between instructor-assigned and self-selected design groups? Which groups produce better products? • Do individuals of the same or differing personality types come together in the self- selected sections? • Are students more satisfied with one or the other type of group formation? • Which groups tend to work best together with the least amount of personal conflicts?This paper provides a qualitative assessment of the effectiveness of these two group formationmethodologies through the use of student grades, course performance, an assessment of thequality of team products and prototypes, surveys, interviews with students, and course-endstudent feedback. The results of this assessment should be useful to any program that
uncertainty. The paperconcludes with a discussion of the implications of these results for instructional design.IntroductionHands-on design activities are increasingly common in engineering programs.1, 2 The increasedfocus on design is largely due to reviews of curricula and surveys of industry that identifiedshortcomings in engineering education, including insufficient opportunities for students todevelop creativity, to apply their technical and analytical knowledge, and to practicecommunication and teamwork skills.3,4 Design courses are intended to address theseshortcomings. According to a review conducted by Turns et al., engineering design courses arepredominantly project-based and involve students working on teams to solve problems. 5Common
to three Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationaspects of Criterion 2: the features of the PEO, the process of determining and assessing thePEO, and documents related to the PEO to be provided to ABET visitors. Finally, we willbriefly address the logistics of managing Criterion 2 in a large college of engineering.A Procedure for Managing Criterion 2Here is the way ABET presents Criterion 2 in Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Criterion 2. Program Educational Objectives Each engineering program for which an institution seeks accreditation or reaccreditation must have in place
abroadprograms in an effort to better prepare students for their future work in global settings. Thispaper presents efforts at Brigham Young University’s College of Engineering and Technology tocreate and assess new programs to help develop such global competence in our students. Anoverview of the college’s international programs is first provided followed by a description oflearning outcomes for these programs. Assessment results gathered across a set of collegeprograms are then summarized, including survey results from industrial recruiters.IntroductionGlobalization of the engineering profession continues to be reported as a major industrial trendthat will continue and expand1-3. Many companies are international in scope and the numberappears to be
these evaluations. External evaluators are invited to campusto judge the senior design poster competition, and these individuals follow a rubric specific to theposter format. A final rubric focuses on web site design, where students provide an overview oftheir project and the results obtained.Since the inclusion of rubrics in the 2002-2003 academic year, subsequent evaluations performedat annual Faculty Retreats have indicated that the rubrics have been a successful model forconducting the evaluation of the various aspects of the senior design experience. Additionally,by coalescing subjective faculty judgments into an objective numerical form through the use ofrubrics, the results can be readily used for program outcomes assessment. As a result
leadership teams. The COVID-19pandemic imposed extra challenges on implementing this model when teaching and learningswitched to an online modality. Program organizers followed the program tenets and“Challenged the Process” to find innovative ways to maintain connections among and withstudents. Working together, students learned to apply their leadership training by organizing andcompleting service projects. Additionally, students practiced leadership skills within registeredstudent organizations. Through dedication by students and coaches, the program exceededexpectations through the pandemic. The LDP continued with 100% graduation and 100%retention rates. Students in the LDP continued to show large, statistically significant gains inLeadership
, McGraw-Hill, co-authored with Roger Pressman). He is a past-President of the Global Online Laboratory Consortium, and is the convenor of the Australian Engineering Associate Deans (L&T) network.Ms. Justine Lawson c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Enhancing mechanics education through shared assessment designThere is considerable commonality between engineering undergraduate programs in terms ofcontent, pedagogies, course structures and assessment practices, particularly in terms ofengineering fundamentals such as mechanics. Despite this, and the availability of an array ofonline resources, there seems to be limited commitment to sharing
