difficult and stressful time of life, but I’ll focus more on the generaltypes and sources of assistance. Aside from the teachers and staff at Twin Cities Engineering(TCE), the clients, mentors, and other students were of great help and impact to me.Additionally, my network of support extends beyond Minnesota State Mankato and mycommunity college. Without these helping hands, shoulders to lean on, and creativebrainstormers in my corner, I feel that I wouldn’t have made it this far or have been successful inmy classes at TCE.Primarily, the teachers can develop strong emotional connections with each of their studentsbecause of the small size of the program. This was one of the main factors that led me tochoosing to apply for the Integrated Engineering
Paper ID #21717Supporting Veteran Students Transitioning to EngineeringDr. Colleen Janeiro, East Carolina University Dr. Colleen Janeiro teaches engineering fundamentals such as Introduction to Engineering, Materials and Processes, and Statics. Her teaching interests include development of solid communication skills and enhancing laboratory skills.Dr. Teresa Ryan, East Carolina University Dr. Teresa Ryan teaches mechanical engineering fundamentals such as Dynamics, Mechanics of Materi- als, Acoustics and Vibrations. She also focuses on technical communication skills within an engineering context. Her research interests
opportunity toreinforce their classroom learning, they also get to appreciate the limitations of the theory.The importance of laboratory experimentation dictates the need for the engineer to becomefamiliar with the methods of measurement as well as analysis techniques for interpretingexperimental data. Engineering laboratories provide unique opportunities for students tohave hands on experiences and is revealing for them to see that some simple experiments donot provide the “exact” anticipated solution as prescribed by theory. This scenario allows theintroduction of practical topics like calibration, error analysis and design of experiments.The authors agree that laboratory experiences prove to be valuable to students and arecertainly useful once
ofFigure 1-Final survey. Therefore, the IE Challenge, as a culmination of the IE lesson materials,has certainly achieved what it was designed to accomplish.4. ConclusionA hands-on, realistic project is used to illustrate the nature of Industrial Engineering in an Page 26.1008.7introduction-to-engineering freshman-level course. Student teams are tasked with designing theseat widths of a passenger airplane as well as determining the travel route. Both IE subfields ofHuman Factors and Operations Research have a role in this exercise. Seat design involves theusage of anthropometric data and the awareness of gender and ethnic differences. Selecting
not limited to,underrepresented multicultural students on a path toward success in Purdue’s graduate programs.(6) Summer Undergraduate Research Interns (SURI).The College of Engineering has the following programs in undergraduate research. (1)Biomedical Engineering Research Experience for Undergraduates: Non-Purdue students whohave completed 4 semesters of undergraduate work. (2) Civil Engineering Research Internship:10-week Joint Transportation Research Program. (3) Introduction to Engineering Opportunitiesthrough Research in Materials Processing: This program welcomes students in science andengineering who have little or no background in materials engineering. (4) SummerUndergraduate Research Fellowships Program (SURF): A campus-wide
AC 2011-1000: ENERGY HARVESTING FOR ENGINEERING EDUCA-TORSEric C Dierks, The University of Texas at Austin Mr. Dierks is currently a Master’s student at The University of Texas at Austin working on powering structural health monitoring systems through energy harvesting and scavenging. He also earned a BSME from the same university in 2008. Following this he worked for the Institute for Advanced Technology in Austin modeling, simulating, optimizing, and testing battery-inductor pulsed power supplies for electro- magnetic rail guns for the US Army and Navy. There, he also briefly served as a reviewer for Carnegie Mellon’s autonomous platform demonstrator robotic program.Jason M Weaver, The University of Texas at
preparing the engineers of tomorrow. The non-profit organization FIRST TM hascreated FIRSTTM LEGO® League to encourage and equip students to pursue careers inengineering and technology fields. As Dean Kamen, the founder of FIRST TM, encourages, “Weneed to show kids that it's more fun to design and create a video game than to play one."2Overview of FIRST TM LEGO® LeagueFIRSTTM is committed to designing “innovative programs to build self-confidence, knowledgeand life skills while motivating young people to pursue opportunities in science, technology andengineering.”3 FIRST TM encourages collaboration between schools and industry to buildpartnerships between existing and future engineers. 4FLL was created by FIRSTTM as a nation-wide program to
. Page 10.224.13 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society of Engineering EducationSTACY S. KLEIN teaches high school physics courses at University School of Nashville, TN, and undergraduateengineering courses at Vanderbilt University. An active developer of new high school and undergraduate curriculathrough the VaNTH ERC, she is co-PI of the NSF-sponsored projects, "Biomedical Imaging Education: Safe,Inexpensive Hands-On Learning" and the Vanderbilt BME RET Site Program.ANITA MAHADEVAN-JANSEN received her Bachelor and Master of Science degrees in Physics from theUniversity of Bombay, Bombay, India, her Master and Doctoral
