discusses energy conversion and conservation issues. Energyproblems lately experienced in the West has generated public concern about energyproduction, consumption, and conservation issues. The selected design project also Page 7.948.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationstimulated students’ interest, awareness, and critical thinking on energy issues in theirvery first engineering course.This paper discusses classroom observations and educational outcomes of the freshmandesign experience in terms of students
and recruitment issues perdepartment remain unknown.Conclusions and Future Work Our first conclusion is that the faculty and lecturers appear to have many of the sameconcerns or awareness issues surrounding FYE that student have in our previous work. Thealignment of the learning objectives with faculty and student responses is a positive one for us.Second, multiple departments being concerned with items beyond retention is positive, as itmeans they understand the purpose of a FYE program is not limited to enrollment numbers. Itstill remains to be seen how departments respond to increased or decreased enrollment numbersboth at the college level and within their own departments. From subsequent surveys performedearlier this year, it is
to satisfy certain requirements that may or may not prove to beimpediments.BackgroundFaculty in civil engineering, civil engineering technology, and construction programs haveexpressed concerns about meeting the vague and increasing expectations for tenure. Previousinvestigations showed that some impediments include lack of funding opportunities, highteaching expectation and teaching load, as well as lack of quality students to employ for researchand as teaching assistants [5, 6]. Comparison of perceptions of these impediments pre and posttenure among faculty has not been performed.Requirements for tenure vary between institutions, and even between academic units within thesame institution. In addition, guidelines for tenure are often
place over five weeks. The program participants engaged inclassroom theorem and hands-on activities related to onshore wind turbines' safe and effectivemaintenance. This paper offers insights from academic faculty on the effectiveness of industry-based training and how collaborative programs can benefit both academia and industries.IntroductionIn January 2021, the State University of New York (SUNY) announced its partnership with theNew York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) to support the lategovernor's goal of achieving 9 Gigawatts offshore wind power by 2035. Together, they launchedthe Offshore Wind Training Institute (OWTI), a $20 million program with the goal of training2,500 workers in the renewable energy industry
Page 22.1529.3Faculty Member (2). Boice classifies new faculty as either typical new faculty or quick starters.Characteristics of each faculty group are listed below:Typical New Faculty Spent considerably less time on writing scholarly proposals and publications. Typically less time than needed to meet promotion and tenure criteria for their university. Went to class with too much material rushing to complete the class lecture at the expense of student participation. The typical new faculty member admitted to spending 30+ hours per week on class preparation. Taught their courses in a manner in which to avoid conflict with students. Concerned that students would complain about content errors in class
Session 2213 Introduction to Chemical Engineering - A New Course for Freshman Students Dana E. Knox and Basil C. Baltzis Department of Chemical Engineering New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, NJ 07102AbstractOftentimes entering freshman students know little about the major they have selected.Furthermore, the transition from high school to university is not straightforward and may createserious problems impacting retention. In order to address the foregoing issues we
processes to extractinformation and compare evidence [14], [15]. This approach is appropriate given the smallsample size (n=4). Representative quotes are included to provide a rich description ofperspectives.Lessons LearnedThe lessons learned across the leadership team revealed the following themes. There wereperceived barriers among faculty and students. Operational obstacles were another theme.Additionally, institutional challenges were noted. These lessons learned are described by thesethemes.Perceived Barriers. When initially presented to faculty, whether in departmental or individualmeetings, initial concerns stemmed from the misperception that the PAtENT pathway wouldrequire additional time for doctoral students to complete their degrees. The
