as a Phi Beta Kappa member and an American Chemical Society Scholar. Dr. Henderson completed his Ph.D. in Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. As a graduate student, he was a NASA Harriet G. Jenkins Graduate Fellow and mentor for the Summer Research Opportunities Program. Dr. Henderson has dedicated his career to increasing the number of students on pathways to pursue STEM careers. He believes that exposing students to STEM early will impact their lives and academic pursuits. He, along with Rick Greer, co-founded the St. Elmo Brady STEM Academy (SEBA). SEBA is an educational intervention that introduces underrepresented and underserved fourth and fifth-grade
Original Quarter One Projects Utilizing Rapid Prototyping Bruce A. Feodoroff New England Institute of TechnologyAbstractThis paper describes the success New England Institute of Technology (NEIT) is experiencing ingrabbing hold of the first quarter students’ creative energy and motivating them to succeed inMechanical Engineering Technology. The introduction and use of a rapid prototype machine hassignificantly impacted not only the quality of the resulting original project models or prototypesbut has greatly enhanced the learning experience for quarter one (freshmen) students. This hashelped in sustaining the students’ interest in Mechanical Engineering
. Her current research interests include the effect of instructional technology on student learning and performance, effective teaching strategies for new graduate student instructors, and the impact of GSI mentoring programs on the mentors and mentees.Chris Groscurth , University of Michigan Christopher R. Groscurth is an instructional consultant in the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching (CRLT) at the University of Michigan. At CRLT Chris promotes excellence in teaching and learning through individual consultation, professional development programs, and applied research. He has a Ph.D. from the Department of Speech Communication at the University of Georgia, and his research
), Construction Engineering (Engr439), Finite Element Methods (Engr 432) and Mechanical and Structural Vibrations (Engr 461).Most of these courses focus on basic design-oriented content to prepare students for practicalexperience. In their last semester, students enroll in a required two-course sequence, SeniorDesign Project (Engr 696/697), in which they: (1) engage in laboratory and field exercises anddemonstrations; (2) discuss the selection of design projects, methods of research, engineeringprofessional practice, ethics, and time management; (3) select, develop, schedule and completean original design project; and (4) present the project orally and in writing. This advanced workis done with maximum independence under the supervision of a faculty
.” These are all examples of activevoice, which Lisa maintained throughout the majority of her interview. Lisa also displayed astrength in problem definition, describing herself as “vigilant and constantly questioning”(00:13:09.930 - 00:13:27.600) structures and the impacts on those involved.In contrast, Summer’s interview provided numerous examples of problem definition, withcomparatively fewer examples of direct problem solving. Summer posed many questions relevantto macroethics and social justice, demonstrating deep understanding and engagement of thesetopics in her work, including her teaching. She gave a number of examples of seeking to promoteaction in students and across the university to answer the questions and solve the problems
improvementrate, nor to generate a deep impact into organization’ KPIs [2]. Therefore, it is crucial forengineering students to get involved in the complexities of interacting with people whenimplanting Lean, to correctly develop their skills in continuous improvement.However, a common limitation for students that are learning Lean Manufacturing is the lack ofexposure to real situations in which Lean is being implemented, such as practices in laboratories,participation in real-world experiences or access to available processes, where implementing leantools and measuring the impact on KPI’s is taking place [3].Attending this urgent need of students to participate in real life process, in Tecnologico deMonterrey, we have designed a course named “Design of
the contextualfactors important to SRL among college engineering students, we engaged in anethnographically-informed study of engineering students who study in teams outside theclassroom environment. Time outside the classroom is often structured by the studentsthemselves in response to the requirements of their courses and competing demands. A focus onthis self-structured time enables us to consider the specific contextual factors that contribute tostudents’ SRL within these outside the class environments where they are making choices aboutlearning habits that impact what, where, how and with whom to study. Situated in a larger study,in this analysis we describe one specific example of how context can impact students’approaches to learning
more involved in now that were mentioned bythe deans include faculty commercializing their research, helping a graduate student start acompany, creating a makerspace, giving a Ted Talk, and creating educational innovations. DeanL explicitly discussed some of the changes they have made in their tenure and promotionguidelines that grant merit in engaging in these types of activities. According to dean L, thesetypes of institutional changes further validate and encourage faculty to participate in non-traditional activities as long as they can demonstrate they make an impact. Dean D (from anR1/R2 private institution) that mentioned the importance of EM in supporting educationalinnovations stated: I think the broad academic community values