placed in the front office of the Engineering Opportunities Center (EOC). The EOC is a location within the WCOE that offers resources on tutoring, career opportunities, community, and retention (Engineering Opportunities Center, 2016). During these hours, students can walkin and ask general questions to the Diplomats. Popular program marketing materials are available for Diplomats to hand out and they utilize computers to help students navigate the IEP website. These three things are some of the largest uses of time for IEP advisors and by utilizing the Diplomats, IEP advisors are able to work on projects and other duties. The IEP has worked hard since the organization’s creation to grow membership, expand duties, and increase their presence
Session Number: 3532 Teaching Software Engineering Bottom Up R. E. K. Stirewalt Software Engineering and Network Systems Laboratory Department of Computer Science and Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48840 e-mail: stire@cse.msu.eduAbstractA typical CS curriculum contains a course on software engineering, which introducesprinciples and heuristic methods for designing large software systems subject to desirableproperties, such as maintainability and extensibility
-Southwest Annual Conference Baylor University, Waco, TX Copyright 2021, American Society for Engineering Education 4“Six distinct themes — lessons learned — emerged as central to the design of effective andflexible engineering program design: • The blurring of disciplinary boarders. • Holistic approach to problem-solving. • Informed by business. • Customizable curriculum. • Dynamic, hands-on learning. • Effective assessment.To remain relevant in the competitive higher education landscape and to effectively developstudents who can meet the needs of today’s global economy, university leadership must bethoughtful about
leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. The Leadership Quarterly 25, pp. 63- 82. 2. Judge, T.A., Piccolo, R.F., and Kosalka, T. (2009). The Bright and Dark Sides of Leader Traits: A Review and Theoretical Extension of the Leader Trait Paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly 20, pp. 855-875. 3. Kraut, R. (2014). Aristotle’s ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zalta, E.N., ed. URL = 4. Steiner, C.J. (1998, February). Educating for innovation and management: the engineering educator’s dilemma. IEEE Transactions on Education 41(1), pp. 1-7. 5. Steiner, C.J. (1999, August). Constructive Science and Technology Studies: On the Path to Being? Social Studies of
towards the completion of the high school competitionproject, but offered one Summer Honors Institute course before moving to his current institutionwhere he teaches Animatronics as a part their high school summer camps as well as theintroduction to engineering course.The author originally employed the idea of using non-kit-based structural, mechanical, electricaland electronics parts while he took advantage of the scrap components and materials in hislaboratories. Over the first few years, this proved to be a challenging but a good concept becauseof the low cost. ZOOB construction toys, shown in Figure 2, were also used due to theirflexibility and help in 3D visualization of concepts alongside the sculpting materials. Five yearsago the author
the AFE enterprise have participated fully in the design process,working with faculty in chemical engineering (CM) and research staff at the KeweenawResearch Center (KRC). This group has expertise in vehicle design, simulation, andtesting. The CM/KRC collaboration helps satisfy the multidisciplinary mission of theenterprise program and gives the students exposure to diverse levels of expertise.Description of Fuel Cells ModuleWith the formation of the AFE Enterprise, students could take up to 8 credits of projectwork in the area of alternative energy. To provide students core material in one form ofalternative energy, a one credit-module course was developed and taught during the fallsemester of 2004 (by Keith and Opella) and 2005 (by Keith
Christian currently serves the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers as a Manager for the Research & Innovation office. She helps lead the MentorSHPE and InternSHPE programs in this role. In her former roles she has served as the Assistant Director for the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED) at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, VA from 2010-2020. Prior to joining Virginia Tech in September of 2010, she served as the Outreach Program Coordinator for the Women in Engineering & Science Program at Kansas State University from 2000-2010. She began her work in STEM outreach and student support at Girls to Women, a private not for profit in Kansas City, in the late 90’s. She has also served on the
