to otherswhen needed [9]. Students quickly learn that as a whole the group benefits by utilizing the differentstrengths of individuals to better ensure the success of the group as a whole. Through this approachstudent self-efficacy can be increased and they learn foundation, a growth mindset, and acommitted work ethic, they can be successful in engineering.TeambuildingTo further promote community building, on the first Saturday morning of the program studentsparticipate in the half day “Big Dawg Challenge” outdoor obstacle course designed by theuniversity Recreational Sports division. The course offers low-ropes workshops designed forgroups to engage in problem-solving strategies requiring both mental and physical involvement ofeach team
. invent what doesn’t exist 6. identify optimal solution 7. prototype (i.e. draft) and refine (i.e. revise) the solution 8. communicate the solution’s designStudents rated their confidence from 0 (cannot do at all) to 100 (certainly can do). Thirteenstudents completed both pre and post course surveys. The data show that student confidenceincreased for all eight activities. This conclusion is based on a nonparametric sign test. For eachof the eight tasks, at least ten of the thirteen students indicated a higher level of confidence at theconclusion of the course. No students indicated a decrease in confidence on any of the first fourtasks, and no more than two showed decreased confidence on any of the last four tasks.All post-course
approach to engineering and engineering education will not only facilitate us toward a more pragmatic essence in our education, but also will bring about a needed reflective 16 disposition that is essentially missing in our education. This will be beyond what we are doing in most programs and what is needed by all. Students need to be asked to reflect on their learning, question the purpose, the ethics and the societal impacts of what they do. In addition, each student needs to create connections between what he or she learns and engages in. Due to the heavy syllabi and abundance of material that is covered, students
students may experience FYE intheir second or third year of overall study. To design better FYE experiences, it is important forthe engineering education research community to systematically examine the impacts thatdifferent FYE designs have on students’ pathways into and through engineering.This WIP is part of a larger study that posits that different FYE paths that students take influencetheir engineering identity and their engineering communities [6]. In this paper, we focus onveterans as a case of non-traditional FYE students. A 2014 systematic review of veterans inhigher education identified cases where veterans outperformed their civilian counterparts as wellas cases where there was no significant difference in academic performance [7]. This
. In this capacity, he is responsible for all activities related to student services (academic administration, advising, career planning, women and diversity programs, etc.) and curricular issues. He is principal investigator on several NSF grants related to retention of engineering students. As a faculty member in civil engineering, he co-teaches a large introductory course in civil engineering. His research and consulting activities have focused on the safety and reliability of hydraulic structures, and he has participated as an expert in three different capacities regarding reviews of levee performance in Hurricane Katrina. He is a three-time recipient of his college’s Withrow Award for Teaching
students had direct experience through coursework, others hadnot formally taken statistics courses or deeply engaged with complex programming. Their self-evaluation of performance varied, often depending on whether they had taken a specific courseon the subject.StatisticsA significant number of students reported a lack of formal training in statistics, a fundamentalcomponent of data science, which impacts their ability to perform statistical analysis. Only threetook stat courses, only two mentioned using stats in CHE courses. This indicates that despite theuse of statistics in various courses, formal education in this area is not widespread among theparticipants. Their ability to perform in statistics is often judged based on whether they
electrode surface oxidation-reduction reactions for sensor applications, material corrosion mechanisms, and electrochemical degradation. She is a strong advocate for integrating high-impact practices, such as problem-based learning, into lectures, laboratories, and outreach initiatives to enhance student and community engagement in STEM education.Melissa Karlin, St. Mary’s University Dr. Melissa Karlin serves as the Director of Office Student Research and Inquiry (OSRI) at St. Mary’s University (StMU), and is a Professor of Environmental Science and Sustainability. A StMU faculty member since 2012, Melissa teaches undergraduate courses in GIS, ecology, experimental design, and conservation biology. Her research focuses
2006-2047: TRACING STUDENT DEVELOPMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION OFENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIOSJennifer Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is an assistant professor in the Department of Technical Communication at the University of Washington. She holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her interests include engineering education, learner-centered design, user-centered design, and audience analysis. Dr. Turns is currently working on multiple NSF grants dealing with engineering education including an NSF Career award exploring the impact of portfolio construction on engineering students’ preparedness for professional engineering