18 years old.The mission of FIRST is to “inspire young people to be science and technology leaders,by engaging them in exciting mentor-based programs that build science, engineering andtechnology skills, that inspire innovation, and that foster well-rounded life capabilitiesincluding self-confidence, communication, and leadership.”3 FIRST is driven by over90,000 volunteers and supported by “a network of more than 3,500 corporations,educational and professional institutions, and individuals”. It is projected to reach over248,000 students for the fall 2010/11 season. The students are projected to build a totalof 20,667 robots 4.In 2005 Brandeis University conducted an independent study where students thatparticipated in FIRST were compared to
Technical Success and Leadership Excellence Among Hispanic Engineering Students. In particular, she aids in the development and organization of a secure, web-based forum for student engagement for this project. Dr. Ruane’s pedagogical and research interests include online learning, computer-mediated communication, computer supported collaborative learning, information exchange in online learning environments, online communities, communities of practice and practice fields, social network analysis, collaboration, peer mentoring, situated learning, cur- riculum theory and development. Dr. Ruane earned her doctorate from Drexel University in Educational Leadership and Learning Technologies in 2012. She completed her Master
. Modern media and academic sources have repeatedlyreported the stress and impacts of an education crisis. Students of all ages have beenasked to isolate and learn without the social support of their classmates and teachers.The grief over the loss of community has been noted and described with reports ofemotional, mental, and physical distress [1]. The grief being described in the ongoingreports equates to a trauma, and while trauma can imply a psychological injury it can initself become a mental health problem [7]. As the pandemic overtakes its one-yearanniversary, educators must reflect on the potential impacts from the prolongedisolation and loss on both individuals and communities and those impacts on the futureof higher education. An entire
/assessment, grant evaluation, analytics related to student success, and system design. His passion is analyzing institutional data related to student academic factors, psycho-social factors collected using surveys, and demographics to uncover factors impacting student success that could be used in strategic decision making. Some of the current projects have an objective of finding differences among the FTIC and Transfer student population at UCF with respect to student success and engagement metrics, factors impacting retention, graduation and time to graduation. Mr. Nair holds a Bachelor’s degree in Engineering (1997) and couple of graduate degrees - Masters in Industrial Engineering (2001) and Business
delivery of content in each different course. However, choosing the best course for thismodular approach can be difficult and one has to consider the compatibility of goals and outcomes for awell-suited match. For our beta-trial, we chose an Introduction to Engineering course as our point ofentry. This course was well match of our purpose due its diverse student major and multiple sectionavailability.Project Management Lecture ModuleOur Project management modules used a student-centric, backward-design curriculum.To impact our students and keep them heavily engage--- Technology-centric PIT successes and projectsstellar project management efforts are showcased to drill home the powerful impact of PIT. Followingeach “new clipping” our lecture series
exposed since their freshman year to real industrial tools, hands-onactivities and simple engineering design, which helps in engaging and motivating them to persistin the program. Student outcomes are analyzed according to specific knowledge, technique andskills relevant to the local stakeholders. Assessment and evaluation of student outcomes,collected through direct and indirect measures, demonstrate the effectiveness of the IET programto prepare students for the market-place and for attaining student outcomes. Index TermsStudent outcomes, Information Engineering Technology, hands-on activities, ABET, computernetworks.1. IntroductionAccording to ABET, engineering technology programs are more practical
focus on social justice inengineering. In environmental sciences and engineering departments, such as those at Universityof California (UC), Berkeley and UC Davis, courses on engineering’s impact on the environmentare being developed. UC Berkeley has a course called “Engineering, Environment, and Society”where students read scholarly works on social justice, examine case studies for impact andinjustice, and work with community clients on projects developing solutions to environmentalissues that disproportionately affect members of historically marginalized groups [20], [21].Hendricks et. al., provided the structure and objectives for their course “Science and Engineeringfor Social Justice,” as a blueprint for other faculty. Their course is