2006-573: ASSESSING THE LONG TERM IMPACTS OF SCIENTIFIC WORKEXPERIENCE PROGRAMS FOR TEACHERSDonna Barrett, Georgia Institute of Technology Donna Barrett is a Program Director for the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Donna is a National Board Certified Teacher in the area of Adolescence and Young Adult Science and taught science at the middle and high school levels for 17 years. She is the director of the Georgia Intern-Fellowships for Teacher Program. She focuses on professional development opportunities for teachers and inquiry-based instruction.Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Marion
Session 1520 Assessing Reliability and Credibility for Online Engineering Resources Beth E. Kolko, Linda Whang University of WashingtonIntroductionThe easy availability of material on the Web means that students are increasingly turning toelectronic resources for research purposes. While many resources that are accessibleelectronically parallel familiar print resources and are, often, simply online versions of familiardatabases and catalogs, there exists a large quantity of information that rests outside familiarframeworks for
Society for Engineering Educationcompliments, and opinions. This present work describes an anonymous electronic journalsystem as it implemented and employed in the FEH Program as a near real time assessment tool.3. A Real-Time Program Assessment ToolVital to the effective administration of any organization is the ability to quickly identify andaddress potential operational issues. Unfortunately, even though the technologies are readilyavailable to construct tools to facilitate quick-response assessment, many educational institutions(including The Ohio State University community at large) still rely heavily on paper-and-pencilcourse evaluation surveys given at the end of the academic term to assess course or programeffectiveness. This approach can
Paper ID #38437Assessment of a Hybrid Research Experience forUndergraduates Program During the COVID-19 PandemicJeremy Straub (Dr.) - © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Assessment of a Hybrid Research Experience for Undergraduates Program During the COVID-19 PandemicAbstractThis paper reports on the fourth year of a cybersecurity-focused research experience forundergraduates programs site in the summer of 2021. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the siteoperated in a hybrid mode during this summer, after operating entirely virtually during
courses. Page 26.218.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Anatomy of Assessment of Manufacturing Design Engineering Academic Program – Do’s and Don’ts ABSTRACTThe anatomy of assessment of manufacturing design engineering academic program wasevaluated in this paper. This paper summarizes not only the annual assessments that wereundertaken to assess this program but also provides a comprehensive review of theassessment process that was developed and adopted in our institution to evaluate themanufacturing design program. Details
AC 2011-1083: MEDICAL IMAGING TEACHING SOFTWARE AND DY-NAMIC ASSESSMENT TRACKING SYSTEM FOR BIOMEDICAL ENGI-NEERING PROGRAMWeizhao Zhao, University of Miami Weizhao Zhao, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Neurology and Radiology Univer- sity of MiamiXiping LiFabrice Manns, University of Miami Page 22.1057.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Medical Imaging Teaching Software and Dynamic Assessment Tracking System for Biomedical Engineering ProgramAbstractMedical imaging education is a key training component in BME programs. Medical
77 154 231 308Table 1 illustrates the data proliferation problem that programs must address in order to submitan accreditation report. Even a small number of performance criteria and a few direct measuresfor each can add up to hundreds of data values that must be stored and analyzed. These are notthe only reports of course. An additional set of reports for each of the student outcomes (a-k) isalso required, based on the direct measures that directly support it. This makes ABET datareporting a formidable challenge. IV. Program assessment data requirements Direct evidence of student performance is gathered from a variety of sources, most oftencoursework, exams, projects, and other graded instruments. These are easily provided by
Session 1625 Implementing a Program of Continuous Assessment and Improvement for a New Sophomore Design Course Kenneth M. Bryden, Donald R. Flugrad Iowa State UniversityAbstractWhen implementing a new course, it is essential to include a program of continuous assessmentand improvement. This paper discusses how a program of continuous assessment andimprovement was included in the development and initial implementation of a new sophomoredesign course in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Iowa State University. In the Fall of1998 the faculty decided to add a new
AC 2012-3617: DIFFERENCES IN EDUCATIONAL GOALS WITHIN THEFIELD OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERINGDiana G. de la Rosa-Pohl, University of Houston Diana de la Rosa-Pohl has been a lecturer in the Cullen College of Engineering at the University of Hous- ton since 2003. She has worked with the PROMES program to develop project-based learning courses for the first-year curriculum. Currently, she is developing and evaluating project-based multidisciplinary courses for the engineering honors program. Page 25.468.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 DIFFERENCES IN EDUCATIONAL