. Page 12.325.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Bringing New Topics into the IE CurriculumAbstractThe need to focus efforts on environmental concerns rings important to young people aswell as to the National Academy of Engineers. The need to raise awareness about theenvironmental impact of decisions in manufacturing and product design should be at theforefront of curriculum enhancement efforts. Industrial Engineers are typically viewed as“systems thinkers” and need to analyze the larger eco-system when new designs are putin place. Thus, the systems-approach to environmentally responsible design andmanufacturing has a natural place in the Industrial Engineering curriculum.The challenge to engineering faculty may
Paper ID #36825Expansive Empathy: Defining and Measuring a NewConstruct in Engineering DesignArdeshir Raihanian MashhadiVanessa Svihla Dr. Vanessa Svihla is an associate professor at the University of New Mexico (UNM) with appointments in learning sciences and engineering. Her research, funded by an NSF CAREER award, focuses on how people learn as they frame problems and how these activities relate to identity, agency and creativity. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Expansive Empathy: Defining and Measuring a New
spring 2009, our faculty voiced concerns regarding discrepancies in the experiences thatstudents had performing research in different faculty labs, which is a sentiment also expressed byHolles and Howe [3]. Our department was interested in establishing general guidelines foractivities that all undergraduate research students should participate in. Examples includedcompleting a written report, oral presentation, literature review, etc. The department’sundergraduate committee discussed the issue and decided to split the undergraduate research forcourse credit experience into two integrated courses, with department approval, in May 2009.Fall 2009 was the first semester we required the 1-hour lecture component. The lecture sectionbrings together all
showcases therange of their technology to assist in promoting conversation to determine the best method ofpresentation for these technologies in an educational laboratory setting. Faculty provided a tourof existing laboratory space to a group comprised of industry administration, engineering andproject management heads.The proposed location for the new installation provided the first significant constraints as theavailable space was significantly smaller, had limited infrastructure and provided limitedaccessibility for the delivery of equipment on the scale of the industrial process model. The visitprompted the process engineering representative to determine that the current industry vision ofan implementation would not work, and a new, specialized
if the initial resistance to a new teaching technique decreases over time. Ifso, this knowledge will encourage new faculty, who are often concerned about studentevaluations, to continue on with new teaching techniques rather than reverting to a format withwhich the students are more comfortable.MethodsStudents (n = 13) were surveyed approximately five weeks into the semester and at the end of thesemester of a junior level dynamics course with 31 total students at California Baptist University(primarily a teaching university). The course met for one and half hours, twice a week, for 13weeks. Students were asked to rate their feelings towards the new classroom techniques asdescribed below. Their answers were then compared to see if the
Session 3225 A New Approach to Teaching Environmental Literacy: A Text for Teachers Indira Nair, Sharon A. Jones Carnegie Mellon University/Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyAbstractEnvironmental issues affect, and are affected by all of our activities to varying degrees. Citizensshould have a working understanding of the fundamental principles involved forenvironmentally responsible decision making in our technological society. The interconnectednature of environmental problems, the interactions between social and individual decisionmaking, their effect on the development of
Session 3560 Controversial Aspects of the New ABET Criteria and its Implementation Omid Ansary, Alireza Rahrooh, and Walter W. Buchanan Penn State University/University of Central Florida/Northeastern University AbstractThis paper will address the problems that are associated with the new ABET criteria.Specifically, it discusses the “a through k” assessment criteria, problems of creating a processand maintaining the infrastructure that is required to validate the outcomes, the cost issuesrelated to the resources engaged in accommodating such a process, and how these issues
advancement, the wideningseparation of faculty and curriculum from industry needs and expectations has resulted in a realthreat to our competitiveness in the global marketplace. Page 13.741.2The construction environment has changed dramatically. International competition, the conceptsof world is flat and small is beautiful shift our economy from manufacturing to service enterpriseand new technologies have restructured the industry and altered how contractors practiceconstruction and engineering. William A. Wulf, thePresident of the National Academy of Engineering, defines engineering as “design underconstraint.” This statement is true for the