concerns that the CBTF-providedcalculator was so antiquated that it was potentially negatively impacting student examperformance. We therefore engaged in a process of gathering student and faculty input to learnmore about concerns and preferences. Based on this input, during Summer 2023, we replaced ourexisting calculators with TI-34 MultiView scientific calculators.5.3 Course Scheduling Policy ChangesA final area of policy change involves the scheduling of course exams. As a new service offeredon campus, the scheduling philosophy was built around a principle that prioritized incorporatingnew courses into the CBTF. That was useful for giving everyone who was interested someresources in the CBTF, but the policy also meant that returning courses
experiences such as the team project and social events are valuable inhelping students bond with their peers and with the program faculty and graduate assistants.Career exploration activities, such as the visits to on-campus faculty research laboratories,attending panels of engineers, and visiting engineering-related industrial sites provide motivationto work hard to prepare for an engineering or computing career and prepares the student for whatto expect when they begin their career.4.2 Suggestions for ImprovementIf we were creating a new S-STEM program, we would consider making the followingimprovements: Improve recruitment activities, engage the upper-level students more fully intothe program, improve near-peer mentoring, and increase the number
extending the workshop’s duration, would further enhanceparticipant engagement and practical understanding. Longitudinal studies are also recommendedto assess the long-term impact of the workshop on faculty teaching practices and studentoutcomes. Finally, developing scalable models for similar workshops at other institutions,particularly resource-limited MSIs, will help address equity in sustainability education andamplify the program’s impact. These steps will ensure the continuous refinement and broaderapplicability of faculty development initiatives in sustainability education.AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to express their gratitude to the Stanford Building Decarbonization LearningAccelerator (BDLA) for organizing and hosting the workshop at
helped bridge the gap between students and faculty, encouragedcommunity, and facilitated an incredibly successful program in helping underrepresentedminority students succeed in science, technology, engineering and mathematics.V. References1. A.L. Zydney, J.S. Bennett, A. Shahid, and K.W. Bauer, “Impact of Undergraduate Research Experience in Engineering,” J. Engineering Education, 91: 151-157. (2002)2. R.S. Hathaway, B.A. Nagda, and S.R Gregerman, “The Relationship of Undergraduate Research Participation to Graduate and Professional Education Pursuit: An Empirical Study,” J. College Student Development. 43: 614-631. (2002)3. May, G. S. and Chubin, D. E., A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success for Underrepresented Minority
science and engineering majors are usuallymore likely to know about the humanities than the average humanities major knowsabout sciences and engineering. Effective communication and understanding betweenmembers of the society with different educational backgrounds is crucial in making bettertechnological decisions that will impact the everyday life, culture, environment and thefuture generations.The idea of offering a course on science, technology, and society in general educationcurriculum for non-engineering students goes several decades back. In late 1960s andearly 1970s many institutions in the USA started to develop technology literacy courses(TLC) for students in majors other than natural sciences and engineering, leading to“Science
length (45-90 minutes vs 45 minutes), targeted age(5th-8th grade vs 3rd-6th), and required knowledge for students. The PPM activity requires thestudents to be able to evaluate the importance of objects based on human needs while PSA relieson numerical calculations of value, supplemented the students’ perceptions of the importance ofthe objects. Both activities have similar lists of objects to those that appear in a “RankingSurvival Objects for the Moon” exercise [12] which is a group decision making exercise [13] butthe PSA adds additional unexpected items to teach about different objectives in optimization andto engage the students. The PPM activity should be applied for older students (5th-8th grade)with longer activity durations while the PSA
the project.3 Projectsthat engage students in a challenging project of significant interest to the students have a greaterimpact on their future plans. Our summer research program focuses on diabetes, a disease thathas an impact on many undergraduates through the diagnosis of family members, friends, oreven themselves. More than 18 million people in the United States (U.S.) have diabetes mellitus.While a cure does not currently exist, the field of biomedical engineering is providing importantinroads to understanding the disease and its many complications. Student projects and activitiesare focused around the disease. We believe this focus will stimulate the interests ofundergraduates in engineering research in general and will specifically