literate.Inspection of the model in Exhibit 1 shows that it conflates both dimensions of literacy. Itsperspective combines both a product/process and broad view of the two literacies. Clearly,the technologies (following Krupczak et al) that are the products of engineering, interact atall levels of society. This can be seen from the influence of electro-mechanical devices in thekitchen and the impact they have had on families, or at a societal level, as for example theconcern that communities have for processes like fracking which enable large quantities ofgas to be extracted from shale. At the micro-level changes in kitchen technology or for thatmatter electronics in the home are adapted to without much thought. Not so when acommunity is faced with fracking
pandemic. In Spring 2020,after shutdowns, students had just completed the last Arduino exam and were moving to workingwith Matlab. Given the difficulties of the early weeks of the pandemic, attendance at Zoomlectures was optional (sessions were recorded), and often focused on answering studentquestions. While coordinating group projects proved difficult, several students also found themhelpful for preserving a sense of connection and community in a difficult semester.The research focused project was introduced in Fall 2021, replacing a game design project. Thiscoincided with students returning to being predominately on campus. A goal of this effort was toencourage students to engage in on-campus activities through introduction to the
of grace andunderstanding as other non-Black students. Because Black students face racism andmicroaggressions in their housing and their classrooms, they expressed feelings of discomfort inthe community that impacted their mental health and overall wellbeing. One student reported:“When I work with non-Black peers, it’s definitely stressful and I adopt some form of socialanxiety. Because I don’t want to be stereotyped or be seen as the black kid that needs to becarried in a team, I push myself more to try and impress or meet expectations. This isn’t alwaysbad, but it is definitely draining and sometimes makes me feel like I can’t make or have excuseswhen I naturally fail” (Male student).Financial ConcernsFigure 11 shows how students often
providing their feedback to student presentations and an “open mic” round-table discussion.The course modules were structured to address each element of the framework with specificlearning objectives, student evaluation, and application opportunity. Essential elements included: • Alignment with one of the blocks in the executive framework; • Lecture material to provide fundamental elements and an application methodology—a process coupled with a worksheet to capture the results for executive communication; • Reading material consisting of traditional textbook excerpts and contemporary articles from peer-reviewed publications emphasizing executive leadership challenges and skills; and • Real-world examples, such
communicating across time zones, are an example of an issue that groupwork in an academic setting rarely confronts. However, working in diverse student groups atleast should allow students to begin considering differences based on cultural norms, even ifsome more time-based difficulties must be neglected. While far from perfect, perhaps this modelpresents the most cost-effective way to help engineering students understand global culturaldiversities and their impacts on engineering decisions.Communication and Teamwork Skills. According to our respondents, communication skillswere clearly the most important attribute of a global engineer (Figure 4). Nearly all of therespondents (94.7%) called communication skills vitally important, with the
. 2. Engage students in social responsibility through real life projects and applications that in turn directly benefit the community and its members. 3. Build working relationships not only through student team work, but also through industrial and non-profit networking. 4. Create excitement for engineering through the promotion of sustainable technologies, project management, hands on experience, open-ended problems and project based learning.To achieve these goals the first service-learning project has been given to theintroductory level material and energy balances class for the fall of 2006. The generalprocess for the project is as follows: 1. Formulation of project: Initial contact was made with many
reports for the different activities hasbeen facilitated by the biweekly team meeting where progress (or setbacks) is discussed andprocedures planned and implemented.This project is building a model that will have a significant impact on the number of STEMgraduates and that will be simple to replicate in other geographical areas. This project intends toincrease the number of students successfully engaged in STEM fields which is a nationalpriority.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions, whichhelped improve the exposition of the paper. In addition, the authors would like to acknowledgefunding from the Department of Education for the activities in this paper.Bibliography1. Fuentes, A. A