teams from Invention and Designsubmitted e-team proposals, and some were funded. The most important consequence of theconference was learning what other schools were doing and meeting the key faculty working onengineering entrepreneurship; Larry Carlson and Jackie Sullivan at the University of Colorado1,Burt Swersey at RPI, Tina Seelig and Tom Byers at Stanford, John Ochs at Lehigh, ElizabethKisenwether at Penn State, and Dani Raviv at Florida Atlantic, and many others. Weincorporated ideas from these programs into our own. The support and advice of Phil Weilersteinalso shaped our ideas on innovation and entrepreneurship.Creativity and New Product Development was initially a third year one-semester course open toany engineering student. It was
Concepts and New TechnologiesAbstract The ever increasing energy usage and depleting nonrenewable energy resources are ofgreat concern to all nations. The staggering cost of gasoline for today’s motorist underscores thetough challenges for industrialized and developing nations with a large appetite fornonrenewable energy resources. Engineers throughout the world have focused their efforts ondeveloping environmentally friendly and energy efficient technological solutions. This paperdiscusses a program created to educate elementary school students on the benefits of theseevolving technologies. The program results showed that connecting students to energy relatedissues at the early stages of their education is
AC 2010-4: IDEAS TO CONSIDER FOR NEW CHEMICAL ENGINEERINGEDUCATORS: SENIOR DESIGNLisa Bullard, North Carolina State University Dr. Lisa G. Bullard is a Teaching Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University. She served in engineering and management positions within Eastman Chemical Co. from 1991-2000. A faculty member at NCSU since 2000, Dr. Bullard was named an Alumni Distinguished Undergraduate Professor at NCSU and was awarded the Outstanding New Teacher Award by the Southeastern Section of ASEE, the NCSU Alumni Outstanding Teaching Award, the COE George H. Blessis
Eastern region has created cultural challenges on both sides, including division andethnocentrism. Since their future careers as engineers will undoubtedly place them ininternational settings, concern for our students‟ ability to function optimally has prompted thiseffort. It is hoped that a byproduct of this module would be that it not only serve to prepare thestudents for their careers but to bring about more harmonious relationships on campus.What is the importance of travel experience in general? Why is it important to your careers?Employees are looking for engineers who can work in global settings. With more companiesexpanding into new areas of the world, the need for engineers who are capable of working inmore than one culture has increased
in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Di- vision. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initiatives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice President, Dr. Lenox led several educational and professional career-development projects for the civil engineering profession – with the overall objective of
faculty,staff, and administrators to develop design parameters for a new type of engineering degree that Page 13.262.4seamlessly integrates science, technology, engineering, and math subjects together with oneanother and with the appropriate economic, social, political, ethical, and legal concerns(exemplified in a strong liberal arts education) to prepare the “engineering versatilists” of the 21stcentury.Program Design ParametersThe task force quickly developed a set of six basic design parameters for the new engineeringdegree program. Namely, the new Engineering program at James Madison University will:• provide a single Engineering Bachelor’s
program’s industrial advisory board, a list ofrelevant topics often neglected in technical courses was created. These topics were then dividedinto four courses: Engineering Leadership, Engineering Statistics, Electronics Testing, and thecourse discussed here, Product Development.The New Product Development CourseCurriculum Development Process Product development is a term that is widely used throughout the public and privatesectors, and the eSET faculty quickly learned that there are a number of different definitions thatexist. In order to begin the curriculum development, a significant amount of time was spentappreciating these differences and how to best define the overall content of the course. Ofparticular concern were the differences
(STEM). Because energy is a growing issue andtoday’s students are the key to its future, the camp introduced student to energy concerns andpossible solutions for the state of Texas and our Nation. The students participated in lectures,discussions, hands-on experiments, a field trip and design competitions involving related toenergy and renewable energy sources. The activities were designed to strengthen thestudents’ foundations in math and science. The goal of this camp is to help develop a moreskilled pool of college graduates for tomorrow’s workforce which is vital to economicsuccess of Texas and the nation. 5 The summer camp provided seventeen
