University and has served in the professorate since 1999. She holds a Ph. D. in Educational Administration from the University of Wisconsin-Madison with a minor in Curriculum and Instruction. Dr. Hobson has written and received grants on the k-12 and university levels related to the areas of teacher recruitment and re- tention, language arts, mathematics, science, and technology. Her research areas include: leadership and organizational development, teacher leadership, mentoring, student retention, and student engagement.Pamela Holland Obiomon, Prairie View A&M University Pamela Obiomon received a BS degree in electrical engineering from the University of Texas, Arlington TX, in 1991, a MS in engineering degree from
by this type of learning, a zoom-conference based class consistingof three second grade children was created. Each day Monday through Thursday the childrenwere presented a hands-on engineering design challenge that utilized materials found in theirhomes. The children had not been previously exposed to the engineering design process (EDP).The theoretical framework for this study lies in the areas of engineering identity as well asteamwork and feedback through engineering discourse. The research questions for this studywere the following: 1) What are the impacts of teaching the engineering design process onlinevia zoom conference on development of children’s ability to use engineering discourse? Arestudents able to master the steps of the
collaborative design of infrastructure systems.Dr. Olivier Ladislas de Weck, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Olivier de Weck is a Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems at MIT. His research focuses on the technological evolution of complex systems over time, both on Earth and in Space . He is a Fellow of INCOSE and served as Editor-in-Chief for the Systems Engineering journal from 2013 to 2018. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 LEGO Product Design and Manufacturing Simulations for Engineering Design and Systems Engineering EducationAbstractThis paper describes a hands-on classroom activity to introduce students to engineering
Paper ID #21118Developing and Assessing a Music Technology and Coding Workshop forYoung WomenMs. Abigail Jagiela, University of St. ThomasJenna Laleman, University of St. Thomas Jenna is a senior at the University of St. Thomas, finishing up her Bachelor’s Degree in Elementary Education and STEM Education with a minor in Psychology. Jenna collaborates with the Center for Engineering Education to create outreach curriculum. She works in her university’s Playful Learning Lab which focuses on engaging students of all ages in hands-on, innovative engineering education, especially focusing on reaching the underrepresented
bio for each presenter (in the order listed above). The bio shouldnot exceed 70 words and should be written as you would want it to appear on the ASEE websiteand program materials.1) Ann Kaiser, CEO of ProjectEngin LLC, has extensive experience as both an engineer and aneducator. A graduate of Columbia University’s Schools of Engineering and International andPublic Affairs, she is committed to developing global citizenship through K-12 engineeringcurriculum. Ann is a Fulbright Distinguished Teacher and has presented as a Top OverseasTeacher in Singapore and a keynote speaker at the 2015 Danish Big Bang National ScienceTeachers Conference.2)3) WORKSHOP INFORMATIONProposed Title:Building a Better World
contributions of material?· What does the DL need to satisfy user needs: “inspire learning of undergraduate SME&T”?· What is the need for adaptive, flexible and responsive to unforeseen needs and problems?While the aim is to bring digital resources into the hands of students in technical disciplines, theapproach to the above problems so far has been conducted from the perspective of the librarianand the social scientist. In the 1990s, there was a major thrust at NSF to bring psychologists andresearchers in the cognitive sciences into the business of engineering education, and to apply theresearch literature on cognitive sciences to the teaching of engineering. However, there has notbeen a commensurate effort to educate the social scientists about
Technology. She spent nine years on Vibration Institute’s Board of Directors, and continues to serve on its Academic and Certification Scheme Committees. She is a Fellow and former Board member of ASEE, and a member of ASME. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Development of Techie TimesAbstractSummer 2020 provided the motivation and opportunity to move summer outreach programs intothe virtual world. Faculty and students in the Purdue University School of EngineeringTechnology moved face-to-face programs into a middle school program called Techie Times.This program was designed to provide students with an organized platform
taught by SFSU engineering faculty from Civil, Electrical,Mechanical and Computer engineering programs. The redesigned summer program involvesprojects that were specifically designed to motivate students’ interest in hands-on research. Theprogram also offers students the opportunity to gain insight into various engineering careeroptions, and academic programs through a combination of lectures, field trips, and workshops.Preliminary results indicate SEI participants showed greater understanding of the engineeringprofession and increased interest in STEM fields. This paper aims to show how a summerengineering program can be designed to enhance interest in engineering among minoritystudents, and how faculty can be actively involved in designing a