at a given institution1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. To date, one of themost common and effective partnership programs on college campuses are learningcommunities7.The current paper describes a small-scale collaboration between two historically unconnectedfirst-year courses at Florida Institute of Technology: University Experience and Introduction toEngineering. Florida Institute of Technology is a small, private, technological institution inMelbourne, Florida. There are just under 5,000 students enrolled in on-campus degree programswith over 50% of those students in the College of Engineering. The University enrollsapproximately 700 first-time-in-college freshmen students every fall.University Experience (ASC 1000), the university’s first-year seminar
involved in research programs at such places as Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the Universities of Texas and Wisconsin in the U.S., Kyoto and Nagoya Universities in Japan, the Ioffe Institute in Russia, and Kharkov Institute of Physics and Tech- nology in Ukraine. He was ECSE Department Head from 2001-2008 and served on the board of the ECE Department Heads Association from 2003-2008. He is presently the Education Director for the SMART LIGHTING NSF ERC.Dr. Dianna L Newman, University at Albany/SUNY Dr. Newman is Professor in the Dept. of Educational and Counseling Psychology and Director of the Evaluation Consortium. She has serve as Principal Evaluator for numerous national and international projects related to
Successful Undergraduate Research Program for Science and Engineering UndergraduatesIf current trends continue, the percentage of whites in the United States by 2020 will decline to63.7% (down from 75.6% in 2000) and by 2050, almost half of the U.S. population will benonwhite1. The group predicted to make up the majority of the nonwhite population areHispanics2, but other underrepresented minority groups will also grow substantially. Hispanicsmake up roughly one in every five high-school-age youth, compared with one in ten in 19902.Those trends are expected to be reflected in the state of Washington as well, but Washington alsohas a relatively large population of Alaska Indians/American Natives (AI/AN), about 1.6% of thepopulation
believe that we have initiated a program that is effectively integrating communication skillsinto the engineering curriculum at our university. Our preliminary assessment tools have yieldedencouraging feedback on these initiatives, but more importantly, they have enabled us to fine-tune our program direction to better meet our student and faculty requirments.We must acknowledge that the number of C-I courses in the COE remains a small percentage of Page 12.279.11the total number in the curriculum. The faculty members who have attended the CxC-sponsoredFaculty Institutes have become reliable proponents of the program objectives, but they are still
new Dean in2011, he was challenged by the President of The Citadel to grow the size of the engineeringprogram. However, the actual school culture dominated by senior faculty was that no change wasrequired based on the high US News and World Report ranking and continual success ofgraduates.An assessment of student accession, retention, graduation, and hiring data showed many trendsthat are seen and being addressed by many engineering programs across the country – loss of 40percent or more of entering freshman engineering students in the first year due to lack of highschool preparation, loss of motivation based on performance in courses that were normallystrengths in high school (mathematics and sciences), poor teaching, and inadequate advising
Computer Science, sup- porting the research of faculty and developing information literary instruction programs for all students in the College. Ven has several interests in many aspects of librarianship – STEM instruction, collaboration and outreach, international relations programs and initiatives, and diversity issues. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Inter-University Bibliometric Comparison of Research Output within Engineering Departments: A Small-Scale Case Study at the University of Central Florida and the University of MiamiabstractBibliometrics is a commonly used tool in the area of information science for measuring andevaluating the scholarly
AC 2011-1456: A SEVEN YEAR REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF LAWRENCETECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY’S ALTERNATIVE ENERGY ENGINEER-ING PROGRAM INITIALLY FUNDED THROUGH GRANTS FROM THESTATE OF MICHIGANRobert W Fletcher, Lawrence Technological University Robert W. Fletcher joined the faculty of the Mechanical Engineering Department at Lawrence Techno- logical University in the summer of 2003, after several years of continuous industrial research, product development and manufacturing experience. Dr. Fletcher earned his Bachelor of Science Degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Washington, in Seattle, Washington, a Master of Engineering in Manufacturing Systems from Lawrence Technological University, in Southfield
