robotics toInspire Scientific Knowledge (BRISK). DSI, taught by a member of the NYU faculty, is adiscussion-based course that covers scientific methods and practice, including their social,cultural, political, and economic contexts; ethical questions surrounding science and technology;and writing, especially as it relates to college application materials and a
the table, the main focus is to achieve intellectual pursuit, globalengagement and a bold vision. By developing these skills, the students can be equipped with theright tools needed to be successful for creating ideas and enhancing what they already know.Table 2. Objectives for student learning from course syllabusConclusionThis paper has shown a project where the students designed, built and tested a thermoformingapparatus and compared experiments with Ansys Polyflow simulations of the draping process.The project offered an opportunity for students to experience classroom learning together withreal-world applications of the thermoforming process.Bibliography[1] M. P. Groover, Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing Materials, Processes, and
program impact included statistical analysis of pre- and post- tests, qualitative researchtechniques of eliciting information using subject-produced drawings, journal writing, focusgroups, and observation. This project is sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF)funded Information Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) program aimedat enhancing traditionally underrepresented youths’ interest in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) subjects. Disciplinary experts were drawn from materialsscience, industrial engineering, mechanical engineering, computer science, sustainability, scienceeducation, mathematics education, cognitive psychology, counseling, and education researchmethods. These experts worked
becauseit is fundamentally different. In a recent article on the topic of undergraduate engineer writing,Schnieter commented on these differences, stating: “English composition allows readers toprovide their own interpretations of what the reader intended. Technical writing, on the otherhand, demands that the reader come only the conclusion intended by the writer”3. Developingstrong technical writing skills requires practice and this practice must come in the context of theengineering discipline.In CE300, Fundamentals of Engineering Mechanics and Design, students are required tocomplete a uniaxial tension test of three different materials, draw conclusions about thematerials, and write a comprehensive report including procedures, data, and findings
written communication: Lab Reports,Software Documentation, PowerPoint Presentations, and a Proposal. Each of these assignments isintended to provide students with a sample of the type of written work that is required oftechnical professionals. By introducing four different writing assignments, one combined with an oral presentation,each student is encouraged to be flexible in their mastery of written communication skills.Competence is achieved through repetition. At the conclusion of the course, the freshman areprepared to advance with a fundamental understanding of the methods employed in effectivetechnical communication.Introduction: EG 1004, Introduction to Engineering and Design, was created as a survey course forfreshmen
University Statewide School of Technologyprogram, we use the services of the Indiana University/Purdue University at Columbus’ Englishcourses W131 “Elementary Composition I”, W132 “Elementary Composition II”, and R110“Fundamentals of Speech Communication” to fulfill the program requirements. While thesecourses can provide useful instruction, they inevitably suffer from certain drawbacks. That is,these courses teach students the basic standardized approach to writing and speaking. However,this does not take into account the significant differences that exist in writing technical reports,the mainstay of the function of an electrical engineering technologist. To help freshman studentsto appreciate the relevance of technical writing, ECET 196
Session 2559 Formal Laboratory Reports Pros and Cons: An Interim Report Peter J. Shull Penn State University, AltoonaI. IntroductionEngineering programs have historically faced the major challenge of providing engineeringstudents with a solid foundation in written communication skills. In response, most engineeringcurricula include fundamental writing courses focused on developing and improving writtenperformance. With this emphasis in mind, the use of writing exercises in the classroom providesan opportunity for engineering
Paper ID #23382Technical Communication for Engineers: Improving Professional and Tech-nical SkillsDr. Alyson Grace Eggleston, The Citadel — The Military College of South Carolina Alyson G. Eggleston received her B.A. and M.A. in English with a focus on writing pedagogy and lin- guistics from Youngstown State University and her PhD in Linguistics from Purdue University. She has taught at several U.S. institutions and in rural Nicaragua. Her research and teaching interests are in language-cognition interaction effects, technical and scientific writing pedagogy, and second language- learning. She is an Assistant Professor in