week was visiting the Marathon Oil refinery. The participantslearned first-hand about the oil refining process and related career opportunities available to theirstudents. They also toured the oil refinery and participated in an interactive lunch discussion withrecent hires and current interns. The panel was comprised of traditionally underrepresentedgroups in engineering. The panel of recent hires and interns discussed the importance ofmathematics and science in high school and the potential impact teachers have on their students‘lives. The panel discussion was a turning point for some teachers because they were hearing theneeds of their diverse students directly from recent high school graduates.RationaleEducation policy reports, consumer
teach them how to 3D print parts created. 2) Improve students’ STEM skills. 3) Introduce the students to advanced manufacturing (AM), solar energy, and materials science and engineering. 4) Improve students’ communication skills.The camp involved twelve high school students (mainly 10th and 11th grade) and a high schoolteacher in a two-week workshop. The aim of the camp was to provide the students hands-onexperience in modeling and generating engineering designs using Autodesk Inventor™ 3D CADcomputer program which is one of the programs used for solid modeling. The program is similarto PTC CREO that is used in Honeywell at the Kansas City Plant, and many other industries. Onemajor advantage of the program is that interested students
part of ENGR 170. The paper concludes with a briefdiscussion of the future directions of this project. IntroductionFaculty at Iowa State University (ISU) have used the process of reverse engineering for the pastfive years to introduce lower division engineering students to product design principles. The ef- Page 2.489.1fort was initiated as part of the National Science Foundation’s Synthesis Coalition, a group ofeight colleges and universities that emphasizes a hands-on approach to engineering education.Since most entry level engineering students do not possess the needed analysis and technicalskills, it
Mechanics,” “ExperimentalAerodynamics,” “Structures,” “Space Mechanics,” and “Spacecraft Detail Design.” A strongemphasis on laboratory and design work prepares students for their senior capstone designcourses, and the engineering faculty stresses an applied, “hands-on” approach to learning.Along with general engineering courses such as “Introduction to Engineering” and various mathand science courses, typical core requirements for the engineering programs at our universityinclude general education courses such as “Engineering and Society,” “Introduction toGeography,” and “Values and Ethics.” As potential pathways to learning, these courses provideunique opportunities for sustainability education. Various minor fields of study may alsoprovide
Paper ID #23669Implementing the Wright State Model First-Year Engineering MathematicsCourse in a Startup School of EngineeringDr. Lynn A Albers, Campbell University Dr. Lynn Albers is an Assistant Professor in the newly formed School of Engineering at Campbell Uni- versity. A proponent of Hands-On Activities in the classroom and during out-of-school time programs, she believes that they complement any teaching style thereby reaching all learning styles. She earned her doctorate in Mechanical Engineering from North Carolina State University specializing in thermal sci- ences where her dissertation research spanned three
processes. For example, General Electric (GE) Corporation has investedapproximately $1.5 billion in advanced manufacturing and additive technologies, in addition tobuilding a global network of Additive centers focused on advancing science [2]. The companyuses the additive manufacturing processes for manufacturing its jet engine nozzles because ituses less material than conventional techniques. That reduces production costs and, because itmakes the parts lighter, yields significant fuel savings for airlines. Conventional techniqueswould require welding about 20 small pieces together, a labor-intensive process in which a highpercentage of the material ends up being scrapped [3]. In order to be competent, modernengineers will need more advanced skills
understanding of engineering or engineering concepts. This diversityof skills and backgrounds constitute the major challenge for designing an engineeringcourse applicable to the general student population. Pertinent to the Dept. of MechanicalEngineering, the list of possible classes might include bioengineering and development oftechnology. The requirements further requested that students learn how to access scientific orengineering literature along with an emphasis on the nature of engineering or scientific 92inquiry and research methodology. The basic rationale was that students should be able tounderstand basic science and engineering technology reports associated with the news,health, environmental