implementation and/or reaffirmed strategies I am currently implementing.” Another CoP question found that 96% of faculty agreed or strongly agreed that “discussions and community building with other faculty is valuable.” 4. Shift of Ownership, a CoP question found that 100% of faculty agreed or strongly agreed that “the tools, strategies, and interactions in the JTFD project would be of value to their future instructional practice and career success.”Summary and ConclusionsThis paper has described the the assessment strategies for a large-scale faculty developmentprogram at a large southwestern university called Just-in-Time-Teaching with Two WayFormative Feedback for Multiple Disciplinary (JTFD) Programs. The 43 faculty in
results are also assessed to determine the benefits and limitations of the flippedclassroom approach versus the traditional classroom format. The shortcomings of the currentformat are addressed and suggestions for improvement based upon one semester of using aflipped classroom approach are discussed.IntroductionA core component of most electrical and computer engineering curriculums is a microprocessorsor microcontrollers programming course. While these courses have shifted over the last fewdecades from being steeped in studying long datasheets, wiring large circuits, and writing somecode to more comprehensive embedded systems courses (Wolf, 2001), the microprocessorscurriculum at most universities continue to require extensive study and
1997, with a research emphasis in Boiling Heat Transfer. His current activities focus on improvement of undergraduate laboratory education, including new experiments, instrumentation, and pedagogy in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, as well as introducing Uncertainty Analysis into the undergraduate curriculum. Page 12.432.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Curricular Assessment Using Existing On-Campus Information DatabasesAbstractAssessment of engineering program success is critical for continual improvement. While thisassessment can take
educational reports and papers. Some of these products/reports have already been launched/completed and are now in use. Others are in their development stages. Dr. Darabi’s research group uses Big Data, process mining, data mining, Operations Research, high performance computing, and visualization techniques to achieve its research and educational goals. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Case Study for the Application of Data and Process Mining in Intervention Program Assessment and ImprovementAbstractThe University of Illinois at Chicago offers an intervention program by admitting students to itsHonors College. We call this program Honors Program (HP). HP
, and mathematics (STEM) outreach programs, and working closely with university enrollment management and data management professionals at the Friday Institute at North Carolina State University (NCSU). She works closely with both large and small NCSU outreach groups offering K-12 outreach to teachers and students. She also assists with planning, implementing, managing, and reporting of project activities which include survey development, coordination of data collection, interfacing with data managers, coor- dination of meetings and workshops for outreach providers to gather feedback, identify best practices, and disseminate findings to stakeholders. In addition, she assists with annual report writing and conference
a form of pedagogy that emphasizes the co-construction of knowledge, based on socio-cultural theories of learning. [8, 9, 22, 25] While there aremany implementations of this underlying concept, one common approach is to have studentswork together in small teams on learning activities. [8, 16, 35, 38] When implemented correctly, thishas been shown to have positive benefits for student motivation, technical learning outcomes,knowledge transfer, and broader objectives such as the ability to work in multidisciplinary teams.[38]A key challenge for collaborative learning is how to implement it at a large scale, especially inintroductory courses with students and instructors who are not familiar with this mode ofeducation. [14] In this paper, we
. Page 12.880.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Independent Student Design Competitions and the Assessment DilemmaAbstractOne of the most difficult assessment problems for faculty is student design competitions whereonly one or maybe two teams participate for independent study. Students are excited andfocused on the possibility of winning. The faculty is usually concerned with process andassessment in the context of a project and program not of their design. The issues are multipliedwhen you combine the problems of team assessment with a small sample pool of participants.This paper presents a case study in process and assessment for a single team of four independentstudy students that entered the 2005-2006 Airport Security