degree in Manufacturing Engineering from the National Institute of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Prior to joining APSU, he served as a faculty member at Ohio Northern University, where he taught courses on the fundamentals of electronics, including electrical circuits. At APSU, Dr. Pallikonda instructs courses specializing in Robotics and its applications, Engineering Economics, CAD and Manufacturing processes. Dr. Pallikonda is passionate about educating and inspiring the next generation of engineers, technologists, and innovators through his lectures. He is deeply committed to advancing the fields of robotics and manufacturing through interdisciplinary research in connected devices and Industrial Internet of
stresses rhetoric and argument, bothin society in general as well as the academic community. Beginning in Spring 2005, theCollege of Engineering is sponsoring a section of Composition II specifically forengineers. The course continues to stress rhetoric, but it does so through technicalwriting. Students are introduced to general business discourse and formats, but the coursealso introduces them to technical writing, including ethical issues within engineering. Asthe syllabus for the course states, “While all English 1304 students are expected to exit the course with a good working knowledge of the fundamentals of critical analysis and argument, students in this section will also work with persuasion as it functions in
in fundamental experimental skills sothat students will be able to use an experiment as a flexible tool for problem-finding andproblem-solving in a self-directed manner.To realize this objective, the curriculum has been designed to instruct them to go throughthe whole process of experimentation starting with finding a problem followed byconducting an experiment and ending with writing a report of the experiment, and toprovide them with the opportunity to have hands-on experience in dealing with all skills ofthe "fundamentals of the experimental method" on a theme/problem.In order to enhance learning outcome, team-based learning and poster sessions have beenadopted. Several advantages have been found in a large class.Large lab courses have
the AI was able to spit out in terms of checking the boxes of the assignment. But that is just it. It just checked boxes. A primary issue with AI-generated content, particularly in first-person writing, is that it fundamentally lacks the human touch. It cannot go deeper than surface-level reflections because it does not know anything more profound. Out of curiosity, I inputted the ChatGPT rendered version into Grammarly’s plagiarism detector, and it said the text was one hundred percent original. This is very concerning, as the text is one hundred percent unoriginal. I hope the awkward style of AI continues to be evident in future models because I don’t think I could tell the difference without it. I found myself wanting to give more
require engineering professors teaching capstone courses to spendconsiderable time evaluating student writing. Varied teaching tools and methods to convey theimportance of communication in professional environments may also be incorporated to enhancestudent learning. Clear communication within an engineering capstone course is important forstudents and engineering instructors. The work in progress describes an effort to improve communication and assessment of studentlearning in an industrial engineering capstone course. To better assess learning objectives,several changes were made to the curriculum over a four-year period. The changes include thedevelopment of a course guide, updated rubrics, project charter discussions, teamworkassessments
section, students focus on finding, interpreting,and integrating scholarly research into a technical report. They learn about scholarlydocumentation in scientific fields as well as conventions of scientific writing, and learn how toassess the credibility of non-scholarly sources.Technology and MultimodalityThe CU Denver Composition program describes this outcome thus: “Students function inelectronic writing spaces, and use technology to compose, revise, and present their writing. Atthe intermediate level, students analyze and/or produce visual, audio, and online texts” [14]. Atits most fundamental level, this outcome is about producing, interpreting, and integrating imagesand other modes of communication. In Composition I students learn how to
challenges engineering educators to structure learning so that competency is builtprogressively throughout a curriculum. The engineering community well understands the needfor proficiency in all modes of communication, with written communication considered of highimportance. For example, a panel of ten representatives from biomedical companies, assembledat Northwestern University in the summer of 2001, stressed the importance of communicationskills for entry-level biomedical engineers. Representatives from Abbott Laboratories, Datex-Ohmeda, and Nova Bionics said that entry-level engineers in biomedical engineering specificallyneed to be able to detail all project subtasks in project design, find and evaluate research relevantto a project, write
electivecourse taken by students at Kettering University. Since this course is not a prerequisitefor any other course offered at Kettering University, the coverage of the course variesfrom term to term depending upon the make of the student body in the class and thestudents’ interests. The textbook used in the course is Chemical Process Safety,Fundamental with Applications by Crowl and Louvar1. Since Kettering University doesnot offer a chemical engineering degree, only certain portions of the text are used.Topics that are typically covered include: 1) Review of inorganic and organic chemical principles 2) Toxicology 3) Industrial hygiene 4) Toxic release and dispersion models 5