accommodate this growing body ofknowledge, as well as growth in our student population, we went from a completely lecture-based course to a blended model using well documented active learning strategies [1-4]. Theformat we employed utilizes online lectures covering the foundational materials science,immunology, and traditional application of biomaterials. The in-class time was then repurposedfor three activities: 1. lectures on the latest research and applications in the field, 2. groupdiscussions around case-studies, and 3. hands-on laboratories. While the online material receivedmixed reviews, the repurposed activities were appreciated and improvements were seen in finalexam scores.IntroductionOur biomaterials course had been developed as a purely
on how theyintegrate learning across levels (vertically) or disciplines (horizontally), and on standards oflearning and achievement to which students and teachers can aspire. Using anecdotal evidence toimplement target standards, usually erring on the side of mediocrity, is very detrimental toengineering education and research, as pointed out by Labaree3.There are several learning issues in context to engineering students that need to be addressedprior to developing any teaching approach. They include the classification of learning styles ofengineering students, how should the material best be presented to promote learning, and howoften should the material be revisited. In addition, the ABET 2000 criteria specifically requirethat students
tothe Structures course. The Structures course is open to students of all majors. In the spring 2015semester, 149 students enrolled in the course. Approximately 60% of the students were majoringin the humanities or social sciences and 40% were natural science or engineering majors. Thesurvey was administered during the last two weeks of classes and 65 students completed thesurvey, which equates to a response rate of 44%.The survey contained four open-ended questions. We received 260 responses to the 4 questions(116 open-ended questions were left unanswered). In the last third of the semester, the firstauthor on this paper, recruited and conducted focus groups. Two students engaged in individualinterviews and three additional students
MechanicalEngineering, Physics, Atmospheric Science and Meteorology, and Computer Science andTechnology disciplines. This group of students under the guidance of faculty advisors weretasked to address a specific ocean engineering challenge named Perseus II, sponsored by theOffice of the Secretary of Defense’s Rapid Reaction Technology Office (RRTO). Briefly, thisproject involved the design, assembly and demonstration of an Unmanned Underwater Vehicle(UUV), Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) or Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) that iscapable of searching for, locating, and collecting information on objects that are potentiallyunexploded ordnances (UXO). More project details on the vehicle assembly and demonstrationcan be found in Ref. [4]. The focus of this
supports the specific and explicit connection of topicsfrom different disciplines, it may make the retrieval of knowledge more efficient when applyingthat knowledge in a new setting [6]. A meta-analysis by Becker and Park [7] suggest thatintegrated STEM education has positive impacts on students’ ability to transfer knowledge tonew settings and problems. Consistent with this extant research, results of our recent studyshowed that the integrated engineering curriculum described in this paper significantlyincreased students’ mathematics and science test scores [8]. In addition to investigating thetransfer of specific knowledge within and across STEM disciplines, there is a long tradition ofeducational research concerned more generally with the
departments within the College ofEngineering”. It includes ”foundation material in: problem definition, solution and presentation;design, including hands-on realization working in teams; modeling and visual representation ofabstract and physical objects; scientific computation; algorithm development, computerimplementation and application; documentation; ethics; professionalism” 38, p.2. The portion ofthe course that the present study focuses on is a two to three week course unit on engineeringethics, which aims to provide an introduction of engineering ethics to students38. Participants for this study were students in one of the lecture sections of the course. Thefaculty member who taught the lecture has had several years’ of experience
earned her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from Ohio State and earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests focus on the intersection between motivation and identity of undergraduate and graduate students, first-year engineering programs, mixed methods research, and innovative approaches to teaching.Dr. Karen E. Irving, The Ohio State University Karen E. Irving is an Associate Professor in the School of Teaching and Learning at The Ohio State University. She earned her B.S. and M.S. in Chemistry at Bucknell University and Ph.D. in Science Edu- cation at the University of Virginia. Dr. Irving was co-principal investigator on the Connected Classrooms in Promoting