course described herein is one component of a larger, NSF-sponsoredcurriculum development effort that seeks to encourage systems thinking in our students.Engineering curricula tend to be compartmentalized leading to topics (e.g., electronics, power,communications in electrical engineering) being taught in isolation without providing connectionsas to how they are dependent in real-world systems. Our project strives to give studentsexperience in making these connections. The course placement in the curriculum is just prior tothe student’s Capstone/senior project. The trend is that Capstone projects are becoming moreinterdisciplinary thus creating a greater need for students to have a systems perspective. Thistrend is certainly true in today’s
. This programincludes complex tasks such as testing the tensile strength of 3D-printed parts. Students mustiteratively use the results of the tensile strength measurement to adjust the 3D printing parametersettings and improve the quality of the print through multiple cycles. TeleopLab preserves theinteractivity and real-world complexity of these processes, allowing students to conduct multiplecycles of testing and adjustment critical to manufacturing training. The educational impact ofTeleopLab was evaluated using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ),with pre- and post-use data collected from six students. The results showed an improvement of25% in self-efficacy, 27% in motivation to re-engage, and a reduction of 13% in
Page 14.1205.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 THE EFFECT OF IMPROVEMENTS IN SOPHOMORE DESIGN INSTRUCTION ON PERFORMANCE IN SUBSEQUENT COURSE OFFERINGSAbstractThe chemical engineering curriculum at Rowan University includes a team-taught,multidisciplinary sophomore course sequence called Sophomore Engineering Clinic I and II,intended to teach engineering design and technical communication. Prior to 2005, SophomoreClinic I featured a semester-long design project. The faculty team made substantial changes tothe course in the Fall of 2005 to address various shortcomings in student achievement of thecourse goals. The new course design featured a 4-week project intended to introduce students tothe
three declared majors in 2009 to 120 in fall of 2018. Jenkins manages a team of College Success Navigators embedded in all Cochise county high schools. Currently, Jenkins sits on the governing board of Villages of Vigneto, is a member of IEEE WIE, and AFCEA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Proven Professional Development Strategies: Data from an ENG Transfer Student Scholarship-Projects-Mentoring Success ProgramAbstractThis DEED paper addresses the following fundamental question – a question impacting institutions acrossthe nation: How can 4-year institutions best prepare engineering and computer science students (hereafterdenoted ENG) for the many
, communicate effectively, work as members of a team, and engage in lifelonglearning. As a result, engineers and engineering technologists often enter the workforceinadequately prepared to adapt to the complex and ever-changing demands of the high-techworkplace8. Research9-11 shows that active learning, learning that involves hands-on experience,significantly improves student comprehension and proficiency. In a study12 where researcherscompared learning outcomes in a management class, taught using lecture-based methods versusactive learning methods, an improvement of one standard deviation was demonstrated withregard to long-term memory and use of concepts over time for the active learning group8.Similarly, in a study of over 6000 participants enrolled
Engineering • Manufacturing Process and Floor PlanningMechanical Engineering • Toy Design • Slider-Crank Mechanism Application • Application Device for Photo Resistor Light • Glider AirplanesIn all modules there was a strong emphasis on “hands-on” experience, developing oral andwritten communication skills, independent group effort and teamwork. The program was wellreceived by both students and faculty.In the interest of course evaluation and assessment, the Office of Institutional Research andPlanning investigated whether quantitative student performance data would support findingsfrom surveys and questionnaires on the freshman engineering curriculum change. The studycompared the impact of the Engineering Graphics course
MOOC, combining online classes with face-to-face instructorguidance. In this paper, this is referred to as a blended MOOC or hybrid MOOC. When MOOCsare offered using hybrid formats, it can improve student outcomes and reduce costs [14]–[16].Results also show the impact of incorporating MOOCs in traditional classroom settings is almostequal or slightly better than face-to-face teaching environments [15]–[17].The key assumptions when designing a blended learning course are: Thoughtfully integratingface-to-face and online learning, fundamentally restructuring and replacing the course design,and class hours for effective student engagement [18]. Curriculum designers must exploreopportunities for blended MOOCs research on how factors like early
electric drives. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Rolling Stone: Evaluation of one NSF S-STEM Program through Successive Grant PeriodsAbstractIn 2008, Gannon University was awarded a National Science Foundation S-STEM grant, whichprovided scholarship funding for academically talented students in STEM fields, having financialneed. The program developed at Gannon University was designed to be quite extensive,providing an educational experience emphasizing not only technical mastery, but personal andprofessional development and community service through partnerships with nonprofitorganizations in the local community. At the time of its development, the program was one-of