College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a Ph.D. in old english philology and Anglo-Latin from the Centre for Medieval Studies in the University of Toronto and an M.A. in linguistics from the University of Texas. Before joining the staff of the Program in Technical Communication, she worked as a Research Scientist on the University of Michigan’s Middle English Dictionary Project and as an Assistant Professor of En- glish at Indiana State University. She is interested in rhetorical grammar and in the special concerns of engineering students writing in English as a second language. Page
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Evaluation of Research Experience for Teachers (RET) Program Effectiveness asSTEM Professional DevelopmentAbstractThe Colorado School of Mines (CSM) hosts a National Science Foundation funded ResearchExperience for Teachers (RET) program that focuses on STEM content surrounding the water-energy nexus (WE2NG: Water-Energy Nexus for the Next Generation). The objectives of thisprogram are to: 1) impact teacher participants by increasing their knowledge of the water-energynexus and by expanding their perspectives on science, engineering and research, 2) to indirectlyimpact K-12 student’s learning, motivation and engagement by increasing teacher passion andawareness and by providing mentors for
impact communitiesglobally (e.g. EWB-USA) and locally (e.g EPICS). Participants will be engaged in exploringthese connections and how to make them in their own classrooms. The workshop will equipteachers to engage students authentically in the engineering processes (e.g. NGSS framework)while they develop solutions to local or global needs. The materials will allow teachers to takeback their approach and impact their own classrooms.The engineering habits of the mind will be used and linked with developing solutions to localneeds within a school’s own community. This adds dimension of people and the environment toany design solution, which adds authenticity to the design experience.There is an opportunity to continue to nurture teachers and
languages, flipped classroom, and virtual training. She is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 WIP: Gamified Learning in Graphical Communications During the COVID-19 PandemicIntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has challenged engineering educators on how to engage students tostudy in a virtual environment [1]. Research has been showing that students may experience alower level of satisfaction, lack of interaction with instructors and peers, and reduced motivationto complete the course work [1]–[3]. This study investigates if a gamified learning in asynchronous class
course requires no textbook, the instructor makes available to students a“Handbook on Writing and Presenting” they have compiled and directs them to other writingresources, such as the Write@UGA Guide to Writing Resources (discussed further below) andthe Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL).A new standalone, communication-intensive undergraduate course called BIOE 2100 TheBioengineering Professional PersonaUpon arrival at UGA in 2019, the Technical Communication Lecturer proposed a standalonewriting course in partial fulfillment of the initiative’s requirements and also to provide adedicated vehicle for engaging with students in a writing-and-presenting space. Onecomplicating factor, however, was the initiative’s stipulation that “the requirement
that will be needed to monitor theteam’s progress and foster continuous improvement, as well as summative feedback to determinethe extent to which the project accomplishes its intended goals. This will include reviewing andproviding feedback on research instruments/protocols, methods, dissemination, and data analysis,as well as monitoring the implementation of the project. Outcome evaluation will include andunderstanding the extent to which curriculum elements and other documents were viewed asuseful, impactful, and accountable. Together, they will serve as an accurate measure to monitorand support the goals of this project.Risk Considerations Due to the nature of the topic, it is possible that the engagement of Ph.D. students and
Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for introductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conduct- ing research on a large scale NSF faculty development project. His team is studying how workshops on strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect faculty be- liefs, classroom practice, and development of disciplinary communities of practice and associated student achievement. He was a coauthor for the best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013 and this year has received the Michael Ashby Outstanding Materials Educator Award from the Materials Division of ASEE.Dr. Keith D
discuss them separately, in reality these groups are not isolated; a Venn diagram would behighly intersecting.Science, Technology, and Society: One group consists of the researchers and academics whowork in the area broadly defined as Science, Technology, and Society (STS). This groupseeks to understand relationships between, and the impacts of, intersections of social andtechnical systems. They also engage with history, sociology, and philosophy, as exemplifiedby the work of Mitcham (Mitcham, 1994), as they seek to understand how the value systemsthat drive technology’s impact with society. An early review of curricular frameworks thatincorporated STS content or ideas identified 29 descriptors drawn from four generalcategories—knowledge, skills