Great Problems Seminars: A New First-Year Foundation at WPI Arthur Heinricher1, Brian Savilonis2, David Spanagel3, Robert Traver4, Kristin Wobbe5AbstractThe Great Problems Seminars are a new program designed to engage Worcester PolytechnicInstitute’s first-year students with current events, societal problems, and human needs. Eachseminar starts with an important global problem and helps students to find a place where they canmake real progress, no matter how small, in solving the problem.Four WPI faculty representing Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, and Humanities developedand delivered two Great Problems Seminars in 2007. Feed the World
Great Problems Seminars: A New First-Year Foundation at WPI Arthur Heinricher1, Brian Savilonis2, David Spanagel3, Robert Traver4, Kristin Wobbe5AbstractThe Great Problems Seminars are a new program designed to engage Worcester PolytechnicInstitute’s first-year students with current events, societal problems, and human needs. Eachseminar starts with an important global problem and helps students to find a place where they canmake real progress, no matter how small, in solving the problem.Four WPI faculty representing Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, and Humanities developedand delivered two Great Problems Seminars in 2007. Feed the World
Great Problems Seminars: A New First-Year Foundation at WPI Arthur Heinricher1, Brian Savilonis2, David Spanagel3, Robert Traver4, Kristin Wobbe5AbstractThe Great Problems Seminars are a new program designed to engage Worcester PolytechnicInstitute’s first-year students with current events, societal problems, and human needs. Eachseminar starts with an important global problem and helps students to find a place where they canmake real progress, no matter how small, in solving the problem.Four WPI faculty representing Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, and Humanities developedand delivered two Great Problems Seminars in 2007. Feed the World
experience for all. First, new assistant professors should not hesitate to ask moreexperienced faculty advisers for advice (Tip #10). Selecting more than one “mentoring mentor”is important because you can gather a full spectrum of advice and be able to follow what fitsyour mentoring style best. Second, there are numerous mentoring resources available in print.In addition to the books and articles mentioned here, there are several excellent books to helpnew assistant professors in all aspects of their position; I indicate the specific chapters dealingwith graduate student mentoring below: P.C. Wankat, “Chapter 9: Graduate Students and Graduate Programs,” The Effective, Efficient Professor: Teaching, Scholarship and Service, Allyn and Bacon
in micrrosystems beecause of thee high surfacce arrea to volum me ratio, • TheT no-slip condition maay not alwayss apply, and • Chemical C issu ues at the surfaces can afffect microscale fluid mechanics.This lectuure was desiigned to provvide a commmon background for studdents from thhe threeengineeriing disciplin nes; (all students had preeviously takeen a fluid meechanics couurse within thheirdepartmeent). It also supported new n materialls introducedd in other moodules.Laboratoory Module I: I Flow in Microchannel M s allowed a comparison
AC 2011-1199: A NEW MODEL OF PROJECT BASED LEARNING IN EN-GINEERING EDUCATIONRonald R Ulseth, Iron Range Engineering Ulseth is an instructor of engineering at Iron Range Engineering and Itasca Community College both in northern Minnesota. He is the co-developer of both programs. For the past 20 years he has taught physics, statics, dynamics, fluid mechanics, and thermodynamics. He has successfully implemented engineering learning communities in first year programs. Recently, Ulseth began a new 100% project-based, industry- sponsored, engineering curriculum.Jefferey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University Jeff Froyd is the Director of Faculty Climate and Development in the Office of the Dean of Faculties and Associate
studentstraveled to Charlottesville to participate the final presentations.Mixed mode version of Creativity and New Product DevelopmentThis year the senior design option includes both developing ETKs and generating newproducts. Our department’s design review committee issued new guidelines for whatqualified as a capstone design option. The traditional and distance learning versions ofCreativity and New Product Development satisfied these guidelines. The ETK version ofthe class was adjusted to incorporate the missing elements by modifying the coverage inthe second semester. These elements included CAD modeling and more engineeringanalysis.In addition to input from our faculty, I regularly seek the opinions of my students on howthe course is going and what