Page 12.678.2existing … capabilities to integrate them within networked optical communications testbeds atthe physical layer...” The phrases “build on existing” and “integrate…within” quickly illustratethe relevance of the role of Engineering Technology. Moreover: although the technologicalimplications are astounding; the underlying mathematics is very simple and readily accessible toEngineering Technology students. These students are also well versed in most of the practicalissues at hand. In particular, those in our photonics program are already experienced in practicaloptical hardware issues involving detectors and photonic sources (two of the key elements forimplementation).Another reason to involve Engineering Technology is because now is
Paper ID #39796Analysis of Engineering Textbook EpistemologiesDr. Michael Robinson, Saint Vincent College Michael Robinson received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Penn State University. He is cur- rently an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Saint Vincent College in Latrobe, Pennsylvania. His academic experience includes positions as an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Messiah College, and as a Visiting Lecturer at Ashesi University in Ghana. His research interests include autonomous vehicle pedestrian avoidance algorithms as well as the development of threaded hands-on experiments to provide students
foundation needed to support successful andsustainable joint-research activities. They also view such programs as a prime opportunity tobenchmark each other’s academic programs, thus providing a thorough, global benchmark tocomplement their respective portfolios of domestic benchmark partners. It is in this context thatthese two research universities have developed a bilateral senior year abroad program and a dualMaster of Science degree program in Mechanical Engineering, both in which the students studyin the language of the host university and graduate on schedule. This paper describes the designof these two programs.Keywords: International education; Study abroad; Dual degree programIntroductionThe objectives of engineering education are evolving
wrong was one that I really thought was correct, I need to goback and re-evaluate my level of understanding of the material.” Given the meanings that areultimately assigned to features of the problem solving experience, what actions could follow? Inthis case, different meanings could lead to different strategies used in subsequent problemsolving efforts.Consider the student who “starts thinking about whether engineering is the best major for her.”This student’s reflective challenge is to determine how to interpret features of her experience interms of their meaning using an identity lens. For example, should her concerns about thedifficulty of the subject matter be interpreted as meaning that she does not belong, or does shedetermine that her
, withcontinuity and symmetry controls, into entirely new freeform shapes, and then converted backinto a solid. Figure 2 shows some examples.Many GE 101 students comment on how different this course is when compared to the normaldose of math, science, and engineering science courses taken at this traditional researchuniversity. They frequently ask about the availability of other courses like this one. Manystudents clearly appreciate this change of pace and there is a growing interest from engineeringstudents in a broader, human-centered approach to design. This is evident in the extra-curricularactivities at UIUC in the iFoundry 3 and IEFX 4 initiatives, started in 2009, which are aimed attransforming the engineering curriculum. Some of these activities
simulation skills. To facilitate this teaching, web-based course materials arealso implemented on our Blackboard site for use by students. The idea behind this teachingstructure is to see how the traditional traffic engineering learning experience can be enhancedthrough cooperative simulation and a real-life engineering project. It is expected that thisintegration will enable students to learn by simulating, the next best thing to learning by doing,and the only practical approach in a field such as transportation that involves various drivers,vehicles and control decisions at any time. It will thus enable them to critically think abouttransportation problems and solutions and will produce students who understand the theory tosupport their
perspective. In reality, there will never be simple levers toadjust on a laptop computer to change global policy and greenhouse gas emissions, yet there arereal people across society working tirelessly to do their part.ConclusionThe idea of running a climate change simulation for a group of engineering students with noprofessed interest in the subject can be unnerving, however the resources provided by ClimateInteractive and the UMass Lowell Climate Change Initiative make the project manageable, evenfor educators with no formal background in climate science. As many of the students soarticulately stated, addressing the problem of climate change will take everyone, not the actionsof a few, to be successful. “Everyone” includes engineering educators
focus in engineering and science educa- tion. Founder of the Design Entrepreneuring Studio: Barbara helps teams generate creative environments. Companies that she has worked with renew their commitment to innovation. She also helps students an- swer these questions when she teaches some of these methods to engineering, design, business, medicine, and law students. Her courses use active storytelling and self-reflective observation as one form to help student and industry leaders traverse across the iterative stages of a project- from the early, inspirational stages to prototyping and then to delivery. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Implementing Abbreviated Personas into