develop solutions to challenges, but also to explore and map the‘interconnectedness’ among various systems and the ‘dynamic impacts’ among parts of thesystems as well as making links to the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs). Collaborative projects were an integral part of our design course, where students workin teams to tackle complex, open-ended, wicked problems framed around key sustainabilitythemes. These projects were co-developed with the Office of Sustainability at the University ofCalgary and require not only technical skills but also creativity, critical thinking, and effectivecommunication. By engaging with real-world challenges, students consider diverse perspectivesand develop inclusive solutions that address the
persons, five members of the NSF project team plus one graduate student, oneinstructor and one laboratory staff development person engaged with first-year engineeringcourses at Ohio State, then contributed ratings for each of the 66 items in the context ofapplicability to a minor or course as either an educational objective or a program outcome usingthe draft definitions of those two terms. Each item was rated on a 1 to 4 scale as: 1-Notapplicable, 2-Secondary impact, 3-Consider in Modified Form, 4-Should be included.Comments space was available for each item. Suggested edits for the definitions were alsosolicited. After review of the consolidated responses, it was decided to work further with thoseitems that ranked above the median for
incorporate reflective shortessays that provide context and connection between student experiences and their futureprofessional and personal aspirations. They have been successfully used by students to showcasetheir accomplishments to potential employers. They have also been beneficial for engineeringprograms to communicate the achievement of student outcomes with ABET program evaluatorsand institutional assessment personnel.This paper compares and contrasts the implementation of ePortfolios by two undergraduatebiosystems / biological engineering programs at two different universities: Auburn Universityand the Ohio State University. One program embeds ePortfolio requirements over three yearsand four courses; the other program highlights the portfolio
exploration.Since this session took place prior to the submission of the write-up, students were encouraged touse this as an opportunity to improve their final model, analysis, and results; questions from theinstructor were directed at further development of the work. This mindset is consistent with theiterative nature of the modeling process and supports growth in multiple career competencies.Overall ObservationsExperiences in the classroom were generally seen as positive. Students were typically engaged inclass despite low energy levels due to it being scheduled in an unpopular timeslot. However, theassessments and course material overall were found to be challenging, both conceptually and inspecific computational skills. This difficulty had an impact on
. Kerrie Douglas, Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue, studies how to improve the quality of classroom assessments and evaluation of online learning in a variety of engineering education contexts. She holds a PhD in Educational Psychology and a M.A. in Educational Studies, with focus on school counseling. She is a co-PI on the SCALE project, leading the evaluation and assessment efforts. She recently received an NSF award to study engineering instructor decisions and student support during COVID-19 and impact the pandemic is having on engineering students. She also recently won the prestigious CAREER award from the U.S. National Science Foundation to study increasing the fairness of engineering
students with constructive feedback to help them learn more effectively. The valueplaced on this learning was enhanced by class discussions of the use of models in the SEMI-STEM approach as well as how these types of activities can impact the students’ self-confidenceand professional career interests. Design is a neglected context for learning science and designactivities not only help students learn science content, but also engage students in scientificdiscourse9. We found that the design process had to be embedded in a student-selected designproject, experience using design tools, and a community that supports iterative reflections anddiscussions and continuous feedback for peers1\0.Our goal was to not only develop exemplary learning materials
. A final survey and individualizedassessments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the program and progress of theindividual students, respectively. Students demonstrated familiarity with basic research methodsand universally reported increased interest in STEM education and careers, with several continuingto work in their labs beyond the program’s formal duration.Keywords — Research-based Learning, Community Colleges, Minority ParticipationIntroductionDespite efforts, underrepresented minority (URM) and female students are disproportionatelyrepresented in STEM disciplines based on their fraction in United States demographics. Femalesand URMs face unique challenges in STEM compared with their white male peers, which need tobe