Paper ID #26085The Diversified Implementation Path of China’s ”New Engineering” Con-struction and the University’s Choice of PathsDr. Lina Wei, Zhejiang University Wei Lina, Ph.D candidate in Institute of China’s Science Technology and Education Policy in Zhejiang University. Research direction:Engineering education reform and interdisciplinary research.Prof. Wei Zhang, Zhejiang University 2015-Present Professor, Institute of China’s Science,Technology and Education Strategy, Zhejiang Uni- versity Associate director of Research Center on Science and Education Development Strategy, Zhejiang University 2012-2014 Professor
the hopes that they willpursue engineering careers. The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy ofEngineering, and Institute of Medicine issued a report entitled “Rising Above the Page 14.554.2Gathering Storm,” which declares that the need to develop new K-12 curriculummaterials in science and mathematics is of the highest priority.4In the development of the INSPIRES curriculum, several factors were considered for thisnew and innovative approach to engineering technology. The intention of the INSPIRESCurriculum is that learning materials should be accessible to all high schools andincorporate hands-on activities and design challenges
as much aspossible.” One example of a project-based, hands-on learning course is Toying WithTechnology. By experiencing inquiry, problem-solving, and investigations asundergraduates, future teachers are able to pose worthwhile tasks and structuremeaningful inquiry in their own K-12 classrooms. Page 5.177.2Teachers working with a base knowledge of engineering can naturally encourage studentsto consider engineering as an interesting area to explore. A national commitment topreparing teachers with an understanding of engineering concepts will have the mostimpact on increasing the number of students remaining engaged in technology, science,and
, BME has been recognized as an engineering discipline unique in itspurpose and practice. Early on, BME was recognized for being more deeply aligned withtraditional science, biology in particular, than other engineering disciplines [4]. BME’s uniqueposition is illustrated in the varied structures of BME programs at institutions around the world.BME programs stem from electrical, mechanical, and materials engineering departments andmany programs partner with medical schools [1]. Across different institutions, BME career pathsvary, ranging from medical school, graduate school, the medical device industry, thepharmaceutical industry, and more. The broad interpretation of a BME degree is also reflected instudents’ perceptions of BME. When asked
100% of judges 100% of corporate partners The Infinity ProjectIn response to the low numbers of high school students pursuing degrees in engineering, theInfinity Project was developed to introduce students to engineering in a year-long high schoolcourse. Developed by a team of university professors, high school teachers, working engineers,and leading researchers, the Infinity Project puts engineering in the hands of high school studentsin a fun, cost-effective, hands-on curriculum that makes math and science relevant in today’shigh-tech world. The Infinity Project provides a complete turnkey solution including world-class Proceedings of
experienced architect knows that the role involves not just these technical activities,but others that are more political and strategic in nature on the one hand, and more like those of aconsultant, on the other.” On the Software Engineering Institute website,6 looking at the manycontributions for, “What are the duties, skills, etc. of a chief software architect?” one finds atheme that “communications with the technical and business teams” is either the number oneskill, or at least a tie with high-level design skills.”For undergraduate software engineering students, a strong role-playing experience enables thislink to the world of the software architect. Some of the social skills are learned, and the rest canbe appreciated from first-hand experience
. Watson teaches computer science and software engineering courses as an associate professor at National University (La Jolla, CA) while continuing research in the areas of human and machine cognition. He holds a joint doctoral degree in Education with emphasis on education technology and multicultural education from Claremont Graduate University and San© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Diego State University. His research work in metacognitive analysis has garnered a number of awards, including Phi Delta Kappa's 2002 Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation, and the top Award in Educational Research for the California State University. Dr. Watson has a B.A. in Economics
hasbeen debate among the faculty over the course content. Should it be soft and fun, aimedat developing creativity so as not to scare away students? Or should it be more difficultand rigorous, presenting significant fundamental concepts and the development of goodpractices in terms of engineering analysis, problem solving, experimentation andreporting which would lay a foundation for engineering science courses in the sophomoreyear? The course has leaned in both of these directions over the last few years. Recentlythe course has sought to achieve a balance and be, on one hand, fun and interesting forthe students and at the same time provide some significant coverage of some importanttopics in engineering and introduce the design process.Team