most of the 'college survival skills' texts on the marketdo not focus solely on skills or tools, but instead cover additional material often found in a three-credit FYE orientation course. Of the texts on the market, the work by Pauk [8] serves as nicereference. Engineers tend to be focused students in search of tools to put into practice and lessconcerned about 'wellness' material often found in other books. Students in the course are expected to · Attend class · Prepare weekly one-page ‘journal entries’ in response to a question on that week’s material · Complete infrequent self-exploration exercises · Use email · Attend the Career Fair · Attend a meeting of the student
teaching and learning when it is integrated with other subject matter?" and "what are someimportant things to consider when attempting this sort of integration?" The evidence needed toanswer these questions is ultimately to be found in student learning outcomes. This, however, isnot the only source of evidence. How the integration of engineering into other content areasaffects teacher thinking and behavior also speaks to these questions. The planning and teachingof a novice teacher, as told in her own words, is the focus of this paper. The teacher is workingin the subject area of science, more specifically she is teaching ideas about scientific reasoning tomiddle school students. The instructional approach she follows relies on ideas from
teaching and learning when it is integrated with other subject matter?" and "what are someimportant things to consider when attempting this sort of integration?" The evidence needed toanswer these questions is ultimately to be found in student learning outcomes. This, however, isnot the only source of evidence. How the integration of engineering into other content areasaffects teacher thinking and behavior also speaks to these questions. The planning and teachingof a novice teacher, as told in her own words, is the focus of this paper. The teacher is workingin the subject area of science, more specifically she is teaching ideas about scientific reasoning tomiddle school students. The instructional approach she follows relies on ideas from
licensure. Dr. Mentzer’s educational efforts in pedagogical content knowledge are guided by a research theme centered in student learning of engineer- ing design thinking on the secondary level. Nathan was a former middle and high school technology educator in Montana prior to pursuing a doctoral degree. He was a National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction. After graduation he completed a one year appointment with the Center as a postdoctoral researcher.Dr. Dawn Laux, Purdue University Dawn Laux is a Clinical Associate Professor in the Department of Computer and Information Technology (CIT) at Purdue University
Page 26.142.2only then will the paper discuss some of the best practices this program evaluator has seen overthe past twenty accreditation visits.Background What does ABET stand for and what do they strive for? As stated on the ABET history web page[4] ABET is simply ABET. ABET only goes by its “Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology, Inc.” corporate name when required by law. ABET’s full vision and mission can befound at their website [5] and can be summarized as serving the global public in many waysthrough assuring quality and stimulating innovation. ABET is organized into four commissions: Applied Science Accreditation Commission (ASAC),Computing Accreditation Commission (CAC), Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC)and
from the dialogs in the second run.There are multiple approaches available through the use of SEEA and ALATs to analyze theevidence of systems engineering competencies learning trajectories. Incorporating the findings ofthis research, the following assessment approaches are worth considering: • Experts’ review and examination • Analysis of learners’ in-SEEA behaviors • Learners’ project performance • Learners’ self-evaluation surveyAs shown in Table 1, each approach has strengths and limitations. (i) Assessment throughexperts’ review and examination is the most popular existing approach. While it tests learners’knowledge and understanding, it lacks the consideration of learners’ hands-on skills andcapabilities. This
, motors,connecting wires and a programmable remote control system. The teams use these materials todesign and construct robotic devices that accomplish a simulated maritime mission. The kit ofparts is reusable each year and requires little machine-shop work to create machines, therebymaking this project ideal for repeated use. The experience is modeled on the capstone designactivity and contains many attributes of the final design experience. The U.S. Coast GuardAcademy has been the only program using this commercially available kit of parts and hasworked with the vendors to improve the system as a tool for engineering design education.IntroductionProviding engineering undergraduates with a sound introduction to the fundamental tools forsuccess